Received: by 10.14.11.79 with SMTP id 55mr50167eew.21.1308224694362;
        Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: shedskin-discuss@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.14.16.205 with SMTP id h53ls1096eeh.5.gmail; Thu, 16 Jun 2011
 04:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.4.166 with SMTP id 38mr105202eej.39.1308224693230;
        Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.4.166 with SMTP id 38mr105201eej.39.1308224693211;
        Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <thomas.sp...@googlemail.com>
Received: from mail-fx0-f50.google.com (mail-fx0-f50.google.com [209.85.161.50])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m11si5575052fah.1.2011.06.16.04.44.53
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of thomas.sp...@googlemail.com designates 209.85.161.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.50;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of thomas.sp...@googlemail.com designates 209.85.161.50 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=thomas.sp...@googlemail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@googlemail.com
Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so1280321fxm.37
        for <shedskin-discuss@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id
         :in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=BWRu1NERxmAHkdbNSjjLQwPNEMD9RMk9yKQHhjAneRI=;
        b=ciRhdhlR13EMDTfkNo1qAo+7ol+dteG1VB67/6N/ENli862VTSnTIsHflHBu4YuWvP
         L0HQLoH9OPUXgAIuSVhubiUMPEB5eHJd7BL0YP/EW1g0WZt03MF11MtKo88sWG8LgQQM
         1CJle+lcrQRHTEcxQuYsRgUUlvDDU6HiTDkiA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references
         :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=QQABj31NB5babvW3hSi/6Fn5yjNWec1gvvRtUt5bQTJRYsnT9zBHOADy64AEmeG9Dh
         s/7FsCOm2OWGCa1IanFrM0kFCEzeZKLqZWoWKYXLAgm9cmk+bXtm0amp2FaYrG9Hya9a
         w9xkptA0c65bx+uLghJaeDuuLwSMQnf32Qs4U=
Received: by 10.223.13.10 with SMTP id z10mr973742faz.69.1308224692910;
        Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <thomas.sp...@googlemail.com>
Received: from moon (eduroam-83-166.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE. [134.93.83.166])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm1856973faz.2.2011.06.16.04.44.51
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Thomas Spura <thomas.sp...@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:44:49 +0200
From: Thomas Spura <toms...@fedoraproject.org>
To: shedskin-discuss@googlegroups.com
Cc: i...@ianozsvald.com
Subject: Re: shed skin 0.8
Message-ID: <20110616134449.4fd688fd@moon>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=gJQpAOeM-kwrWV3GxdKfM5gg...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikEcLpPLznuqe5Gq=0L4XqrfmP...@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110616093817.67566d1c@moon>
	<BANLkTim8_+WJFMPthm_-yax+_P-+m7M...@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=gJQpAOeM-kwrWV3GxdKfM5gg...@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I don't think so.
fc15 has:
$ python
Python 2.7.1 (r271:86832, Apr 12 2011, 16:15:16) 
[GCC 4.6.0 20110331 (Red Hat 4.6.0-2)] on linux2

And all tests are passing right now on i686:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3133911

	Thomas

On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:55:48 +0100
Ian Ozsvald wrote:

> Ah - I was running the Mac tests on Python 2.7.1 32bit. Maybe the 4
> errors I saw were due to that configuration?
> Ian.
> 
> On 16 June 2011 09:17, Mark Dufour <mark.duf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > hi thomas,
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> >> Here is the build.log from an el5 machine and several tests are
> >> failing there:
> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3133926&name=build.log
> >> *** tests failed: 14
> >> [168, 173, 179, 180, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 194, 195,
> >> 196]
> >
> > hmm, perhaps I should have mentioned there are some tests that
> > depend 2.6 only features or behavior. I looked at a few of these
> > failures, and so far this like the cause for all of them. perhaps
> > we should add some conditionals to the tests, e.g. sys.version
> > >=.., so the tests will also pass on 2.4..
> >
> >
> > mark.
> > --
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6LsfnBmdnk
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "shedskin-discuss" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
> > shedskin-discuss@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group,
> > send email to shedskin-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/shedskin-discuss?hl=en.
> >
> 
> 
>