Received: by 10.103.198.15 with SMTP id a15mr99284muq.25.1233530363963;
        Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:19:23 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <wh...@cam.ac.uk>
Received: from ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 5si632760fge.15.2009.02.01.15.19.23;
        Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:19:23 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of wh...@cam.ac.uk designates 131.111.8.131 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.111.8.131;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of wh...@cam.ac.uk designates 131.111.8.131 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=wh...@cam.ac.uk
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from whg21.trin.private.cam.ac.uk ([172.16.115.98]:41279)
	by ppsw-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.151]:465)
	with esmtpsa (PLAIN:whg21) (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
	id 1LTlb1-0005Ax-4o (Exim 4.70) for shdc@googlegroups.com
	(return-path <wh...@cam.ac.uk>); Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:19:23 +0000
Subject: Re: [shdc] SHDO#1!
From: Henry Gomersall <wh...@cam.ac.uk>
Reply-To: h...@cantab.net
To: shdc@googlegroups.com
In-Reply-To: <1628589b-4d37-4bf0-84ce-48a62b22e344@k36g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
References:
	 <1628589b-4d37-4bf0-84ce-48a62b22e...@k36g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:19:21 +0000
Message-Id: <1233530361.6326.4.camel@whg21-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 10:50 -0800, Simon Ford wrote:
> Anyone up for either of these? And any other ideas for interesting
> SHDOs?!
> 

yeah, awesome.

cheers,

hen