Shareholder Oppression

[http://www.shareholderoppression.com/Newsletter.html] Earlier this month, Fryar Law Firm published

On March 28, 2011, the Dallas Court of Appeals issued a significant shareholder oppression opinion in

[http://www.shareholderoppression.com/Shareholder/Vermont/Morrissey.html] Vermont Supreme Court

[http://shareholderoppression.com/Newsletter.html] First Issue of Shareholder Oppression Newsletter

[http://www.shareholderoppression.com/Shareholder/Florida/Florida-Shareholder-Oppression-Buy-Out.html

The ultimate goal of every scheme of shareholder oppression is to eliminate the minority

[http://www.shareholderoppression.com/Shareholder/South-Dakota/Link-LSI.html] Link v. LSI, Inc., 793

[http://www.fryarlawfirm.com/law/2011-01-13_Skyport_Opinion.pdf] An issue that recurs with annoying

[http://www.fryarlawfirm.com/Shareholder/Texas/Rosenbaum.html] Return of Investment as an Oppression

United States District Court Judge Barbara MG Lynn issued a brief, unpublished opinion addressing

[http://www.fryarlawfirm.com/Shareholder/Texas/Texva.html] fa corporation formed under the laws of

In Re Schmitz, No. 07-0581, 2009 WL 1427184 (Tex.), 52 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 772 (Tex. May, 22, 2009) [

Lund v. Krass Snow & Schmutter, PC., --- NYS2d ----, 2009 NY Slip Op. 03996, 2009 WL 1406312 (

Rusyniak v. Gensini, Slip Copy, No. 5:07-CV-0279 (GTS/RFT), 2009 WL 1269911 (NDNY May 05, 2009)—In

[http://www.law360.com/articles/85215] Eric Fryar and this blog were extensively quoted in an article

Perry v. Cohen, No. 03-05-0078-CV (Tex. App.—Austin, March 26, 2009) [Read Opinion] In this case, 14

Kaplan v. First Hartford Corp., --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2009 WL 737681 (D. Me. March 20, 2009) [Read

In re Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, 964 A.2d 106 (Del. Ch. February 24, 2009) [

Long v. Biomet, Inc., 901 NE2d 37 (Ind. App. February 13, 2009). [Read Opinion] This recent case

Cotton v. Expo Power Systems, Inc., 89 Cal.Rptr.3d 112 (Cal. App. 2 Dist., February 09, 2009). [Read

Good article, if importing pecan pickers from a cheaper oversea vendor could possiobly be construed

[www.shareholderoppression.com] ShareholderOppression.com has had a total makeover and is greatly

Tritek Telecom v. Superior Court, 169 Cal.App.4 th 1385, 87 Cal.Rptr.3d 455 (Jan. 7, 2009). Under

Jardine v. McVey, 276 Neb. 1023, 759 NW2d 690 (Jan. 9, 2009). The Supreme Court of Nebraska has

Encompass Teleservices, Inc. v. Scheets, Slip Op. No. 04-821-HU, 2008 WL 5156561 (D. Ore. Dec. 9,

Bartfield v. Murphy, 578 F.Supp.2d 638 (SDNY Sep 29, 2008). The United States District Court for the

Carbona v. CH Medical, Inc., 266 SW3d 675 (Tex. App.—Dallas, October 23, 2008) The Dallas Court of

Span Enterprises v. Wood, No. 01-07-00364-CV (Tex. App.—Houston [1 st Dist.] December 4, 2008). [

Haag Trucking Co., Inc. v. Haag, --- NE2d ----, 2008 WL 5006541 (Ind. App. November 26, 2008). The

Fortenberry v. Cavanaugh, No. 03-07-00310, ___ SW3d ___, 2008 WL 4997568 (Tex. App.—Austin November