Friday Colma Shuffle 6:45 RRR Conversational/Fat-Burning Pace
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Ted Ketai
Feb 9, 2012, 1:56:06 PM2/9/12
to SF2G
Relaxing Friday pace, shenanigans strictly prohibited, aiming for about 16mph average to RWC (which probably translates to 16.5-17 to MTV). Regroups for anybody that gets stopped at a light etc.
Eric Altendorf
Feb 9, 2012, 3:54:39 PM2/9/12
to tke...@gmail.com, SF2G
+1
> --
> store: http://sf2g.com/store.html | blog: http://blog.sf2g.com | terms:
> http://sf2g.com/terms.html | bike prep: http://sf2g.com/prep.html | unsub:
> http://groups.google.com/group/sf2g
StStein
Feb 9, 2012, 4:17:54 PM2/9/12
to SF2G
+1 Had food truck fish and chips for lunch so I definitely need to
burn some fat tomorrow. (But it was gooooooooooooood.)
burn some fat tomorrow. (But it was gooooooooooooood.)
Anton D'Auria
Feb 9, 2012, 5:06:33 PM2/9/12
to steven...@gmail.com, SF2G
+1
murphstahoe
Feb 9, 2012, 5:21:52 PM2/9/12
to SF2G
+1 - diverting in Redwood City (Maple) to Alameda De Las Pulgas-
>Junipero->Foothill->Homestead
>Junipero->Foothill->Homestead
Scott Crosby
Feb 9, 2012, 5:44:49 PM2/9/12
to ta...@murphstahoe.com, SF2G
moots day. will concentrate on not unleashing wave upon wave of attacks.
Judd Blair
Feb 9, 2012, 5:45:34 PM2/9/12
to scr...@gmail.com, ta...@murphstahoe.com, SF2G
Opposite day? I'll bring the R3?
Blair Menn
Feb 9, 2012, 8:26:14 PM2/9/12
to judd...@gmail.com, ta...@murphstahoe.com, scr...@gmail.com, SF2G
+1 on top of Mission
Benry
Feb 9, 2012, 10:08:05 PM2/9/12
to SF2G
+1
Ben
Anton D'Auria
Feb 9, 2012, 11:01:57 PM2/9/12
to SF2G
dammit, I now have a meeting in the morning, so -1
+1
Ben
Michael Schumann
Feb 10, 2012, 12:00:33 AM2/10/12
to anton....@gmail.com, SF2G
+1 from somewhere around Brisbane
Benry
Feb 10, 2012, 9:40:35 AM2/10/12
to SF2G
Alarm never went off. May try to meet you guys on 30th and Guerrero.
John Murphy
Feb 10, 2012, 9:44:07 AM2/10/12
to hen...@gmail.com, SF2G
Alarm (toddler) did go off. Next time...
Sent from my iPhone
Ted Ketai
Feb 10, 2012, 1:23:03 PM2/10/12
to ta...@murphstahoe.com, hen...@gmail.com, SF2G
Nice ride folks. A little faster than intended, but a good time. Tri-guy and PfC are officially reprimanded for instances of ride-style hijacking.
Jason Thorpe
Feb 10, 2012, 1:24:31 PM2/10/12
to tke...@gmail.com, SF2G
On Feb 10, 2012, at 10:23 AM, Ted Ketai wrote:
> Nice ride folks. A little faster than intended, but a good time. Tri-guy and PfC are officially reprimanded for instances of ride-style hijacking.
Did you get rained on at all? There was a mild drizzle at 18th & Castro while I waited for my bus this morning...
-- thorpej
Ted Ketai
Feb 10, 2012, 1:31:51 PM2/10/12
to Jason Thorpe, SF2G
No rain. Lovely the whole way.
Scott Crosby
Feb 10, 2012, 1:32:35 PM2/10/12
to tho...@me.com, tke...@gmail.com, SF2G
no rain at all, nice weather, fun ride.
but yeah dudes, please adhere to the ride call. people show up expecting a certain pace, and they shouldn't be forced to hang on for dear life. Ted very clearly said style III, no shenanigans. that means no surging off the front at lights and you should never see >22mph on your speedo on the flats (that said, pfc was just closing a gap, not instigating).
just gotta go faster? call your own ride.
-sc
Ted Ketai
Feb 10, 2012, 1:51:21 PM2/10/12
to Scott Crosby, tho...@me.com, SF2G
I think the apparent need to 'close a gap' is the problem. If somebody shows up to a style III ride and starts hammering at 26mph, just let them go, otherwise things rapidly degenerate into a hammer-fest.
Peter Chang
Feb 10, 2012, 2:02:47 PM2/10/12
to SF2G
Le 10 février 2012 10:51, Ted Ketai <tke...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> I think the apparent need to 'close a gap' is the problem.
> I think the apparent need to 'close a gap' is the problem.
ok, ok.
i'd hardly call it a need but it seemed fun to try to see if we could
catch in one segment (wind-tunnel). after that we were >22 on the sun
sprint but it was more like cruising home on auto-pilot.
\p
Ryan Anderson
Feb 10, 2012, 2:15:06 PM2/10/12
to d...@google.com, SF2G
So, for the record, Thursday ride was really nice for me; generally
started out casually from the lights, running up to ~23 in between,
with occasional runs up to 24-25, but they were generally gradual,
which makes things much easier to hang on for, in my experience.
(Especially if you didn't have to struggle to get on at the light.)
started out casually from the lights, running up to ~23 in between,
with occasional runs up to 24-25, but they were generally gradual,
which makes things much easier to hang on for, in my experience.
(Especially if you didn't have to struggle to get on at the light.)
Following a similar plan on slower rides, just toned down (example:
run up to 20, 21 in between, occasionally push it into the 23 range),
would probably have avoided comment. :)
> --
> store: http://sf2g.com/store.html | blog: http://blog.sf2g.com | terms: http://sf2g.com/terms.html | bike prep: http://sf2g.com/prep.html | unsub: http://groups.google.com/group/sf2g
--
Ryan
Peter Chang
Feb 10, 2012, 2:20:04 PM2/10/12
to SF2G
Le 10 février 2012 11:15, Ryan Anderson <ry...@michonline.com> a écrit :
> Following a similar plan on slower rides, just toned down (example:
> run up to 20, 21 in between, occasionally push it into the 23 range),
> would probably have avoided comment. :)
> Following a similar plan on slower rides, just toned down (example:
> run up to 20, 21 in between, occasionally push it into the 23 range),
> would probably have avoided comment. :)
no, i think ted would have called me out regardless :-)
\p
Judd Blair
Feb 10, 2012, 2:38:35 PM2/10/12
to d...@google.com, SF2G
I mean, that's how the whole PFC thing got started after all - it's what you mutter under your breath as you try . It hurts, but keeps me from the clutches of laziness.
\p
Peter Chang
Feb 10, 2012, 2:50:29 PM2/10/12
to SF2G
i'm just admitting that it was my fault and should have known better.
now, changing the subject to trains, recovery, and beverages?
\p
StStein
Feb 10, 2012, 3:24:55 PM2/10/12
to SF2G
+1 for the 267
"you win the race, not the training ride"
On Feb 10, 11:50 am, Peter Chang <d...@google.com> wrote:
> Le 10 février 2012 11:20, Peter Chang <d...@google.com> a écrit :
>
"you win the race, not the training ride"
On Feb 10, 11:50 am, Peter Chang <d...@google.com> wrote:
> Le 10 février 2012 11:20, Peter Chang <d...@google.com> a écrit :
>
Eric Altendorf
Feb 10, 2012, 3:25:54 PM2/10/12
to d...@google.com, SF2G
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Peter Chang <d...@google.com> wrote:
> Le 10 février 2012 11:20, Peter Chang <d...@google.com> a écrit :
>> Le 10 février 2012 11:15, Ryan Anderson <ry...@michonline.com> a écrit :
>>> Following a similar plan on slower rides, just toned down (example:
>>> run up to 20, 21 in between, occasionally push it into the 23 range),
>>> would probably have avoided comment. :)
>>
>> no, i think ted would have called me out regardless :-)
>
> i'm just admitting that it was my fault and should have known better.
> Le 10 février 2012 11:20, Peter Chang <d...@google.com> a écrit :
>> Le 10 février 2012 11:15, Ryan Anderson <ry...@michonline.com> a écrit :
>>> Following a similar plan on slower rides, just toned down (example:
>>> run up to 20, 21 in between, occasionally push it into the 23 range),
>>> would probably have avoided comment. :)
>>
>> no, i think ted would have called me out regardless :-)
>
> i'm just admitting that it was my fault and should have known better.
It's what happens when you think with your legs...
>
> now, changing the subject to trains, recovery, and beverages?
Mebbe. If by 4pm my UPS tracking number has another delivery-failed
line, then I'm in ... if the package is still out for delivery I may
hop an early shuttle and try to get home to receive it. Damn UPS.
Peter Chang
Feb 10, 2012, 4:17:11 PM2/10/12
to steven...@gmail.com, SF2G
Le 10 février 2012 12:24, StStein <steven...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> +1 for the 267
> +1 for the 267
that sounds ok to me
> "you win the race, not the training ride"
and it's a commute not even a training ride.
\p
Eric Altendorf
Feb 10, 2012, 4:19:35 PM2/10/12
to d...@google.com, steven...@gmail.com, SF2G
Slogan for the next set of socks: "Attackers are Wankers" ?
Ted Ketai
Feb 10, 2012, 4:39:20 PM2/10/12
to erical...@gmail.com, d...@google.com, steven...@gmail.com, SF2G
+1 for 267
murphstahoe
Feb 10, 2012, 5:27:34 PM2/10/12
to SF2G
Depends on if your package is on this truck...
http://www.cyclelicio.us/2012/highway-9-cycling-saves-lives/
http://www.cyclelicio.us/2012/highway-9-cycling-saves-lives/
Scott Crosby
Feb 10, 2012, 5:32:06 PM2/10/12
to ta...@murphstahoe.com, SF2G
the only package I'm concerned with is murph's growler. anyone know its likely whereabouts this afternoon?
murphstahoe
Feb 10, 2012, 5:56:57 PM2/10/12
to SF2G
TBD.
Ted Ketai
Feb 10, 2012, 5:59:21 PM2/10/12
to ta...@murphstahoe.com, SF2G
please never write the words "the only package I'm concerned with is murph's" ever again.
Scott Crosby
Feb 10, 2012, 6:04:20 PM2/10/12
to tke...@gmail.com, ta...@murphstahoe.com, SF2G
murph. package. mmm.
murphstahoe
Feb 10, 2012, 6:33:46 PM2/10/12
to SF2G
365. Bring your drinking shoes because I won't, driving to Healdsburg
tonight.
tonight.
Peter Chang
Feb 10, 2012, 6:44:34 PM2/10/12
to SF2G
Le 10 février 2012 15:33, murphstahoe <ta...@murphstahoe.com> a écrit :
> Bring your drinking shoes because I won't, driving to Healdsburg tonight.
> Bring your drinking shoes because I won't, driving to Healdsburg tonight.
wait, you're not bringing your package or it's all for us?
\p
ta...@murphstahoe.com
Feb 10, 2012, 6:47:21 PM2/10/12
to d...@google.com, sf...@googlegroups.com
Bringing beer, but not drinking it. A Festivus for the rest of us!
------- Original Message -------
On 2/10/2012 11:44 PM Peter Chang wrote:
Le 10 février 2012 15:33, murphstahoe a écrit :
> Bring your drinking shoes because I won't, driving to Healdsburg tonight.
wait, you're not bringing your package or it's all for us?
\p
------- Original Message -------
On 2/10/2012 11:44 PM Peter Chang wrote:
Le 10 février 2012 15:33, murphstahoe a écrit :
> Bring your drinking shoes because I won't, driving to Healdsburg tonight.
wait, you're not bringing your package or it's all for us?
\p
Scott Crosby
Feb 10, 2012, 6:48:00 PM2/10/12
to d...@google.com, SF2G
rats, I'm locked into the 267. c'mon, it's only ~30 min later.
Eric Altendorf
Feb 10, 2012, 6:59:00 PM2/10/12
to scr...@gmail.com, d...@google.com, SF2G
Fucking UPS. You would think they'd realize that some people have
jobs and can't sit in the house all fucking day waiting for a box.
jobs and can't sit in the house all fucking day waiting for a box.
ok. when is this damn 267. in a sour mood. need beer.
murphstahoe
Feb 10, 2012, 7:00:46 PM2/10/12
to SF2G
dude 365 is at 4:37. A mere 25 minutes earlier.
On Feb 10, 3:59 pm, Eric Altendorf <ericaltend...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fucking UPS. You would think they'd realize that some people have
> jobs and can't sit in the house all fucking day waiting for a box.
>
> ok. when is this damn 267. in a sour mood. need beer.
>
On Feb 10, 3:59 pm, Eric Altendorf <ericaltend...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fucking UPS. You would think they'd realize that some people have
> jobs and can't sit in the house all fucking day waiting for a box.
>
> ok. when is this damn 267. in a sour mood. need beer.
>
Ted Ketai
Feb 10, 2012, 7:02:11 PM2/10/12
to erical...@gmail.com, scr...@gmail.com, d...@google.com, SF2G
267 gets to mountain view at 5:03. Leave the sour mood at the station ;-)
Blair Menn
Feb 10, 2012, 7:05:23 PM2/10/12
to erical...@gmail.com, scr...@gmail.com, d...@google.com, SF2G
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Eric Altendorf <erical...@gmail.com> wrote:
Fucking UPS. You would think they'd realize that some people have
jobs and can't sit in the house all fucking day waiting for a box.
And this is when USPS wins. FedEx and UPS are great for businesses. Not so much for home delivery.
Blair Menn
Feb 10, 2012, 7:12:04 PM2/10/12
to ta...@murphstahoe.com, SF2G
Oh and +1 for 365. Can't let that growler go undranked.
Peter Chang
Feb 10, 2012, 7:29:44 PM2/10/12
to Eric Altendorf, Scott Crosby, SF2G
grab the 365 and you can probably pickup at tge depot (267 probably works too :-)
\p
Eric Altendorf
Feb 10, 2012, 7:30:36 PM2/10/12
to Peter Chang, Scott Crosby, SF2G
hmm, tempting -- this is to be discussed on board the 267. see you
there? getting ready to leave now.
there? getting ready to leave now.
Scott Crosby
Feb 10, 2012, 7:40:31 PM2/10/12
to Eric Altendorf, Peter Chang, SF2G
365 doesn't stop in palo alto, and I have a heavy non-beer burden to carry. 267 FTW.
Eric Altendorf
Feb 10, 2012, 7:54:02 PM2/10/12
to Scott Crosby, SF2G, Peter Chang
Cool. See you there, 2nd bike car
Peter Chang
Feb 10, 2012, 7:55:59 PM2/10/12
to Eric Altendorf, SF2G, Scott Crosby
caught the 365 to hear murph's tale of woe.
now sitting south of rwc. mmmm. delays. murph says delay as far as san Carlos
\p
Scott Crosby
Feb 10, 2012, 7:58:31 PM2/10/12
to Peter Chang, Eric Altendorf, SF2G
will be on PA platform as soon as I finish this beer. maybe see you chumps then.
Eric Altendorf
Feb 10, 2012, 8:04:35 PM2/10/12
to Scott Crosby, SF2G, Peter Chang
Wait, does this mean I'm riding the 267 by myself the whole way?
Ted Ketai
Feb 10, 2012, 8:08:06 PM2/10/12
to erical...@gmail.com, Scott Crosby, SF2G, Peter Chang
I'll be there
Eric Altendorf
Feb 10, 2012, 9:17:59 PM2/10/12
to Ted Ketai, Peter Chang, SF2G, Scott Crosby
En route to benders
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages