Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion PostgreSQL Array Support
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jeremy Evans  
View profile  
 More options Mar 7 2012, 1:04 pm
From: Jeremy Evans <jeremyeva...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:04:12 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Mar 7 2012 1:04 pm
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Array Support

On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 12:29:57 AM UTC-8, Peter van Hardenberg wrote:
> fantastic! now that hstore is a proper extension in 9.1, i'd love to
> revisit the work i did on that and get it merged in. i'll try and make
> some time on thursday to talk.

That's actually next on my list after I finish up the array support. :)  
Let's talk tomorrow and get the details worked out.  When I looked over
sequel-hstore last night, there were just a few significant changes I was
considering:

* Hash keys should be strings, not symbols
* HStore should be a DelegateClass of Hash, not a subclass
* Make Hstore#[]= convert input key and value to strings before storing
* Consider using the default proc of {|h,k| h[k.to_s]} for the hash so that
you can access values with symbols even though they are stored as strings
* Refactor the parsing somewhat

Thanks,
Jeremy


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.