Semeval-2013 Task 11: WSI & Disambiguation within An Application

All good. Important that the measures make sense since we're working in a word sense application.

Well of course I mean Jun 14-15, I'd be *very* unhappy with Jan. :) On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 6:

yes, we'll circulate the paper later today, I guess. Best, Roberto 2013/4/14 Ted Pedersen <

Following up on the S-recall and S-precision discussion - I re-ordered my output via the following

Ah, thank you! I see my mistake - I had mapped the queries assuming an alphabetical ordering (in my

Well my excitement has subsided a bit. :) It seems like F1 is correlates pretty strongly to the

SORRY! I made a mistake, confusing task 11 with 12!!! The correct reference to our system paper:

it's probably gmail and me having too many emails and not much time aaargh hectic life!... :-)

This is great! Thanks very much!! Cordially, Ted On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Roberto Navigli

Hi, I haven't received results. My login id is rakeshdhanireddy. I had uploaded a single

Ted, yes, in those cases Google search did not return any sentence snippet for the result. Kind

Hi Ted, Yes, it's correct. Best Daniele > Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:15:48 -0500 > Subject:

Hi, I have two questions: (1) For a WSI system, is the gold standard number of senses an information

Hi Michael, you are absolutely right. This is already remarked in the task information page: "In

No, all queries will be in English. But note that they might not be contained within dictionaries (

Dear Micha, 2013/2/5 Micha <mic...@informatik.uni-mannheim.de> Dear Roberto, I've to ask

Hi Ted, the format will be the same as in previous WSI semeval evaluations. The test set will be