I've skipped a bit of the above conversation, but what you're
describing sounds very similar to what I use on my site. I have pages
for environment groups, which use a semantic template. In one of the
fields, "campaigns", I use a sub-semantic-template in which people can
list up to 20 campaigns for a group, and each of these is put into a
separate [[Has campaign::]] property. It works quite well, but it
doesn't work with semantic forms.
A possible work around for me would be to just chuck the sub-semantic-
template in as the default value for the field, and let the user work
it out, but I tried "{{{field|campagins|default={{GroupCampaigns|
environment|campaign2|...}}}}}" and it doesn't work - the template
screws up the field at the first | symbol. I also tried it with quotes
and <nowiki>, but it didn't work.
Ideally, it would be great to be able to replace a textfield with
another template.
An example of how the template works is on
http://en.envirowiki.info/Hunter_Community_Environment_Centre - you
can find both the templates used if you edit the page.
cheers
ned
On Aug 28, 2:21 am, Chuwiey <
bredt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes that is possible with a multiple value field, however, it isn't
> visually appealing since the one field would have to have all the urls
> with a delimiter in it... that's why i suggested to make a more
> visually appealing multiple valued field... making the add another
> button work for a field as well would allow for a certain fields to be
> a bit more visually appealing while not changing too much
> functionality.. this option could remain as a choice between a comma
> delimited mv (multiple value) or a "add another" mv...
>
> -Chuwiey
>
> On Aug 27, 12:59 pm, Guoqian Jiang <
gqji...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I would like to describe a use case that might be related to anestedform feature.
>
> > We have a template [[Template: Definition]] that has two fields. The first one {{{1}}} is assigned as the textual value of [[Property:definition]] and second field {{{2}}} is used to capture web url as reference. We would like to make the second field multiple. In that way, user can attach zero to many reference urls to this definition. Is this possible in current SF?
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > -Guoqian
>
> > Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:49:40 -0400From: yaro...@gmail.comTo: semantic-fo...@googlegroups.comSubject: [Semantic Forms] Re: instances within instances within instances
> > Well,nestedtemplatesand alternatingtemplatesare two separate discussions. Fornestedtemplates, I don't see much of a need, especially until SMW offers support for sub-objects in a page (i.e., true n-ary relations), and maybe not even afterwards. I similarly haven't seen a real need for alternatingtemplates, although I'm always open to hearing about specific cases where they could be helpful.-Yaron
> > Though, you have to admit.Nestedtemplatesis a decent feature we could consider offering in the future. Same with
alternatingtemplates.ie: you have Template A B C and D. A goes at the start, D goes at the end. But B and C go in the middle but are 0 or more types and rather than having b's then c's, they can me mixed..A - B - C - DA - B - DA - C - DA - C - B - DA - B - C - B - B - C - Dor whatever...From what I remember there is no way to do this currently... and it does have some use...Infobox startInfobox rowInfobox rowInfobox box (like a related collapsible box)Infobox rowInfobox boxInfobox end~Daniel Friesen(Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) of:
> > Ah, I see. Well, there's no way to have a form embedtemplateswithin other