Fwd: Selenium proposal merged into Software Quality Assurance & Testing - Area 51 - Stack Exchange
Alexei Barantsev
From: Stack Exchange Area 51 <do-not...@stackexchange.com>
Date: 2011/4/26
Subject: Selenium proposal merged into Software Quality Assurance & Testing - Area 51 - Stack Exchange
To: bara...@gmail.com
Hello,
We're writing because you committed to the Area 51 proposal Selenium.
We believe this proposal, as stated, is a subset of another proposal per the following guidelines:
- Almost all X questions are on-topic for site Y
- If Y already exists, it already has a tag for X, and nobody is complaining
- You’re not creating such a big group that you don’t have enough experts to answer all possible questions
- There’s a high probability that users of site Y would enjoy seeing the occasional question about X
For more background, read merging season.
After some community discussion on Area 51, we have elected to merge this proposal with another Area 51 Proposal, Software Quality Assurance & Testing.
Your commitment has been transferred to Software Quality Assurance & Testing, in the hopes that a slightly broader site proposal will have a better chance of succeeding. We hope that you will continue to support the merged proposals.
As always, thank you for participating on Area 51!
Yours,
The Stack Exchange Team
Questions? Comments? Let us know on our feedback site. If you no longer want to receive mail from Stack Exchange Area 51, unsubscribe from all Area 51 emails with a single click.
David Burns
I have uncommitted. Sad Atwood and Spolsky don't listen to there users.
> That happened :/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Stack Exchange Area 51 <do-not...@stackexchange.com>
> Date: 2011/4/26
> Subject: Selenium proposal merged into Software Quality Assurance & Testing
> - Area 51 - Stack Exchange
> To: bara...@gmail.com
>
>
> Hello,
>
> We're writing because you committed to the Area 51 proposal
> .
>
> We believe this proposal, as stated, is a subset of another proposal per the
> following guidelines:
>
> 2. If Y already exists, it already has a tag for X, and nobody is
> complaining
> 3. You’re not creating such a big group that you don’t have enough
> experts to answer all possible questions
> occasional question about X
>
> For more background, read merging
> .
>
> After some community discussion on Area
> we have elected to merge this proposal with another Area 51 Proposal, Software
> Quality Assurance &
> .
>
> *Your commitment has been transferred to Software Quality Assurance &
> Testing<http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/2241/software-quality-assurance-testing>
> *, in the hopes that a slightly broader site proposal will have a better
> chance of succeeding. We hope that you will continue to support the merged
> proposals.
>
> As always, thank you for participating on Area 51!
>
> Yours,
>
> The Stack Exchange Team
>
> Questions? Comments? Let us know on our feedback
> If you no longer want to receive mail from Stack Exchange Area 51, unsubscribe
> from all Area 51
> a single click.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Selenium Developers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to selenium-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to selenium-develo...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/selenium-developers?hl=en.
>
Kristian Rosenvold
too. Seems like you can uncommit the SQA site and not the selenium
proposal, although the selenium proposal is "merged".
Kristian
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to selenium-developers
> +unsub...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/selenium-developers?hl=en.
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Selenium Developers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> selenium-...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to selenium-developers
> +unsub...@googlegroups.com.
Jari Bakken
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Kristian Rosenvold
<kristian....@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we're probably too small for them. I uncommitted the SQA site
> too. Seems like you can uncommit the SQA site and not the selenium
> proposal, although the selenium proposal is "merged".
>
> Kristian
>
> ti., 26.04.2011 kl. 19.44 +0100, skrev David Burns:
>> ...
Ivo Grootjes
doesn't understand how most people committed to the selenium proposal
feel about this merge. The selenium proposal is in state closed and
it's probably best to reopen it if that would somehow be possible.
Or did he understand and went for the merge anyway?
Tarun K
~T
Tarun K
http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/88952/how-do-i-reopen-a-closed-proposal
And it is already marked -1 by some one!!!
~T
jeremy.herault
On 27 avr, 09:20, Tarun K <tkum...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I posted it here and rather frustrating response -http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/88952/how-do-i-reopen-a-close...
jeremy.herault
doesn't understand why we don't want this f**king merge.
Dave Hunt
Browser Automation: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/31757/browser-automation
Please help by suggesting and voting for on/off topic questions. It
may help to mention various browser automation tools in the suggested
questions, and would also be great if we could use these suggested
questions to demonstrate how the topic is not limited to testing/QA.
Thanks,
Dave