Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
More bad news for the whining Righturds
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Moder@tor
May 15, 2013, 2:07:36 AM5/15/13
to
http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/U-S-Deficit-Narrows-to-642-Billion-in-Budget-4516749.php
Sort of blows Your Lying MoFo Al's debt argument out of the water.
Sort of blows Your Lying MoFo Al's debt argument out of the water.
1,969 murdered in Obama's organized communities
May 15, 2013, 3:33:27 AM5/15/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 08:07:36 +0200, "Moder@tor" <Mo...@tor.com> wrote:
>http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/U-S-Deficit-Narrows-to-642-Billion-in-Budget-4516749.php
>
>Sort of blows Your Lying MoFo Al's debt argument out of the water.
Sheeyut! That's barely pocket change!
>http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/U-S-Deficit-Narrows-to-642-Billion-in-Budget-4516749.php
>
>Sort of blows Your Lying MoFo Al's debt argument out of the water.
Yer Pal Al
May 15, 2013, 3:47:51 PM5/15/13
to
On May 14, 11:07 pm, "Moder@tor" <Mo...@tor.com> wrote:
> http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/U-S-Deficit-Narrows-...
I'm glad that you agree that the sequester working and reducing the
debt is a good thing. Bush's spending was bad and he should be
criticized for it. Obama's spending is twice as bad.
> Sort of blows Your Lying MoFo Al's
Is that me? You've got a pet name for me? How cute.
> debt argument out of the water.
What argument is that?
> http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/U-S-Deficit-Narrows-...
I'm glad that you agree that the sequester working and reducing the
debt is a good thing. Bush's spending was bad and he should be
criticized for it. Obama's spending is twice as bad.
> Sort of blows Your Lying MoFo Al's
> debt argument out of the water.
a425couple
May 15, 2013, 1:06:17 PM5/15/13
to
"Moder@tor" <Mo...@tor.com> wrote in message...
looks good for POTUS Obama??
"May 15 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. budget deficit will shrink by the end
of fiscal 2013 to $642 billion, the smallest shortfall in five years,
according
to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office."
"The decline from last year's $1.1 trillion deficit would mark the first
time
since 2008 that the gap between taxes and spending slipped to under
$1 trillion."
So, Obama has had 4 terrible deficits, and now his
5th, although still terrible, is not nearly as bad.
And what, "Moderator" thinks that deserves a good award?
> http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/U-S-Deficit-Narrows-to-642-Billion-in-Budget-4516749.php
>
> Sort of blows Your Lying MoFo Al's debt argument out of the water.
How does "Moder@tor" think that Bloomberg article
>
> Sort of blows Your Lying MoFo Al's debt argument out of the water.
looks good for POTUS Obama??
"May 15 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. budget deficit will shrink by the end
of fiscal 2013 to $642 billion, the smallest shortfall in five years,
according
to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office."
"The decline from last year's $1.1 trillion deficit would mark the first
time
since 2008 that the gap between taxes and spending slipped to under
$1 trillion."
So, Obama has had 4 terrible deficits, and now his
5th, although still terrible, is not nearly as bad.
And what, "Moderator" thinks that deserves a good award?
Moder@tor
May 16, 2013, 10:46:59 AM5/16/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 10:06:17 -0700, "a425couple" <a425c...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>"Moder@tor" <Mo...@tor.com> wrote in message...
>> http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/U-S-Deficit-Narrows-to-642-Billion-in-Budget-4516749.php
>>
>> Sort of blows Your Lying MoFo Al's debt argument out of the water.
>
>How does "Moder@tor" think that Bloomberg article
>looks good for POTUS Obama??
I didn't say it did. Your Lying Pal Al, however, always blamed the deficit on
>"Moder@tor" <Mo...@tor.com> wrote in message...
>> http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/U-S-Deficit-Narrows-to-642-Billion-in-Budget-4516749.php
>>
>> Sort of blows Your Lying MoFo Al's debt argument out of the water.
>
>How does "Moder@tor" think that Bloomberg article
>looks good for POTUS Obama??
Obama. Seems he can't do that anymore.
>
>"May 15 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. budget deficit will shrink by the end
>of fiscal 2013 to $642 billion, the smallest shortfall in five years,
>according
>to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office."
>"The decline from last year's $1.1 trillion deficit would mark the first
>time
>since 2008 that the gap between taxes and spending slipped to under
>$1 trillion."
>
>So, Obama has had 4 terrible deficits, and now his
>5th, although still terrible, is not nearly as bad.
One way of stating it. Seems a Righturd spin way IMHO. Better to say that it is
>"May 15 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. budget deficit will shrink by the end
>of fiscal 2013 to $642 billion, the smallest shortfall in five years,
>according
>to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office."
>"The decline from last year's $1.1 trillion deficit would mark the first
>time
>since 2008 that the gap between taxes and spending slipped to under
>$1 trillion."
>
>So, Obama has had 4 terrible deficits, and now his
>5th, although still terrible, is not nearly as bad.
steadily declining and there is good news on the horizon. Which is the overall
gist of the article.
>And what, "Moderator" thinks that deserves a good award?
me. But you Righturds who have been pissing yourselves and whining about how the
debt grows ever higher, will need to find something new to wet yourselves about.
0 new messages