> I've agreed to help Bhasha create, host, and maintain a freely
> available digital archive of this material. That's where Scriblio
> comes in.
>
If you don't have existing MARC records, I'm not so sure Scriblio is the
right tool for the job. If you can describe the functionality you want
to have in your digital archive and give a better sense of how these
materials are currently described, I may be able to point you to other
tools that may be more appropriate.
--SET
http://beyondbrownpaper.plymouth.edu/browse/
Photos are being uploaded to flickr, where they're tagged, then a
Greasemonkey script sends them to Scriblio. I've not released the
flickr importer because that site is running old code and it's not
compatible with the current version of Scrib, but I'm under the gun to
get the site upgraded and will have a new version very soon.
Additionally, a feature that hasn't been discussed is the ability to
add or change cataloging metadata inside Scrib. More on that later.
--Casey
As noted previously, the Beyond Brown Paper archive might be a useful
model for you.
http://beyondbrownpaper.plymouth.edu/browse/
The cataloging is being done in flickr, where metadata is entered as
tags in this form:
fieldname=value
So a photo of a bunch of logs might have a tag that looks like this:
subject=logs
To bring it all together I wrote a very simple importer that reads the
tags from a flickr photo and parses them into the kind of metadata
Scriblio expects.
Your question also made me finish work on a feature in bSuite[1] that
allows you to enter and edit tags in WordPress/Scriblio in that form.
I call them "machine tags"[2] because that's a term flickr uses. All
the metadata inside Scriblio is actually stored as machine tags, so
this feature allows you to fix records or do original cataloging right
inside Scriblio.
You don't have to declare or configure a fieldname before you use it,
it's simply a matter of typing it in. On the other hand, what you type
is what you get, so any typos in the fieldname will create a new facet
in Scriblio (though you can fix it simply by correcting that typo).
And there's no vocabulary control or other enforcement of data
standards.
There are, in fact, a lot of reasons why this is a bad solution for
anybody attempting to create a project such as you describe (or the
one I named above), but my experience is that the "right" way to do
something often doesn't ever get it done.
Our comfort in this process with the Beyond Brown Paper archive has
been that we can pretty easily export the data in MARC or MODS or just
about any other format (in case we find better software). And flickr
offers some surprisingly powerful tag manipulation tools that help us
fix data as we get better about defining our vocabulary for the
collection.
For your project, you could think of it as WordPress with better
metadata. You'd create posts that represent the archive objects and
add machine tags to make them more findable. Then the users can link
to and comment on them (which is when an archive gets exciting to me).
--Casey
[1] bSuite is required for Scriblio, but it's also used in general
WordPress installations. http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/bsuite/
[2] More info on machine tags and their implementation in bSuite: http://maisonbisson.com/blog/bsuite/machine-tags