Message from discussion
Possible style overwrite?
Received: by 10.68.227.67 with SMTP id ry3mr26427030pbc.8.1341962932879;
Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: scite-interest@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.211.194 with SMTP id ne2ls124379pbc.9.gmail; Tue, 10 Jul
2012 16:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.227.67 with SMTP id ry3mr26427013pbc.8.1341962932228;
Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.227.67 with SMTP id ry3mr26427011pbc.8.1341962932211;
Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <nyamaton...@me.com>
Received: from nk11p08mm-asmtpout001.mac.com (nk11p08mm-asmtpout001.mac.com. [17.158.58.246])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id ir9si313359pbc.1.2012.07.10.16.28.52;
Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nyamaton...@me.com designates 17.158.58.246 as permitted sender) client-ip=17.158.58.246;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nyamaton...@me.com designates 17.158.58.246 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nyamaton...@me.com
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Received: from [10.1.1.8] (124-171-27-243.dyn.iinet.net.au [124.171.27.243])
by nk11p08mm-asmtp001.mac.com
(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Jan
3 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0M6Y00CO2X819...@nk11p08mm-asmtp001.mac.com> for
scite-interest@googlegroups.com; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:28:52 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure
engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855,1.0.260,0.0.0000
definitions=2012-07-10_08:2012-07-10,2012-07-10,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0
ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam
adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1203120001
definitions=main-1207100247
Subject: Re: [scite] Possible style overwrite?
From: Neil Hodgson <nyamaton...@me.com>
In-reply-to: <87f3a314-b62a-4013-bf25-bbb96c28a9f9@googlegroups.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:28:48 +1000
Message-id: <0AE9C344-DECE-4020-A21E-3EA7771B6...@me.com>
References: <87f3a314-b62a-4013-bf25-bbb96c28a9f9@googlegroups.com>
To: scite-interest@googlegroups.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
zetah:
> So I first had a look at various properties files to distill global scheme for "style.*.#" and was surprised that there is no such thing. Various properties use same style number for different definitions.
Each lexer is different, providing whichever styles are sensible for that language.
> Searching more I found about "colour.<definition>" property, which I believed would change above observation, but for some reason it doesn't do anything here. For example I commented styles in Python properties
With no styles defined for Python, all Python code will appear the same.
> colour.number=fore:#FF0000
> colour.keyword=fore:#00FF00
> colour.string=fore:#0000FF
> colour.char=fore:#FFFF00
> colour.operator=fore:#FF00FF
Without referring to these in lexer-specific style definitions, this will have no effect.
> Lastly is there global setting which can overwrite styles defined in various properties files, with the one I set in my user properties file?
You can define each specific style in your user properties.
Neil