Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
A QT version of SciTE?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  5 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jim  
View profile  
 More options Sep 27 2012, 7:23 pm
From: Jim <macr0t0...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Sep 27 2012 7:23 pm
Subject: A QT version of SciTE?

So, I see that Scintilla has been ported to QT.  Since I'm having headaches
with scrolling in GTK3 (GTK2 servers are fine), I'm rather interested in
using the QT platform instead.  Our other QT apps are pretty fast & solid.  
Has SciTE been updated to handle the QT libraries, for I only see a "gtk"
make folder.  There is "qscite," but that was a severely custom job from an
old version: http://code.google.com/p/qscite/downloads/list

I'm guessing that the "outer layer" of SciTE would have to be re-written
for QT, and I have a feeling that the commercial version of SciTE in the
Mac App store may be that QT port.  If so, I'm guessing source will not be
available.  I suppose I could look at JuffEd. Or, am I mistaken and I just
don't see it?

- Jim


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Neil Hodgson  
View profile  
 More options Sep 27 2012, 8:06 pm
From: Neil Hodgson <nyamaton...@me.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:06:52 +1000
Local: Thurs, Sep 27 2012 8:06 pm
Subject: Re: [scite] A QT version of SciTE?
Jim:

> Has SciTE been updated to handle the QT libraries, for I only see a "gtk" make folder.

   The standard distribution of SciTE only supports Win32 and GTK+ on Linux.

> I'm guessing that the "outer layer" of SciTE would have to be re-written for QT, and I have a feeling that the commercial version of SciTE in the Mac App store may be that QT port.

   The Mac version of SciTE calls Cocoa directly. It does not use Qt.

>   If so, I'm guessing source will not be available.

   I have no current plans to publish the source code for OS X SciTE.

   Neil


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Shawn Rutledge  
View profile  
 More options Sep 28 2012, 4:43 am
From: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.t.rutle...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:43:51 +0200
Local: Fri, Sep 28 2012 4:43 am
Subject: Re: [scite] A QT version of SciTE?
On 28 September 2012 01:23, Jim <macr0t0...@gmail.com> wrote:

> So, I see that Scintilla has been ported to QT.  Since I'm having headaches
> with scrolling in GTK3 (GTK2 servers are fine), I'm rather interested in
> using the QT platform instead.  Our other QT apps are pretty fast & solid.
> Has SciTE been updated to handle the QT libraries, for I only see a "gtk"
> make folder.  There is "qscite," but that was a severely custom job from an
> old version: http://code.google.com/p/qscite/downloads/list

> I'm guessing that the "outer layer" of SciTE would have to be re-written for
> QT, ...

I always thought that's a great idea too; cross-platform becomes
easier and more native-looking.  But there are many features of SciTE
which are added on to Scintilla itself, so there might be a lot of
rewriting to do, depending on how reusable the code is.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jim  
View profile  
 More options Oct 2 2012, 8:06 pm
From: Jim <macr0t0...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 17:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Oct 2 2012 8:06 pm
Subject: Re: [scite] A QT version of SciTE?

Neil:
The Mac SciTE is done in Cocoa?  Wow, that is a serious re-write.  I
already assumed you wouldn't post the source code (it's common practice to
make a little money by making a stellar wrapper around open-source software
if the license permits it).  It is your own work, after all.

So, that means the alpha project I listed is the closest thing to a QT
version of SciTE.  Hmmmm....intriguing...I wonder how much of SciTE is
portable between GTK and QT.  Unfortunately, my "hobby coding" time is
greatly reduced now that I have two boys and a full-time job. I'll stick
with GTK for now.

- Jim


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Neil Hodgson  
View profile  
 More options Oct 3 2012, 6:50 pm
From: Neil Hodgson <nyamaton...@me.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:50:23 +1000
Local: Wed, Oct 3 2012 6:50 pm
Subject: Re: [scite] A QT version of SciTE?
Jim:

> The Mac SciTE is done in Cocoa?  Wow, that is a serious re-write.

   Yes, it took quite some time. If it had been a smaller effort than it would have been open source.

> So, that means the alpha project I listed is the closest thing to a QT version of SciTE.  Hmmmm....intriguing...I wonder how much of SciTE is portable between GTK and QT.

   There's a small amount of Unix code for processes and files that would be portable but the bulk of the GUI code inside SciTEGTK.cxx would have to be rewritten.

   Neil


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »