Re: [scintilla] rapidsvn is used locally and checkin would be good

[Neil Hodgson]

Hi netkoala,

> rapidsvn is used locally - so i thing its good.

Scintilla switched to Mercurial (Hg) mostly due to it being a distributed SCM but also due to it being the focus of more effort than Subversion.

> To be able to checkin code would be good.

I prefer to review code before it is committed to the main repository. There are some narrow exceptions but I'd need to be convinced there was a net benefit to allowing more committers.

Neil

[Andreas Tscharner]

On 15.05.2013 00:11, Neil Hodgson wrote:

[snip]

> I prefer to review code before it is committed to the main
> repository. There are some narrow exceptions but I'd need to be
> convinced there was a net benefit to allowing more committers.

Does SourceForge have a "Pull Request" feature like BitBucket has? I
think that could be used in this case...

Best regards
Andreas
--
Andreas Tscharner <sterne...@gmail.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Intruder on level one. All Aliens please proceed to level one."
-- Call in "Alien: Resurrection"