Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
scintilla-interest
Home
About this group
Apply for group membership
Message from discussion CMake support
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Matthew Brush  
View profile  
 More options Sep 10 2012, 9:15 pm
From: Matthew Brush <matthewbr...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:15:06 -0700
Local: Mon, Sep 10 2012 9:15 pm
Subject: Re: [scintilla] CMake support
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

On 12-09-07 10:17 AM, Robert Dailey wrote:

> Hey guys, I've created a build script for CMake that I can use to
> build Scintilla with Visual Studio 2008. Additional work will need to
> be done to make this work on mac/linux/other, and unfortunately I do
> not have the environment to test these. However, this script certainly
> works on Windows and I can help with getting it to work on other
> platforms.

> Would you guys find this useful? Can you look it over and let me know
> if the way I've set up the library to build is incorrect? Note that I
> currently have it setup to build as a shared library (which isn't
> correct, since the code does not export symbols with
> declspec(dllexport). I can easily change it to build as static, but I
> kept it as shared for now so that I can resolve linker issues.

Just as a note, you could toss up a repository somewhere (ex. Github,
Bitbucket, etc.) and keep it up-to-date there. I'd guess that Neil would
add a link from the "related" page on Scintilla.org and perhaps even a
note in one of the doc/readme files for CMake users to find it. If you
"announce" it on this list with a link to the repo, anyone searching for
"scintilla cmake" will more than likely be able to find it since this
list is well indexed by (at least) Google.

I rarely use CMake myself, but my understanding is that you could just
unzip/checkout the related files into Scintilla's source tree and run it
like that. If it proves to be well maintained and a lot of people use
it, it might make a better case for upstreaming it.

Just my 2 cents.

Cheers,
Matthew Brush


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google