IDSA must be partying now with AIG (Greenwich LymeTards)

[Mort Zuckerman]

To: emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com,
for...@nytimes.com, nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov,
brigidc...@optonline.net, tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com,
jle...@courant.com, tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org,
thomas...@usdoj.gov, thoma...@po.state.ct.us,
kur...@washpost.com, georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org
Subject: IDSA must be partying now with AIG (Greenwich LymeTards)
Date: Mar 19, 2009 9:03 AM

Off the top of my head (and even with extra
thought) I can't think of a single other
doctors group whose work is entirely about
advocacy *for* insurance companies besides
IDSA.

Here, below, the Greenwich LymeDiseaseAssociation.org
(a CT branch of a New Jersey group- the same
ones who fraudulently trashed the original CT
Lyme group, the LDF or Lyme.org so that Pat Smith
could be Queen of Lyme) complain that their own MDs
should be allowed to treat as they see fit. This
argument has merit, except for the fact that their
MDs, ILADS, are utterly clueless about the mechanisms
of illness in Borreliosis and are now advocating for
IDSA's position on what Lyme is:
http://www.actionlyme.org


Lyme Borreliosis is not a chronic inflammatory
disease:
http://www.actionlyme.org/MUNCHAUSENS.htm


"Lyme Disease" BECAME a hypersensitivity reaction
in a knee, redefined by Allen Steere in Europe and
blamed on the young German student, Frank Dressler:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CRYMEDISEASE_CHP3_B.htm

"Lyme Borreliosis" or "Lyme Relapsing Fever" or
"OspA-Relapsing Fever" is now everything else *BESIDES*
"Lyme Disease," and which constitutes all the chronic
cases with neurologic, radiating pain, extreme fatigue
(see Biomarkers
http://www.actionlyme.org/BIOMARKERS2.htm
and what mycoplasma do to RBCs) and dementia signs
(due to, again, a subset of mechanisms).

IDSA (AIG, Kaiser-Permanente, CDC staff patenteers
who are now scared to death of criminal charges)
has claimed "Lyme Disease" as "a bad knee
cause by HLA-related hyperimmunity."


HOWEVER, Every single one of the IDSA crooks has
published about the non-Steere, non-chronic-inflammatory
kind of Lyme, and that data, their own data, they refused
to turn over to the CT AG to answer his subpoena.


Now it is clear from ILADS.org (see my homepage
about ILAD's latest announcement:
http://www.actionlyme.org
), that they never had a clue what they are talking
about, which perhaps is the reason the patients are
doing all the talking.


Both the patients and ILADS have some splainin
to do about why they are unable to think and
why they think they should be treated for IDSA's
imaginary disease, "Lyme Disease." As you can
see, this lymediseaseassociation.org / ILADS.org
group just gave away 75,000 dollars to treat
Steere's HLA-bad knees disease:
http://www.actionlyme.org/index.htm
the disease that has no brain or fatigue
signs.


IDSA must be throwing a party. Perhaps
even with their partying partners, AIG:
http://www.actionlyme.org/ALDF_BOARD.htm


Kathleen M. Dickson
======================================

http://www.greenwichtime.com/ci_11943619
Lyme treatment

To the editor:

Greenwich-based Time for Lyme is grateful that its hometown papers are
covering issues dealing with Lyme disease ("Allowing appropriate Lyme
treatment," Greenwich Time editorial, Feb. 25). The piece was largely
about the state legislative bill on treatment for Lyme disease.

We wish however to clarify one point about the editorial. TFL
enthusiastically supports the proposed Lyme bill. We fully believe
that doctors have the right to reasonably determine Lyme treatment for
their patients.

TFL disagrees with the Infectious Diseases Society of America
guidelines, which can be extremely harmful for individuals and
families with Lyme and can be used to deny insurance claims for
treatment and prescriptions. TFL is also disappointed about the
reconstituted IDSA Lyme disease guidelines panel, which excludes
physicians who treat patients with chronic Lyme disease, once again
eliminating divergent scientific perspectives.

The current IDSA guidelines recommend against treating Lyme disease
more than a few weeks, against using specific types of antibiotics,
against alternative treatments and even supplements. The guidelines
are so restrictive that physicians are not permitted to use clinical
judgment in diagnosing or treating Lyme patients, and the overreliance
on tests, which are inconclusive, can leave patients without a
diagnosis during the earliest and most treatable stage of the disease.

We are hopeful that Connecticut will pass the Lyme bill and let
doctors determine the best treatment for their patients.

Diane Blanchard

Debbie Siciliano

The writers are co-chairs of Time for Lyme, and can be reached through
timeforlyme.org.

"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci