Ellsberg: not guilty "by reason of governmental misconduct."

[Mort Zuckerman]

To: zerh...@od.nih.gov, Spin...@yahoogroups.com,
kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com, patrick.f...@usdoj.gov,
model...@sbcglobal.net, jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com,
Jgerb...@cdc.gov, jle...@courant.com, michae...@po.state.ct.us,
con...@po.state.ct.us, executiv...@nytimes.com, managing-
edi...@nytimes.com, news...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com,
biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com, me...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, ma...@concentric.net,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
FalN...@aol.com, brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net,
o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com,
rast...@aol.com, billc...@gmail.com, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com, paulcrai...@yahoo.com,
sidney_b...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov

Subject: [SpinLyme] Ellsberg: not guilty "by reason of governmental
misconduct."

Date: Aug 8, 2008 12:36 AM

http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2008/08/07/ellsberg-remembering-anthony-russo/

In the Inkel torture case, as in the case of Yale's Lyme crime- of
which the
CDC clearly approves - Ellsberg says, blowing the whistle was:
"So it was crucial for freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and
the public’s
need to know that Tony was not convicted in our trial, by reason of
governmental
misconduct."

Inkel Torture case (Annette Anderson, DCF's insane torturer, with her
military-type
torturer boyfriend, "Mr. Maris")

http://www.actionlyme.org/BROWN_INKEL_080801.htm

Remember the crazy B-word dared to allege that I did not report her
to the police and DCF:
http://www.actionlyme.org/ANDERSON_COMPLAINT.htm

Complaint to the Police:
http://www.actionlyme.org/ENTRAPMENT_DCF_CHILD_ABUSE.htm
Audio recording of my calling the abuse into the DCF:
http://www.actionlyme.org/AUD_0004.ASF

Reply by the New London Chief of Police:
http://www.actionlyme.org/DCF_CRIMES_AND_COVER_UP_101.htm

Note the date. July 3.

So, either this is going to be another bag job or we are
going to discover all sorts of "governmental misconduct."

KMDickson
-----Original Message-----
>From: Kathleen <janmu...@earthlink.net>
>Sent: Aug 7, 2008 10:44 AM
>Subject: [SpinLyme] "Using the machinery of the courts to silence their
online critics."
>
>
>"Few courts have considered this question, but it is becoming a crucial
one, particularly in light of the increasing number of cases where
those who have
been criticized on the Internet seek to use the machinery of the
courts to unmask,
intimidate and silence their online critics," he wrote earlier this
year."
>
>Wow, that sounds so DURLAND FISH AND EDWARD MCSWEEGAN.
>http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-ctapyale0807.artaug07,0,2200773.story
>
>
>Check out what Karen Forschner said about "Chuck P Adams" who
>somehow knew Donald Dickson falsely told duh DCF that I intended to
>drive my congenitally infected Lyme children into a lake, even before
>I knew about the false allegation:
>Karen's letter:
>http://www.actionlyme.org/PHILLIPS_JE_PERVERT.htm
>"Chuck P Adams" (IP locates to New Haven) posting about my kids, 5
days
>before they were kidnapped with the Donald Dickson allegation that I would
>drive my Lyme children- for whom I am an activist, I remind- into a lake:
>http://www.actionlyme.org/CHUCK_LAKE_DRIVER_c1ad57c80986aaf6.htm
>
>How did this person find out before I did, that the DCF would kidnap
>my children 5 days later with the "lake driver" allegation?
>
>Come to my next bogus trial in New London, August 19th and see
>if I get bagged againt (false criminal charges), or will this be a case
>where we get to hear about all of DCF's illegal tactics?
>http://www.actionlyme.org/ANDERSON_COMPLAINT.htm
>
>The same bag jobs by Lyme criminals happens to Lyme-literate
>treaters. It's always McSweegan who is in close contact with
>insurance company executives, especially the ones who live
>next door to him in Old Lyme, CT (Blue Cross).
>
>Jodi Rell does not do anything about all of this crime and abuse
>that originates in her State. I wonder, does she, have something
>she does not want exposed, should she go after these crooks?
>
>Is she being blackmailed like Dems?
>
>
>It is so *ODD* that a female and mother as a governor would allow
>all this harm to children to occur, unchecked. I think it is very
>*STRANGE* not to be an advocate for childrens health if you are a
>mother.
>
>I can't imagine not giving a crap about your own kids' health:
>http://www.actionlyme.org/Schoen.htm
>http://www.actionlyme.org/DIANE_EHRLICHIOSIS.htm
>
>The Forschners started the Lyme Foundation AFTER Jamie Forschner
>died of congenital Lyme disease. Their kid was already dead and
>they still cared about other people's kids.
>http://www.lyme.org
>
>
>Of course, I *do* know some people who do not give a shit about kids
>as I have previously mentioned:
>http://groups.google.com/group/scilyme2/browse_thread/thread/6104eda41c0577ed?hl=en
>
>They do not advocate for autism or even neurofibromatosis. They have
>explicitly said that they never think about the kids' outcomes as adults.
>The rest never mentioned neurofibromatosis at all, not even *once* in 42 years:
>http://www.actionlyme.org/Hilarious.htm
>
>
>Kathleen M. Dickson
>http://www.actionlyme.org/THE_REAL_DON_DICKSON.htm
>
>===================================
>
>Yale Students Name Lawsuit Defendant
>
>By JOHN CHRISTOFFERSEN | Associated Press
> August 7, 2008
>
>NEW HAVEN — - Two female students at Yale Law School who say anonymous, defamatory
comments were made about them on the Internet identified one of the
defendants in
their federal lawsuit for the first time Wednesday.
>
>The women filed new documents in U.S. District Court naming Mathew C. Ryan of
Austin, Texas.
>
>Through subpoenas to Internet service providers, the women have learned the
real identities of several other defendants, but are trying to resolve
their claims
against those people before deciding whether to name them, according
to court papers.
>
>The move threatens to expose top Ivy League law students and renews debate about
whether anonymous Internet scribes should be outed — and held legally
responsible
— for malicious online postings.
>
>The women's lawsuit, filed last year, charges that they were defamed by
repeated postings they deemed sexually harassing and threatening.
>
>The postings were made to AutoAdmit, an Internet discussion board about colleges
and law schools that draws 800,000 to 1 million visitors per month,
according to
court papers.
>
>The women say Ryan made sexually charged slurs about them on the Web, including
a false claim that one of the women had a sexually transmitted
disease. The lawsuit
also alleges that Ryan encouraged further attacks on the other woman
and used anti-Semitic
language.
>
>Efforts to reach Ryan were unsuccessful Wednesday. One telephone number in his
name was disconnected, and messages were left at other numbers.
>
>Court papers do not indicate which college Ryan attended.
>
>Other posts by other defendants included remarks about one plaintiff's breasts
and a claim that women with the same first names "should be raped."
Some
postings discussed the women's family backgrounds and supposed sexual
exploits
while invoking racially and sexually charged slurs.
>
>The judge overseeing that case has agreed to let the women proceed under pseudonyms
because of their fears of further harassment. No trial date has been
set.
>
>The lawsuit sparked a countersuit from a University of Pennsylvania law graduate
who lost a lucrative job offer after he was linked to websites that
crudely discussed
the female law students.
>
>Anthony Ciolli's libel lawsuit charges that the Yale Law School students
sued him although they knew he did not control the message boards at
either AutoAdmit.com,
where he was an editor, or at a now-defunct site that ranked the looks
of top women
law students.
>
>The women dropped Ciolli as a defendant in November, leaving numerous alleged
anonymous posters as defendants.
>
>In sworn affidavits, the women say the stress caused their work to suffer at
school and on the job. Their classmates and job supervisors were aware
of the salacious
postings, they said.
>
>"As a result of the stress, anxiety, and insomnia that I suffered, I withdrew
socially and often isolated myself from my friends at school. ... My
academic performance
also deteriorated," one woman wrote. She ultimately took a leave of
absence
from Yale, she said.
>
>The person who allegedly wrote the rape comment has fought a subpoena to have
his Internet provider disclose his identity. In a motion filed under
his online
name, "John Doe 21," he argued that the rape remark did not
specifically
harm or threaten either woman since millions of women share their
first names.
>
>He calls the online postings "unsavory but legally innocuous" — and
argues that his free-speech rights outweigh the women's right to seek
redress.
>
>"Few courts have considered this question, but it is becoming a crucial
one, particularly in light of the increasing number of cases where
those who have
been criticized on the Internet seek to use the machinery of the
courts to unmask,
intimidate and silence their online critics," he wrote earlier this
year.
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>