Pentagon Contracts Probe- McSweegan and Fish?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Mort Zuckerman

unread,
Jul 26, 2008, 11:23:55 AM7/26/08
to scilyme2
To: zerh...@od.nih.gov, Spin...@yahoogroups.com,
kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com, patrick.f...@usdoj.gov,
model...@sbcglobal.net, jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com,
Jgerb...@cdc.gov, len...@courant.com, michae...@po.state.ct.us,
con...@po.state.ct.us, executiv...@nytimes.com, managing-
edi...@nytimes.com, news...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com,
biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com, me...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, ubi...@courant.com, ma...@concentric.net,
camp...@courant.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, cohen...@aol.com,
FalN...@aol.com, brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net,
o...@po.state.ct.us, da...@davila-dilzer.com,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, thomas...@usdoj.gov, amcg...@rms-law.com,
rjmu...@aol.com, paulcrai...@yahoo.com,
sidney_b...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov

Subject: Pentagon Contracts Probe- McSweegan and Fish?

Date: Jul 26, 2008 11:23 AM

ARTICLE BELOW

I hope they'll be looking at what McSweegan and Fish did with the US
Navy's
former
vector-borne diseases bioweapons work and as regards Durland Fish's
abuse of
NASA
satellites as a market analysis tool for the www.ALDF.com:
http://www.actionlyme.org/GOLDWATER_LETTER.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/TICK_BITE_CONSPIRACY.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/LYME_A_BIOWEAPON.htm

They sure did not save America any money by diverting US Navy research
funding
into this criminal cabal:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CONNOLLY_FIH_WEINSTEIN.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/ALDF_BOARD.htm
who effed up Lyme, HIV and tuberculosis, not to mention every other
chronic
disease (ALS, MS, Lupus, Alzheimer's, strokes,) except diabetes,
globally.

And the infection itself exploded because these criminals did not tell
us that the only thing we could do about Lyme was get rid of the deer.

http://www.actionlyme.org/CRYME_DISEASE.htm

It was a huge international catastrophe and it was all Edward
McSweegan's
brilliant idea- when trashing the US Navy in 1986 and exposing all
that
other evidence about the Navy's nerve agents and their antidotes (part
of
the damage of Gulf War Syndrome).

==================

http://rawstory.com/news/afp/Probe_of_irregularities_in_defense__07252008.html


Probe of irregularities in defense contract audits: Pentagon
AFP
Published: Friday July 25, 2008

Propel This! - Submit to Propeller.com




A Pentagon agency that oversees billions of dollars in defense
contracts said Friday
it has asked for a review of allegations that supervisors sought to
pressure auditors
to favor major contractors.

The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) took the step following a
scathing report
by a congressional audit agency this week that found numerous
irregularities in
a review of 14 DCAA audits between 2003 and 2007.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) also charged that DCAA
managers took
actions against staff, "attempting to intimidate auditors, prevent
them from
speaking with investigators, and creating a generally abusive work
environment."

DCAA director April Stephenson said she had asked the Defense
Department's inspector
general to conduct a review of the allegations.

"We take the GAO report very seriously," she said in a statement. "It
is crucial that we have a clear understanding of any problems
associated with our
audit effort."

The GAO report said it found numerous examples where the DCAA had
failed to comply
with generally accepted accounting rules.

It said contractors and Defense Department officials had improperly
influenced the
scope, conclusions and opinions of three audits, which the report said
was "a
serious independence issue."

It also found evidence that working papers did not support reported
opinions, that
supervisors dropped findings and changed audit opinions without
adequate evidence
for the changes, and that insufficient work was done to support audit
opinions and
conclusions.

"DCAA did not agree with the 'totality' of GAO's findings, but
it did acknowledge shortcomings with some audits and agreed to take
corrective action,"
the GAO said.

The GAO report did not identify the contracts in which irregularites
were found.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages