Tufts reveals that it is insurance companies who actually want a vaccine against Lyme- which is impossible.

[Mort Zuckerman]

To: emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com,
for...@nytimes.com, nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov,
brigidc...@optonline.net, tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com,
jle...@courant.com, tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org,
thomas...@usdoj.gov, thoma...@po.state.ct.us,
kur...@washpost.com, georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org

Subject: Tufts reveals that it is insurance companies who actually
want a vaccine against Lyme- which is impossible.

Date: Apr 3, 2009 6:03 AM

(ARTICLE BELOW)

LYMErix was not "taken off the market because
of poor sales," but because of all the damage it
did, the two lawsuits, the public hearing in
Jan 2001, and after Karen Forschner of the
Lyme Foundation found a Tufts' patent for a
new OspA vaccine that did not act like
a superantigen, binding the HLA molecule:
http://www.actionlyme.org/KFORSCHNER_DISCOVERS_LYME_TOXIN.htm

The Lyme toxin was OspA, the vaccine, according
to this Tufts patent. However, Mark Klempner reported that
OspA antibodies cross-reacted with Myelin Oligidendrocyte
Basic Protein.
http://www.actionlyme.org/KFORSCHNER_DISCOVERS_LYME_TOXIN.htm
^^^See for yourself; LYMErix Disease is not a knee disease,
according to Mark Klempner.


In the article below, this is an insurance
company talking, saying they want a vaccine against
Lyme and it looks like a Freudian slip on his name:
Is it Guy "Barker" or "Baxter," the company Gary
Wormser is working with to cover his ass over the
last failed OspA vaccines?

All along we were told the "Lyme victims wanted
a vaccine," when how could that be true, if all
along we wanted a CURE, for this obvious chronic
illness?

Nobody I know said anything about a vaccine, and
besides, a vaccine for what? Lymepochondria?
Feminocatastromyalgia?
Munchausens-by-Placing Ticks on Sleeping Children?:
http://www.actionlyme.org/MCSWEEGAN_AND_MUNCHAUSENS.htm


[Don't forget, now: Gary Wormser's new company
Diaspex is in the business of inventing new
psychiatric diseases for people to have, not that
the APA hasn't a constant supply of ideas for new-
diseases-to-fit-the-drugs from BigPharma. The latest
one out of Lenny Sigal and Gary Wormser in New
Jersey is that we Lyme victims now have a disorder
called "Doesn't Deal With Reality Well" or something
like that. Usually the psychiatric diseases they
think up for what other people have are what they
themselves suffer, because who is the best source for
LIES but a liar? These evil Lyme criminals are the
twins of the NeoCons:
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/04/02/the-goldberg-syndrome/
It's identamogenical.
Freud did the same thing. He was "doing" his sister-in-law
so he invented that everyone was basically a pervert
and that this was "normal." Clearly these Israeli Lyme
crooks are intellectual perverts for inventing that
diseases which are untestable - psychiatric illnesses -
could come from real diseases that are testable by the
crooks' own biomarkers:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BIOMARKERS2.htm ]



The only person I ever met who said they had
chronic Lyme who ended up to possibly not have
chronic Lyme was an opiate-seeker or a Rx psychotropics
addict and that was just recently. The only people
who possibly might not have chronic illnesses and
are fooling around, are the ones who - and you can
tell from talking to them - are apparently obsessed
with symptoms for the purpose of furthering either
1) their personal pain-killer agenda, or because they're
2) just plain vain and self-absorbed.

Usually, both.

You can tell from their manner of speech and topics,
whether or not they want to dominate a conversation
with their own symptoms and problems, or are they
asking what they can do to help the overall campaign
to end this crime?

You can tell from their WILL: What do they *WANT?*"


The *Real* Lyme Victims are the fighters, only.

And that does not include intellectual property
thieve$ like the author$ of these last two book$
out on the Lyme crymes, and neither does it include
the Queens or the national Lyme Activist Psychopaths
and their Pathlings.


Me, I have no problem, since every kind of test
possible is positive:
http://www.actionlyme.org/PHILLIPS_JE_PERVERT.htm
including verifiable CONGENITAL LYME in my children:
http://www.actionlyme.org/Schoen.htm
7 CDC bands for Lara, and Diane has Ehrlichiosis,
too:
http://www.actionlyme.org/DIANE_EHRLICHIOSIS.htm




Yesterday we saw the CDC/FDA crooks try to say
that LYMERix arthritis was not related to Steere's
HLA (which was the new, Dearborn *definition* of
the disease; OspA hypersensitivity or lipoprotein
hypersensitivity, much like chronic arthritis is often
caused by mycoplasma in joints), when the actual claim
we made to the FDA about LYMErix adverse events
was that most of them ended up to be Chronic-Neurologic-
Lyme-like, and in the end we found - with the help of
Paul Duray of the US Army, Ft. Detrick, and the National
Cancer Institute; the NCI has a lab and base at
the Ft. Detrick base for obvious reasons):
http://www.actionlyme.org/Duray.htm
was the result of the immune suppression caused
by Pam3Cys, which was also the reason for the failed
tuberculosis and HIV vaccines. They're all the same
thing: Pam3Cys:
http://www.actionlyme.org/PAM3CYS_IMMUNE_SUPPRESSION.htm
or fungal lipoproteins of the same basic shape.
Pam3Cys or Pam2Cys.


The CDC/FDA had no data in their claim yesterday,
that LYMErix arthritis was not due to an HLA association:
http://groups.google.com/group/scilyme2/browse_thread/thread/ff7b677e96af7d26?hl=en
http://www.actionlyme.org/PAM3CYS_LYME_HIV.htm
The Korean scientists stated that OspA tends to
aggregate. That's apparently what happened to
OspA in a vial, too, as shown by the blot-smudging:
http://www.actionlyme.org/DICKSON_FDA_SUBMISSION.htm


The question as really never about autoimmune arthritis
from LYMErix vaccination; the majority of outcomes
were neurologic, just like Chronic Lyme and this
was also stated by Dave Persing in his RICO patent:
http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6045804.PN.&OS=PN/6045804&RS=PN/6045804
"Additional uncertainty may arise if the vaccines are not completely
protective; vaccinated patients with multisystem complaints
characteristic of later presentations of Lyme disease may be difficult
to distinguish from patients with vaccine failure. Vaccine failures
have been occasionally noted in animal models (E. Fikrig et al.,
Science, 250, 553-6 (1990)), and infection with antigenically variant
strains of B. burgdorferi, which are being increasingly documented in
the U.S., might still occur."


As I - and the victims of LYMErix - told the FDA in Jan 2001:
http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/ac/01/slides/3680s2.htm


And Mark Klempner reported that OspA antibodies cross-reacted
with Myelin Oligidendrocyte Basic Protein. Therefore, LYMErix
Disease is not a knee disease, according to Mark Klempner:
http://www.actionlyme.org/KFORSCHNER_DISCOVERS_LYME_TOXIN.htm
^^^See for yourself that this is what Klempner says.


So, I wonder why CDC's Marty Schreifer would run a study
recently on the association between Steere's HLA and
LYMErix *Arthritis?*

Doesn't CDC Officer and former Tufts employee Mark
Klempner ever talk to the other CDC officers and
save them the time and money on bogus experiments?


KMDickson
----------------------------------------

http://www.masshightech.com/stories/2009/03/30/weekly10-New-Tufts-vet-lab-to-study-insect-borne-diseases.html
Friday, April 3, 2009
New Tufts vet lab to study insect-borne diseases
By Marc Songini
Video Gallery

BigDog robot goes through paces at Ft. Benning

MHT's Marc Songini: Mass. bio firms prep for lifting of stem cell ban

MIT debuts RoboClam

Other matches for ""Lyme disease"":

Conn. AG to investigate Lyme disease guidelines [November 16, 2006]

Immunetics lands SBIR grant for Lyme disease test [April 1, 2002]

Vitex says its product stops Lyme disease bacteria, West Nile virus
[July 15, 2002]

Eliance adds breath of fresh air to local biotech scene [January 7,
2002]

New Tufts vet lab to study insect-borne diseases [April 3, 2009]

More Search Results

The newly-dedicated biosafety lab at Tufts University’s Cummings
School of Veterinary Medicine hopes to be welcoming guests most people
just shun: dangerous-disease-carrying arthropods, such as West Nile-
or Lyme disease-carrying mosquitoes or ticks.

Not to worry — these guests will find it quite difficult to leave the
Grafton-based facility, which is one of perhaps only two biosafety
level 3 “insectary” labs in Massachusetts that are proposed to handle
arthropods and study the diseases they transmit.

This arthropod lab is part of the $31 million New England Regional
Biosafety Laboratory that officials dedicated on Monday. Along with
the insectary at the Boston University Medical Center’s National
Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories facility on Boston’s Albany
Street, the Cummings facility is unique to the state, said Sam
Telford, associate professor at Tuft’s department of biomedical
sciences. The arthropod lab currently at the Cummings is conducive to
working only with ticks. The new insectary’s 450 square feet will
potentially handle ticks, but also mites, lice, fleas, mosquitoes and
bed bugs, said Telford. It will also house caged animals used in the
research.

Such a biosafety level 3 lab is needed to study arthropod-borne
infections safely and find vaccines and cures. “Literally, there are
several hundred arthropod viruses,” he said. “There are 10 different
kinds within arthropods that bite humans or animals in Massachusetts,
and of those, four are classified as biosafety level 3 agents,
including West Nile and Eastern Equine Encephalitis.” Lots of public
attention is devoted to West Nile virus, but many viruses, such as
Jamestown Canyon Virus, go undetected because they produce few or mild
symptoms, said Telford. In fact, there are two mosquito-borne
infections, Rift Valley Fever and Chikungunya, that experts fear may
hit the United States and make West Nile virus “look like Play-Doh.”

The insectary will have a number of special safety controls.
Researchers must wear protective gear and there will be an “air
curtain” to ensure nothing gets out. Currently, the lab is awaiting
tenants, and following a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) inspection,
could be ready for business in midsummer.

The potential development of a facility to work on insect vaccines is
a welcome prospect, said Guy Barker, the Eastern Massachusetts
operations director for Passport Health LLC in Woburn. The company
provides immunization services to clients. Baxter said Passport would
welcome a vaccine for Lyme disease, which is carried by ticks. He
claimed the disease afflicts about 80 New Englanders each week during
the summer. “The pity is that there was a vaccine once, but it was
withdrawn by the manufacturer in 2002 because of poor sales.”

Internationally, there are other diseases, as well, such as dengue,
transmitted by mosquitoes, which have no vaccines. “There is a lot of
demand for new vaccines and new biotechnology,” said Baxter.


"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci