COURANT- New DCF Shenanigans investigation
kathleen
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
len...@courant.com, steven....@po.state.ct.us,
con...@po.state.ct.us, executiv...@nytimes.com, managing-
edi...@nytimes.com, news...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com,
biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com, me...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, spo...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov,
brigidc...@optonline.net, tr...@hotmail.com, ubi...@courant.com,
ma...@concentric.net, camp...@courant.com, jhorn...@fff.org,
thomas...@usdoj.gov, edi...@commondreams.org, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, cohen...@aol.com,
FalN...@aol.com, brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net,
mcne...@aol.com, o...@po.state.ct.us, da...@davila-dilzer.com,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, thomas...@usdoj.gov, amcg...@rms-law.com,
rjmu...@aol.com, paulcrai...@yahoo.com,
sidney_b...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov
Subject: DCF in the news AGAIN
Date: Jul 18, 2007 11:42 AM
NEW DCF COURANT ARTICLE BELOW
I have the scientific and other data for the Burgos family if they
would like to
sue the State of Corrupticut in a wrongful death case over the forced
drugging.
I am volunteering, that is, to help that family sue these bastards,
since I can
*prove* that the State of Corrupticut was *in possession of* numerous
scientific
journal articles which prove that all psychotropics are brain damaging
before the
Burgos suicide.
This in fact, is the main reason the State wanted to bag me.
I explain it all in the video, but I have a ton more data than this:
http://www.actionlyme.org/Psychiatric_MumboJumbo.htm
I helped Andy Vickery with this. Now he has a video, himself, on his
website (justiceseekers.com)
where he instructs people who may be eligible for psychotropics injury
claims against
BigPharma.
We have no such un-cowardly lawyers in Corrupticut.
The main issue is that DCF and DMHAS never perform any valid cognitive
testing on
these learning disabled kids, and I know a lot about it, because I
have a kid with
a learning disability, and my sister's daughter the school wanted to
diagnose
with "Childhood Schizophrenia" because of her severe thought disorder.
The kid has neurofibromatosis, her brother has neurofibromatosis and
autism, and
her mother has neurofibromatosis.
Kids with learning disabilities act out, out of frustration. This is
not "mental
illness" most of the time and should NEVER be drugged.
The easiest way in the world to understand what a learning disability
is, is to
pretend everyone else speaks one and a half times more languages that
you, but it's
all English. Add a dimension that you can't see, touch, or reach, and
think
about how difficult that would be.
Now, "Treating" a cognitive disability with brain anesthesia?
This is what DCF and DMHAS do even though they know better, but with
psychiatry,
there's no such thing as malpractice, since it is not a science.
They're
all allowed to make it all up as they go along.
Think about it: Psychiatrists say the brain damage that is visible
(agitation)
from psychotropics is "unmasking" an underlying disorder and they will
say that in court, under oath.
THIS IS FACT.
Think about it.
You have to, since we're all at the same risk from these kooks.
When I said all of these things to DMHAS and to the shrinks in the
prison, THEY
FLIPPED OUT.
When I said these things to the shrinks in the psych klink, *THEY*
FLIPPED OUT.
When both of sets of kooks asked me what was wrong with my bloodwork
and I said,
"I have Lyme and Autism," THEY FLIPPED OUT.
I'm not kidding. One of them literally got up and ran out of the
room.
I'm not exaggerating. You can literally see these shrinks just
stiffen up,
go white, stop breathing, eyes pop out of their heads...
They don't know what to say, and immediately ended *all* the meetings
right
then and there.
One of them ran out, though, leaving me alone in the room without
saying a word.
God as my witness.
Pretty inexplicable behavior for psychiatrists. Call it whatever you
want. I know
for sure that when confronted with scientific facts, not a one of
these shrinks
does *not* react in a bizarre way.
"STUMPED" I guess is the word that describes their reactions to facts.
"TRUMPED" is more scientifically appropriate snce psychiatry is all
made
up nonsense and keeps changing all the time- even according to
themselves.
In no other field do they do no work in a laboratory and come up with
a definition
of an "illness." In no other field are there two subspecialties,
Clinical
Psychiatry, and Neuropsychiatry, that completely conflict, canceling
out the former.
Clinical psychiatry is where you do no scientifically valid testing.
This is the
SUPERIMAGINATORS' domain. This is where they get out their secret
crystal ball
or throw some old bones on the ground or read the tea leaves or OCD
over their own
weiners, but never for a minute wonder how NASA's moonlandings were
related
to penises and sex since their own personal disconnect between reality
and sex they
don't even see. It's known as a "psychosis," when one denies
reality.
Neuropsychiatry is like, for Lupus, MS, Lyme Disease, etc, where they
perform all
sorts of brain scans and blood tests and give you ProVigil or Ritalin
to increase
daytime alertness and explain to you about the MS diet or testing an
elimination
diet, and explain and how food allergies can contribute to tiredness
and the like.
They understand that the illness drives how you feel.
You know, like in the old days, when a person was sick and went to the
doctor expecting
to be believed since doctors did that sort of thing, and that's what
they were
for.
Nowadays, BigInsurance instructs GPs to give out antidepressants and
never run any
valid testing, since that way, the GP can't be sued for malpractice
(since there's
no SCIENTIFIC LAB DATA to malpractice over), no actual illness gets
detected, treated,
or paid for.
If people don't understand this "subjective vs objective" bullshit
going on here, they may have a kid some day with the potential to be
an Einstein,
but that kid will never emerge intact if psychiatry gets ahold of
them.
They tried to pull this will me, only retroactively. Yale's Vladimir
Coric
said under oath that I was treated with antipsychotics for 5 years in
the 1980s.
No such thing happened. *** Not even close. *** Or I would never
finished college
with a degree in chemistry.
Autism is a condition where a person has the *inability* to put
themselves into
every equation- are the perfect scientists. The closest thing to
perfect objectivity,
since Autism is a perfect misnomer. (It's not about us. It's about
the
facts. It's about "how everything works.")
But who thunk up the word?
A psychiatrist.
Again, I am available and willing to help the Burgos family or any
other victims
of DCF or DMHAS.
I helped in the Andrea Yates case and I helped in the "Zoloft Murder"
case, Christopher Pittman.
These psychiatrists are hurting A LOT OF PEOPLE.
KMDickson
===================================
http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-ctlakegrove0718.artjul18,0,1143110.story
DCF Seen As Backtracking
By COLIN POITRAS | Courant Staff Writer
July 18, 2007
State child welfare officials are considering creating a 64-bed
facility for abused
and neglected children with cognitive disabilities, a move the state's
child
advocate and attorney general said flies in the face of current
treatment standards.
The Department of Children and Families began advertising bids for the
project on
June 15, about a month after the agency announced it was removing its
children and
adolescents from the 116-bed Lake Grove School in Durham because of
concerns about
the quality of care.
Lake Grove had been a valuable resource for DCF because it was the
only large facility
in the state that was able to accommodate this particular population
with its unique
therapeutic, schooling and treatment needs.
At the time the Lake Grove decision was announced, Brian Mattiello,
who was then
the acting commissioner, said the department would work to place the
children in
"smaller and more community-based programs" as part of the agency's
push toward deinstitutionalization.
Connecticut Child Advocate Jeanne Milstein and Attorney General
Richard Blumenthal
want to know why the agency now appears to be reversing course.
Milstein and Blumenthal had repeatedly complained about inadequate
medical care
and supervision at Lake Grove before DCF's decision to stop using the
facility.
The two are expected to release an investigative report on Lake Grove
later this
year.
"We are deeply troubled that ... DCF is moving in the direction of
perpetuating
institutionalization of children with disabilities," Milstein and
Blumenthal
wrote in a June 26 letter to DCF Commissioner Susan Hamilton obtained
by The Courant.
They cited the federal Adoption and Safe Families Act, the Olmstead
Act and the
Americans with Disabilities Act as all encouraging the
deinstitutionalization of
the developmentally disabled.
"This continued reliance on institutional care for children with
developmental
disabilities will only serve to harm those children," Milstein and
Blumenthal
said. "It is bad policy and creates an unacceptable level of risk of
abusive
practices."
DCF spokesman Gary Kleeblatt said that just because the agency is
soliciting bids
for a facility with up to 64 beds doesn't mean that will be the end
result.
"We are seeking residential treatment services for 64 children,"
Kleeblatt
said in a written response Tuesday. "However, those services are not
necessarily
going to be provided in a single facility. ... We may find that the
best proposal
is to open two or three programs that might serve a total of 64
children."
But the bid specifications make no mention of several smaller
residential centers.
The project summary refers to the creation of a single "Center of
Excellence"
for children with cognitive limitations that would include a large
treatment center
of up to 64 beds with its own school; up to three transitional living
cottages of
up to six beds each; and between one and three therapeutic group homes
of up to
six beds each. Qualified bidders have until Thursday to submit their
letters of
interest in the project.
"As a state, we have determined that is inadequate for adults with
disabilities
to live in large institutions. Why is it acceptable for children?"
Milstein
said Tuesday.
Of the 32 DCF children discharged from Lake Grove since Feb. 1, two
were placed
with families and 16 were placed in group homes, which typically have
up to five
beds, Kleeblatt said. Ten children were placed in other residential
programs in
Connecticut, and four children were placed out of state. Twenty-seven
children remain
at Lake Grove. The agency hopes to find places for those children by
September.
Kleeblatt said a program for 64 children is not unusual. He cited
other large residential
programs such as Connecticut Junior Republic in Litchfield (84 beds)
and Lake Grove
(116 beds) as being large. But those facilities were built before the
trend toward
deinstitutionalization.
State Sen. Edward Meyer, D-Guilford, said he believes there may still
be a need
for larger residential centers that provide intense 24-hour care.
Meyer, who is
chairman of the legislature's Select Committee on Children and whose
district
includes Lake Grove in Durham, said he believes that all of the
problems at Lake
Grove have been corrected and that he would like DCF to reconsider its
stance.
"With the exception of a few mistakes in pharmacological procedures
and limited
cases of abuse, I felt this program was useful to the children of
Connecticut,"
Meyer said.
Contact Colin Poitras at cpoi...@courant.com.
More articles