years Inactive Active Total Disconnection Rate
0-1 34 123 157 34/157
1-2 15 89 104 15/104
...
Howver, when i use proc lifetest, the procedure will treat the
customers who have been with the service for two years and are still
active as censored cases for the 0-1 years period, thus inflates the
denominator of the 0-1 years. Instead of 34/157, now it's 34/(157+89).
My question is: is there a way to get around this problem? I believe
the current life table method is correct. And since i only have 1994
data, current life table is my only choice. I speculate if i have a
longitudinal data, e.g. all customers who started subscribing the
service in 1980 and their connection status in the following 20 years.
Then i can use clinical life table method and get the same result as
what i got from 1994 period data by using current life table method.
Dear Peter,
It seems to me that you are wanting to see a simple Cross-tabulation,
rather that something that *I* would call a life-table. The statistics
that SPSS or SAS produces will be appropriate to 'life-tables', in the
way that I know them.
So, I do not understand what your problem is... the *rate* of
disconnections for a year certainly includes, as base, *all* the
people who subscribed for that many years OR MORE, even though you
seem to object to that idea.
Rich Ulrich, biostatistician wpi...@pitt.edu
Western Psychiatric Inst. and Clinic Univ. of Pittsburgh
======================start of question
PETER LUO (PL...@DRAFT.DRAFTNET.COM) wrote:
: It seems that SAS and SPSS can only produce clinical life table, but
: not period life table. For example, I have a data set that contains
: customer infomation with a cable company in 1994. Of them some were
: disconnected during 1994 after subscribing the service for a period of
: time(event), some were still active by the end of 1994(censored). I
: was expecting a current life table in which the disconnection rate for
: each time interval is determined by dividing the inactive customers by
: all customers who had subscribed the service for that long.
: years Inactive Active Total Disconnection Rate
: 0-1 34 123 157 34/157
: 1-2 15 89 104 15/104
: ...
: Howver, when i use proc lifetest, the procedure will treat the
: customers who have been with the service for two years and are still
: active as censored cases for the 0-1 years period, thus inflates the
: denominator of the 0-1 years. Instead of 34/157, now it's 34/(157+89).
: My question is: is there a way to get around this problem? I believe
=================================== . . .