have you seen (on my website and blog or on the Space forums where I
post from Oct. 2005) my suggestion to develop a BIGGER (150-200 mT
payload) Ares-5 ?
...like the (May 21, 2006) "3+3 engines Super SLV":
http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/006_superSLV.html
...or the (May 20, 2007) "AresX":
http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/029aresX.html
... and the (June 26, 2008) "Ares 5+":
http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/032ares5srb3.html
all these concepts coming from my evaluation (now known and clear to
everybody) that (both) Ares-1 and Ares-5 designs
was/are underpowered...
...as explained in this (July 28, 2006) article:
http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/011srb5.html
...and in this (November 4, 2007) ghostNASA post:
http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/012arescantfly.html
that (as a consequence) gives an incredibly POOR lunar cargo to the
ESAS Moon missions:
http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/031poorcargo.html
well... the latest news say that NASA is going EXACTLY towards the way
I've suggested TWO YEARS ago... :) ...but TWO years LATER:
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5481
NASA calls its latest (and more powerful) Ares-5 design the "Ares V
Max" ...that sounds pretty close MY "Ares 5+"... :)
this choice (also) means that the (FAST-SLV-like but FOUR months
LATER) "Direct" has ZERO chances to born:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.space.policy/browse_thread/thread/256e299d48c799ec#
.
...just waiting the "Mr. clueless/notviable/toobigfortheMLP/
etc." (alias Mr. HobbySpace) reply... :)
.
You seem to care too much for your own good.
What is it about our Zionist/Nazi DARPA that you like, if anything?
* Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
All lies and misconceptions
> All lies and misconceptions
We've all been kicked off of every forum in existence.
That INCREASES one's credibility, if anything.
We all know who Geronimo is and his claims.
He claims he thought of the best idea, first.
Now, can you possibly see how easy that is to remember?
Fortunately for all of us, Michael Griffin killed his ideas.
There you have it folks :
George W. Bush and Michael Griffin, in a nutshell.
> ...just waiting the "Mr. clueless/notviable/toobigfortheMLP/
> etc." (alias Mr. HobbySpace) reply... :)
>
Next goal is to get you banned from space politics. It will happen
without me doing anything . gaetanomarano will do it all himself
Your understand of the Usenet is astonishing.
Why do you hate Italians for their freedoms?
So you mean http://www.spacepolitics.com?
Why didn't you just say so? I'm banned from that INTERNET forum, and I
still post there all the time. Unless they institute registration, or
physically remove the posts, there is nothing keeping him from posting.
If your goal is to get someone banned, that makes you a FASCIST.
But we already knew that. You fascists just crack me up.
Rand Simberg, and Dennis Wingo, for instance.
Obvious and blatant science illiterate fascists, and the industry just
DROOLS over them. But this is the INDUSTRY and the GOVERNMENT that
brought us the Ares I - the Stick, so I can completely understand it.
Now Keith just bans me at the server level, AND he moderates his posts,
so there is just about no way I can or will ever post there, which is
not a problem with me, since he became an obvious astronaut groupie.
I'm just some guy, who has a MAJOR SCIENTIFIC RESULT under my belt, that
happens to involve the theory of everything, who is interested in space.
How can you go wrong with that? Let me explain, I've gotten where I am
by having bad shit blow up in my face almost every time I turn around.
Pessimism is a virtue in the rocket business. Someday I'll get around to
telling you guys my 35th anniversary of the Apollo landing experience.
Or maybe you'll have to wait for the book. Or the movie.