Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

lightuponlight

0 views
Skip to first unread message

amisb65

unread,
Sep 4, 2008, 10:56:17 AM9/4/08
to

I would be thankful if you give my article 5 minute of your value
time. THANK YOU.


lightuponlight

http://www.lightuponlight.com/islam

For more information about Islam : www.imanway1.com
Please Do Not Reply This Message
Contact Me At Dawaa...@gmail.com

Eric Chomko

unread,
Sep 4, 2008, 1:20:22 PM9/4/08
to
> Contact Me At Dawaa2is...@gmail.com

Koran-thumping at its best.

Willie...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 5, 2008, 2:03:53 PM9/5/08
to

I thought it was light up on light - and was an article about solar
pumped lasers. sheez

Here's something morei interesting.

http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/19402/
http://www.nrel.gov/news/press/1995/solar.html


BradGuth

unread,
Sep 6, 2008, 5:01:25 PM9/6/08
to

Oddly, I too would tend to agree that piping or pumping out light upon
light is doable, and quite possibly as FTL communications. Otherwise,
creating clean and renewable terrestrial energy that's highly
affordable is more than worth doing.

Too bad that affordable clean energy will never happen under the watch
of William Mook.

~ BG

Ian Parker

unread,
Sep 7, 2008, 2:16:05 PM9/7/08
to

What you are interested in ultimately is NOT efficiency but power
produced per Kg. There is plenty of room in space. The main problem I
see is that you need rods doped with Neodymium. These are heavy. What
you are after is a thin film of Silicon that is 25% effcient and
weighs <1g/m^2.


- Ian Parker

BradGuth

unread,
Sep 9, 2008, 9:24:56 AM9/9/08
to
On Sep 7, 11:16 am, Ian Parker <ianpark...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5 Sep, 19:03, Willie.Moo...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 4, 1:20 pm, Eric Chomko <pne.cho...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 4, 10:56 am, amisb65 <amis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > I would be thankful if you give my article 5 minute of your value
> > > > time. THANK YOU.
>
> > > > lightuponlight
>
> > > > http://www.lightuponlight.com/islam
>
> > > > For more information about Islam :www.imanway1.com
> > > > Please Do Not Reply This Message
> > > > Contact Me At Dawaa2is...@gmail.com
>
> > > Koran-thumping at its best.
>
> > I thought it was light up on light - and was an article about solar
> > pumped lasers. sheez
>
> > Here's something morei interesting.
>
> >http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/19402/http://www.nrel.gov/news...

>
> What you are interested in ultimately is NOT efficiency but power
> produced per Kg. There is plenty of room in space. The main problem I
> see is that you need rods doped with Neodymium. These are heavy. What
> you are after is a thin film of Silicon that is 25% effcient and
> weighs <1g/m^2.
>
> - Ian Parker

Stored energy simply can not be of LH2 or LOx, because it required too
much bulk of volumetric containment and insulation.

~ BG

Eric Chomko

unread,
Sep 9, 2008, 10:56:19 AM9/9/08
to
On Sep 5, 2:03 pm, Willie.Moo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sep 4, 1:20 pm, Eric Chomko <pne.cho...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 4, 10:56 am, amisb65 <amis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > I would be thankful if you give my article 5 minute of your value
> > > time. THANK YOU.
>
> > > lightuponlight
>
> > >  http://www.lightuponlight.com/islam
>
> > >  For more information about Islam :www.imanway1.com
> > > Please Do Not Reply This Message
> > > Contact Me At Dawaa2is...@gmail.com
>
> > Koran-thumping at its best.
>
> I thought it was light up on light - and was an article about solar
> pumped lasers.  sheez
>
> Here's something morei interesting.

Isn't just about anything more interesting?

>
> http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/19402/http://www.nrel.gov/news/press/1995/solar.html

0 new messages