What I'm curious about is, there must be long-lead items, the
things that have to be built early in order to ever get a rocket out at
some later date. What was the longest-lead item, and how many of them
did get reasonably started (admitting that that's a vague threshhold)
before the program ended?
--
Joseph Nebus
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Nebus wrote:
> I know there were four N-1 launches of varying degrees of coming
> near almost successful, and recall from various discussions that plans
> on how to modify and launch a fifth test vehicle were under way when the
> project was finally cancelled.
>
> What I'm curious about is, there must be long-lead items, the
> things that have to be built early in order to ever get a rocket out at
> some later date. What was the longest-lead item, and how many of them
> did get reasonably started (admitting that that's a vague threshhold)
> before the program ended?
>
I would think it would be the engines, especially if you count
development time into the equation.
The Russians still have a lot of N-1 engines in storage from the
program. Kistler Aerospace was going to use the surplus N-1 engines on
their K-1 rocket: http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/kislerk1.htm
Leftover N-1 parts ended up being used for a lot of odd buildings around
Baikonur, including outdoor showers and gazebos:
http://www.astronautix.com/graphics/n/n1dome2.jpg
http://www.astronautix.com/graphics/n/n1dome4.jpg
http://www.astronautix.com/graphics/n/n1dome5.jpg
Pat
Kistler Aerospace received 46 Russian NK-33 and NK-43 engines from Aerojet.
Obtained a Right of First Refusal for all remaining Russian NK-33 and NK-43
engines.
gb wrote:
>
> Kistler Aerospace received 46 Russian NK-33 and NK-43 engines from Aerojet.
> Obtained a Right of First Refusal for all remaining Russian NK-33 and NK-43
> engines.
>
Kistler just got dumped by NASA BTW:
http://www.space.com/news/070910_nasa_rocketplane_notice.html
Pat