Earth Losing Oxygen / by Hank Kroll
BradGuth
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/EarthLoosingOxygen/
This topic of "Earth Losing Oxygen" is just getting started, as being
related to the loss of Earth's magnetosphere that's failing us by
roughly -.05%/year, and otherwise it's about those essential
populations of diatoms as having thinned out at perhaps a much greater
than ten-fold rate as of just the last century.
Is this sustainable, and if so, for how long?
. - Brad Guth
V-for-Vendicar
"BradGuth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote
> This topic of "Earth Losing Oxygen" is just getting started, as being
> related to the loss of Earth's magnetosphere that's failing us by
> roughly -.05%/year,
Because as we all know, oxygen is magnetic, so much so that gaseous oxygen
collects near the poles of magnets.
MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
BradGuth
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote
Is that what a "V-for-Vendicar" fart sounds like?
. - Brad Guth
V-for-Vendicar
>> Because as we all know, oxygen is magnetic, so much so that gaseous
>> oxygen
>> collects near the poles of magnets.
>>
>> MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
"BradGuth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote
> Is that what a "V-for-Vendicar" fart sounds like?
Come on over and stick your face near my ass, and I'll show you in person.
MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
BradGuth
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> >> Because as we all know, oxygen is magnetic, so much so that gaseous
> >> oxygen
> >> collects near the poles of magnets.
>
> >> MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
>
>
> > Is that what a "V-for-Vendicar" fart sounds like?
>
> Come on over and stick your face near my ass, and I'll show you in person.
>
> MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
Yes rabbi Hitler, anything you say.
. - BG
V-for-Vendicar
>> > Is that what a "V-for-Vendicar" fart sounds like?
>>
>> Come on over and stick your face near my ass, and I'll show you in
>> person.
>>
>>
MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
"BradGuth" <brad...@gmail.com>
> Yes rabbi Hitler, anything you say.
MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
BradGuth
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> >> > Is that what a "V-for-Vendicar" fart sounds like?
>
> >> Come on over and stick your face near my ass, and I'll show you in
> >> person.
>
> MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
>
>
> > Yes rabbi Hitler, anything you say.
>
> MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
At least I can tell whenever my keyboard keys sticking. (obviously you
can't)
. - Brad Guth
V-for-Vendicar
>> >> > Is that what a "V-for-Vendicar" fart sounds like?
>>
>> >> Come on over and stick your face near my ass, and I'll show you in
>> >> person.
>>
>> MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
>>
>> "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com>
>>
>> > Yes rabbi Hitler, anything you say.
>>
>> MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
"BradGuth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote
> At least I can tell whenever my keyboard keys sticking. (obviously you
> can't)
MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
Alan Erskine
news:wY3Cj.27520$612....@read1.cgocable.net...
BradGuth
> "V-for-Vendicar" <Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote in message
>
> news:wY3Cj.27520$612....@read1.cgocable.net...
>
>
>
> > >> >> > Is that what a "V-for-Vendicar" fart sounds like?
>
> > >> >> Come on over and stick your face near my ass, and I'll show you in
> > >> >> person.
>
> > >> MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
>
> > >> "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com>
>
> > >> > Yes rabbi Hitler, anything you say.
>
> > >> MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
>
> > > At least I can tell whenever my keyboard keys sticking. (obviously you
> > > can't)
>
> > MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
>
> You're the bloody moron! Now PHARK ORF!
Some of these warm and fuzzy Usenet topic/author stalking morons like
"V-for-Vendicar" are forbidden to "PHARK ORF", as otherwise their own
pretend-atheist swarm of their own Third Reich kind will put them on a
stick for another one of those faith-based PR stunts.
. - Brad Guth
Hagar
"BradGuth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9b84d895-af6b-4f8b...@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
At least he categorized you correctly, moron (see, no sticky keys) ..
V-for-Vendicar
"Alan Erskine" <alan.e...@bigpond.com> wrote
> You're the bloody moron! Now PHARK ORF!
Well said....
MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
V-for-Vendicar
"BradGuth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote
> Some of these warm and fuzzy Usenet topic/author stalking morons like
> "V-for-Vendicar" are forbidden to "PHARK ORF", as otherwise their own
> pretend-atheist swarm of their own Third Reich kind will put them on a
> stick for another one of those faith-based PR stunts.
MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
The Ghost In The Machine
<Jus...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com>
wrote
on Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:51:15 -0800
<Ww1Cj.27495$612....@read1.cgocable.net>:
We *are* losing oxygen; any wood, coal, or gasoline burned
will take it out of the air and convert it into either CO2
or water. To reclaim that oxygen will probably require
photosynthesis.
How much, I don't know without some poking about.
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Been there, done that, didn't get the T-shirt.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
V-for-Vendicar
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ew...@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote
> We *are* losing oxygen; any wood, coal, or gasoline burned
> will take it out of the air and convert it into either CO2
> or water. To reclaim that oxygen will probably require
> photosynthesis.
>
> How much, I don't know without some poking about.
21% oxygen .038% CO2 So doubling the CO2 concentration of the atmosphere
will reduce oxygen levels from 21% to 20.962%
Woo Hooo.....
Hank Kroll
Dear Mr. Woo Woo
When studying the history of Earth's atmosphere you have to look a the
entire geologic history including all the coal, oil and limestone
deposition not the last 50 years of mankind's industrilization.
Why is it the wheelchair-bound government-NAZI-agents with their
Stephan Hawking hand wands that find it cute to spell moron by
pressing the button ten times for each letter can never contribute any
hard data? You'd think that if there were CIA///NSA they would have
the entire National Archive data bank at their dingertips and possibly
actually contribute something "hard" once in a while. I intentionally
mispelled the word dingertip so don't comment on it.
V-for-Vendicar
"Hank Kroll" <Hank...@gmail.com> wrote
> When studying the history of Earth's atmosphere you have to look a the
> entire geologic history including all the coal, oil and limestone
> deposition not the last 50 years of mankind's industrilization.
MMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNN
Kroll doesn't understand simple ratio's.
BradGuth
> "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
If that's all it takes for making you and others of your silly kind a
happy camper, then so be it.
. - Brad Guth
BradGuth
<ew...@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote:
> In sci.environment, V-for-Vendicar
> <Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com>
> wrote
> on Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:51:15 -0800
>
>
>
> > "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote
> >> This topic of "Earth Losing Oxygen" is just getting started, as being
> >> related to the loss of Earth's magnetosphere that's failing us by
> >> roughly -.05%/year,
>
> > Because as we all know, oxygen is magnetic, so much so that gaseous oxygen
> > collects near the poles of magnets.
>
> > MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNN
>
> We *are* losing oxygen; any wood, coal, or gasoline burned
> will take it out of the air and convert it into either CO2
> or water. To reclaim that oxygen will probably require
> photosynthesis.
>
> How much, I don't know without some poking about.
Then poke, and use our 2048 fast CPUs that are within our public owned
supercomputer that's on lone to NASA, to figure out what's in the
future if we keep consuming and otherwise badly polluting our mostly
N2 atmosphere, as well as eliminating surface and ocean plants along
with having traumatized our global populations of diatoms to death.
Don't forget about our failing magnetosphere that's leaving us in the
dark, so to speak, at -.05%/year.
Of course, you'll obviously have to get whatever research pre-approved
by lord V-for-Vendicar, or else it simply doesn't count.
. - Brad Guth
BradGuth
> On Mar 13, 10:45 am, "V-for-Vendicar"
>
> <Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> > "The Ghost In The Machine" <ew...@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote
>
> > > We *are* losing oxygen; any wood, coal, or gasoline burned
> > > will take it out of the air and convert it into either CO2
> > > or water. To reclaim that oxygen will probably require
> > > photosynthesis.
>
> > > How much, I don't know without some poking about.
>
> > 21% oxygen .038% CO2 So doubling the CO2 concentration of the atmosphere
> > will reduce oxygen levels from 21% to 20.962%
>
> > Woo Hooo.....
>
> Dear Mr. Woo Woo
>
> When studying the history of Earth's atmosphere you have to look a the
> entire geologic history including all the coal, oil and limestone
>
> Why is it the wheelchair-bound government-NAZI-agents with their
> Stephan Hawking hand wands that find it cute to spell moron by
> pressing the button ten times for each letter can never contribute any
> hard data? You'd think that if there were CIA///NSA they would have
> the entire National Archive data bank at their dingertips and possibly
> actually contribute something "hard" once in a while. I intentionally
Our resident topic/author stalking fuckologest "V-for-Vendicar" is
another example of the 99.9% worthless scum of the Earth. Remeber, at
Usenet being 99.9% infested with those genetic incest mutated souls
exactly like V-for-Vendicar is why we're at war with so many of those
mostly nice Muslims, and it also why his boss Hitler accomplished so
much collateral damage and carnage of the innocent of that era, was
specifically due to the smarts of his Semitic Third Reich army of mad
scientists.
. - Brad Guth
Hank Kroll
>
> - Show quoted text -
IF YOU THINK THEY ARE STUPID NOW WAIT TWENTY-FIVE YEARS WHEN THE
OXYGEN LEVELS DROP TO 12%:
EARTH LOOSING OXYGEN
Since the time Moses walked the Earth we have lost half our oxygen
due to stupid humans burning things like the rainforest and carbon
resources.
You can't have oxygen on any planet without a constant supply because
everything rusts and rots. I'll repeat that again: "You can't have
oxygen around any planet without a constant supply!"
The main source of oxygen on 'this' planet is diatoms which can
multiply eight times in 24 hours given 24 hours of light in the right
UV spectrum. (Also, the plants that make limestone and choral
contribute a good share of the free oxygen.) Diatoms are little plant/
animals that live in the sea. Their dead bodies/shells are made of
carbon dioxide and calcium and are used to filter your drinking
water.
Diatoms won't grow without carbon dioxide (CO2) which is plant food.
Releasing CO2 is good because it is the basis of all life on the
planet and it is now down to .033% which isn't enough to keep diatoms
alive. If Earth looses it's diatoms it looses its oxygen and
everything dies. CO2 is too heavy to be a greenhouse gas. It is heavy
therefore half--50% lays close to the ground below the 3000 foot level.
That is why trees don't grow above timber line.
I should have done the math earlier but I didn't because I thought
everyone could see this. When I went to school only 50 years ago, the
oxygen content of our atmosphere was of 25%. Some old textbooks listed
the oxygen content at 28 %. Now it is down to 20% (less inside
buildings where people are thinking, breathing and working). An oxygen
loss of 5% in 50 years means we are now loosing 1% every decade. This
is alarming when you consider the fact that the oxygen content of our
atmosphere will be 15% in another 50 years--the point where humans
will have to live inside domes and be charged for their oxygen by the
sex-slave-masters.
This becomes even more alarming when you consider that oxygen loss
due to humans burning things is not a linear function but an
exponential one. With a human population growth of 7% a year the
population will double in one decade. Do the math! With China and
India coming into the industrial age the burning of carbon resources
(coal, oil, and natural gas) will increase more than 7% a year--
possibly 20% so you could see the oxygen levels could fall to as
little as 12% in 25 years.
Henry Kissinger and the Rockefellers of Bohemian Grove want to reduce
the world population by 80% with another global war so they can become
even more powerful. This will mark the end of all personal freedom on
the planet thus relegating all science to the realm of the elite
ensuring there will be no new energy discoveries forever. This will
definitely keep humans planet bound.
THE SOLUTION: QUIT BURNING THINGS! QUIT BURNING UP YOUR OXYGEN!
Use geothermal, wind, tide, solar and hydroelectric sources of
energy.
Best Wishes,
Hagar
The primary reason for the relatively recent trend in oxygen depletion can
be explained in two simple words:
Art Deco
When his "Brainwashed Followers" gather around him for adulation and homage
paying, all modesty is thrown into the wind and the "Slurpfest" begins. The
activites sends PedoDeco into a state of hyper-ventilation, taking huge
gasps, each of which consuming a cubic forthnight of precious oxygen.
Conclusion: Kill Deco and save the world
V-for-Vendicar
"BradGuth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote
> Our resident topic/author stalking fuckologest "V-for-Vendicar" is
> another example of the 99.9% worthless scum of the Earth. Remeber, at
> Usenet being 99.9% infested with those genetic incest mutated souls
> exactly like V-for-Vendicar is why we're at war with so many of those
> mostly nice Muslims, and it also why his boss Hitler accomplished so
> much collateral damage and carnage of the innocent of that era, was
> specifically due to the smarts of his Semitic Third Reich army of mad
> scientists.
Sorry Brad, as much as you would like, I will not permit you to suck my
cock, no matter how you whine.....
V-for-Vendicar
"Hank Kroll" <Hank...@gmail.com> wrote
> IF YOU THINK THEY ARE STUPID NOW WAIT TWENTY-FIVE YEARS WHEN THE
> OXYGEN LEVELS DROP TO 12%:
Grade school math continues to ellude you.
MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNN
BradGuth
> "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
But why waste a perfectly good bullet or whatever method of kill,
especially when we have this one-way mission to Mars that needs the
kind of folks like Art Deco has to offer, as having all "the right
stuff".
We should instead build a seriously big spacecraft for this mission,
with sufficient capacity for the likes of accommodating our mostly
Semitic Third Reich folks of Usenet and of their army or Borg like
collective of brown-nosed minions (including their resident warlords)
being sent to Mars. That way Mars gets a nifty cesspool of weird DNA
in order to restart some otherwise nifty slime form of life that'll
have to somehow manage to evolve and thereby survive in spite of how
nasty that Mars environment actually is.
. - Brad Guth
Hank Kroll
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> "Hank Kroll" <HankKr...@gmail.com> wrote
Why don't you try writing a book? It might develop your vocabulary and
help you formulate longer sentences. Who knows it might even stimulate
your mind to come up with some origional ideas of your own.
Too bad the GW lemmings never look at the thermometer or even bother
to go outside to shovel snow. Most of them are wheelchair bound
freeks with Stephan Hawking hand wands and their only enjoyment is
trying to seem intelligent by typing one to three-word sentences on
the web, This is an indication of their mental development.
Did you ever listen to a teenager talk on a CB radio. That is exactly
what most of these forums sound like. Obviously many of them are
affected by attention deficite disorder and low IQs. Their inability
to forumulate long sentences gives them away--especially when they
type moron by pressing the same keys on their hand wand ten times for
each letter.
Their only sex life is web porn because any kind of
interpersonal relationship either male or famale is out of the out of
the question due to their underlying anger and hate. The hatred
shines through when you comment on these truths because they so
quickly resort to profanity.
Please forgive them because, "They know not what they do." It is not
their fault! The ADD is the falut of the government selected school
carriculums, school lunches, 50 to 100 mercury vaccines, mercury
fillings, ritilin, weather modification and MTBE.
GW is all about keeping the Bohemian Grove elite in power forever.
These are the same characters that own or control most of the stock
in the energy companies. This all dates back to a time when money
didn't exist on the planet and birthright and controll where the
controll over the people. More
about this in a future book that will be out next year.
I am now more concerned about Earth loosing it's oxygen due to stupid
humans burning things than either GW or GC. This is a result of my
book
research when I was writing COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES & GLOBAL WARMING
which will be avilable in a couple months on Amazon and Barns & Noble
and on my web site: www.alaskapublishing.com.
Best wishes,
Hank Kroll
>
> - Show quoted text -
With risk of revealing my IQ with short stntences, the Fourth Rich
folks are already living on Mars!
Hagar
"Hank Kroll" <Hank...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e257a207-20ab-4a5c...@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
That be them Grmans, you imply ???
Yr IQ be arnd 10 ??
Hank Kroll
> "Hank Kroll" <HankKr...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
The Germans were brought over from Germany and they now run NASA and
the Pentigon. Its a good thing too otherwise there would have been
nobody to stop Bush from bringing on the Christian Armageddon by
droping the atomic bomb he stold from North Dakota. All seven people
who reported the theft are now dead!
At leastsome of us are having fun. Too bad the GW lemmings never look
at the thermometer or even bother to go outside to shovel snow. Most
of them are wheelchair bound freaks with Stephan Hawking hand wands
and their only enjoyment is trying to seem intelligent by typing one
to three-word sentences on the web, Their only sex life is web porn
because any kind of interpersonal relationship either male or female
is out of the out of the question due to their underlying anger and
hate. The hatred shines through when you comment on these truths
because they so quickly resort to profanity.
Did you ever listen to a teenager talk on a CB radio. That is exactly
what most of these forums sound like. Obviously most of them are
affected by attention deficit disorder and low IQs. Their inability to
formulate long sentences gives them away--especially when they type
moron by pressing the same keys on their hand wand ten times for each
letter.
Please forgive them because, "They know not what they do." It is not
their fault! Their ADD is the fault of the government selected school
curriculums, school lunches, 50 to 100 mercury vaccines, mercury
fillings, Ritalin and MTBE.
GW is all about keeping the Bohemian Grove elite in power forever.
These are the same characters that own or control most of the stock in
the energy companies. This all dates back to a time when money didn't
exist and birthright and control where the currency. More about this
in my book, Caucasians which will be out next year.
I am now more concerned about Earth loosing it's oxygen due to stupid
humans burning things than either GW or GC. This is due to my book
research when I was writing COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES & GLOBAL WARMING
which will be available in a couple months on Amazon and Barns & Noble
BradGuth
> EarthLoosingOxygen · Earth loosing its free oxygen! / by Hank Kroll
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/EarthLoosingOxygen/
>
> This topic of "Earth Losing Oxygen" is just getting started, as being
> related to the loss of Earth's magnetosphere that's failing us by
> roughly -.05%/year, and otherwise it's about those essential
> populations of diatoms as having thinned out at perhaps a much greater
> than ten-fold rate as of just the last century.
>
> Is this sustainable, and if so, for how long?
> . -BradGuth
Ever notice how the usual Semitic Third Reich (aka pretend-atheists)
of this Usenet simply doesn't get it. No wonder this anti-think-tank
Usenet from nayism hell on Earth has us headed for WWIII instead of
paying attention to our badly failing environment, or much less
allowing the whole truth and nothing but the truth of this topic to
ever get published.
Here we are at roughly 1% of what atmosphere Earth started out with,
it's still measurably per year going away (much the same as for that
of our magnetosphere is failing us), and yet nothing all that much is
getting said or otherwise argued about it. Figures, doesn't it.
. - Brad Guth
V-for-Vendicar
"Hank Kroll" <Hank...@gmail.com> wrote
> The Germans were brought over from Germany and they now run NASA and
> the Pentigon. Its a good thing too otherwise there would have been
> nobody to stop Bush from bringing on the Christian Armageddon by
> droping the atomic bomb he stold from North Dakota. All seven people
> who reported the theft are now dead!
Kook-a-doodle D0000000000000
And he's a raving KKKonservative Loonie T000000000000000000
V-for-Vendicar
"Hank Kroll" <Hank...@gmail.com> wrote
> Why don't you try writing a book?
What makes you think that I haven't already done so?
But I would never self publish as you do.
Self Publishing is a sure sign of being a loser.
BradGuth
It's a lost cause because V-for-Vendicar can't read, except out of
context, much less create an actual book.
Global warming is interrelated to the ongoing loss of our oxygen, as
is the polluting of our wet atmosphere and acidic oceans along with
the failing of our magnetosphere that's losing its intensity by .05%/
year (not that our magnetosphere hasn't fluctuated before, just not so
extensively as is currently the case).
All we have to do is evolve ourselves via intelligent design into a
rad-hard species within the next couple of thousand years. How hard
could that be?
. - Brad Guth
The Ghost In The Machine
<brad...@gmail.com>
wrote
on Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
<f2a4c7f0-0ad3-4cfb...@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>:
And the solution to this would be....?
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Useless C/C++ Programming Idea #104392:
for(int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) sleep(0);
The Ghost In The Machine
<Jus...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com>
wrote
<yMkCj.27774$612....@read1.cgocable.net>:
I didn't say we were losing all that much. ;-)
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Conventional memory has to be one of the most UNconventional
architectures I've seen in a computer system.
Hank Kroll
> rad-hard species within the next couple of thousand years. How hard
> could that be?
>
> - Show quoted text -
First of all let me explain for the Vendicars and the others who
missed school what the magnetosphere is and where the air comes from
on this planet. The main source of our atmosphere comes from volcanoes
and most of what comes out is CO2. The magnetosphere is an indicator
of the activity of the molton material and when it decreases by .05 %
per year so does Earth's atmosphere and the loss of atmosphere seems
to be directly propotional. As the earth cools there is less volcanism
and less Co2 and water released from volcanoes.
Earth is definitely loosing it's atmosphere. In ancient times it was
some where between 1450 PSI and 750 PSI --this according to mainstream
science. Now it is down to 14.5 PSI at sea level. Co2 is the basis of
all life on this planet and it is down to .033%. The clothes on your
back, the sheetrock on the wall, the gas and oil in your car and the
food you eat were all made from Co2 because CO2 is plant food.
Five years ago scientis took plaster casts of dynosaur lung cavities
and determined that they could not live in today's atmosphere. Their
lungs were to small! Earth's atmosphere had to be over 30 pounds per
square inch and have a higher oxygen content than it does today in
order for the dynosaurs to live.
Earth is loosing it's oxygen at an alarming rate because there isn't
enough CO2 and sunlight to keep the diatoms alive. Diatoms are little
plants in the oceans are the main source of atmospheric oxygen. Their
dead bodies which are made of calcium and oxygen are used to filter
your drinking water. When I went to school 50+ years ago the oxygen
content of our atmosphere was 26% so we are loosing 1% per decade.
With China and india coming on line the rate of oxygen loss will
increase so that we will have to live in domes and be charged for
oxygen in another fifty years.
The following is a breakdown of our atmosphere:
Nitrogen 78.084 %
Oxygen 20.947 % -- Some say 18%?
Argon .0934 %
Carbon Dioxide .033 %
Neon 18.2 parts per million
Helium 5.2 parts per million
Krypton 1.1 parts per million
Sulfur dioxide1.0 parts per million
Methane 2.0 parts per million
Hydrogen .5 parts per million
Nitrous oxide .5 parts per million
Xenon .5 parts per million
Ozone .0 to .07 parts per million
Nitrogen dioxide .02 parts per million
Iodine .01 parts per million
Carbon Monoxide .0 to trace
Ammonia .0 to trace
The reason I am concerned with atmospheric and oxygen depletion by
stupid humans burning things is because I think we are being lead down
the wrong evolutionary path by an elite few who control the energy
companies. With billions of people coming into the industial age we
will be forced to live in domes sooner than you think.
We could easily be utilizing more geothermal, solar, wind and tide to
produce vast amounts of electricity and hydrogen. Our small engines
can be run on hydrogen, which when burned with oxygen turns into water
which can then be recycled using electricity back into hydrogen and
oxygen.
Best wishes, Hank
BradGuth
<ew...@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote:
> In sci.environment, BradGuth
> <bradg...@gmail.com>
> wrote
> on Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>
> > On Mar 12, 6:56 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> EarthLoosingOxygen · Earth loosing its free oxygen! / by Hank Kroll
> >> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/EarthLoosingOxygen/
>
> >> This topic of "Earth Losing Oxygen" is just getting started, as being
> >> related to the loss of Earth's magnetosphere that's failing us by
> >> roughly -.05%/year, and otherwise it's about those essential
> >> populations of diatoms as having thinned out at perhaps a much greater
> >> than ten-fold rate as of just the last century.
>
> >> Is this sustainable, and if so, for how long?
> >> . -BradGuth
>
> > Ever notice how the usual Semitic Third Reich (aka pretend-atheists)
> > of this Usenet simply doesn't get it. No wonder this anti-think-tank
> > Usenet from nayism hell on Earth has us headed for WWIII instead of
> > paying attention to our badly failing environment, or much less
> > allowing the whole truth and nothing but the truth of this topic to
> > ever get published.
>
> > Here we are at roughly 1% of what atmosphere Earth started out with,
> > it's still measurably per year going away (much the same as for that
> > of our magnetosphere is failing us), and yet nothing all that much is
> > getting said or otherwise argued about it. Figures, doesn't it.
> > . - Brad Guth
>
> And the solution to this would be....?
To use our best intelligent design expertise in order to artificially
cultivate and then to sustain our new and improved diatom populations,
then as much as possible to stop burning our mostly N2 atmosphere, and
to enforce upon investing into the R&D plus mass productions of
renewable energy alternatives so that our voracious energy usage isn't
unsafe or adding further environmental insult to injury. Check out
what Finland has been doing right, as well as other Nordic nations as
having essentially resolved the vast bulk of their energy needs
without nearly as badly impacting our frail environment or much less
causing wars.
I'm not even the least bit opposed to thorium reactors. How about
yourself?
Even our resident green-hydrogen wizard William Mook isn't entirely
without a few good methods of getting us out of this energy and global
polluting mess, even if his methods requires vast dedicated amounts of
donated and tax exempt land usage that'll only make his rich and
powerful ENRON friends a whole lot more rich and powerful (because
Mook intends to never create a surplus of energy that would only bring
down the end-use cost of such energy), though never quite as wealthy
and powerful as the all-knowing lord Mook himself requires.
. - Brad Guth
BradGuth
Earth with a future population of 1e10 souls will likely demand
having 100 terawatts of local and/or grid sustained energy, and that's
in addition to the 10+billion tonnes per year of various bio/fossil/
synfuel that'll likely still be in hot demand demand or simply
consumed by way of other causes created by humanity. It's somewhat
doubtful that Earth can sustain the 100 million barrels per day of oil
consumption past the next century, and of natural gas and coal isn't
going to outlast the century after that. Then what?
Renewable h2o2 seems likely as a viable replacement for otherwise
burning our mostly N2 atmosphere. Even as a supplement to consuming
atmosphere, h2o2 is an absolute win-win for the old gipper of
directly benefiting mother nature.
. - Brad Guth
Hank Kroll
>
> - Show quoted text -
I don't know a lot about thorium reactors but when dealing with
radioactive elements there are big problems. Thorum is cheaper,
cleaner and the waste product is Thorium 233 plus a little
radium.Thorium reactors are less invasive to the biosphere than
plotonim but all reactors in this country are controlled by
bureaucrats known as the Atomic Energy Comission. However, whenever
you have bureaucrats controlling a substance be it drugs or
radioactive material there is alwayse the chance they will sell it to
terrorists or drug dealers.
It takes many thousands of gallons of diesel oil and coal to forge the
hardware for any kind of reactor which depletes earth's oxygen supply.
Then more diesel is used to transport t waste and dig big repositories
consuming even more oxygen---etc.etc..
When dealing with radioactive substances the two methods of disposal
are to put it into bombs and drop it on third world nations or dig big
caves and hire bureaucrats to watch it for three million years.
Either way it creates jobs for civil service workers cleaning up the
mess. Civil Service are people who don't earn the original dollar and
live off from taxpayers. Creating jobs is good but non-productive jobs
are bad.
Best wishes, www.alaskapublishing.com
Hank Kroll
We will be living in domes on this planet sooner than you think. Why
the government behind the prohibition of Co2 release is beyond my
comprehension--especially with the ongoing oxygen depletion due to
diatoms dieing in the oceans due to loss of Co2. Heny Kissenger and
his Bohemian Grove friends will come to the rescue by extermaniting
90% of us.
GW is all about keeping the Bohemian Grove elite in power forever.
These are the same characters that own or control most of the stock in
the energy companies. This all dates back to a time when money didn't
exist and birthright and control where the currency. More about this
in my book, Caucasians which will be out next year.
I am now more concerned about Earth loosing it's oxygen due to stupid
humans burning things than either GW or GC. This is due to my book
research when writing COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES & GLOBAL WARMING which
will be available in a couple months on Amazon and Barns & Noble and
on my web site: www.alaskapublishing.com
Hank Kroll
BradGuth
That's only somewhat true of Thorium, although compared to the likes
of Pu238, Th233 is nearly harmless, and the bit of radium created can
be easily extracted and put to darn good use. Thorium fuel isn't 10%
as spendy as Uranium, and it'll out-last by decades per load. Other
nations obviously smarter than us are going with the thorium
alternative, because it works much safer and a whole lot cheaper, that
is unless you're trying to create a weapons grade byproduct, because
thorium simply can't do that.
If 50% of the 100 terawatts required in the future is via thorium,
perhaps 25% could be via 3He/fusion, with the remaining 25% as fully
green and/or of renewable alternatives seems doable as is, and without
our having to reinvent the wheel, saving our fossil substances for
much better things than getting burned up along with our mostly N2
atmosphere that's already polluted and acidic beyond the point of what
much other life can survive as is.
. - Brad Guth
Hank Kroll
THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT
It isn't the Bohemian Grove crowd we have to be afraid of right now
it is the Christian Right led by George Bush seeking to bring on
Armageddon with a False Flag operation.
Notice that whenever I bring up this subject Vendicar and his ilk are
gone from the web. This means he is either afraid of the repercussions
or a government agent being paid to discredit posts to this site. "His
execute the bush traitor" logo may be a ploy to glean
counterintelligence information. Most people know this stuff anyway.
It all began on August 30 2007 with an attempt to steal a nuclear-
armed B-52 from Minot, North Dakota, AFB. Fortunately the attempt
failed during a stopover or transfer at Barksdale AFB in Louisiana.
The incident was not reported until five days later.
There were six nuclear tipped CRUISE missiles called, "ARROWS", that
left Minot, ND and flew over the US to Barksdale, LA. From Barksdale
they were to be flown to the Middle East.
Military police at Minot said they loaded LIVE NUKES onto a transport
by accident! This is absolutely impossible because all missiles and
warheads are cataloged and have to be specifically assembled before
transport and each piece is required to have no fewer than ten
signatures. Each piece has to be moved out of storage with heavy
equipment into the open, across a field and onto the plane. These are
nuclear bombs not cases of beer behind 7-11. I fact, there would be
only two people capable of giving the order to transport nuclear bombs
across the US> The first is called ALICE IN THE SKY and the second is
the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
It wasn't ALICE IN THE SKY because that is a series of flying
fortresses that are in the air over the US 24-hours a day commanded by
a general with full authority to launch an all out nuclear strike. He
also has the authority to override any other military commander. That
only leaves the President! .
Everyone, the French, the Germans, the Israelis, the British; everyone
except the people in the United States knows that 9/11 was an inside
job. They all think that Bush is crazy enough to blow up three targets
within the United States just to get his war going with Iran.
A flurry of executive orders all have been put in place to allow the
President to disband Congress and take complete control of the
country. They have patched up all the holes in the false Patriot Act
to make sure the Constitution did peak through anywhere allowing the
President to hold anybody without trial forever.
One student I know whose father is a highly placed general called and
told his son to have his bags packed by the door and be ready to
evacuate Las Vegas on a moments notice. The targets have already been
picked, Portland, Phoenix and the US military base in Guam. There is
talk of using Phosgene gas and the operation SOLID CURTAIN/CITADEL
SHIELD W is now in full swing. This is military operation within the
US that includes a terrorist response and the implementation of
national martial law.
This is to used as provocation for an attack on Iran and other
"terrorists" targets.
The cod name is: OPERATION SOLID CURTAIN CITADEL SHIELD for this
final takeover of America, the end of the Constitution, round up
political dissidents under PROJECT FALCON and drive oil prices up to
$200 a barrel.
The Iranians have 6000 strike missils aimed at Jerusalem, Tel Aviv
and our green Zones inside Iraq. They can bottle up the straits of
Hormuz, then use a whole new generation of TOPO-SS-5 (Tactical Evader
Missiles) the just got from the Russians.
Everybody, the Iranians, the Israelis, the Afghanistan, India, the
China and the Russians are poised and ready to bring it on!
Meanwhile earth is loosing its oxygen! It was 26% fifty years ago and
we have been loosing 1% per decade. www.alaskapublishing.com
BradGuth
The burning of stuff that has to use such vast amounts of our mostly
N2 atmosphere is creating NOx as well as a healthy surplus cache of
CO2. Human soot (white to black) is also adding another global
dimming and thus a thermal warming factor, plus the commercial usage
of fresh water in the process of our burning most everything in sight
for creating the vast bulk of our electrical and industrial process
energy is simply adding to the existing 100 teratonnes worth of our
acidic atmospheric suspended h2o as is.
I guess diatoms are just going to have to suck it up, or die while
trying to evolve as they adapt.
With more h2o and co2 as artificially contained within our otherwise
NOx polluted atmosphere is adding that little extra punch of mother
nature's storm energy, as well as interacting at greater differential
force between those pesky hot and cold fronts. Perhaps at some point
WWIII will start looking better than doing without sufficient fossil
and/or yellowcake derived energy.
. - Brad Guth
BradGuth
and Iran has Russian ties that might not back down if we should try
anything funny, like we did on behalf of that 6-Day war fiasco that
hasn't ever been fully resolved.
Presidential signings has this nation under a nearly ideal Zionist
Hitler format, of allowing our president taking total control in spite
of any public opinions, short of a bullet to his head. Higher energy
cost is just another tip of their melting iceberg that's intended to
flood as much of Earth as possible, because none of that will bother
the rich and powerful one bit.
As is 1% of America is in jail or otherwise doing time, and we're even
killing off 100,000 per year by way of medical mistakes (most of which
easily preventable), and there's oddly not a word as to our doing a
better job of taking care of our own kind. FEMA is further proof
positive that our government is a joke that's almost as bad off as DHS
that has absolutely no controls over MI5/CIA, or the private Federal
Reserve Bank that's extensively in charge of whatever does or doesn't
get funded.
Other than all of that, things could get worse.
. - Brad Guth
BradGuth
> Sorry, Brad, but nitrogen doesn't burn! lmao!
>
> Saul Levy
That's true, because instead it just consumes a great deal of energy
as it turns into NOx.
You are opposed to thorium reactors?
. - Brad Guth
BradGuth
> Seems like enough atmosphere for me to breath, Brad! lmao!
>
> Saul Levy
Humans, if wealthy and powerful enough, as such can always adapt to
living large along with a great deal of CO2 and even a touch of NOx,
along with rising oceans of dead zones and those pesky storms from
hell that'll help force global inflation to more than double the cost
of most everything within the next decade, if not the one we're in.
However, most other life on this planet can't seem to cope or
otherwise evolve fast enough to keep up with the human pace of
pillaging, plundering and of raping mother Earth for all she's worth,
and then some.
Without a robust magnetosphere, a good series of halo CMEs could
easily excavate another good portion of our atmosphere away.
Of course, none of this would ever bother a true Old Testament
thumping individual like yourself, or that of your puppet warlord(GW
Bush), would it.
. - Brad Guth
>
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:45:52 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
Timelord
news:7f373dab-95c6-4f88...@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
EarthLoosingOxygen · Earth loosing its free oxygen! / by Hank Kroll
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/EarthLoosingOxygen/
This topic of "Earth Losing Oxygen" is just getting started, as being
related to the loss of Earth's magnetosphere that's failing us by
roughly -.05%/year, and otherwise it's about those essential
populations of diatoms as having thinned out at perhaps a much greater
than ten-fold rate as of just the last century.
Is this sustainable, and if so, for how long?
. - Brad Guth
Yes quite frankly it's true ( we really must go solar )...
--
Thanks,
Timelord
Charlie's Place BBS, Newsgroups - Games - Files - Gifs
--- Synchronet 3.14a-Win32 NewsLink 2.02
Charlie's Place BBS - http://cpbbs.synchro.net:8080 - telnet://cpbbs.synchro.net.16:8023 - ftp://cpbbs.synchro.net:8021/00index.html
Hank Kroll
this> wrote:
> "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7f373dab-95c6-4f88...@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> EarthLoosingOxygen ·Earthloosingits freeoxygen! / by Hank Kroll
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/EarthLoosingOxygen/
>
> This topic of "EarthLosingOxygen" is just getting started, as being
> related to the loss ofEarth'smagnetosphere that's failing us by
> roughly -.05%/year, and otherwise it's about those essential
> populations of diatoms as having thinned out at perhaps a much greater
> than ten-fold rate as of just the last century.
>
> Is this sustainable, and if so, for how long?
> . - Brad Guth
>
> Yes quite frankly it's true ( we really must go solar )...
> --
> Thanks,
> Timelord
> Charlie's Place BBS, Newsgroups - Games - Files - Gifs
> --- Synchronet 3.14a-Win32 NewsLink 2.02
> Charlie's Place BBS -http://cpbbs.synchro.net:8080- telnet://cpbbs.synchro.net.16:8023 -ftp://cpbbs.synchro.net:8021/00index.html
I am really astounded how few people know where oxygen comes from. You
would think that somthing so essential to life as oxygen that they
would pay more attention in school. I am amazed at how few people know
how the atmosphere is made on Earth. Atmosphere is released over time
by volcanoes--mostly during periods of peak volcanism. Such volcanism
blocks sunlight and causes global cooling--that is, unless our Sun
happens to be near larger stars such as the one we are in orbit around
that imparts additional light and heat to Earth keeping us our of an
ice age. Free oxygen cannot exist around any planet unless there is a
constant supply. The biggest supplier on earth is diatoms in the
oceans and they are dieing off. Oceans cover 4/5 of the globe and are
capable of rebuilding the atompsphere if given enough CO2 and light in
the right spectrum. That is where Sirius B comes into the picture. I
am trying not to use big words here so the average joe can follow
this.
I may have over stated slightly when I said: "If you think they are
stupid now wait twenty-five years when the oxygen levels drop to 12%."
But, with the main supply of free oxygen dieing off the rate of supply
is reduced to practically nothing. As more of the Earth's surface
being oxposed due to the ice caps melting and vast areas of tundra
thawing out it means more things will be oxidizing (rotting) thereby
using up more of Earth's oxygen supply. Thawing out vast areas of
tundra means more methane release which, unlike carbon dioxide, is a
real greenhouse gas.
Carbon dioxide is a rather heavy gas (with a high specific gravity) so
50% of all atmospheric CO2 stays below the 3000 foot level. This is
why the oceans absorb so much CO2 and why plants grow well in the
oceans. That is why there is a timberline and why it is hard to grow
crops at high altitude. Sixty-five million years ago before Earth
lost 50% of its atmosphere and free oxygen it was an ecological
utopia. Everything, trees, animals and even humans were much bigger at
that time. Yes, contrary to what mainstream dogma has been programing
you with all your life there were giants on the Earth in prehistoric
times. Go to You Tube and seach giant skellitons to see actual
photograps of giants being excavated in the Middle East and India.
We re living in the fifty world. There wre four other advanced
civilization before us and some of them got off the planet. American
Indian legend, Sumarian clay tablets, and Ancient Indian texts and
even the Bible confirm this. Its amazing how much we have been
brainwashed in this country.
BradGuth
this> wrote:
> "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7f373dab-95c6-4f88...@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> EarthLoosingOxygen · Earth loosing its free oxygen! / by Hank Kroll
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/EarthLoosingOxygen/
>
> This topic of "Earth Losing Oxygen" is just getting started, as being
> related to the loss of Earth's magnetosphere that's failing us by
> roughly -.05%/year, and otherwise it's about those essential
> populations of diatoms as having thinned out at perhaps a much greater
> than ten-fold rate as of just the last century.
>
> Is this sustainable, and if so, for how long?
> . - Brad Guth
>
> Yes quite frankly it's true ( we really must go solar )...
> --
> Thanks,
> Timelord
> Charlie's Place BBS, Newsgroups - Games - Files - Gifs
> --- Synchronet 3.14a-Win32 NewsLink 2.02
I fully agree, that green/renewable whatever is our only clean and
bloodless way out of this mess, although we'll likely still require at
least 25% of our global energy demands via thorium reactors, and
otherwise as much other energy as 3He/fusion as possible. Of course
that still doesn't advance our evolution along any path of salvation
once Earth has lost the bulk of its magnetosphere, as for our
obtaining those rad-hard forms of DNA code does not look all that
doable, does it.
Perhaps banked bone marrow or essentially stem cell banking is the
best future alternative we can count on.
. - Brad Guth
BradGuth
>
> I am really astounded how few people know where oxygen comes from. You
> would pay more attention in school. I am amazed at how few people know
> how the atmosphere is made on Earth. Atmosphere is released over time
> by volcanoes--mostly during periods of peak volcanism. Such volcanism
> blocks sunlight and causes global cooling--that is, unless our Sun
> happens to be near larger stars such as the one we are in orbit around
> that imparts additional light and heat to Earth keeping us our of an
> ice age. Free oxygen cannot exist around any planet unless there is a
> constant supply. The biggest supplier on earth is diatoms in the
> oceans and they are dieing off. Oceans cover 4/5 of the globe and are
> the right spectrum. That is where Sirius B comes into the picture. I
> am trying not to use big words here so the average joe can follow
> this.
>
> I may have over stated slightly when I said: "If you think they are
> stupid now wait twenty-five years when the oxygen levels drop to 12%."
> But, with the main supply of free oxygen dieing off the rate of supply
> is reduced to practically nothing. As more of the Earth's surface
> thawing out it means more things will be oxidizing (rotting) thereby
> using up more of Earth's oxygen supply. Thawing out vast areas of
> tundra means more methane release which, unlike carbon dioxide, is a
> real greenhouse gas.
>
> Carbon dioxide is a rather heavy gas (with a high specific gravity) so
> 50% of all atmospheric CO2 stays below the 3000 foot level. This is
> why the oceans absorb so much CO2 and why plants grow well in the
> oceans. That is why there is a timberline and why it is hard to grow
> crops at high altitude. Sixty-five million years ago before Earth
> lost 50% of its atmosphere and free oxygen it was an ecological
> utopia. Everything, trees, animals and even humans were much bigger at
> that time. Yes, contrary to what mainstream dogma has been programing
> you with all your life there were giants on the Earth in prehistoric
> photographs of giants being excavated in the Middle East and India.
>
> We re living in the fifty world. There were four other advanced
> civilization before us and some of them got off the planet. American
> Indian legend, Sumarian clay tablets, and Ancient Indian texts and
> even the Bible confirm this. Its amazing how much we have been
> brainwashed in this country.
Don't entirely discount the terrific bluish spectrum worth of Sirius
A, as being nearly ideal photon food/energy worthy for the likes of
diatoms that need to do their CO2-->co/o2 thing on our behalf, and
otherwise we have to keep reminding these naysay folks of perpetual
denial as to the acidic nature of our artificially polluted atmosphere
is directly causing the ongoing demise of these nifty diatoms, as well
as traumatizing multiple other complex species of life past the point
of no return, that are so essential to sustaining this frail
environment that we modern and supposedly educated humans are so
focused or intent upon consuming and/or destroying at a much faster
rate than mother nature can possibly repair or otherwise replenish.
It's almost too late for the bulk of humanity to get survival smart,
as this ship of greedy and arrogant fools is sinking itself, much like
the Titanic that wasn't supposed to ever sink.
. - Brad Guth
Jeff▲Relf
Mother earth is our landlord,
we're just its lame-ass tenants... 'til we get evicted.
The Ghost In The Machine
<bffc8048-db57-4f68...@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>:
I'd have to research the issue. Standard fission reactors
have minor problems with respect to solid and liquid
waste disposal but are otherwise very clean and safe
(Chernobyl being a very unfortunate exception, and US
reactor design is very different; the worst accident in our
history released a very tiny amount of radioactive steam
in the air, even though the core was virtually destroyed
in 1979's Three Mile Island accident).
Ideally, we'd dump the stuff on the moon somewhere,
if we can afford it. Of course that has problems of
its own. (No, I'd not be worried about a Space: 1999-type
explosion.)
This pales in comparison with the issues regarding coal
consumption; coal has thorium nodules in it. Fortunately,
the resulting fly ash is scrubbed out using special
scrubbers now. At least, I hope most of it's being
scrubbed out.
And then there's the miner deaths...
U238 is usable in so-called "breeder reactors", producing
weapons-grade plutonium which can also be used to fuel
reactors. Such issues have precluded U238's use in
reactors for many years, and could prove problematic from
a political standpoint.
Thorium is another kettle of fish. I don't know what
needs to be done to thorium to extract energy from it.
Most likely it'll need to be put into a breeder as well.
To be fair, the actual mining of uranium does appear to
be rather poisonous, with the tailings having to be dealt
with somehow; they're radioactive, obviously.
Earth-based fusion remains an elusive dream. At best,
ITER might pave the way for larger reactors sometime in
the future. At worst, it would be a complete bust and
it's back to square one.
>
> Even our resident green-hydrogen wizard William Mook isn't entirely
> without a few good methods of getting us out of this energy and global
> polluting mess, even if his methods requires vast dedicated amounts of
> donated and tax exempt land usage that'll only make his rich and
> powerful ENRON friends a whole lot more rich and powerful (because
> Mook intends to never create a surplus of energy that would only bring
> down the end-use cost of such energy), though never quite as wealthy
> and powerful as the all-knowing lord Mook himself requires.
> . - Brad Guth
How does one create a surplus of electrical energy?
Electrical energy must be immediately consumed.
The thing that bothers me about hydrogen is leakage.
That results in loss of the hydrogen to the atmosphere,
and ultimately to space.
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
/dev/signature: No such file or directory
BradGuth
Why the moon, when Th232 is nearly harmless as spent fuel. 233 and
even radium are easy enough to extract, and otherwise perfectly
valuable to reuse elsewhere.
>
> This pales in comparison with the issues regarding coal
> consumption; coal has thorium nodules in it. Fortunately,
> the resulting fly ash is scrubbed out using special
> scrubbers now. At least, I hope most of it's being
> scrubbed out.
>
> And then there's the miner deaths...
I agree, that most everything about coal is bad news, birth-to-grave
spendy and otherwise lethal as all get out. You don't what to live or
having to work downwind, much less having to work those mines.
>
> U238 is usable in so-called "breeder reactors", producing
> weapons-grade plutonium which can also be used to fuel
> reactors. Such issues have precluded U238's use in
> reactors for many years, and could prove problematic from
> a political standpoint.
U238 is extremely spendy and otherwise good for creating WWIII, WWIV
and so forth, if that's what you want.
>
> Thorium is another kettle of fish. I don't know what
> needs to be done to thorium to extract energy from it.
> Most likely it'll need to be put into a breeder as well.
We've been there, done that, and it works just fine and dandy. No
need to reinvent wheel.
>
> To be fair, the actual mining of uranium does appear to
> be rather poisonous, with the tailings having to be dealt
> with somehow; they're radioactive, obviously.
>
> Earth-based fusion remains an elusive dream. At best,
> ITER might pave the way for larger reactors sometime in
> the future. At worst, it would be a complete bust and
> it's back to square one.
You mean square two, because there's not hardly much sense in
repeating the same old mistakes, unless you're an educated American
that can't deductively think.
>
> > Even our resident green-hydrogen wizard William Mook isn't entirely
> > without a few good methods of getting us out of this energy and global
> > polluting mess, even if his methods requires vast dedicated amounts of
> > donated and tax exempt land usage that'll only make his rich and
> > powerful ENRON friends a whole lot more rich and powerful (because
> > Mook intends to never create a surplus of energy that would only bring
> > down the end-use cost of such energy), though never quite as wealthy
> > and powerful as the all-knowing lord Mook himself requires.
> > . - Brad Guth
>
> How does one create a surplus of electrical energy?
> Electrical energy must be immediately consumed.
You know of only the dark side of such matters.
Surplus, as in the form of liquid and solid forms of energy, as well
as in the form of creating many other essential products and services,
not to mention making most all homes and industry as electrically
powered as possible is far better off than wasting our limited
resource of fossil energy that requires the vast burning of our mostly
N2 atmosphere.
>
> The thing that bothers me about hydrogen is leakage.
> That results in loss of the hydrogen to the atmosphere,
> and ultimately to space.
h2o2 doesn't leak so easily, and it keeps for quite rather nicely some
time.
. - Brad Guth
Pat Flannery
Jeff▲Relf wrote:
> The only problem I see is rage from the pompous, idle, lazy, and lame.
> Mother earth is our landlord,
Excuse me, but wouldn't that be "our landlady"?
Pat
Rand Simberg
Flannery <fla...@daktel.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:
Mother Earth is the ultimate MILF.
Hank Kroll
> On Mar 18, 7:07 am, simberg.interglo...@org.trash (Rand Simberg)
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:12:29 -0600, in a place far, far away, Pat
> > such a way as to indicate that:
>
> > >Jeff▲Relf wrote:
> > >> The only problem I see is rage from the pompous, idle, lazy, and lame.
> > >> Mother earth is our landlord,
>
> > >Excuse me, but wouldn't that be "our landlady"?
>
> > Mother Earth is the ultimate MILF.
>
> over at his fascist blog, he's fucking his own mother like there is no
> tomorrow. But Rand Simberg has his, he's good to go. Screw the rest.
>
> Rand Simberg - Motherfucker.
You gay guys might not want to have your names and e-mails on this
site after Homeland Security gets done reading the following:
--- In EarthLoosingOxygen@ yahoogroups. com, "Brad E. Guth"
<bradguth@.. .> wrote:
>
> "CO2 is a rather heavy gas therefore the majority of it tends to
stay
> below the 3000 foot level and Co2 is plant food. That is why there
is
> a timberline. Trees won't grow above a certain level because there
> isn't enough food."
>
> "Earth already lost most of its atmosphere. To save the planet, stop
> burning things!"
> www.AlaskaPublishin g.com
>
> That's true, as above the tree-line of roughly 10,000' there's
simply
> not all that much detectable CO2 as plant or diatom food. Of
course,
> having a good bluish and violet spectrum worth of penetrating solar
> photons to work with is also extremely important, as is UVa
essential
> to the conversion process that plants and diatoms tend to work their
> best conversion of CO2-->co/o2.
> - Brad Guth
>
THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT
It isn't the Bohemian Grove crowd we have to be afraid of
right now it is the Christian Right led by George Bush seeking to
bring on Armageddon with a False Flag operation.
Notice that whenever I bring up this subject Vendicar is gone
from the web. This means he is either afraid of the repercussions or
a government agent being paid to discredit posts to this site. "His
execute the bush traitor" logo may be a ploy to glean
counterintelligence information. Most people know this stuff anyway.
It all began on August 30 2007 with an attempt to steal a
nuclear-armed B-52 from Minot, North Dakota, AFB. Fortunately the
attempt failed during a stopover or transfer at Barksdale AFB in
Louisiana. The incident was not reported until five days later.
There were six nuclear tipped CRUISE missiles
called, "ARROWS", that left Minot, ND and flew over the US to
Barksdale, LA. From Barksdale they were to be flown to the Middle
East.
Military police at Minot said they loaded LIVE NUKES onto a
transport by accident! This is absolutely impossible because all
missiles and warheads are cataloged and have to be specifically
assembled before transport and each piece is required to have no
fewer than ten signatures. Each piece has to be moved out of storage
with heavy equipment into the open, across a field and onto the
plane. These are nuclear bombs not cases of beer behind 7-11. I fact,
there would be only two people capable of giving the order to
transport nuclear bombs across the US. The first is called ALICE IN
on! Meanwhile earth is loosing its oxygen and nobody cares! It was
26% fifty years ago and we have been loosing 1% of our oxygen every
decade. WWIII will really exacerbate the problem.
www.alaskapublishin g.com
Eric Chomko
wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:12:29 -0600, in a place far, far away, Pat
> such a way as to indicate that:
>
>
>
> >Jeff▲Relf wrote:
> >> The only problem I see is rage from the pompous, idle, lazy, and lame.
> >> Mother earth is our landlord,
>
> >Excuse me, but wouldn't that be "our landlady"?
>
> Mother Earth is the ultimate MILF.
That is a bizarre comment. You abusing your meds again?
Rand Simberg
Eric Chomko <pne.c...@comcast.net> made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:
>On Mar 18, 9:07 am, simberg.interglo...@org.trash (Rand Simberg)
>wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:12:29 -0600, in a place far, far away, Pat
>> Flannery <flan...@daktel.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
>> such a way as to indicate that:
>>
>>
>>
>> >Jeff▲Relf wrote:
>> >> The only problem I see is rage from the pompous, idle, lazy, and lame.
>> >> Mother earth is our landlord,
>>
>> >Excuse me, but wouldn't that be "our landlady"?
>>
>> Mother Earth is the ultimate MILF.
>
>That is a bizarre comment.
It was a joke, you moron.
Eric Chomko
wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:35:50 -0700 (PDT), in a place far, far away,
> glow in such a way as to indicate that:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Mar 18, 9:07 am, simberg.interglo...@org.trash (Rand Simberg)
> >wrote:
> >> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:12:29 -0600, in a place far, far away, Pat
> >> Flannery <flan...@daktel.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
> >> such a way as to indicate that:
>
> >> >Jeff▲Relf wrote:
> >> >> The only problem I see is rage from the pompous, idle, lazy, and lame.
> >> >> Mother earth is our landlord,
>
> >> >Excuse me, but wouldn't that be "our landlady"?
>
> >> Mother Earth is the ultimate MILF.
>
> >That is a bizarre comment.
>
> It was a joke, you moron.
Don't quit your day job as you'll never make it as a comedian. I mean,
that is while trying to be. haha
V-for-Vendicar
"Rand Simberg" <simberg.i...@org.trash> wrote
> Mother Earth is the ultimate MILF.
Odd that Random would like to fuck a 13 billion year old woman.
One wonders what he thinks of his own mother.
V-for-Vendicar
"Rand Simberg" <simberg.i...@org.trash> wrote
> It was a joke, you moron.
Certainly doesnt' look like it Random. How long have you had these
lustful feelings for very, very, very old women?
What do you think about your own mother?
Rand Simberg
"V-for-Vendicar" <Jus...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> made the phosphor
on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
>
>"Rand Simberg" <simberg.i...@org.trash> wrote
>> Mother Earth is the ultimate MILF.
>
> Odd that Random would like to fuck a 13 billion year old woman.
Odd that you really believe that the earth is a woman. Do you believe
that it's flat as well? That theory actually makes more sense.
Was your sense of humor excised at birth, or did that occur later?
Hank Kroll
wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:21:44 -0800, in a place far, far away,
> on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
>
>
>
> >> Mother Earth is the ultimate MILF.
>
> > Odd that Random would like to fuck a 13 billion year old woman.
>
> Odd that you really believe that the earth is a woman. Do you believe
> that it's flat as well? That theory actually makes more sense.
>
> Was your sense of humor excised at birth, or did that occur later?
You gay guys might not want to have you names on this site after
Homeland Security gets done reading what I posted about Bush, the
Christian Right and the nuclear bomb missing inside the US !
V-for-Vendicar
>> Odd that Random would like to fuck a 13 billion year old woman.
"Rand Simberg" <simberg.i...@org.trash> wrote
> Odd that you really believe that the earth is a woman.
Odd that you referred to her as a MILF.
How long have you lusted after old hags Random?
V-for-Vendicar
"Hank Kroll" <Hank...@gmail.com> wrote
> You gay guys might not want to have you names on this site after
> Homeland Security gets done reading what I posted about Bush, the
> Christian Right and the nuclear bomb missing inside the US !
I would select a target in Texas.
V-for-Vendicar
"Hank Kroll" <Hank...@gmail.com> wrote
> The main source of our atmosphere comes from volcanoes
> and most of what comes out is CO2. The magnetosphere is an indicator
> of the activity of the molton material and when it decreases by .05 %
> per year so does Earth's atmosphere and the loss of atmosphere seems
> to be directly propotional. As the earth cools there is less volcanism
> and less Co2 and water released from volcanoes.
MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNN
V-for-Vendicar
"Hank Kroll" <Hank...@gmail.com> wrote
> I am really astounded how few people know where oxygen comes from. You
> would think that somthing so essential to life as oxygen that they
> would pay more attention in school. I am amazed at how few people know
> how the atmosphere is made on Earth. Atmosphere is released over time
> by volcanoes--mostly during periods of peak volcanism. Such volcanism
> blocks sunlight and causes global cooling--that is, unless our Sun
> happens to be near larger stars such as the one we are in orbit around
> that imparts additional light and heat to Earth keeping us our of an
> ice age.
MMMOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNN
V-for-Vendicar
"Hank Kroll" <Hank...@gmail.com> wrote
> We will be living in domes on this planet sooner than you think. Why
> the government behind the prohibition of Co2 release is beyond my
> comprehension--especially with the ongoing oxygen depletion due to
> diatoms dieing in the oceans due to loss of Co2. Heny Kissenger and
> his Bohemian Grove friends will come to the rescue by extermaniting
> 90% of us.
MMMMMMMOOOOOORRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNN
BradGuth
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> "Hank Kroll" <HankKr...@gmail.com> wrote
We see that your 'made in China' keyboard keys are still sticking, and
that you're still too dumb and dumber to realize such.
. - Brad Guth
V-for-Vendicar
"BradGuth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote
> We see that your 'made in China' keyboard keys are still sticking, and
> that you're still too dumb and dumber to realize such.
> . - Brad Guth
MMMMMMMOOOOOORRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNN
V-for-Vendicar
"kT" <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote
> What are the chances that a 13.7 billion year old woman would produce
> Rand Simberg, think about that!
If she is infinately big and fat, the chances are very good. And that
seems to be the case.
BradGuth
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote
See what I mean.
. - BG
BradGuth
> EarthLoosingOxygen · Earth loosing its free oxygen! / by Hank Kroll
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/EarthLoosingOxygen/
>
> This topic of "Earth Losing Oxygen" is just getting started, as being
> related to the loss of Earth's magnetosphere that's failing us by
> roughly -.05%/year, and otherwise it's about those essential
> populations of diatoms as having thinned out at perhaps a much greater
> than ten-fold rate as of just the last century.
>
> Is this sustainable, and if so, for how long?
> . - Brad Guth
Apparently, at least within this Usenet nayism cesspool of their anti-
think-tank and denial, all such things polluting and lethal to life as
we know it are for the mindset of the rich and powerful sustainable
until the very last drop of bloody and radioactive oil, tonne of nasty
and radioactive coal, or cubic meter of radioactive natural gas that's
otherwise wasting 3He as they create as much CO2 and NOx as humanly
possible.
. - Brad Guth
Hank Kroll
> On Mar 12, 6:56 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/EarthLoosingOxygen/
>
> > This topic of "EarthLosingOxygen" is just getting started, as being
> > related to the loss ofEarth'smagnetosphere that's failing us by
> > roughly -.05%/year, and otherwise it's about those essential
> > populations of diatoms as having thinned out at perhaps a much greater
> > than ten-fold rate as of just the last century.
>
> > Is this sustainable, and if so, for how long?
> > . - Brad Guth
>
> Apparently, at least within this Usenet nayism cesspool of their anti-
> think-tank and denial, all such things polluting and lethal to life as
> we know it are for the mindset of the rich and powerful sustainable
> until the very last drop of bloody and radioactive oil, tonne of nasty
> and radioactive coal, or cubic meter of radioactive natural gas that's
> otherwise wasting 3He as they create as much CO2 and NOx as humanly
> possible.
> . - Brad Guth
GREETINGS:
There is no noticable change in the climate here in Kenai, Alaska
either. We had the usual two, two-week cold snaps of -20F and a few
days when the temperature dropped to minus ten and zero. The same goes
for other areas of Alaska.
If you think they are stupid now wait twenty-five years
when the oxygen levels drop to 12%!
You won't be able to change anything without raising human
conscisness. Most people have no idea where air come from in the
first
place and they believe eveything the government-funded and energy
company-funded, scientists tell them without considering that the
propaganda they put forth is money driven. That means they write the
intelligent sounding papers to satisfy the people who pay them.
We are loosing our atmosphere from a high in ancient times
before life got started of 1450 PSI down to less than 14,5 PSI at
sealevel. At the present time most of the air and (CO2) on this
planet
comes out of volcanoes that are melting ancient sheets of limestone
that were laid down prior to the Carboniferous Era.
I have been trying to tell the GW bozoes that CO2 is plant
food and the reason there is a timber line is because trees won't
grow
above a certain level because there isn't enough CO2. I get all kinds
of flack from people like Saul Levi when I comment such basic
knowledge that kids learn in grade school. Anyone who has ever walked
into a fertilizer store know that plants need potash, phosperous and
phosphate to make the leaves green, But, that isn't all. Plants also
need water and CO2. What they don''t seem to get is the plants I am
talking about are diatoms that live in the oceans wich cover 4/5 of
the globe and they are dieing therefore Earth is loosing it's free
oxygen. The fact is the carbon in C02 is the building block of all
life on the planet and it is now down to less than .033% (that is1/3
of 1/10th %). The government is behind the brainwashing in regard to
stopping the human release of Co2 because they can pass laws which
enslave you.
Everything you eat, wear, breathe, heat your home with, the
wood chair you sit on--even the sheetrock on the wall of your house
is
made from CO2 and the government wants to pass laws to prohibiting
the
release of CO2! How stupid can people get to fall for this kind of
garbage?
Free oxygen is released from Co2 by plant growth--mostly in
the oceans by the creatures that make limestone and diatometious
earth. The dead bodies of diatoms are the little creatures that
filter
your drinking water. It is called diatometious earth. Most everyone
know this except the twelv-year-old wheelchair people with no lives
of
their own that read these web posts or government counter-
intelligence
agents who are sent to disrupt them with 14-year-old commentary. That
is why they call them Counter Intelligence. They post garbage with no
intelligence!
Best wishes, Hank Kroll www.alaskapublishing.com
V-for-Vendicar
"BradGuth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote
> See what I mean.
MMMMMMMOOOOOORRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNN
V-for-Vendicar
"Hank Kroll" <Hank...@gmail.com> wrote
> There is no noticable change in the climate here in Kenai, Alaska
> either.
MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNN
Alaska's climate has warmed about 4°F since the 1950's and 7°F in the
interior during winter. The state experienced a 30% average increase in
precipitation between 1968 and 1990. The growing season has lengthened by
two weeks. Sea ice has retreated by 14% since 1978 and thinned by 60% since
the 1960s with widespread effects on marine ecosystems, coastal climate, and
human settlements. Permafrost melting has caused erosion, landslides and
damaged infrastructure in central and southern Alaska. Recent warming has
been accompanied by "unprecedented increases in forest disturbances,
including insect attacks. A sustained infestation of spruce bark beetles,
which in the past have been limited by cold, has caused widespread tree
deaths over 2.3 million acres on the Kenai Peninsula since 1992, the largest
loss to insects ever recorded in North America" (US Global Change Research
Program, National Assessment, 2001).
Hank Kroll
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> "Hank Kroll" <HankKr...@gmail.com> wrote
>
> > We will be living in domes on this planet sooner than you think. Why
> > the government behind the prohibition of Co2 release is beyond my
> > diatoms dieing in the oceans due to loss of Co2. Heny Kissenger and
> > his Bohemian Grove friends will come to the rescue by extermaniting
> > 90% of us.
>
> MMMMMMMOOOOOORRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNN
Government Inteligence is definitely an oxymoron and
Counter Intelligence Agents are just that. Morons sent to disrupt
intelligent discourse.
You counter intelligence agents definitely need a homework assignment.
Open any text book on physics today and you will notice that the mass
of a photon is zero. Any moron knows that photons have some mass
otherwise you wouldn't be able to see anything. The photons reflect
off from objects, pass through the lense in your eye and leave their
mass/energy on the cones and rods in your eye. If photons didn't have
mass you wouldn't feel the infrared photons radiating out of your wood
stove. We know that photons are bent by gravity so they have to have
some kind of mass. There are literally thousands of examples that
photons have mass but the brains on this planet don't get it. My
research team had to search quite a bit to find the mass of a photon.
According to Team Hubbil the mass of a photon is 5.18
E-66 grams and there are 1E100 photons for every atom. When God said,
"Let there be light" he wasn't messing around. Light in all
frequencies is a very prolific particle. The mass of our sun is 2.0E30
grams. If you multiply the mass if a photon by the number of photons
per atom you get 5.18 E34 grams. In other words the mass of the number
of photons per atom is more than the mass of our sun and all the
planets combined.
Multiply this number by the number of atoms in the
Universe by the weight in grams of all the photons and add the weight
of all the 1E 100 atoms + add another 78% for the dark matter then
using Einstein's simple energy conversion formula (E=MC2) determine
how much energy it takes to create a new universe. If you need help
adding or multiplying the numbers such as the speed of light squared,
go on line to my son's million digit calculator. It is capable of
multiplying numbers over three million digits and converting them to
any of 256 number bases but the larger numbers might take a day or
two. It will take you one entire year to write down a number with
31,536,000 digits writing down one per second 24 hours a day.
That web site again is: www.milliondigitcalculator.com
The fight is always over who has the authority to define
the faith. This makes them easily manipulated by profiteers into
extermnating other faiths to secure wealth for the profiteers. The
problem is we have reached a point where the Earth won't stand for any
more profiteering when it comes to burning carbon. Crude oil and coal
use isn't a bad thing when used to make plastics for computers,
clothes and cars and it can be recycled into park benches and other
building material but when burned it uses up our oxygen. Since we have
lost most of the organizms that release free oxygen maybe its time to
start thinking about conserving oxygen.
Large two-solar-mass suns warm four times more space
compared with our sun. When passing within 1/10 light years of Sirius
A & B the temperature on Earth increases 12 to 14 degrees. This shows
up on the Antarctic Ice core graphs. The aditional light input (mostly
in the invisible UV) mops up most of the CO2 in the oceans with plant
growth. If you have studied the data like I have then you would know
this. Sirius B is responsible for most of the free oxygen, coal, oil
and limestone on earth. It took the power of a white dwarf to
penetrate Earth's 1450PSI ancient atmosphere and get life started on
the planet. Prior to that time Earth was in an ice age for over one-
billion years. Check it out! www.alaskapublishing.com
BradGuth
Try to remember that 99.9% of Usenet is from the dark side. In other
words they not only voted for GW Bush but wish the hell they could
keep this warlord next to forever. Many are upset because they lost
their Zionist puppet Hitler before their global domination job was
done.
Proto-Earth at one time was very much Venus like. Earth eventually
cooled off and then proceeded to get itself icy cold, but then also
extra illuminated and thawed out on a regular cosmic cycle that has
nothing whatsoever to do with our passive sun or semi-elliptical orbit
of our passive sun. Gaining a moon is what most likely gave us our
seasonal tilt and substantial internal tidal issues that take place
below the thin crust of this 98.5% fluid Earth.
Sirius A and B are each far more important contributors to our local
planetary and solar system evolution than being given credit by those
in charge of our private parts and most of our hard earned loot.
. - Brad Guth
Hank Kroll
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> "HankKroll" <HankKr...@gmail.com> wrote
I actually agree with most of the figures in your post but it is still
not solid evidence of GW. It may be only a short term phenomenon. We
had one winter when it went to 40-below in 2002. Three winters ago I
picked brocoley in december.
We just came out of an ice age so we can expect some global warming on
the order of what you state above. Until we have accurate data dating
back a couple hundred years we won't know for sure. I do know that we
are in orbit around other stars and we can expect warming when we get
closer because of interacting Kuppier belts and more light input to
Earth.
BradGuth
Have you ever cared about Earth's environment, or the cost of living
(specifically the cost of energy)?
Would you care if road fuel became $10/gallon, and if whole grid
derived electrical energy was $1/kwhr ($1.50/kwhr residential)?
Would you care if milk became $10/gallon, an adult Happy Meal worth
$20?
. - Brad Guth
On Mar 19, 4:53 pm, Saul Levy <saulle...@cox.net> wrote:
> Repeating yourself again, Brad? lmao!
>
> Saul Levy
>
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:31:44 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
BradGuth
As a whole Earth is getting warmer, and because of humans it's getting
more and more CO2 and NOx acidic is simply another good reason why
those diatoms are giving up on us.
Artificially sustaining an extra 50 teratonnes of h2o into the
atmosphere isn't exactly helping, especially when we're also adding
our soot laced with CO2 and NOx just as fast and hard as we can.
Crystal dry NOx or CO2 (like the CO2 on Venus or Mars) is not a
problem . CO2 and water is what becomes a complex issue of life
having to evolve, or else. NOx and water is lethal to most forms of
life that can't manage to adapt their DNA to processing NOx.
Of what optional humans can adapt to isn't the same as what other
essential species can manage. If only the alpha species survives,
then what?
. - Brad Guth
BradGuth
> I thought Hank said that CO2 was DECREASING,Brad? lmao!
>
> You guys should get your stories straightened out! lmao! Both can't
> be happening at the SAME TIME! lmao!
>
> Saul Levy
I didn't get that interpretation. Only a certified bigot like
yourself would.
. - Brad Guth
V-for-Vendicar
"Hank Kroll" <Hank...@gmail.com> wrote
> You counter intelligence agents definitely need a homework assignment.
MMMMMMMOOOOOORRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNN
V-for-Vendicar
"BradGuth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote
> Sirius A and B are each far more important contributors to our local
> planetary and solar system evolution than being given credit by those
> in charge of our private parts and most of our hard earned loot.
> . - Brad Guth
MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNNN
BradGuth
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote
Dear, MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNNN
. - Brad Guth
V-for-Vendicar
"Hank Kroll" <Hank...@gmail.com> wrote
> > > There is no noticable change in the climate here in Kenai, Alaska
> > > either.
> > Alaska's climate has warmed about 4°F since the 1950's and 7°F in the
> > interior during winter. The state experienced a 30% average increase in
> > precipitation between 1968 and 1990.
"Hank Kroll" <Hank...@gmail.com> wrote
> I actually agree with most of the figures in your post but it is still
> not solid evidence of GW.
MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNN
BradGuth
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> "Hank Kroll" <HankKr...@gmail.com> wrote
>
> > > > There is no noticable change in the climate here in Kenai, Alaska
> > > > either.
> > > Alaska's climate has warmed about 4°F since the 1950's and 7°F in the
> > > interior during winter. The state experienced a 30% average increase in
> > > precipitation between 1968 and 1990.
>
>
> > I actually agree with most of the figures in your post but it is still
> > not solid evidence of GW.
>
> MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNN
And here we'd thought the Third Reich was dead and gone, then comes
along V-for-Vendicar.
I actually agree with GW, just that it's not entirely AGW, and thereby
I'm not with any silly notions that we haven't an ongoing
environmental fiasco of a nasty situation going on. Hank Kroll also
agrees that GW is quite real, as obviously we would not still be
thawing out from from the last ice-age this planet w/moon is ever
going to see, unless GW wasn't a firm matter of fact.
We humans are contributing perhaps as little as 10%, though possibly
as much as 25% to this GW+AGW situation, that's only going to get a
whole lot worse for centuries to come (at least up until we badly
manage to burn and/or kill ourselves out of spendy and lethal fossil
fuels).
Hank Kroll, Willie.Moo(aka William Mook), Warren Buffett and myself
among others have had multiple solutions at hand, whereas the likes of
yourself, your resident warlord(GW Bush), ENRON and ExxonMobile are
apparently not willing to share upon one good notion that woud
potentially cut into any of their tax-avoidance offshore bank
accounts. Why is that?
. - Brad Guth
V-for-Vendicar
"BradGuth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote
Would you care if milk became $10/gallon, an adult Happy Meal worth
$20?
U.S. food prices are already up 10 percent this year, and expected to climb
by a similar amount over the coming year.
So long Suckers......
BradGuth
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote
In many other nations, it seems we've caused their food and energy
cost to having exceeded 100% inflation in just the last year, and
since we get so much of our food, energy and consumer goods imported,
go figure as to what this next year is going to bring our adult happy
meal closer to that $20 mark, as well as fuel closer to $10/gallon,
with global crude, coal and natural gass going through the roof along
with whatever nuclear alternatives becoming spendy and still at best
another decade away from their getting on-line.
Nearly half of our old oil refineries are either out of commission or
operating at far less than full capacity, thus imported refined fuel
is yet another spendy alternative we'll get to pay for. Canada,
Mexico and even Russia should thank our resident LLPOF warlord(GW
Bush), if they haven't already.
. - Brad Guth
BradGuth
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/EarthLoosingOxygen/
>
> This topic of "Earth Losing Oxygen" is just getting started, as being
> related to the loss of Earth's magnetosphere that's failing us by
> roughly -.05%/year, and otherwise it's about those essential
> populations of diatoms as having thinned out at perhaps a much greater
> than ten-fold rate as of just the last century.
>
> Is this sustainable, and if so, for how long?
> . - Brad Guth
Earth is in fact losing its O2, as well as having been losing its grip
upon the likes of He, H and of most everything else that's lighter
than our polluted and physically thin air, compounded along by the
matter of Earth's magnetosphere failing us by roughly -.05%/year.
What's left is the heavier CO2 and NOx that our failing populations of
diatoms don't exactly much care for, especially when there's less
solar blue and violet spectrum to work with, and our oceans are
turning warmer as well as into highly acidic and vast dead-zones of
mostly jellyfish habitats.
. - Brad Guth
V-for-Vendicar
"BradGuth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote
> Earth is in fact losing its O2,
MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNN
BradGuth
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote
>
> > Earth is in fact losing its O2,
>
> MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNN
Boy! are you good at this stuff, or what. You must be one of those
smart 5th graders we keep hearing about.
. - BG
V-for-Vendicar
"BradGuth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote
> Boy! are you good at this stuff, or what. You must be one of those
> smart 5th graders we keep hearing about.
Keep wanking...
MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNN
BradGuth
<Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote:
> "BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote
Whatever makes you a happy camper.
. - Brad Guth
V-for-Vendicar
"BradGuth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote
> Whatever makes you a happy camper.
MMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNN
BradGuth
> EarthLoosingOxygen · Earth loosing its free oxygen! / by Hank Kroll
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/EarthLoosingOxygen/
>
> This topic of "Earth Losing Oxygen" is just getting started, as being
> related to the loss of Earth's magnetosphere that's failing us by
> roughly -.05%/year, and otherwise it's about those essential
> populations of diatoms as having thinned out at perhaps a much greater
> than ten-fold rate as of just the last century.
>
> Is this sustainable, and if so, for how long?
> . - Brad Guth
Notice how "V-for-Vendicar" isn't quite as smart as a 5th grader, but
then we should give the poor bastard an "A" for such a good effort.
. - Brad Guth
V-for-Vendicar
"BradGuth" <brad...@gmail.com> wrote
> Notice how "V-for-Vendicar" isn't quite as smart as a 5th grader, but
> then we should give the poor bastard an "A" for such a good effort.
Gosh, I haven't been as smart as a 5th grader since pre-school.
When I was in 5th grade one of my interests concerned the use of
radioactive materials - beta emitters - for use in constucting atomic
batteries.
How about you Brad. Did you have a leaf collection or something?