Re: New Essay On Space Policy
Brad Guth
news:4144cc42...@news.west.earthlink.net
> I've have a long essay in this quarter's issue of The New Atlantis, in
> which I discuss the myths of the old space age.
>
> http://www.thenewatlantis.com/archive/6/simberg.htm
How about including an update as to sharing the new and improved space
policy that way more than sucks and blows?
As per usual, we're seeing more and more of the usual "Mailgate: Message
not accessible", as clear indications of their focused Usenet's intent,
as to stealth moderate on behalf of protecting their almighty
NASA/Apollo butts. In fact, most anytime you see their "Mailgate:
Message not accessible" as perhaps robo-posted within the Mailgate.org
index is another clear indication of what's intended to butt-suck up to
protecting most anything that's MI/NSA, especially when they force the
number of available replies down to the count of just having one. Of
course the unregistered public doesn't even get to review much of
anything, and hardly of whatever's most current.
Sadly, these silly if not pathetic folks (such as "Peter Webb" and
others of his/her kind) of NASA's Usenet damage-control land of spewing
continual disinformation and infomercial hypology, of their cloak and
dagger mindset of borg like MIB spooks, moles and clowns having such
hocus-pocus conditional physics, and of their evidence exclusion at
their disposal, as such are more than a little deathly afraid of any
kind of potentially anti-NASA/Apollo question. I'm sure the same can be
said of anyone within the USSR/Russian cult that's playing right along
with our mutually perpetrated cold-war games.
A green laser hit every 3 seconds is simply more than good enough,
especially when accomplished via earthshine, such as an hours worth =
1200 such illuminating hits, and that number of millisecond/shot of such
photon efficient illuminating hits can be doubled to 2400/hr if need be.
Unlike yourself, I can think of all sorts of perfectly honest and
perhaps somewhat new and improved methods of optically and thus CCD or
even good old film image recording a good sized frame on behalf of such
an accomplishment.
Therefore, KECK along with those soft-modifications that I'd previously
provided would in fact allow as good as a meter/pixel resolution, of
which this is clearly more than enough results since even via a solf 200
m/pixel alternative is also perfectly sufficient, though obviously at
200 m/pixel is without providing any reflective item per item details.
In spite of all the officially infomercial spewed crapolla that's
continually flowing up NASA's all-or-nothing hill, it has been
technically and thus entirely possible for more than a couple decades,
as for the rest of us village idiots once and for all to see the fuzzy
remains of whatever if anything was NASA/Apollo, although such impact
deployments are simply not going to leave all that much of any sizable
items within their debris field, just a few nifty artificial craters of
perhaps 100+ meters in diameter (more than good enough for getting a
laser reflection from).
BTW; there's also other intelligent life, that's obviously way smarter
than us, existing/coexisting on Venus.
-
Earth may in fact be a rare and unique planet (it's certainly by far the
most dumbfounded planet) along with having an even more than rare moon,
but nearby Venus is by far a whole lot more interesting, along with raw
energy potential to burn (sort of speak). Too bad we're not the least
bit smart enough to realize the wealth of such a terrific and newish
planetology that's so nearby.
While Mars is fully capable of freezing your nuts off, Venus L2 is in
fact humanly cool enough to the naked touch. However, Venus itself is
not the least bit too hot to touch with the Ovglove. That is as long as
you don't run yourself out of ice cold beer and pizza, in that I really
don't see all that much of a problem unless it's because of your head
that's still stuck up your evidence excluding ass.
As long as you've got way more spare/renewable energy at your disposal,
more than you could possibly know what to do with, and by having that
nifty thermal suit made by Ovglove, where's the big-ass insurmountable
problem with taking that hot-foot of a toasty stroll on Venus?
CO2-->CO/O2 is not hardly a technical problem, hasn't been for a good
decade or more.
Pure H2O (as many teratonnes worth as you'd like) as easily extracted
from those somewhat cool nighttime acidic clouds (above the S8 layer) is
simply another mission positive win-win for making more ice cold beer or
the likes of h2o2.
The 65 kg/m3 worth of buoyancy as also working right along with the
90.5% gravity (makes it worthy of 72 kg/m3), offering a couple of other
nifty factors that'll work rather well for your composite rigid airship
(just like on behalf of those Venusian composite rigid airships).
If you're any damn good at PhotoShop, goto:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
or perhaps it's best you start with your very own look-see at the
following official image site:
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif
The 36 look per pixel of that primary GIF image format starts getting
downright interesting at being 3X resampled, and then giving it all the
best PhotoShop or whatever else you can muster, although the original
GIF 1:1 image was actually good enough for my PhotoShop configured brain
to deductively interpret upon what's most likely artificial as opposed
to what's perfectly natural. 36 looks per pixel is offering a lot of
truthworthy image data to start with, so it's a good one to stick with
rather than dealing with their individual 75 meter/pixel versions as
having combined but four looks per pixel.
Don't even try to process the entire image unless you've got one heck of
a nifty PC or MAC. Try cropping out the small portion of the total
image that's roughly a third up from the bottom and just to the right of
center, as we're talking about utilizing less than 10% or perhaps even
as little as 5% from that primary GIF image, and to process upon just
that much shouldn't traumatise your limited memory or lower performance
PC or MAC.
I'll honestly review each of your results, that by rights should become
a whole lot better than mine. Obviously anyone can over/under force
those PhotoShop refinements, well past the point of no return, so don't
do that. My extremely old version of PhotoShop can't hardly accomplish
much better than 8X resampling without losing ground, and besides, we
don't actually require much better than 6X for most others to see
clearly as to what I'd first interpreted from the original 1:1 format.
Thanks once again to 'tomcat' for also having posted this updated page
of Venus images.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/thumbnail_pages/venus_thumbnails.html
It's image No.17 from the top left being the one that so happens to
include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex community of
'GUTH Venus'.
"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif
-
Brad Guth
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG