we did not go to the moon.got it?.
hun...@hotmail.co.uk
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2265515730495966561&q=moon
wakey wakey
hun...@hotmail.co.uk
Secr...@verizon.net
Go to hell ... got it ??
Orval Fairbairn
hun...@hotmail.co.uk smoked a bunch of dope, wet his bed, kicked the
dog, ate a bunch of boogers and pecked out:
> another documentry that rips the official nasa story to shreds.
>
>
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2265515730495966561&q=moon
>
>
> wakey wakey
WHOOP! WHOOP! WHOOP! WHOOP! Bullshit Detector Overload!
hun...@hotmail.co.uk
together
but if you want the truth that shouldn't be a problem.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1913474363747128107&q=illuminati
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2265515730495966561&q=moon
Orval Fairbairn
hun...@hotmail.co.uk wet the bed, smoked some dope, swallowed a bunch
of boogers, barked at the moon and pecked out:
The truth is -- the videos are chock full of errors. The "experts"
quoted have demonstrated no apparent expertise!
For instance: the narrator makes a lot of fuss over the American flag
waving "in the wind." Of course, there is no wind on the moon! But, if
you look at the hands of the astronaut handling the flag, you can see
that he is rotating the flagstaff, causing it to wave. The flag was
starched and had a top spar holding it out, but it was otherwise loose
at the bottom. Hence, when the staff was rotated, the flag would lag the
rotation of the staff and appear to "wave in the wind."
Another: "Why was there no crater under the lander?" The lander landed
on a rock face, where there was very little dust cover -- hence no
crater!
Yet another: The narrator quotes "experts," who, in 1959, claimed very
low probability of success for men to return from the moon. The entire
Apollo Program didn't come along until 1961 or 1962! I remember, also,
"experts" who thought that the moon was covered in hundreds of feet of
dust, into which an astronaut would sing and never be seen again.
In short, I had to erect a containment field to keep the bovine fecal
matter from overwhelming everything!
hun...@hotmail.co.uk
errors.
look at the astronauts when questioned,their reactions speak volumes.
how do you explain the transfer of earth placed over the window to
convince us
the astronauts were 150 000 miles from earth,when really they were in
earths orbit.
these videos explain it all.
3 hours in all.But if you want to know the truth its worth it.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1913474363747128107&q=illuminati
part one
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5737681932896358451&q=illuminati
part two
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2265515730495966561&q=moon
astronauts interviewed
hun...@hotmail.co.uk
surfdu...@yahoo.com
can not bring myself to understand how the gene pool still brings these
idiots to the world.
Next they are going to tell me that Tony didn't find that bottle on the
beach, (LOL)!
Carl
P.S.
That hardware on display and the fact that I witnessed all the liftoffs
is enough for me, (and the rest of the population of Coco Beach)!
hun...@hotmail.co.uk
> P.S.
> That hardware on display and the fact that I witnessed all the liftoffs
> is enough for me, (and the rest of the population of Coco Beach)!
good argument.i'm convinced now.
all that evidence against it was getting me worried for a while.But
seeing as
you saw the lift off i can rest at ease.
salmo...@aol.com
> beach, (LOL)!
Take a look at this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_astronauts_by_name
Notice the lack of Anthony Nelson on this list. Notice that Roger
Healey is mysteriously missing as well. And I *saw* those guys in their
capsule. Something fishy is going on.
Pat Flannery
surfdu...@yahoo.com wrote:
>Can someone mod this group to avoid all this mystery machine stuff. I
>can not bring myself to understand how the gene pool still brings these
>idiots to the world.
>
>
Sci.space.history is unmoderated, which does mean we get whackos, but
also means that the thread can move in bizarre and fascinating
directions such as the epic description of the history of railway track
gauges, or the subtle nuances of evacuation procedures from the Sperry
Ball Turret.
There is sci.space.moderated, but it's about as interesting as day old
bread, and I doubt that many of its readers can even quote the entirety
of "Monty Python And The Holy Grail" like this groups readers can.
Ni.
Pat
surfdu...@yahoo.com
public.
I checked out the link to the Astronauts list! That person was right
Tony and Rodger are missing from the list! It must be a plot! You know
I always watched for the belly button shot that never came, Damn!
(LOL)!
Sue Ya!, (LOL)!
Carl
hun...@hotmail.co.uk
it appears we were lied to.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1913474363747128107&q=illuminati
part one
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5737681932896358451&q=illumi...
JGDeRuvo
hun...@hotmail.co.uk
part one
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5737681932896358451&q=illumi...
part two
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2265515730495966561&q=moon
astronauts interviewed
all the evidence you need.is there
i like the glint on the wires holding them up
the amazing self standing astronaut and the footage
catching them placing a transfer of earth over the window
and claiming to be 150 000 miles from earth.classic
your link didnt seem to address these issues.
also interesting to note astronauts behaviour when under pressure.
anyone with an ounce of perceptivness can see there lying.
Brad Guth
Skull and Bones) doesn't have to accept whatever's of actual
hard-science that's easily replicated, nor do they have to use the
regular laws of physics, any more so than having to base anything upon
your evidence or the better interpretations of whatever NASA/Apollo
evidence. If need be, they'll simply exclude whatever evidence rocks
their boat, and otherwise just as soon invent WMD, so that they can
justify summarily nuking your sorry butt, and then some.
Would you folks like to know what else they screwed up on?
-
Brad Guth
Secr...@verizon.net
hun...@hotmail.co.uk
Brad Guth wrote:
> The mainstream status quo of our NASA/Apollo rusemasters cult (aka
> Skull and Bones) doesn't have to accept whatever's of actual
> hard-science that's easily replicated, nor do they have to use the
> regular laws of physics, any more so than having to base anything upon
> your evidence or the better interpretations of whatever NASA/Apollo
> evidence. If need be, they'll simply exclude whatever evidence rocks
> their boat, and otherwise just as soon invent WMD, so that they can
> justify summarily nuking your sorry butt, and then some.
>
> Would you folks like to know what else they screwed up on?
> -
> Brad Guth
was everyone aware of kerry and bush's skull and bones connection
at the last election?
should of sent some alarm bells off.
Brad Guth
nicely avoided via a good deal of infomercial applied disinformation,
and of well orchestrated wag-thy-dog tactics, and/or having been nicely
$$$ sequestered away from getting too much into the mainstream media.
Unfortunately, there were previous members of our Skull and Bones that
emerged out of their Third Reich migration into the primary country
that had knowingly banked on their behalf, of having accommodated the
bulk of their Jewish loot and whatever other taken wealth, thus it
wasn't just the really bad guys that we'd protected, but also a fair
number of their collaborating Jewish minions that also didn't want to
get left behind, especially when the bulk of their own taken loot, as
perhaps by some stretch of the imagination borrowed from their very own
kind, was now extensively held within the very same corrupt American
banking system (apparently not all Jews were the son of God).
Much of our NASA/Apollo ruse is essentially religious based
infomercial-science, and most of that religious influence had been and
still is Jewish and Third Reich formulated at that.
-
Brad Guth
surfdu...@yahoo.com
old are you? (10?)? Yes there is a conspiracy, (no, you do not
understand it)! I have been in and out of the industries surrounding
the cape for many years. I have no doubt that the only lies that need
to be research are related to the MOL, and Blue Gemini programs. Now
take your thumb out of your mouth and type with both hands, (i.e., do
some real research, not this fantasy, they lied to us shit). The Air
Base at the Cape is the Real Dreamland, that needs to Awaken, to public
light. Do real research, or get a paper route, and quit playing with
your dads computer!
Carl
P.S.
Give me your mailing address and I'll send you a box of non-toxic
crayons!
hun...@hotmail.co.uk
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a15/a15v_1244753.mov
D. Scott Ferrin
wrote:
You did a post once on thread drift and moon ownership, Nazis,
Indians, you name it. I had to save it it was a classic :-)
Secr...@verizon.net
hun...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
> good argument.i'm convinced now.
> all that evidence against it was getting me worried for a while.But
> seeing as you saw the lift off i can rest at ease.>>
Good to see that you've come around cause we really did get there and
back within the time frame spelled out by Kennedy.
Thank you for your inspiration Mr. President.
Secr...@verizon.net
we did send humans to the Moon rather than being dead set against the
idea. I have been open and I have looked into the hoax theories and I
have not been convinced.
I see no evidence of Xenon lighting. Sure I see a flag moving, but
only when someone is holding the pole that it's attached to, never
any other time.
I know photography well enough to know that you cannot expose faint
stars in the same field as objects lit with full sunlight. I am not
convinced that the lack of stars in the photos is proof that we did not
go. I think the lack of stars is proof that we did go. I have heard
the people that are most outspoken about a hoax and I'm just not
convinced that they are credible. I know who Brian O'Leary is,
I've read his book ... have you ?? He was never a pilot, he is the
least credible of all astronauts, he left after 6 months and he never
flew in space ... and this is your source of proof that we did not go
?? I am not convinced.
Fist lines of chapter 18 reads as follows:
"Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin set foot on the moon a little more
than one year after I left the astronaut program."
He goes on to say how he regrets leaving NASA (on the same page ...
#205) He describes the problems of Apollo 8's orbit. (Mascons) and
there is NOTHING in there about any moon hoax; O'Leary believes we
went to the moon. You people are clearly seeing things only the way
you want to see them, you should be more open minded.
Bill Kaysing received a Bachelor of Arts in English in 1949 from USC,
he was not an engineer. He worked for Rocketdyne as a cataloger of
their technical publications and he left Rocketdyne in 1963 .... This
is not a good source. Why can't you get better sources of
information ?? Like from James Webb or Chris Kraft, Gene Kranz or Tom
Kelly ??
You can't because they all think you are nuts for believing that we
didn't go.
Brad Guth
>expose faint stars in the same field as objects lit with full sunlight.
you're nothing but another born-again liar because, a good couple of
dozen items besides that of our Earth should have been easily and/or
unavoidably recorded within any number of such images (obviously not
all at the same time), and of that video camera having it's multiple
fold better DR than film is only adding further proof-positive that
you're nothing but another God damn liar of the worse possible kind.
>I see no evidence of Xenon lighting. Sure I see a flag moving, but
>only when someone is holding the pole that it's attached to, never
>any other time.
More proof-positive that you're another incest cloned pagan butt ass
liar, that which most any damn village idiot can otherwise prove those
unfiltered Kodak moments were those of anything but the raw solar
illuminated environment.
>Why can't you get better sources of information ??
>Like from James Webb or Chris Kraft, Gene Kranz or Tom
>Kelly ??
Why not directly from Kodak corporate, or from damn near most any old
camera toting fart that uses optical spectrum filters on a regular
basis in order to diminish the excessive amounts of near-UV plus a good
UV-a cut-off as needed right here upon good mother Earth, that is
unless such things are being nicely xenon lamp spectrum illuminated
instead of by that of our near-UV and UV-a terrestrial saturated
daylight that isn't even a tenth as bad off as would have been for
those raw solar illuminated EVA Kodak moments. In fact, and according
to NASA's own infomercial-science, any such moon environment of the
UV-a spectrum is offering a good 64 fold worse off, and the unfiltered
Kodak film is in fact sensitive to a sufficient portion of that UV-a
spectrum.
Would you naysay folks like to see what the blue within each of our
flags should have recorded like, especially if having been photographed
via unfiltered optics and having that amount of extra UV energy/m2 to
deal with?
Would you also like to see a few examples of whatever's photographed
via UV black-light that's of no where nearly as intense of UV
energy/m2, that'll unavoidably create a nifty secondary/recoil spectrum
worth of those near-blue photons?
BTW; obviously you and those of your all-knowing pagan naysay mindset,
of NASA's buttology infomercial-science on a stick, didn't bother take
notice of the speed or velocity of falling on a 1/6th gravity moon,
whereas that unusually thin and relatively clean as well as static free
layer of such supposedly clumping moon-dust or whatever of such light
colored debris that came along for the ride, as picked up with and
subsequently fell off the item as it was being picked up (just prior to
it's being tossed), whereas frame by frame is where oddly that moon
stuff hit the deck from roughly one meter within a 10th of a second,
instead of the 0.6 second that it should have taken.
-
Brad Guth
Pat Flannery
D. Scott Ferrin wrote:
>
>You did a post once on thread drift and moon ownership, Nazis,
>Indians, you name it. I had to save it it was a classic :-)
>
>
(Cut to image of myself cleaning up empty beer bottles after I roll out
of bed around 3 PM)
"I wrote _what_?" :-)
Pat
D. Scott Ferrin
wrote:
>
>
From: Pat Flannery <fla...@daktel.com>
Newsgroups: sci.space.history
Subject: The "Buy Land on the Moon" thread.
Is it just me, or is this one the all-time winner thread for topic
drift?
Let's review it in a "Reader's Digest" form:
It starts off with the sale of land on the Moon.
Instantly, it moves over to slavery.
Then the Indians arrive for Thanksgiving.
Next, the Pilgrims have to decide whether they are commies or
capitalists.
Then Great Britain has to answer for helping the slave-owning South
during the unpleasantness of 1861-65.
To our surprise, we find out that the Baby Mithra was born on
Christmas day.
Meanwhile, back at Plymouth, John Alden and Miles Standish are
squabbling.
Everyone wonders: "Can I still buy a slave somewhere?"
...The Nazis used slaves, you know....
...As do Commies....
But not the Czar after 1861.
Indians are "Native Americans".
No, they aren't.
Oh yes they are.
"I know more Indians than you do!"
"Yeah, well I know more Native Americans than you do!"
Military conscription is a form of slavery....
As is working in a low wage factory....
Oh no, it's not...
Manzanar was a slave camp.
Oh no, it wasn't.
The Saudi's had slaves until 1967...go figure.
There are no dead on the Moon.
The draft is slavery.
Cherokees owned land; and they aren't even Arabs.
How much Native American blood must you have before you are an Indian?
How much before you get the Death Penalty in: Afghanistan, Algeria,
Antigua And Barbuda, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus,
Belize, Benin, Botswana, Burundi, Cameroon, Chad, China, Comoros,
Congo
(Democratic Republic), Cuba, Dominica, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea,
Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana, India,
Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakstan, Kenya, Korea
(North), Korea (South), Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon, Lesotho,
Liberia, Libya, Malawi, Malaysia, Mauritania, Mongolia, Morocco,
Myanmar, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Palestinian Authority, Philippines,
Qatar, Rwanda, Saint Christopher & Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent &
Grenadines, Saudi Arabia, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Somalia, Sudan,
Swaziland, Syria, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Trinidad And
Tobago, Tunisia, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Viet Nam,
Yemen, Zambia and Zimbabwe?
If you say: "Wakarimashita. Arigatou, to oyasuminasai" do you get put
in
an internment camp? How about a reservation?
Eugene Shoemaker owns the Moon.
It is legal to not only know, but to marry, an American Indian.
Thomas Jefferson owned slaves. But not as far as is known, Indians; As
they would not have recognized his right of ownership, unless they
were
Cherokees, and living on land he bought...
Those advanced Indian civilizations of Southwestern America could have
kicked ass if they hadn't all gotten sick with the Spanish Flu.
How many Indians were there in America prior to them getting the
Spanish
Flu?
Who knows?
"White Man STEAL Indian Land!"
The Draft is slavery.
Oh no it's not.
People may be sold like cattle, but according to the North Koreans,
don't taste as good.
The Draft is Slavery
Oh no it's not.
There is actually a town named Puyallup.
When did the South's slaves achieve freedom?
Depends who you ask; and where...
Eli Whitney was responsible for the Civil War.
You have no idea how many Indians I've met.
The Confederates lost the Civil War.
It wasn't a Civil War.
Australians kept British children as both slaves and exotic pets.
The Teamsters were responsible for the Civil....er...that war.
The Holiday of Thanksgiving memorializes the Civil...er... that war.
The Southern slaves had no G.I. Bill.
If you go to college, you will not be drafted; hence you will not get
the G.I. Bill's benefits that will allow you to go to college; but
your
chances of stepping on a landmine while attending college are far
less.
Although military service may be a form of slavery, if your teeth are
shot out during combat you will be indentured.
Slaves still called there boss "Massa" after the civil war, as they
assumed he came from Stockholm, Sweden.
Native Americans are diverse; in the North some live in igloos and eat
seals; in the Southwest some live in cliff dwellings and eat Indians.
Texas is still at war with the Union...they are advancing, and have
now
taken the White House through "Treachery and Bloodshed."
There were U.S. Marines before there was a U.S.
Slaves were responsible for the War Of Southern Aggression.
Would Irish immigrants have made good slaves?
Depends on whether you gave them the Red Pill or the Blue pill for
their
hangovers.
Would Germans have made good slaves?
Ask Adolph, he thought so.
According to the U.S. Census, Czechs may be Indians.
Ships were responsible for the war of Northern Aggression.
No, the Pilgrims were.
If your are conscious, you can go to college, and not be drafted.
"Dictionaries? We don't need no stinkin' dictionaries!"
If A=B, and AB=C, then A+B+C= A Native American Algebra teacher that
I've met.
The Southern states used many different railway track gauges...Oh
God....here we go again...
I can see clearly now that we are all both Native Americans...and
Indians.
After having dinner with the Pilgrims, many Indians came down with a
case of Manifest Dysentery.
The Air Force used to be part of the Army (how the hell did that get
in
here?)
There was a U.S. Army before there was a U.S.
There was a U.S. Army Air Corps before there were airplanes.
The population of Native Americans in casinos alone exceeds the total
number that were here before Columbus.
No it doesn't.
Wanna bet on it?
Never drink Tang and Vodka...especially in a casino.
Someone has married a seven year old girl...
This is only arguably legal according to Norman French law.
As is having a child who is older than you are.
Webster's dictionary pointed out that "phant'sies" is no way to spell
"Fantasies" unless you are trying to show off.
It's possible to legally adopt adult women.
... And keep them as exotic pets...
When there is no more war, then war will have stopped.
The U.S. wiped out the Inca's after they came down with Manifest
Dysentery.
Although Robert E. Lee's horse had a name, Lee didn't know how to
spell
it... except that it sure as hell wasn't "Phant'sies".
Considering what total percentage of nuts by variety and weight get
imported to the U.S.; is a xenophobic nutcase ever going to feel
completely safe eating a handful of them?
Do you have Full Faith in the Credit Clause? How about the Santa
Claus?
The Commemorative Air Force are a bunch of wussies.
94% of everything is crap...most of it the end result of Manifest
Dysentery.
Sturgeon, Silverberg, Native American, Indian, Slave, Draftee, Air
Corps, Air Force... SH-E-E-E-S-H!
Colorblind, Gay...Oh-oh... here we go...
"I know more gays than you do!"
"Yeah, well I know more homosexuals than you do!"
There are more homosexuals alive today than when Columbus arrived.
Gays were responsible for the Civil war.
That's the War Of Heterosexual aggression.
Two gays can raise a child every bit as well as two straights.
Isn't the kid going to think it's a little strange that they have two
fathers?
One can dress as a woman.
Mom pees standing up?
Mom has to...mom has an enlarged clitoris.
Where did the kid come from anyway?
They adopted it.
Was it older than them?
No, that would be immoral.
Under Norman French law?
No- if the child was colorblind and Native American...that would make
it
slavery.
In the United States?
No, on the Moon; where the child owns land.
If the child is Native American, how can he own land?
He's a Cherokee. Cherokee People, Cherokee Pride, Cherokee own
regolith
on the farside.
But Gene Shoemaker owns the Moon.
"WHITE MAN STEAL INDIAN MOON!"
And I think that's about where it stands at the moment...
Pat
Pat Flannery
D. Scott Ferrin wrote:
>
>
>From: Pat Flannery <fla...@daktel.com>
>Newsgroups: sci.space.history
>Subject: The "Buy Land on the Moon" thread.
>
>
Oh, _that_ one! I recognize my child now. Yeah, I always thought that
was fun also. :-)
Pat
Brad Guth
Just going by their artificial XENON lamp spectrum of what those
UNFILTERED Kodak moments had recorded is offering us honest folks more
than sufficient proof-positive of such images not having been exposed
to the raw solar spectrum, not to mention the total lack of any
double-IR impact or having recorded any worth of cosmic and solar
radiation influx, much less yet for such film that was near-blue,
near-UV and even a bit UV-a sensitive as having been totally unaffected
by all of the local gamma and unavoidable hard-X-rays, or even from the
UV-a/blacklight worth of secondary/recoil photons worth of near-blue
that should have been vibrant off the flag white, more so off those
extra white moonsuits and having given the flag blue a somewhat
fluorescent illuminated look as a super-bright and/or over-saturated
blue via color film and offering a light gray to nearly white look as
of recorded by their equally unfiltered B&W film. End of freaking
argument, as in case summarily closed, and absolutely nowhere for all
of those absolutely pagan liars and status quo rusemasters of our
perpetrated cold-war to hide their remorseless LLPOF butts.
Moon cameras would have needed considerable shielding, extra thick
leaded glass lenses and having a good deal of applied spectrum
filtration (especially via the raw solar spectrum) on top of all that.
I'd also have to insist upon their EVAs taking advantage of only
earthshine unless it were a one way ticket to ride. Human DNA simply
isn't rad-hard, and at best there are limits even if having a
substantial cash of banked bone marrow back home.
At best they likely managed a short mission turn-around within L-1
(roughly 60,000 km away from the physically dark and nasty surface of
our moon), though even that effort should have been damn freaking nasty
to their DNA. Of whatever orbited and subsequently impacted the moon
was, as having been accomplished before, robotic and therefore wasn't
at all of we've been informed, nor hardly of what we've paid for, and
paid for and will most likely pay even more dearly for because of what
these absolute Skull and Bones perverts and Christ on a stick bastards
have done and gotten away with for all of these decades. Fortunately
it's not quite as bad off as for their kind getting Jesus Christ on a
stick, and then lying about their ancestors (AKA kin folk) not ever
having anything whatsoever to do with such, but it's certainly running
a close second.
Does it get any worse off; you bet it does.
Could a one-way ticket to ride have deployed science instruments. Of
course that's still a viable possibility, at least better off than most
anything fly-by-rocket of AI/robotics could have managed way back in
the mid 70's.
-
Brad Guth