Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Dietary ethics
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
d...@.  
View profile  
 More options Nov 14 2012, 3:08 pm
Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, alt.food.vegan, alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, sci.skeptic
From: dh@.
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:08:35 -0500
Local: Wed, Nov 14 2012 3:08 pm
Subject: Re: Dietary ethics

On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:06:03 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:51:33 -0500, the following appeared
>in sci.skeptic, posted by dh@.:

>>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:06:44 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:

>>>No response?

>>    Keep trying to find some example(s) of someone explaining what prevents any
>>and every creature from benefitting from its life. Unless you can do that it
>>will remain clear that it has not been done and probably never will be.

>This has been explained multiple times.

    It remains clear that it has not been done and probably never will be.

>Nothing is needed
>for prevention since life alone confers no benefit.

    How do you think you'll be able to continue benefitting from anything after
you lose the benefit of life?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.