Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Kent "Dogeater" Wills: An Analysis.
89 views
Skip to first unread message
yumhuyk
Sep 24, 2012, 9:19:56 PM9/24/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
Kent Wills has claimed the following:
To have waited for hours at a dangerous intersection deep in the
south
side ghetto of Chicago.
To have Polynesian friends.
To have ancestry including but not limited to Gypsie, Laplander,
Injun, Jew, Andaman and San.
To have performed a "voice analysis test" between Moe and some person
on youtube which showed a "4% match"
To have eaten a dog in order to join an Injun cult.
To have eaten a whale.
To not have broken into Bob Larson's garage.
Conclusion: Kent is batshit insane, or a pathological liar, or
troll. Probably all three. Avoid.
yours in Christ,
isamu
To have waited for hours at a dangerous intersection deep in the
south
side ghetto of Chicago.
To have Polynesian friends.
To have ancestry including but not limited to Gypsie, Laplander,
Injun, Jew, Andaman and San.
To have performed a "voice analysis test" between Moe and some person
on youtube which showed a "4% match"
To have eaten a dog in order to join an Injun cult.
To have eaten a whale.
To not have broken into Bob Larson's garage.
Conclusion: Kent is batshit insane, or a pathological liar, or
troll. Probably all three. Avoid.
yours in Christ,
isamu
Fred Hall
Sep 24, 2012, 10:00:33 PM9/24/12
to
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:56 -0700 (PDT), yumhuyk
<wost...@gmail.com> wrote:
>To have Polynesian friends.
Got a problem with that, puke boi?
--
September 2012 nominations:
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/08/september-2012-nominations.html
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html
http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)
<wost...@gmail.com> wrote:
>To have Polynesian friends.
Got a problem with that, puke boi?
--
September 2012 nominations:
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/08/september-2012-nominations.html
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html
http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Sep 25, 2012, 1:08:18 AM9/25/12
to
Fred Hall wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:56 -0700 (PDT), yumhuyk
> <wost...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >To have Polynesian friends.
>
> Got a problem with that, puke boi?
Fred Hall
Sep 25, 2012, 2:53:58 AM9/25/12
to
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Sep 27, 2012, 1:02:41 AM9/27/12
to
Fred Hall wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:08:18 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
> Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Fred Hall wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:56 -0700 (PDT), yumhuyk
> >> <wost...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >To have Polynesian friends.
> >>
> >> Got a problem with that, puke boi?
> >
> >Ralph, ain't d'Blue Turbin!
>
> I blame it on the toxic chemicals in your back yard.
Which is "PROOF" the Blue Turbin was ON SCHEDULE, regardless of your intent to Fuck
Aunt Old Agnes' Bones!
You launched the Missiles, Fenris came to be Guardian not Destroyer!
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Sep 27, 2012, 1:15:01 AM9/27/12
to
> >Kent Wills has claimed the following:
> >
> > To have waited for hours at a dangerous intersection deep in the
> >south side ghetto of Chicago.
>
> Who said it was dangerous? It's not, of course.
> >
> > To have waited for hours at a dangerous intersection deep in the
> >south side ghetto of Chicago.
>
Is too!
Weather Underground, of Obama's Skull and Bones, doing the Hells Angels, to
Stop Hells ANGEL!
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Sep 27, 2012, 1:15:25 AM9/27/12
to
K Wills wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:00:33 -0500, Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:56 -0700 (PDT), yumhuyk
> ><wost...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>To have Polynesian friends.
> >
> >Got a problem with that, puke boi?
>
Far more than I am!
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Greegor
Sep 27, 2012, 2:07:15 PM9/27/12
to
[Tor] Fred Hall
Sep 27, 2012, 2:22:16 PM9/27/12
to
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:02:41 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
I think you're confused, BlueBoi.
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Sep 29, 2012, 12:19:39 AM9/29/12
to
Greegor wrote:
> MACKLEMORE - THRIFT SHOP
Beats Sac's Prices, any day!
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Sep 29, 2012, 12:22:11 AM9/29/12
to
"[Tor] Fred Hall" wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:02:41 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
> Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Fred Hall wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:08:18 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
> >> Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Fred Hall wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:56 -0700 (PDT), yumhuyk
> >> >> <wost...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >To have Polynesian friends.
> >> >>
> >> >> Got a problem with that, puke boi?
> >> >
> >> >Ralph, ain't d'Blue Turbin!
> >>
> >> I blame it on the toxic chemicals in your back yard.
> >
> >So do I!
> >Which is "PROOF" the Blue Turbin was ON SCHEDULE, regardless of your intent to Fuck
> >Aunt Old Agnes' Bones!
> >You launched the Missiles, Fenris came to be Guardian not Destroyer!
>
> I think you're confused, BlueBoi.
Your Lies, don't mean a thing!
Except They takes you so damned long to Fabricate!
%
Sep 29, 2012, 12:28:31 AM9/29/12
to
[Tor] Fred Hall
Sep 29, 2012, 12:53:47 AM9/29/12
to
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:22:11 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
Careful, BlueBoi, or I'll order another truckload of toxic chemicals
for your back yard.
for your back yard.
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 1, 2012, 12:13:42 AM10/1/12
to
But then Homophobes, Always do!
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 1, 2012, 12:22:40 AM10/1/12
to
Art Deco's Sock
Oct 1, 2012, 11:43:10 AM10/1/12
to
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 20:22:40 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
You have no proof of me being Art's sock, and the things you are
posting about me are untrue, BlueBoi.
posting about me are untrue, BlueBoi.
--
September 2012 nominations:
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/08/september-2012-nominations.html
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html
http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/afa-b-awards-in-exile.html
September 2012 nominations:
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/08/september-2012-nominations.html
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html
http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)
Message has been deleted
%
Oct 4, 2012, 12:15:07 PM10/4/12
to
K Wills wrote:
> On Sep 25, 4:33 am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:56 -0700 (PDT), yumhuyk
>>
>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:56 -0700 (PDT), yumhuyk
>>
>> <wostyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Kent Wills has claimed the following:
>>
>>> To have waited for hours at a dangerous intersection deep in the
>>> south side ghetto of Chicago.
>>
>>> Kent Wills has claimed the following:
>>
>>> To have waited for hours at a dangerous intersection deep in the
>>> south side ghetto of Chicago.
>>
>> Who said it was dangerous? It's not, of course.
>>
>>> To have Polynesian friends.
>>
>>
>> I do. How else could I know all I do about the culture that is
>> nothing like what you claim?
>>
>>> To have ancestry including but not limited to Gypsie, Laplander,
>>> Injun, Jew, Andaman and San.
>>
>> Liar.
>>> To have ancestry including but not limited to Gypsie, Laplander,
>>> Injun, Jew, Andaman and San.
>>
>>
>>> To have performed a "voice analysis test" between Moe and some
>>> person on youtube which showed a "4% match"
>>
>> Liar.
>>> To have performed a "voice analysis test" between Moe and some
>>> person on youtube which showed a "4% match"
>>
>>
>>> To have eaten a dog in order to join an Injun cult.
>>
>> Liar.
>>> To have eaten a dog in order to join an Injun cult.
>>
>>
>>> To have eaten a whale.
>>
>> You're lying, still.
>>> To have eaten a whale.
>>
>>
>>> To not have broken into Bob Larson's garage.
>>
>> I've never been to Larson's home. Ever. For any purpose. In fact,
>>> To not have broken into Bob Larson's garage.
>>
>> I don't even know his address.
>>
>>> Conclusion: Kent is batshit insane, or a pathological liar, or
>>> troll. Probably all three. Avoid.
>>
>> You flat out LIE and claim I'm the one who is insane, a
>>> Conclusion: Kent is batshit insane, or a pathological liar, or
>>> troll. Probably all three. Avoid.
>>
>> pathological liar, and/or a troll? Really?
>> Please prove each of your claims to be true, unless each one is,
>> in reality, nothing more than another of your lies.
>> I'm waiting...
>>
>
> And I'm still waiting.
so am i , you can't prove anything ,
so now you can believe i said waterboarder first
Greegor
Oct 4, 2012, 4:02:25 PM10/4/12
to
Message has been deleted
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 7, 2012, 1:28:09 AM10/7/12
to
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 7, 2012, 1:40:58 AM10/7/12
to
Why your still a Virgin too!
K Wills wrote:
> On Sep 25, 4:33 am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:56 -0700 (PDT), yumhuyk
> >
K Wills wrote:
> On Sep 25, 4:33 am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:19:56 -0700 (PDT), yumhuyk
> >
> > <wostyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >Kent Wills has claimed the following:
> >
> > > To have waited for hours at a dangerous intersection deep in the
> > >south side ghetto of Chicago.
> >
> > >Kent Wills has claimed the following:
> >
> > > To have waited for hours at a dangerous intersection deep in the
> > >south side ghetto of Chicago.
> >
> > Who said it was dangerous? It's not, of course.
> >
> > > To have Polynesian friends.
> >
> > I do. How else could I know all I do about the culture that is
> > nothing like what you claim?
> >
> >
> > > To have Polynesian friends.
> >
> > I do. How else could I know all I do about the culture that is
> > nothing like what you claim?
> >
> > >To have ancestry including but not limited to Gypsie, Laplander,
> > > Injun, Jew, Andaman and San.
> >
> > Liar.
> > > Injun, Jew, Andaman and San.
> >
> >
> > > To have performed a "voice analysis test" between Moe and some person
> > > on youtube which showed a "4% match"
> >
> > Liar.
> > > To have performed a "voice analysis test" between Moe and some person
> > > on youtube which showed a "4% match"
> >
> >
> > > To have eaten a dog in order to join an Injun cult.
> >
> > Liar.
> > > To have eaten a dog in order to join an Injun cult.
> >
> >
> > > To have eaten a whale.
> >
> > You're lying, still.
> > > To have eaten a whale.
> >
> >
> > > To not have broken into Bob Larson's garage.
> >
> > > To not have broken into Bob Larson's garage.
> >
> > I've never been to Larson's home. Ever. For any purpose. In fact,
> > I don't even know his address.
> >
> > I don't even know his address.
> >
> > > Conclusion: Kent is batshit insane, or a pathological liar, or
> > >troll. Probably all three. Avoid.
> >
> > >troll. Probably all three. Avoid.
> >
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 7, 2012, 1:42:13 AM10/7/12
to
Was a PUBLIC Word, LONG before you Claimed it, and MY USE, was Original
in Concept, especially before you and your Plagiarists!
in Concept, especially before you and your Plagiarists!
Art Deco's Sock
Oct 7, 2012, 4:17:21 PM10/7/12
to
On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 21:28:09 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
Words can't speak, BlueBoi. Words are spoken.
--
October 2012 nominations:
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/10/october-2012-nominations.html
--
October 2012 nominations:
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/10/october-2012-nominations.html
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 7, 2012, 10:35:39 PM10/7/12
to
Thomas Trotter
Oct 7, 2012, 10:44:32 PM10/7/12
to
On Sep 24, 9:19 pm, yumhuyk <wostyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kent Wills has claimed the following:
>
> To have waited for hours at a dangerous intersection deep in the
> south
> side ghetto of Chicago.
> To have Polynesian friends.
> Kent Wills has claimed the following:
>
> To have waited for hours at a dangerous intersection deep in the
> south
> side ghetto of Chicago.
> To have ancestry including but not limited to Gypsie, Laplander,
> Injun, Jew, Andaman and San.
> Injun, Jew, Andaman and San.
> To have performed a "voice analysis test" between Moe and some person
> on youtube which showed a "4% match"
> on youtube which showed a "4% match"
> To have eaten a dog in order to join an Injun cult.
> To have eaten a whale.
> To not have broken into Bob Larson's garage.
>
>
> Conclusion: Kent is batshit insane, or a pathological liar, or
> troll. Probably all three. Avoid.
>
> yours in Christ,
> troll. Probably all three. Avoid.
>
> isamu
Bizalziwab mikiwiwiwiwiw ZACKIFUNKY.
ljksdflkjsdflkjsdflkjsdflkjsdflkjsdflkjsdflkj
yours in Don Rickles,
mm
Art Deco's Sock
Oct 8, 2012, 5:02:33 PM10/8/12
to
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:35:39 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
How did you become willfully blind, BlueBoi?
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 9, 2012, 12:39:27 AM10/9/12
to
Art Deco's Sock wrote:
Gotta "Kill" Satan, Jesus said so!
Greegor
Oct 9, 2012, 9:14:12 PM10/9/12
to
Kent Wills claimed that he ate dog and whale meat.
Now he's doing a dance and throwing chaff rather
than simply explain WHY he ate whale meat.
Now he's doing a dance and throwing chaff rather
than simply explain WHY he ate whale meat.
Message has been deleted
Art Deco's Sock
Oct 10, 2012, 5:50:55 PM10/10/12
to
On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:39:27 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
Did you receive that message via your tinfoil hat, BlueBoi?
--
"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan
"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." -
Nellie Hall
KotAGoR XXXXI
COOSN-075-07-81342
Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1
Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1
Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10
@'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1
eMutT lits o' hate #4
Lits Slut#10
Usenet Ruiner #3
Top Asshole On The Net #2
Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2.
Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2
Hammer of Thor - August 2005
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle,Trainer of Rasta Khan, March 2006
Pierre Salinger HL&S January & February 2012
--
"These clowns are all Jokers!" - Rasta Khan
"I'm more of a Usenet force than you'll ever imagine in your wildest dreams." -
Nellie Hall
KotAGoR XXXXI
COOSN-075-07-81342
Brainwashed Follower of Art Deco #1
Old Gringo's Poopy Lits #1
Nellies invalid AUK Sociopath lits #10
@'s Lits of cyberterrorists and cyber bullies #1
eMutT lits o' hate #4
Lits Slut#10
Usenet Ruiner #3
Top Asshole On The Net #2
Most Hated Usenetizen of all time #2.
Sweetness Seal Of Approval #2
Hammer of Thor - August 2005
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle,Trainer of Rasta Khan, March 2006
Pierre Salinger HL&S January & February 2012
yumhuyk
Oct 10, 2012, 11:41:04 PM10/10/12
to
yours in Christ,
isamu
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 11, 2012, 12:31:09 AM10/11/12
to
Greegor wrote:
> Kent Wills claimed that he ate dog and whale meat.
Onions and Carrots, ain't "Sentient"!
Checkmate
Oct 11, 2012, 12:32:18 AM10/11/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what yumhuyk said:
Who the FUCK cares if someone ate whale meat or why? Jesus Fuckin'
Christ. Greegor is a complete moron.
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright ￜ 2012
all rights reserved
____________________________________________________________________
A new revelation from David Keeting the Assworm:
"there's not much you can tell me about the boner that i don't know
already."
Message-ID: <JO6dnTGAR5mq6MPN...@giganews.com>
____________________________________________________________________
Uncle Steve learns about pigs:
<US> How much money have you spent paying off the PIGS?
<CM> The pigs have no use for money. They're content to eat table scraps
and forage for truffles.
<US> I keep forgetting you've been doing this for so long that it's easy
for you. I can't wait to piss on your grave.
Regards,
Uncle Steve
Message-ID: <b18ab6cb2c...@gmail.com>
____________________________________________________________________
[tard] Phoenix swallows the hook, the line, the sinker, and half of the
pole:
<CM> Watch the stupid cunt ask what 1337 means...
<JD> That is exactly what I am expecting.
<CM> ROT 1337... it'll make you dizzy!
<Tard> Did... did you just tell someone to attempt to ROT-13 *numbers*,
you Clueless Newbie of the Month candidate?
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! Even when we warned him first, he still fell for it!
Message-ID: <k3ae35$prb$1...@news.mixmin.net>
_____________________________________________________________________
Checkmate!
First, check out what yumhuyk said:
Christ. Greegor is a complete moron.
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright ￜ 2012
all rights reserved
____________________________________________________________________
A new revelation from David Keeting the Assworm:
"there's not much you can tell me about the boner that i don't know
already."
Message-ID: <JO6dnTGAR5mq6MPN...@giganews.com>
____________________________________________________________________
Uncle Steve learns about pigs:
<US> How much money have you spent paying off the PIGS?
<CM> The pigs have no use for money. They're content to eat table scraps
and forage for truffles.
<US> I keep forgetting you've been doing this for so long that it's easy
for you. I can't wait to piss on your grave.
Regards,
Uncle Steve
Message-ID: <b18ab6cb2c...@gmail.com>
____________________________________________________________________
[tard] Phoenix swallows the hook, the line, the sinker, and half of the
pole:
<CM> Watch the stupid cunt ask what 1337 means...
<JD> That is exactly what I am expecting.
<CM> ROT 1337... it'll make you dizzy!
<Tard> Did... did you just tell someone to attempt to ROT-13 *numbers*,
you Clueless Newbie of the Month candidate?
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! Even when we warned him first, he still fell for it!
Message-ID: <k3ae35$prb$1...@news.mixmin.net>
_____________________________________________________________________
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 11, 2012, 12:43:13 AM10/11/12
to
K Wills wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 18:14:12 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >>On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 19:44:32 -0700 (PDT), Thomas Trotter <thomastr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>Bizalziwab mikiwiwiwiwiw ZACKIFUNKY.
> >>ljksdflkjsdflkjsdflkjsdflkjsdflkjsdflkjsdflkj
> >>
> >>yours in Don Rickles,
> >
> >>On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 19:44:32 -0700 (PDT), Thomas Trotter <thomastr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>Bizalziwab mikiwiwiwiwiw ZACKIFUNKY.
> >>ljksdflkjsdflkjsdflkjsdflkjsdflkjsdflkjsdflkj
> >>
> >>yours in Don Rickles,
> >
> >Kent Wills claimed that he ate dog and whale meat.
> >
>
> Outside of your latest PROOF that you were being honest when you
> >
>
> openly admitted that you use and abuse illegal drugs, I'm not Thomas.
But, Doubt On!
yumhuyk
Oct 11, 2012, 12:46:49 AM10/11/12
to
On Oct 10, 11:32 pm, Checkmate <LunaticFri...@The.Edge> wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what yumhuyk said:
>
> > He ate the whale because he was hungry and now they are extinct.
>
> > yours in Christ,
> > isamu
>
> Who the FUCK cares if someone ate whale meat or why? Jesus Fuckin'
> Christ. Greegor is a complete moron.
>
Greenpeace cares. Anyone trying to help save a species cares.
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what yumhuyk said:
>
> > He ate the whale because he was hungry and now they are extinct.
>
> > yours in Christ,
> > isamu
>
> Who the FUCK cares if someone ate whale meat or why? Jesus Fuckin'
> Christ. Greegor is a complete moron.
>
yours in Christ,
isamu
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 11, 2012, 12:50:04 AM10/11/12
to
Art Deco's Sock wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:39:27 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
> Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Art Deco's Sock wrote:
> >
> >UGW Militia BS!
> >Gotta "Kill" Satan, Jesus said so!
>
> Did you receive that message via your tinfoil hat, BlueBoi?
> --
ME, I am a Vampyre, who doesn't wear Foil Hats to avert the energy, I demand
Universal oneness of the Energy!
You don't get it, never will!
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 11, 2012, 12:53:24 AM10/11/12
to
"Extinct", they are not!
Doesn't matter how hard the Eskimo Hunt em!
Russian and Jap Experiments same as United States Woodhall Institute, do
far more DAMAGE!
Checkmate
Oct 11, 2012, 1:57:17 AM10/11/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what yumhuyk said:
>
> On Oct 10, 11:32 pm, Checkmate <LunaticFri...@The.Edge> wrote:
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!
> >
> > First, check out what yumhuyk said:
> >
> > > He ate the whale because he was hungry and now they are extinct.
> >
> > > yours in Christ,
> > > isamu
> >
> > Who the FUCK cares if someone ate whale meat or why? Jesus Fuckin'
> > Christ. Greegor is a complete moron.
> >
>
> Greenpeace cares. Anyone trying to help save a species cares.
>
> yours in Christ,
> isamu
I'm sure he didn't eat that much... whales are big, maybe he just took a
Checkmate!
First, check out what yumhuyk said:
>
> On Oct 10, 11:32 pm, Checkmate <LunaticFri...@The.Edge> wrote:
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!
> >
> > First, check out what yumhuyk said:
> >
> > > He ate the whale because he was hungry and now they are extinct.
> >
> > > yours in Christ,
> > > isamu
> >
> > Who the FUCK cares if someone ate whale meat or why? Jesus Fuckin'
> > Christ. Greegor is a complete moron.
> >
>
> Greenpeace cares. Anyone trying to help save a species cares.
>
> yours in Christ,
> isamu
little bite out of a fin or something.
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Greegor
Oct 11, 2012, 6:03:15 AM10/11/12
to
On Oct 11, 12:57 am, Checkmate <LunaticFri...@The.Edge> wrote:
[...]
Great minimization strategy there Checky! LOL
[...]
> I'm sure he didn't eat that much... whales are big, maybe he just took a
> little bite out of a fin or something.
Conjures image of a whale swimming around with bite out of fin.
> little bite out of a fin or something.
Great minimization strategy there Checky! LOL
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 12, 2012, 12:47:03 AM10/12/12
to
yumhuyk wrote:
> On Oct 10, 11:32 pm, Checkmate <LunaticFri...@The.Edge> wrote:
> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> > Checkmate!
> >
> > First, check out what yumhuyk said:
> >
> > > He ate the whale because he was hungry and now they are extinct.
> >
> > > yours in Christ,
> > > isamu
> >
> > Who the FUCK cares if someone ate whale meat or why? Jesus Fuckin'
> > Christ. Greegor is a complete moron.
> >
>
> Greenpeace cares.
Big Brother got Inside, so he could Control the Hippies, huntin the whale
hunters!
%
Oct 12, 2012, 1:07:33 AM10/12/12
to
no you do
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Art Deco's Sock
Oct 12, 2012, 8:56:04 PM10/12/12
to
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:50:04 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
>ME, I am a Vampyre, who doesn't wear Foil Hats to avert the energy, I demand
>Universal oneness of the Energy!
Demand in one hand, shit in the other, BlueBoi. See which one fills
up first, BlueBoi.
>You don't get it, never will!
>
I'll get what I want, when I want, BlueBoi. Nothing you can do about
it except whine.
Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
>
>
>Art Deco's Sock wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:39:27 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
>> Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Art Deco's Sock wrote:
>> >
>> >UGW Militia BS!
>> >Gotta "Kill" Satan, Jesus said so!
>>
>> Did you receive that message via your tinfoil hat, BlueBoi?
>> --
>
>No YOU DID!
You lie, BlueBoi.
>
>
>Art Deco's Sock wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:39:27 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
>> Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Art Deco's Sock wrote:
>> >
>> >UGW Militia BS!
>> >Gotta "Kill" Satan, Jesus said so!
>>
>> Did you receive that message via your tinfoil hat, BlueBoi?
>> --
>
>No YOU DID!
>ME, I am a Vampyre, who doesn't wear Foil Hats to avert the energy, I demand
>Universal oneness of the Energy!
up first, BlueBoi.
>You don't get it, never will!
>
it except whine.
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 13, 2012, 1:11:07 AM10/13/12
to
Your living Proof of it!
Cept just becAuse ya Got Long Hair and don't Bath, doesn't make ya a
Hippie!
"Your Flowers, turned to Guns"!
Cept just becAuse ya Got Long Hair and don't Bath, doesn't make ya a
Hippie!
"Your Flowers, turned to Guns"!
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 13, 2012, 1:18:50 AM10/13/12
to
Art Deco's Sock wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:50:04 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
> Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Art Deco's Sock wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:39:27 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
> >> Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Art Deco's Sock wrote:
> >> >
> >> >UGW Militia BS!
> >> >Gotta "Kill" Satan, Jesus said so!
> >>
> >> Did you receive that message via your tinfoil hat, BlueBoi?
> >> --
> >
> >No YOU DID!
>
> You lie, BlueBoi.
So BELIEVE what YOU want!
Greegor
Oct 14, 2012, 7:11:39 AM10/14/12
to
On Oct 10, 11:31 pm, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole"
I thought Kent's Veganism was to keep
his Type 2 diabetes in check.
<laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
his Type 2 diabetes in check.
Message has been deleted
Art Deco's Sock
Oct 14, 2012, 9:13:53 PM10/14/12
to
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:18:50 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
>So BELIEVE what YOU want!
Believe me, I will, BlueBoi.
Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
>
>
>Art Deco's Sock wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:50:04 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
>> Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Art Deco's Sock wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:39:27 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
>> >> Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Art Deco's Sock wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >UGW Militia BS!
>> >> >Gotta "Kill" Satan, Jesus said so!
>> >>
>> >> Did you receive that message via your tinfoil hat, BlueBoi?
>> >> --
>> >
>> >No YOU DID!
>>
>> You lie, BlueBoi.
>
>Legends say regardless of your Insistence of such, "I Don't"!
Legends are lies, BlueBoi.
>
>
>Art Deco's Sock wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:50:04 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
>> Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Art Deco's Sock wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:39:27 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
>> >> Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Art Deco's Sock wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >UGW Militia BS!
>> >> >Gotta "Kill" Satan, Jesus said so!
>> >>
>> >> Did you receive that message via your tinfoil hat, BlueBoi?
>> >> --
>> >
>> >No YOU DID!
>>
>> You lie, BlueBoi.
>
>Legends say regardless of your Insistence of such, "I Don't"!
>So BELIEVE what YOU want!
Fred Hall
Oct 14, 2012, 9:16:07 PM10/14/12
to
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 04:11:39 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I thought
No you didn't, waterboarder. Why were you in the bathroom with a
naked 7 year old girl, Rock Hard Stupid?
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I thought
No you didn't, waterboarder. Why were you in the bathroom with a
naked 7 year old girl, Rock Hard Stupid?
Message has been deleted
Greegor
Oct 15, 2012, 2:30:52 PM10/15/12
to
Why did you eat whale meat, Kent?
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 15, 2012, 10:47:55 PM10/15/12
to
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 15, 2012, 11:07:26 PM10/15/12
to
> I claimed to be vegan?
Thought all Nazi's are?
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 15, 2012, 11:24:28 PM10/15/12
to
Art Deco's Sock wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:18:50 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
> Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Art Deco's Sock wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:50:04 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
> >> Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Art Deco's Sock wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:39:27 -0800, "Lady Azure, Baroness of the North
> >> >> Pole" <laddie'o'lugh@gall's.org> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Art Deco's Sock wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >UGW Militia BS!
> >> >> >Gotta "Kill" Satan, Jesus said so!
> >> >>
> >> >> Did you receive that message via your tinfoil hat, BlueBoi?
> >> >> --
> >> >
> >> >No YOU DID!
> >>
> >> You lie, BlueBoi.
> >
> >Legends say regardless of your Insistence of such, "I Don't"!
>
> Legends are lies, BlueBoi.
>
> >So BELIEVE what YOU want!
>
> Believe me, I will, BlueBoi.
I Intend to to Exactly the Same, regardless of how Stupid or Delusional You are!
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 15, 2012, 11:25:43 PM10/15/12
to
Fred Hall wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 04:11:39 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I thought
>
> No you didn't, waterboarder.
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 15, 2012, 11:30:46 PM10/15/12
to
K Wills wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:16:07 -0500, Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 04:11:39 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> ><gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>I thought
> >
> >No you didn't, waterboarder. Why were you in the bathroom with a
> >naked 7 year old girl, Rock Hard Stupid?
>
I started collecting my Evidence, when they put a Bounty on Virus
Flingers!
Thing is their Connected!
Can't sell Anti Virus Protection if there ain't no Viruses!
Can't Eves Drop on Suspects, if ya can't Hack Lines.
World Press? bust proved that!
Untouchables who Hacked the Queen got Caught, and it ain't Done Yet,
regardless of what You think!
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 15, 2012, 11:35:48 PM10/15/12
to
Greegor wrote:
> Why did you eat whale meat, Kent?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Greegor
Oct 16, 2012, 12:21:41 PM10/16/12
to
Kent has posted several times that he became
vegetarian as a result of his diabetes.
Why deny it now, Kent?
Even though you (deceptively) claim that you
already answered the question, Kent, could
you please explain why you ate whale meat?
Humor me, Kent.
vegetarian as a result of his diabetes.
Why deny it now, Kent?
Even though you (deceptively) claim that you
already answered the question, Kent, could
you please explain why you ate whale meat?
Humor me, Kent.
Message has been deleted
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 17, 2012, 11:12:51 PM10/17/12
to
K Wills wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:21:41 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Kent has posted several times that he became
> >vegetarian as a result of his diabetes.
> >
>
> Liar.
> >vegetarian as a result of his diabetes.
> >
>
> Why are you so UNABLE to be honest?
>
> >Why deny it now, Kent?
>
> I'm not Lady A. Honest.
> >Why deny it now, Kent?
>
Nor am I Greegor!
So don't Play with ME, and I won't take offensive actions to your Game!
Greegor
Oct 25, 2012, 3:02:34 PM10/25/12
to
G > Why did you eat whale meat, Kent?
LA > Got the Munchies with some Eskimos!
Were you visiting with some Inuits, Kent?
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Oct 26, 2012, 2:00:00 AM10/26/12
to
I, Azure do!
Greegor
Nov 23, 2012, 3:14:27 PM11/23/12
to
On Sep 24, 7:19 pm, yumhuyk <wostyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kent Wills has claimed the following:
>
> To have waited for hours at a dangerous intersection deep in the
> south
> side ghetto of Chicago.
> To have Polynesian friends.
> To have ancestry including but not limited to Gypsie, Laplander,
> Injun, Jew, Andaman and San.
> To have performed a "voice analysis test" between Moe and some person
> on youtube which showed a "4% match"
> To have eaten a dog in order to join an Injun cult.
> To have eaten a whale.
> To not have broken into Bob Larson's garage.
>
> Conclusion: Kent is batshit insane, or a pathological liar, or
> troll. Probably all three. Avoid.
>
> yours in Christ,
> isamu
Yep!
> Kent Wills has claimed the following:
>
> To have waited for hours at a dangerous intersection deep in the
> south
> side ghetto of Chicago.
> To have Polynesian friends.
> To have ancestry including but not limited to Gypsie, Laplander,
> Injun, Jew, Andaman and San.
> To have performed a "voice analysis test" between Moe and some person
> on youtube which showed a "4% match"
> To have eaten a dog in order to join an Injun cult.
> To have eaten a whale.
> To not have broken into Bob Larson's garage.
>
> Conclusion: Kent is batshit insane, or a pathological liar, or
> troll. Probably all three. Avoid.
>
> yours in Christ,
> isamu
Yep!
Greegor
Dec 2, 2012, 1:22:05 AM12/2/12
to
yumhuyk wrote:
y > Kent Wills has claimed the following:
y > To have waited for hours at a dangerous
y > intersection deep in the south
y > side ghetto of Chicago.
y > To have Polynesian friends.
y > To have ancestry including but not limited to Gypsie, Laplander,
y > Injun, Jew, Andaman and San.
y > To have performed a "voice analysis test" between Moe and some
person
y > on youtube which showed a "4% match"
y > To have eaten a dog in order to join an Injun cult.
y > To have eaten a whale.
y > To not have broken into Bob Larson's garage.
y > Conclusion: Kent is batshit insane, or a pathological liar, or
y > troll. Probably all three. Avoid.
G > Yep!
KBW > It took your drug addled
Nope.
KBW > mind more than a month
Nope.
KBW > to come up with your one word reply?
Nope.
y > Kent Wills has claimed the following:
y > To have waited for hours at a dangerous
y > intersection deep in the south
y > side ghetto of Chicago.
y > To have Polynesian friends.
y > To have ancestry including but not limited to Gypsie, Laplander,
y > Injun, Jew, Andaman and San.
y > To have performed a "voice analysis test" between Moe and some
person
y > on youtube which showed a "4% match"
y > To have eaten a dog in order to join an Injun cult.
y > To have eaten a whale.
y > To not have broken into Bob Larson's garage.
y > Conclusion: Kent is batshit insane, or a pathological liar, or
y > troll. Probably all three. Avoid.
G > Yep!
KBW > It took your drug addled
Nope.
KBW > mind more than a month
Nope.
KBW > to come up with your one word reply?
Nope.
Greegor
Dec 2, 2012, 10:00:39 PM12/2/12
to
Aug 12 2003 05771 FECR176876 STATE v WILLS [DOB] 01/08/1969
2 counts on the conviction.
Felony garage burglary
Misdemeanor use of a teenager as accomplice to a Felony
http://www.lexisone.com/lx1/caselaw/freecaselaw?action=OCLGetCaseDetail&format=FULL&sourceID=beeheh&searchTerm=eHdU.Zbaa.aadj.eabQ&searchFlag=y&l1loc=FCLOW
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html
2 counts on the conviction.
Felony garage burglary
Misdemeanor use of a teenager as accomplice to a Felony
http://www.lexisone.com/lx1/caselaw/freecaselaw?action=OCLGetCaseDetail&format=FULL&sourceID=beeheh&searchTerm=eHdU.Zbaa.aadj.eabQ&searchFlag=y&l1loc=FCLOW
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html
Greegor
Dec 3, 2012, 12:14:24 PM12/3/12
to
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ia-supreme-court/1360099.html
http://law.justia.com/cases/iowa/supreme-court/2005/04-0202.html
http://statecasefiles.justia.com/documents/iowa/supreme-court/04-202-(2005-05-06).doc?ts=1323896353
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D.
Huppert, Judge.
Defendant appeals claiming ineffective assistance of counsel.
AFFIRMED.
Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender, and Tricia Johnston,
Assistant State Appellate Defender, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin Cmelik, Assistant Attorney
General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch, Assistant
County Attorney, for appellee.
WIGGINS, Justice.
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary
contending that an attached garage is a separate occupied structure
from that of the living quarters of the residence. In this appeal, we
must determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for (1) failing
to move for judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient
evidence to convict Wills of second-degree burglary when he entered an
attached garage of a residence when no persons were present in the
garage, but when persons were present in the living quarters; and (2)
failing to object to a jury instruction based on this same argument.
Because we find there was no legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury instruction, Wills’ trial
counsel was not ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of
the district court.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called the local police to report
that a car alarm sounded in the resident’s neighborhood. The city
dispatched a police officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only to be stopped a couple of
blocks later by a person who informed the officer he had witnessed
someone running from the area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the car alarm, he noticed a person
walking on the sidewalk. The officer asked the person, a minor, if he
had noticed anybody running from the area. The minor answered that he
had not. While the officer and another officer were speaking to the
minor, another resident of the neighborhood arrived in her car and
informed the officers that she had observed two people, one of whom
was heavy set with a blinking light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor’s residence. She observed the heavier-set
individual, later identified as Wills, enter her neighbor’s attached
garage through an unlocked service door. She further observed a
smaller individual standing by a van parked in the neighbor’s
driveway.
The officers eventually let the minor leave even though they found a
large amount of coins, a flashlight, and an electronic pocket
organizer in his pockets. After releasing the minor, the police
officers drove to the residence where the neighbor observed the two
suspicious people and woke the owner. The owner, his wife, and two
daughters were in the residence sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered change and an electronic pocket
organizer were missing from the vehicles. The owner’s daughter
reported a diamond ring and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted the minor’s parents, who
informed the officers the minor was with Wills. After the officers
questioned the minor again, he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary. Although Wills denied
involvement in the burglary, the officers arrested him.
The State filed a trial information charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the information to include two
additional charges of burglary in the third degree and using a
juvenile to commit an indictable offense.
The jury returned a verdict finding Wills guilty of the crimes of
burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and using
a juvenile to commit an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary claiming ineffective assistance
of counsel.
II. Scope of Review.
Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are derived from the Sixth
Amendment of the United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed.
2d 674, 691-93 (1984). Our review for a claim involving violations of
the Constitution is de novo. State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
claims for postconviction relief actions. State v. Carter, 602 N.W.2d
818, 820 (Iowa 1999). However, we will address such claims on direct
appeal when the record is sufficient to permit a ruling. State v.
Artzer, 609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The appellate record in the
present case is sufficient to allow us to address Wills’ ineffective-
assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal.
In order for a defendant to succeed on a claim of ineffective
assistance of counsel, the defendant must prove: (1) counsel failed
to perform an essential duty and (2) prejudice resulted. Id.
Prejudice results when “there is a reasonable probability that, but
for the counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding
would have been different.” State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills’ arguments also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for correction of errors at law.
State v. Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).
III. Analysis.
To find Wills guilty of burglary in the second degree, the State had
to prove Wills perpetrated a burglary “in or upon an occupied
structure in which one or more persons are present . . . .” Iowa Code
§ 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).
In this appeal, Wills first contends his trial counsel was ineffective
for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal on the basis there was
insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons present in or upon the occupied
structure. Wills concedes the garage was an occupied structure, but
argues the living quarters and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore, the jury could not have
found there were people present in the attached garage at the time of
the burglary.
The Code defines an “occupied structure” as:
[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances to buildings and structures,
land, water or air vehicle, or similar place adapted for overnight
accommodation of persons, or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity therein, or for the storage or
safekeeping of anything of value. Such a structure is an “occupied
structure” whether or not a person is actually present.
Id. § 702.12.
Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590 N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to
argue the garage and the living quarters are separate and independent
occupied structures. In Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors were operated in the same
structure. 590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant committed two
burglaries by entering each business because “[t]he facility’s
construction history and physical make-up demonstrate that the
portions are independent working units which constitute ‘[a]
combination of materials to form a construction for occupancy [or]
use.’” Id. Smothers is not at odds with the present case because the
living quarters and the garage are not separate or independent units
of the residence.
Our review of the record reveals the garage in question was a three-
car attached garage separated from the living quarters by a door. The
same roof covered the garage as the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides. It was structurally no
different from any other room in the residence.
The garage was a functional part of the residence. On the night of
the incident, the door was unlocked. The owner of the residence used
two stalls in the garage to park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As such, the garage and the
living quarters are a single “structure” or “building” functioning as
an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single “occupied structure” under section
702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App.
1995) (holding defendant’s entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house;
therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an inhabited
dwelling house); People v. Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding “ordinarily an attached garage is a ‘dwelling’
because it is part of the structure in which the owner or occupant
lives”); State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53 (N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding
“burglary of the [attached] garage was burglary of the dwelling house
because the garage was a part of the structure used as living
quarters”); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d 760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
(holding “[s]ince the garage in the present case was structurally part
of a building which was used for overnight lodging of various persons,
it must be considered as part of a dwelling”); White v. State, 630 S.W.
2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982) (holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered a habitation within the
purview of the penal code because the garage is a structure
appurtenant to and connected to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.2d
551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993) (holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington’s burglary statute included an attached garage).
Had Wills’ trial counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal on the
basis there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the
time Wills entered the garage there were no persons present in or upon
the occupied structure, it would have been overruled by the court
because the owner and his family were present in the residence at the
time of the burglary.
Wills also claims his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district court on the same ground;
that the living quarters were a separate and independent occupied
structure from the attached garage. The instruction as given stated:
The State must prove all of the following elements of Burglary in the
Second Degree as to Count I:
1. On or about the 12th day of August, 2003, the defendant or someone
he aided and abetted broke into or entered the residence at . . . .
2. The residence at . . . was an occupied structure as defined in
Instruction No. 29.
3. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did not have
permission or authority to break into the residence at . . . .
4. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did so with the
specific intent to commit a theft therein.
5. During the incident persons were present in or upon the occupied
structure.
If the State has proved all of the elements, the defendant is guilty
of Burglary in the Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree and you will then consider the charge of Attempted
Burglary in the Second Degree explained in Instruction No. 21.
(Emphasis added.)
Wills’ claim is without merit. As we have discussed, the residence is
the one and only “occupied structure” under the facts of this case.
Had Wills’ trial counsel made this objection to the instruction, it
would have been overruled.
Therefore, Wills’ trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting to the instruction because
there was no legal basis for the motion or objection. See State v.
Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234, 238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an issue that has no merit).
IV. Disposition.
We affirm the judgment of the district court because Wills’ trial
counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise meritless issues.
AFFIRMED.
http://law.justia.com/cases/iowa/supreme-court/2005/04-0202.html
http://statecasefiles.justia.com/documents/iowa/supreme-court/04-202-(2005-05-06).doc?ts=1323896353
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D.
Huppert, Judge.
Defendant appeals claiming ineffective assistance of counsel.
AFFIRMED.
Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender, and Tricia Johnston,
Assistant State Appellate Defender, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin Cmelik, Assistant Attorney
General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch, Assistant
County Attorney, for appellee.
WIGGINS, Justice.
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary
contending that an attached garage is a separate occupied structure
from that of the living quarters of the residence. In this appeal, we
must determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for (1) failing
to move for judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient
evidence to convict Wills of second-degree burglary when he entered an
attached garage of a residence when no persons were present in the
garage, but when persons were present in the living quarters; and (2)
failing to object to a jury instruction based on this same argument.
Because we find there was no legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury instruction, Wills’ trial
counsel was not ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of
the district court.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called the local police to report
that a car alarm sounded in the resident’s neighborhood. The city
dispatched a police officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only to be stopped a couple of
blocks later by a person who informed the officer he had witnessed
someone running from the area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the car alarm, he noticed a person
walking on the sidewalk. The officer asked the person, a minor, if he
had noticed anybody running from the area. The minor answered that he
had not. While the officer and another officer were speaking to the
minor, another resident of the neighborhood arrived in her car and
informed the officers that she had observed two people, one of whom
was heavy set with a blinking light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor’s residence. She observed the heavier-set
individual, later identified as Wills, enter her neighbor’s attached
garage through an unlocked service door. She further observed a
smaller individual standing by a van parked in the neighbor’s
driveway.
The officers eventually let the minor leave even though they found a
large amount of coins, a flashlight, and an electronic pocket
organizer in his pockets. After releasing the minor, the police
officers drove to the residence where the neighbor observed the two
suspicious people and woke the owner. The owner, his wife, and two
daughters were in the residence sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered change and an electronic pocket
organizer were missing from the vehicles. The owner’s daughter
reported a diamond ring and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted the minor’s parents, who
informed the officers the minor was with Wills. After the officers
questioned the minor again, he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary. Although Wills denied
involvement in the burglary, the officers arrested him.
The State filed a trial information charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the information to include two
additional charges of burglary in the third degree and using a
juvenile to commit an indictable offense.
The jury returned a verdict finding Wills guilty of the crimes of
burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and using
a juvenile to commit an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary claiming ineffective assistance
of counsel.
II. Scope of Review.
Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are derived from the Sixth
Amendment of the United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed.
2d 674, 691-93 (1984). Our review for a claim involving violations of
the Constitution is de novo. State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
claims for postconviction relief actions. State v. Carter, 602 N.W.2d
818, 820 (Iowa 1999). However, we will address such claims on direct
appeal when the record is sufficient to permit a ruling. State v.
Artzer, 609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The appellate record in the
present case is sufficient to allow us to address Wills’ ineffective-
assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal.
In order for a defendant to succeed on a claim of ineffective
assistance of counsel, the defendant must prove: (1) counsel failed
to perform an essential duty and (2) prejudice resulted. Id.
Prejudice results when “there is a reasonable probability that, but
for the counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding
would have been different.” State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills’ arguments also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for correction of errors at law.
State v. Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).
III. Analysis.
To find Wills guilty of burglary in the second degree, the State had
to prove Wills perpetrated a burglary “in or upon an occupied
structure in which one or more persons are present . . . .” Iowa Code
§ 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).
In this appeal, Wills first contends his trial counsel was ineffective
for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal on the basis there was
insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons present in or upon the occupied
structure. Wills concedes the garage was an occupied structure, but
argues the living quarters and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore, the jury could not have
found there were people present in the attached garage at the time of
the burglary.
The Code defines an “occupied structure” as:
[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances to buildings and structures,
land, water or air vehicle, or similar place adapted for overnight
accommodation of persons, or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity therein, or for the storage or
safekeeping of anything of value. Such a structure is an “occupied
structure” whether or not a person is actually present.
Id. § 702.12.
Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590 N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to
argue the garage and the living quarters are separate and independent
occupied structures. In Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors were operated in the same
structure. 590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant committed two
burglaries by entering each business because “[t]he facility’s
construction history and physical make-up demonstrate that the
portions are independent working units which constitute ‘[a]
combination of materials to form a construction for occupancy [or]
use.’” Id. Smothers is not at odds with the present case because the
living quarters and the garage are not separate or independent units
of the residence.
Our review of the record reveals the garage in question was a three-
car attached garage separated from the living quarters by a door. The
same roof covered the garage as the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides. It was structurally no
different from any other room in the residence.
The garage was a functional part of the residence. On the night of
the incident, the door was unlocked. The owner of the residence used
two stalls in the garage to park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As such, the garage and the
living quarters are a single “structure” or “building” functioning as
an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single “occupied structure” under section
702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App.
1995) (holding defendant’s entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house;
therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an inhabited
dwelling house); People v. Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding “ordinarily an attached garage is a ‘dwelling’
because it is part of the structure in which the owner or occupant
lives”); State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53 (N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding
“burglary of the [attached] garage was burglary of the dwelling house
because the garage was a part of the structure used as living
quarters”); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d 760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
(holding “[s]ince the garage in the present case was structurally part
of a building which was used for overnight lodging of various persons,
it must be considered as part of a dwelling”); White v. State, 630 S.W.
2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982) (holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered a habitation within the
purview of the penal code because the garage is a structure
appurtenant to and connected to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.2d
551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993) (holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington’s burglary statute included an attached garage).
Had Wills’ trial counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal on the
basis there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the
time Wills entered the garage there were no persons present in or upon
the occupied structure, it would have been overruled by the court
because the owner and his family were present in the residence at the
time of the burglary.
Wills also claims his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district court on the same ground;
that the living quarters were a separate and independent occupied
structure from the attached garage. The instruction as given stated:
The State must prove all of the following elements of Burglary in the
Second Degree as to Count I:
1. On or about the 12th day of August, 2003, the defendant or someone
he aided and abetted broke into or entered the residence at . . . .
2. The residence at . . . was an occupied structure as defined in
Instruction No. 29.
3. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did not have
permission or authority to break into the residence at . . . .
4. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did so with the
specific intent to commit a theft therein.
5. During the incident persons were present in or upon the occupied
structure.
If the State has proved all of the elements, the defendant is guilty
of Burglary in the Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree and you will then consider the charge of Attempted
Burglary in the Second Degree explained in Instruction No. 21.
(Emphasis added.)
Wills’ claim is without merit. As we have discussed, the residence is
the one and only “occupied structure” under the facts of this case.
Had Wills’ trial counsel made this objection to the instruction, it
would have been overruled.
Therefore, Wills’ trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting to the instruction because
there was no legal basis for the motion or objection. See State v.
Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234, 238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an issue that has no merit).
IV. Disposition.
We affirm the judgment of the district court because Wills’ trial
counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise meritless issues.
AFFIRMED.
Bob Casanova
Dec 3, 2012, 12:23:54 PM12/3/12
to
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 19:00:39 -0800 (PST), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com>:
So who's this Kent Wills you're obsessing over?
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com>:
So who's this Kent Wills you're obsessing over?
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Message has been deleted
Bob Casanova
Dec 4, 2012, 1:14:42 PM12/4/12
to
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 03:43:29 -0600, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by K Wills <comp...@gmail.com>:
>On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 10:23:54 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
>wrote:
>also claimed I am several other people with the name Kent Wills. Greg
>states he has PROVED (emphasis his) that I live in four different
>places, at the same time, via the phone book.
> And he's openly admitted that nothing he posts is actually about
>me. Sadly, he MUST post the information. His mind is such that he
>honestly does not have any choice.
Asked and answered; thanks. He sounds like a nutjob. And my
killfile, which is getting rather large, takes yet another
bite...
in sci.skeptic, posted by K Wills <comp...@gmail.com>:
>On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 10:23:54 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 19:00:39 -0800 (PST), the following
>>appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Greegor
>><gree...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>So who's this Kent Wills you're obsessing over?
>
> He claims I am the Kent Wills he's OBSESSED with. Of course, he's
>>On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 19:00:39 -0800 (PST), the following
>>appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Greegor
>><gree...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>So who's this Kent Wills you're obsessing over?
>
>also claimed I am several other people with the name Kent Wills. Greg
>states he has PROVED (emphasis his) that I live in four different
>places, at the same time, via the phone book.
> And he's openly admitted that nothing he posts is actually about
>me. Sadly, he MUST post the information. His mind is such that he
>honestly does not have any choice.
Asked and answered; thanks. He sounds like a nutjob. And my
killfile, which is getting rather large, takes yet another
bite...
Checkmate
Dec 4, 2012, 3:36:43 PM12/4/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
First, check out what Bob Casanova said:
>
> On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 03:43:29 -0600, the following appeared
> in sci.skeptic, posted by K Wills <comp...@gmail.com>:
>
> >On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 10:23:54 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 19:00:39 -0800 (PST), the following
> >>appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Greegor
> >><gree...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>So who's this Kent Wills you're obsessing over?
> >
> > He claims I am the Kent Wills he's OBSESSED with. Of course, he's
> >also claimed I am several other people with the name Kent Wills. Greg
> >states he has PROVED (emphasis his) that I live in four different
> >places, at the same time, via the phone book.
> > And he's openly admitted that nothing he posts is actually about
> >me. Sadly, he MUST post the information. His mind is such that he
> >honestly does not have any choice.
>
> Asked and answered; thanks. He sounds like a nutjob. And my
> killfile, which is getting rather large, takes yet another
> bite...
Greegor is the star in many killfiles. In fact, I heard that some
newsreaders now come with that feature as a default.
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
I'm Checkmate, and I approve this message...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpZhZAr1cQU
Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
_____________________________________________________________________
"I keep forgetting you've been doing this for so long that it's easy
for you. I can't wait to piss on your grave."
Uncle Steve
Message-ID: <b18ab6cb2c...@gmail.com>
_____________________________________________________________________
"Did... did you just tell someone to attempt to ROT-13 *numbers*, you
Clueless Newbie of the Month candidate?"
Paul Derbyshire, socked-up as [tor] Phoenix
Message-ID: <k3ae35$prb$1...@news.mixmin.net>
_____________________________________________________________________
"Nov. 1 can't come quickly enough for me. I really, REALLY want to put
that little + in the box for your Creepy Candy Coating on the ballot,
so badly my hand is twitching. And I'm sorely tempted to rustle up a
couple dozen sockpuppets and stuff the ballot box just to make
absolutely sure you "win" it, you fucking lech!"
Paul Derbyshire, socked up as Andrew Wilson
Message-ID: <9870030e-6c49-4f16-af9e-
070a57...@g18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
_____________________________________________________________________
"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."
-Ragnar
_____________________________________________________________________
"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"
-Ragnar, socked-up as "Wildhare"
_____________________________________________________________________
Checkmate!
First, check out what Bob Casanova said:
>
> On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 03:43:29 -0600, the following appeared
> in sci.skeptic, posted by K Wills <comp...@gmail.com>:
>
> >On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 10:23:54 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 19:00:39 -0800 (PST), the following
> >>appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Greegor
> >><gree...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>So who's this Kent Wills you're obsessing over?
> >
> > He claims I am the Kent Wills he's OBSESSED with. Of course, he's
> >also claimed I am several other people with the name Kent Wills. Greg
> >states he has PROVED (emphasis his) that I live in four different
> >places, at the same time, via the phone book.
> > And he's openly admitted that nothing he posts is actually about
> >me. Sadly, he MUST post the information. His mind is such that he
> >honestly does not have any choice.
>
> Asked and answered; thanks. He sounds like a nutjob. And my
> killfile, which is getting rather large, takes yet another
> bite...
newsreaders now come with that feature as a default.
--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012
co-winner, Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker award, May 2001
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved
I'm Checkmate, and I approve this message...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpZhZAr1cQU
Read what others are saying about Checkmate!
_____________________________________________________________________
"I keep forgetting you've been doing this for so long that it's easy
for you. I can't wait to piss on your grave."
Uncle Steve
Message-ID: <b18ab6cb2c...@gmail.com>
_____________________________________________________________________
"Did... did you just tell someone to attempt to ROT-13 *numbers*, you
Clueless Newbie of the Month candidate?"
Paul Derbyshire, socked-up as [tor] Phoenix
Message-ID: <k3ae35$prb$1...@news.mixmin.net>
_____________________________________________________________________
"Nov. 1 can't come quickly enough for me. I really, REALLY want to put
that little + in the box for your Creepy Candy Coating on the ballot,
so badly my hand is twitching. And I'm sorely tempted to rustle up a
couple dozen sockpuppets and stuff the ballot box just to make
absolutely sure you "win" it, you fucking lech!"
Paul Derbyshire, socked up as Andrew Wilson
Message-ID: <9870030e-6c49-4f16-af9e-
070a57...@g18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
_____________________________________________________________________
"You can sit there all you want and spit out all the denial you can
muster, it still doesn't change the fact that you are the current
king shit of the puppeteers in this group."
-Ragnar
_____________________________________________________________________
"You have got to be the biggest butt fucking moron in this place.
You use socks and then admit to it? What the fuck is the point?"
-Ragnar, socked-up as "Wildhare"
_____________________________________________________________________
Message has been deleted
Bob Casanova
Dec 5, 2012, 12:19:06 PM12/5/12
to
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:25:02 +0000, the following appeared in
sci.skeptic, posted by sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe):
>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
>> Asked and answered; thanks. He sounds like a nutjob. And my
>> killfile, which is getting rather large, takes yet another
>> bite...
>> --
>>
>> Bob C.
>
>Woollen or acrylic, Bob C.?
Linen. But why do you ask?, he queried.
sci.skeptic, posted by sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe):
>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
>> Asked and answered; thanks. He sounds like a nutjob. And my
>> killfile, which is getting rather large, takes yet another
>> bite...
>> --
>>
>> Bob C.
>
Linen. But why do you ask?, he queried.
Message has been deleted
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Dec 6, 2012, 1:19:32 AM12/6/12
to
"Sn!pe" wrote:
> Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
> > Asked and answered; thanks. He sounds like a nutjob. And my
> > killfile, which is getting rather large, takes yet another
> > bite...
> > --
> >
> > Bob C.
>
> Woollen or acrylic, Bob C.?
Static on the Lines eh what!
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Dec 6, 2012, 1:21:01 AM12/6/12
to
Bob Casanova wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:25:02 +0000, the following appeared in
> sci.skeptic, posted by sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe):
>
> >Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >
> >> Asked and answered; thanks. He sounds like a nutjob. And my
> >> killfile, which is getting rather large, takes yet another
> >> bite...
> >> --
> >>
> >> Bob C.
> >
> >Woollen or acrylic, Bob C.?
>
> Linen. But why do you ask?, he queried.
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Dec 6, 2012, 1:24:31 AM12/6/12
to
"Sn!pe" wrote:
> Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:25:02 +0000, the following appeared in
> > sci.skeptic, posted by sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe):
> >
> > >Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Asked and answered; thanks. He sounds like a nutjob. And my
> > >> killfile, which is getting rather large, takes yet another
> > >> bite...
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Bob C.
> > >
> > >Woollen or acrylic, Bob C.?
> >
> > Linen. But why do you ask?, he queried.
>
> I'm in my 60s and it's what I do.
> > sci.skeptic, posted by sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe):
> >
> > >Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Asked and answered; thanks. He sounds like a nutjob. And my
> > >> killfile, which is getting rather large, takes yet another
> > >> bite...
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Bob C.
> > >
> > >Woollen or acrylic, Bob C.?
> >
> > Linen. But why do you ask?, he queried.
>
Pester people with weird questions?
Why did ya wait till your 60's to do that?
My Mom, Believed in my RIGHT, to ask Questions.
She did Not believe in people Telling us what to think.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Bob Casanova
Dec 6, 2012, 12:12:28 PM12/6/12
to
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 08:35:29 +0000, the following appeared in
So you're a sock puppet? Or do you fabricate sock puppets?
Either way is fine with me; to each his own...
>I never heard of linen socks before, don't they get all crinkly?
Damfino; I don't make *or* use them.
sci.skeptic, posted by sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe):
>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:25:02 +0000, the following appeared in
>> sci.skeptic, posted by sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe):
>>
>> >Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Asked and answered; thanks. He sounds like a nutjob. And my
>> >> killfile, which is getting rather large, takes yet another
>> >> bite...
>Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:25:02 +0000, the following appeared in
>> sci.skeptic, posted by sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe):
>>
>> >Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Asked and answered; thanks. He sounds like a nutjob. And my
>> >> killfile, which is getting rather large, takes yet another
>> >> bite...
>> >Woollen or acrylic, Bob C.?
>>
>> Linen. But why do you ask?, he queried.
>
>Only because I'm always interested in novel hosiery materials, Bob.
>>
>> Linen. But why do you ask?, he queried.
>
So you're a sock puppet? Or do you fabricate sock puppets?
Either way is fine with me; to each his own...
>I never heard of linen socks before, don't they get all crinkly?
Damfino; I don't make *or* use them.
Message has been deleted
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Dec 9, 2012, 12:02:40 AM12/9/12
to
> [...]
Ain't "DONE" a damned thing, which is what gets me!
>
>
> > Why did ya wait till your 60's to do that?
>
> Oh, I didn't wait, I've always been an earnest seeker after truth.
But when did ya start listening?
>
>
> > My Mom, Believed in my RIGHT, to ask Questions.
>
> Quite RIGHT too, Questions are Most IMPORTANT.
> Everybody should Think for Themselves.
>
> Nice to meet you, Lady Azure, I don't think I've had
> the pleasure before. Will you be sticking around? <G>
I ain't going no where, but NG's sure are!
Especially allowing the Troll Militia to be the Net Gods, dictating the
Definition of "Free Speech"!
Wicca ain't Atheist, and Atheist ain't Wicca, but I don't consider either,
to be Fundie Rightard's doing the reverse evolution of Mankind idea, while
the Flame War dividing Fellowship IS!
As such WITCH HUNTERS, inciting fights between the HERETICS and PAGANS,
ain't your Friends!
From Venus and Mars came Harmony, from Chaos and Discord came the Light and
Order of Ra!
The Rod AND the Staff!
>
>
> --
> ^Ï^. Sn!pe <sn...@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk>
>
> My pet rock Gordon just is.
>
>
> > > > >Woollen or acrylic, Bob C.?
> > > >
> > > > Linen. But why do you ask?, he queried.
> > >
> > > I'm in my 60s and it's what I do.
> >
> > Pester people with weird questions?
>
> Weird is as weird does, Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole.
> > > > >Woollen or acrylic, Bob C.?
> > > >
> > > > Linen. But why do you ask?, he queried.
> > >
> > > I'm in my 60s and it's what I do.
> >
> > Pester people with weird questions?
>
Ain't "DONE" a damned thing, which is what gets me!
>
>
> > Why did ya wait till your 60's to do that?
>
But when did ya start listening?
>
>
> > My Mom, Believed in my RIGHT, to ask Questions.
>
>
> > She did Not believe in people Telling us what to think.
>
> She was Very Wise; Moms usually are.
> > She did Not believe in people Telling us what to think.
>
> Everybody should Think for Themselves.
>
> Nice to meet you, Lady Azure, I don't think I've had
> the pleasure before. Will you be sticking around? <G>
I ain't going no where, but NG's sure are!
Especially allowing the Troll Militia to be the Net Gods, dictating the
Definition of "Free Speech"!
Wicca ain't Atheist, and Atheist ain't Wicca, but I don't consider either,
to be Fundie Rightard's doing the reverse evolution of Mankind idea, while
the Flame War dividing Fellowship IS!
As such WITCH HUNTERS, inciting fights between the HERETICS and PAGANS,
ain't your Friends!
From Venus and Mars came Harmony, from Chaos and Discord came the Light and
Order of Ra!
The Rod AND the Staff!
>
>
> --
> ^Ï^. Sn!pe <sn...@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk>
>
> My pet rock Gordon just is.
>
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Dec 9, 2012, 12:04:23 AM12/9/12
to
"Sn!pe" wrote:
> Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:25:02 +0000, the following appeared in
> > sci.skeptic, posted by sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe):
> >
> > >Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Asked and answered; thanks. He sounds like a nutjob. And my
> > >> killfile, which is getting rather large, takes yet another
> > >> bite...
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Bob C.
> > >
> > >Woollen or acrylic, Bob C.?
> >
> > Linen. But why do you ask?, he queried.
>
> > sci.skeptic, posted by sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe):
> >
> > >Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Asked and answered; thanks. He sounds like a nutjob. And my
> > >> killfile, which is getting rather large, takes yet another
> > >> bite...
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Bob C.
> > >
> > >Woollen or acrylic, Bob C.?
> >
> > Linen. But why do you ask?, he queried.
>
> Only because I'm always interested in novel hosiery materials, Bob.
> I never heard of linen socks before, don't they get all crinkly?
No Inner Support to carry itself aloft for the day!
Gives ya Rug burn too!
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Dec 9, 2012, 12:05:38 AM12/9/12
to
Bob Casanova wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 08:35:29 +0000, the following appeared in
> sci.skeptic, posted by sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe):
>
> >Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:25:02 +0000, the following appeared in
> >> sci.skeptic, posted by sn...@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe):
> >>
> >> >Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Asked and answered; thanks. He sounds like a nutjob. And my
> >> >> killfile, which is getting rather large, takes yet another
> >> >> bite...
>
> >> >Woollen or acrylic, Bob C.?
> >>
> >> Linen. But why do you ask?, he queried.
> >
> >Only because I'm always interested in novel hosiery materials, Bob.
>
> So you're a sock puppet? Or do you fabricate sock puppets?
> Either way is fine with me;
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole
Dec 9, 2012, 12:08:43 AM12/9/12
to
"Sn!pe" wrote:
> Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>
> > >> >Woollen or acrylic, Bob C.?
> > >>
> > >> Linen. But why do you ask?, he queried.
> > >
> > >Only because I'm always interested in novel hosiery materials, Bob.
> >
> > So you're a sock puppet? Or do you fabricate sock puppets?
> > Either way is fine with me; to each his own...
>
> Hell no! I am a fine, upstanding netizen of probity and good taste.
> > >>
> > >> Linen. But why do you ask?, he queried.
> > >
> > >Only because I'm always interested in novel hosiery materials, Bob.
> >
> > So you're a sock puppet? Or do you fabricate sock puppets?
> > Either way is fine with me; to each his own...
>
> I do have a couple of other hats that I wear from time to time but I
> find that wearing socks cuts off all the supply of feet to my blood.
La Foote doing the Sabot?
Jig holds the Dancer to the rhythm, and but 1 Blade of Grass can keep ya
from falling off the Face of the earth!
Least to a Leprechaun!
o};-)
%
Dec 8, 2012, 10:46:10 PM12/8/12
to
%
Dec 8, 2012, 10:46:28 PM12/8/12
to
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole wrote:
%
Dec 8, 2012, 10:46:47 PM12/8/12
to
Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole wrote:
%
Dec 8, 2012, 10:47:06 PM12/8/12
to
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages