ALTERNATIVE Comet Rendevous Mission
John Mechalas
<Tom> As opposed to "mainstream" comet rendevous
> The two proposed NASA comet rendezvous and sample return
> missions are expected to cost BILLIONS
<Joel> Carl Sagan!
> of dollars, take
> nearly 20 years from now to complete, and could FAIL in
> DOZENS of ways!
>
> Therefore, I believe that NASA, the United States, and
> the project scientists and engineers, should all SWALLOW
> THEIR PRIDE
<Crow> Without cheweing?
> and ask the Russians for help. The Russians have
> some equipment that could COMPLETE a MANNED comet rendezvous
> and sample return mission, ROUND TRIP,
<Tom> Like you could do a rendevous *and* return mission *without* it
being a round trip! Bite me, pal!
> in a matter of only a
> couple of MONTHS! In spite of their economic and political
> problems, they are
<Jeol> really nice people.
> FAR AHEAD in space, militarily and
> scientifically.
<Tom> I thought they were behind us?
<Crow> I think they are gaining on us...
<Joel> "Inconceivable!"
> Most of the following information came from the late Dr.
> Peter David Beter,
<Crow> Peter Beter! Peter Beter! Peter Beter!
<Joel> "For Beter or for Worse"
<Tom> My information is Beter than your information!
> a well respected Washington, DC attorney,
<Joel> Well respected attorney? In Washington? Isn't that an
oxymoron?
<Tom> Deja vu...
> Doctor of Jurisprudence, and expert and consultant in
> international law, finance, and intelligence, who received
> most of his information from many associates in the CIA and
> other intelligence groups
<Crow> Who were, obviously, telling him the truth about Life, The Universe,
and Everything.
> of other countries who disapproved
> of many of the things happening or being planned behind the
> scenes.
<Tom> This is Mr CIA Man. He's trying "Not to be seen". He is cleverly
hiding 'behind the scenes', but we know *which* scene..."
<All> *Ka-BOOM*
> [See especially the 2-7-80, 5-14-81, 5-21-81, 5-27-
> 82, and 10-14-82 back-issues of WISCONSIN REPORT newspaper,
> P.O. Box 45, Brookfield, WI 53005; and The Dr. Beter Audio-
> Letters (AL) #64, #79, and #53.]
>
> The Russians have spacecraft called "COSMOSPHERES",
> which were originally built and used for "Starwars" defense.
<Crow> I thought "Star Wars" was our defense system?
<Tom> They were building it for us! Wow!
> They are spherical in shape,
<Tom> Hence the name, "CosmoSPHERE"
<Joel> I guess that's why they didn't call them "Cosmocubes"
<Crow> Or "Cosmododecahedrons"
> INvisible to radar beyond about
> 50 miles away, atomic-powered [possibly Migma fUsion],
<Crow> Migma Fusion?
<Joel> Perhaps he mean "Enigma Fusion"
> electro-gravitic (can hover against gravity), and equipped
> with "Psycho-energetic Range Finding" (PRF) which tunes-in to
> the actual atomic signature of an object or target.
<Tom> Of course, all this super-advanced technology has been wasting away
in a warehouse in Moscow because no one could figure out what to do
with it.
>
> The 3rd-generation JUMBO
<Joel> Gumballs!
> Cosmospheres occupy more volume
> than the Hindenburg blimp,
<Crow> Which is very easy to do, considering the Hindenburg is a pile of
ashes.
> and are ELECTRO-MAGNETICALLY
> PROPELLED (can accelerate continuously and rapidly, and make
> it to Saturn in three WEEKS!).
<Tom> Is that with, or without, a pit stop at Jupiter?
> [Many of them are armed with
> charged-particle beam weapons, neutron beam weapons, and/or
> microwave brain-scrambling equipment!]
<Joel> Which no one has ever considered using, say, in a war.
<Tom> I think Robert was hit by one of those brain-scramblers.
<Crow> You think so?
<Tom> Just look for yourself... Coincidence?
<Joel> Read the book...!
> I would not be surprised if the Russians have already
> COMPLETED a comet rendezvous and sample return mission and
> have data and samples to share.
<Tom> I would!
<Crow> That's one of their two chief weapons: surprise and fear!
<Tom> Fear? I wasn't expecting one to be fear...
<Joel> "No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!"
> AIR BOOMS, 1977-78
> I wish to add that the 1st-generation COSMOSPHERES were
> deployed beginning in the Fall of 1977.
<Crow> Why do they call it the "Fall of 1977"
<Joel> Because, Crow, people had been trying for a whole year to
overthrow 1977 before they finally succeeded.
> In late 1977 and
> early 1978, there was a strange rash
<Tom> on my bottom.
> of giant AIR BOOMS along
> the East Coast of the U.S and elsewhere.
<Joel> Where else?
<Tom> No, no! *Else...where*!
> The AIR BOOMS were
> never satifactorily explained, by either the government or
> news media. They could NOT be positively identified with any
> particular SST or other aircraft, and indeed were much louder
> than aircraft sonic booms.
<Tom> Unless of course, you happen to be deaf.
> The giant AIR BOOMS were actually caused by Russia
> COSMOSPHERES
<Crow> Wait a minute! I thought he just said that "they could not be
positively identified"! Joel, he's not making any sense!
<Joel> And this is a new thing?
> firing CHARGED-PARTICLE BEAMS down into the
> atmosphere in a DE-focused mode (spread out)
<Joel> A spread-out focus?
<Tom> A planet where *apes* evolved from *men*?
> for the purpose
> of announcing their presence to the WAR-MONGERS in the U.S.
> Pentagon. [AL #29.]
<Crow> "We're he-e-e-e-re....."
<Joel> "Inconceivable!"
> The 3rd-generation JUMBO COSMOSPHERES were first
> deployed in April 1981, in parallel with the first U.S. Space
> Shuttle Mission. They significantly INTERFERED
<Tom> with cable television broadcasts
> with that
> mission, in ways which were successfully COVERED-UP by NASA
<Tom> Now wait a minute...I'm confused. If people found out about the
cover-up, then would it really be considered "successful"?
> using techniques similar to those shown in the movie
> "Capricorn I". [AL #64.]
<Crow> Now *there's* a scientific source!
> CREDIBILITY of Dr. Beter
>
> I wish to give some additional information supporting
> Dr. Beter's credibility, and that of his informers.
>
> Dr. Beter predicted the bombing of the Marines in Beirut
> A FULL YEAR BEFORE IT HAPPENED. He warned that the U.S.
> Pentagon and the Israeli Mossad were CONSPIRING to
> DELIBERATELY ARRANGE IT in order to try to get Americans
> angry at the Arabs. (It was NO SURPRISE to me when it
<Tom> Well, I'm *proud* of you, son!
> happened!) [AL #78, #79, and #80 (11-3-82).]
<All> Seen it!
> Dr. Beter predicted the assassination of Anwar Saddat
> SIX DAYS BEFORE IT HAPPENED. [AL #68 (9-30-81) and #69.]
<All> Seen it!
> Dr. Beter predicted what he called the "RETIREMENT" of
> Leonid Brezhnev ONE WEEK BEFORE Brezhnev "died". [Note that
> the word "retirement" was used for the TERMINATION OF
> REPLICANTS in the 1982 movie "Blade Runner".]
<All> Ooooooooooooooo!
<Tom> Coincidence? You decide!
<Joel> Read the book!
> He also
> predicted that Brezhnev would be quickly replaced with
> Andropov,
<Joel> of the Flying Circus Andropovs
> which occurred ONLY THREE DAYS after the "death" of
> Brezhnev, to the SURPRISE of all government and media
> analysts. [AL #8O (11-3-82).]
<All> Seen it!
>
> Dr. Beter was able to "predict" these events because he
> had been INFORMED about the PLANS to carry them out.
<All> Seen it!
> [I KNOW that we are all supposed to LAUGH at the word
> "conspiracy".
<All> HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
> That is what the various government, military,
> political, media, banking, and corporate CONSPIRATORS have
> successfully PROGRAMMED most of us to do. ]
<Tom> What? I've been programmed?
<Joel> Of course you have been, Tom. You're a robot.
<Tom> Well, what kind of program?
<Joel> Episodes of "Moonlighting" and "Sledge Hammer"
> THE DR. BETER AUDIO-LETTERS
>
> ALL 80 Dr. Beter Audio-Letters (about 50 KB each) and an
> Overview (about 75 KB) have been digitized
<Crow> against our better nature
> by Jon Volkoff at
> "eide...@cerf.net" and are available
<Tom> evenings and weekends
> from him and from some
> FTP sites where he sent them.
>
>
> Jon Volkoff states: "I know of two ftp sites (there are
> a few "gopher" servers too) as follows:
>
> uglymouse.css.itd.umich.edu (141.211.182.53),
> under /pub/Politics/Beter.Audio.Letter
>
> ftp.uu.net (192.48.96.9),
> under /doc/political/umich-poli/Beter.Audio.Letter ."
>
>
> I especially recommend
<Crow> Extensive psycho-therapy
> Audio-Letters #64, 74, 40, 53,
> 54, 55, 45, 46, 47, 48, 78, 79, and 80, and the Overview.
> ALL of these will fit on a SINGLE 3-1/2-inch disk formatted
> for 720 KB.
>
> Audio-Letter #64 is about the "STS-1 DISASTER/
> /COVERUP". Audio-Letter #74 is about the "SECRET PURPOSE of
> the Falklands War", and includes IN-VISIBILITY Technology and
> a Russian NEUTRON BOMB.
<Tom> You know...it just occured to me how *weird* this guy is.
> Audio-Letter #40 is about the
> "MILITARY PURPOSE of Jonestown Mass-MURDER".
<All> *BZZZT* Seen it!
> ELECTRO-MAGNETIC PROPULSION
>
> I indicated that the Russian 3rd-generation "JUMBO
> COSMOSPHERES" are ELECTRO-MAGNETICALLY PROPELLED.
<Joel> Why, yes, Robert, you did! And here's Tom Servo to tell you
what you've won!
<Tom> Well Robert, we have ESPECIALLY for you a DICTIONARY!! Inside
you'll find all sorts of words, words, and more words! You'll
be able to look up the meanings of words such as "paranoid",
"delusion", "guillible", "irrelevant", and "rambling"!
<Joel> And that's not all! You'll also receive all of our wonderful
parting gifts! Thank you for playing!
> I heard of that concept long before 1981, in connection
> with UFO's
<All> Pigs.....In.....Spa-a-a-a-a-a-ace!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> and unorthodox inventors,
<Tom> Read: "Losers"
> but I never was able to
> find out how or why they work, or how they are constructed.
<Tom> Well! I wonder why that is!
> I found a possible clue about why they might work on
> pages 112-113 of the book "BASIC PROPERTIES OF MATTER", by
> the late Physicist Dewey B. Larson,
<Joel> He was Gary's cousin, you know.
> which describes part of
> Larson's comprehensive
<Crow> "Night of the Crash Test Dummies"
> GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the physical
> universe. I quote one paragraph:
>
> "As indicated in the preceding chapter, the development
> of the theory of the universe of motion arrives at a totally
> different concept of the nature of electrical resistance.
<Tom> Joel, I forget...How did we get here from "Comet Rendevous"?
<Joel> I dunno Tom...He lost me when he started mentioning "Brain
scramblers"
<Crow> Is it a coincidence? Or evidence of some, higher power?
<All> Read the book!
> The electrons, we find, are derived from the environment. It
> was brought out in Volume I
<Crow> But, nobody cared.
> [Larson's book "NOTHING BUT
> MOTION"] that there are physical processes in operation which
> produce electrons in substantial quantities, and that,
> although the motions that constitute these electrons are, in
> many cases, absorbed by atomic structures, the opportunities
> for utilizing this type of motion in such structures are
> limited. It follows
<Tom> It's following us?
<Joel> "Inconceivable!"
> that there is always a large excess of
> free electrons in the material sector [material half]
<Tom> Well?! Which is it? The material half, or the material sector?
<Joel> I think it's a little bit of both.
> of the
> universe, most of which are uncharged.
<Joel> He was a rebel without a charge!
> In this uncharged
> state the electrons cannot move with respect to extension
> space, because they are inherently rotating units of space,
> and the relation of space to space is not motion. In open
> space, therefore, each uncharged electron remains permanently
> in the same location with respect to the natural reference
> system, in the manner of a photon.
<Crow> This is getting way too silly for me.
> In the context of the
> stationary spatial reference system the uncharged electron,
> like the photon, is carried outward at the speed of light by
> the progression of the natural reference system. All
> material aggregates are thus exposed to a flux of electrons
> similar to the continual bombardment by photons of radiation.
> Meanwhile there are other processes, to be discussed later,
> whereby electrons are returned to the environment. The
> electron population of a material aggregate such as the earth
> therefore stabilizes at an equilibrium level."
>
> Note that in Larson's Theory, UNcharged electrons are
> also massLESS,
<Tom> Look, Joel! Capital letters!
<Crow> In a McElwaine post?
<Joel> "Inconceivable!"
> and are basically photons of light of a
> particular frequency (above the "unit" frequency) spinning
> around one axis at a particular rate (below the "unit" rate).
> ("Unit velocity" is the speed of light, and there are
> vibrational and rotational equivalents to the speed of light,
> according to Larson's Theory.) [I might have the "above" and
> "below" labels mixed up.]
<Tom> Oh, great, Joel! Now even *he* doesn't know what he's talking about!
> Larson is saying that outer space is filled with mass-
> LESS UN-charged electrons
<Crow> Didn't we just see this?
> flying around at the speed of
> light!
<Tom> *sarcasm* Oh! I'm excited NOW!
> If this is true,
<Joel> then the civilized world is in deep doo-doo.
> then the ELECTRO-MAGNETIC PROPULSION
> fields of the Russian JUMBO COSMOSPHERES
<Crow> What about the Cosmocubes?
> might be interacting
> with these electrons, or other particles in space, perhaps
> GIVING them a charge
<Tom> card with a credit line of, oh, say, $1000.
> (and mass) and shooting them toward the
> rear to achieve propulsion.
<Joel> Man! I hope he's not shooting them at *my* rear!
<Crow> That's *deep hurting*!
> (In Larson's Theory, an
> electrical charge is a rotational vibration of a particular
> frequency (above the "unit" frequency) superimposed on the
<Crow> photograph of my sister.
> rotation of the particle.)
>
> The paragraph quoted above might also give a clue to
<Tom> everyone except you!
> confused meteorologists about how lightning is generated in
> clouds.
>
>
> For more information, answers to your questions, etc.,
<Joel> or a good laugh
> please consult by CITED SOURCES.
> UN-altered REPRODUCTION and DISSEMINATION of this
> IMPORTANT Information is ENCOURAGED.
<Crow> But *not* recommended!
> Robert E. McElwaine
> B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
1....2....3....4....5....6....G
<Joel> What do you think, Sirs?
--
John Mechalas \ If you think my opinions are Purdue's, then
mech...@expert.cc.purdue.edu \ you vastly overestimate my importance.
Purdue University Computing Center \ Stamp out and abolish redundancy.
General Consulting \ If you can read this you are too close.