Even Moonbat says the "science" now needs "reanalyising"
bo*n*z*o
November 24 2009
Even George Monbiot, one of the fiercest media propagandists of the warming
faith, admits he should have been more sceptical and says the science now
needs to be rechecked:
"It's no use pretending that this isn't a major blow. The emails extracted
by a hacker from the climatic research unit at the University of East Anglia
could scarcely be more damaging. I am now convinced that they are genuine,
and I'm dismayed and deeply shaken by them. "
"Yes, the messages were obtained illegally. Yes, all of us say things in
emails that would be excruciating if made public. Yes, some of the comments
have been taken out of context. But there are some messages that require no
spin to make them look bad. There appears to be evidence here of attempts to
prevent scientific data from being released, and even to destroy material
that was subject to a freedom of information request."
"Worse still, some of the emails suggest efforts to prevent the publication
of work by climate sceptics, or to keep it out of a report by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. I believe that the head of the
unit, Phil Jones, should now resign. Some of the data discussed in the
emails should be re-analysed. "
Sure, Moonbat claims the fudging of what he extremely optimistically puts as
just "three or four" scientists doesn't knock over the whole global warming
edifice, yet.
If even Monbiot, an extremist, can say that much, why cannot the Liberals
say far more?
And will now the legion of warmist journalists in our own media dare say as
Moonbat has so belatedly:
"I apologise. I was too trusting of some of those who provided the evidence
I championed. I would have been a better journalist if I had investigated
their claims more closely."
Scepticism is the essential disposition of our craft, yet too many
journalists have abandoned it.
Remember: the opposite of sceptical is gullible.
Warmest Regards
B0n oz
"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps
US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists
worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct
from natural variation."
Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
jason
>
> Warmest Regards
>
> B0n oz
>
> "It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps
> US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists
> worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct
> from natural variation."
>
> Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
Bonzy - your like a boke in the eye of a cyclone saying "Look the wind
has stopped. All this nonsense about another half to come is just that
- nonsense". Aren't you?
Surfer
>
>
>November 24 2009
>
>Even George Monbiot, one of the fiercest media propagandists of the warming
>faith, admits he should have been more sceptical and says the science now
>needs to be rechecked:
>
Really?
George Monbiot
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cif-green/2009/nov/23/global-warming-leaked-email-climate-scientists
"........But do these revelations justify the sceptics' claims that
this is "the final nail in the coffin" of global warming theory? Not
at all. They damage the credibility of three or four scientists. They
raise questions about the integrity of one or perhaps two out of
several hundred lines of evidence. To bury man-made climate change, a
far wider conspiracy would have to be revealed......"
bo*n*z*o
"jason" <z.y...@live.com.au> wrote in message
news:a53b3264-c967-437d...@y10g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
======================================
No.
bo*n*z*o
"Surfer" <n...@spam.net> wrote in message
news:jdpog59n5le14suvl...@4ax.com...
So he's contradicetde himself.
What else is new ....
jason
Division required?