Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy
From: k...@hotmail.com
Date: 1999/06/19
Subject: Re: "...blow your brains out." A statement by Leslie Packer, "psychotherapist"
In article <19990618195737.25795.00001...@ng-cl1.aol.com>,
erebus1...@aol.comTFF-FAN (EREBUS1845) wrote: T>One can be trained by Freud and Jung themselves, it doesn't >mean that the person is any better at wisdom because of the K>That's for sure. As I've always said, Leslie Packer's >training. >judgment is extremely poor. T>I still can't believe she'd waste everything to spout off >like that, Curio. I've had times when I wanted to state some I know. I think one can write flames, even insults, and some >vile things, but common sense prevails. of it is even humorous or entertaining. It ceases to be funny when people use violent imagery. I don't like what Fiona stated to UG Panther -- using suicide imagery under guise of myth. I don't like what Nancy Alvarado stated to you, (FOAD) I don't like that Leslie Packer tells both of us to blow our brains out or John Price's reference to my death over the years. For the regulars on this sci group, I know I'm going to T>Harassment and death threats, professionally ethical to you, >Silke? K>She probably thinks she's still in a Jackie Collins novel. >LOL! It's all a black comedy here isn't it? Where friends of Yes, Silke has played her own games over the years and lied >friends protect others because they have religious and other >ties. A clique that one has to protect another to get in. to me via e-mail to try to get me to cancel one of my own posts under false pretenses, but I tend to reward good behavior, no matter how slight. I'll leave it at that unless there's reason to expand on these comments. >And why some folks (like Sara) wonder why they just I'm just skimming some of these posts. I read her commentary > don't fit in with anyone here. and I consider it to be a bizarre take on events. K>Of course it's not acceptable, but some of these people >are so sociopathic that it does no good to appeal T>Yes, and I can see that's very evident. How can *anyone* >to their "higher" nature. >justify "blow your brains out?" Only one with a pathological If you are shocked at this it's probably because you are >need to destroy another. a genuinely good person and want to think the best of people. I do that on occasion but not with people who indicate early on that they have sociopathic tendencies. I got her number years ago. It has nothing to do with exchanging dialogue with a person who holds a legitimate difference of opinion, it has to do with my awareness of conscious deception. She has made it more than obvious over the years, as have many here. It could also be due to my work background and personal life experience, most of which I do not disclose. I don't care too much to write posts for this newsgroup K>I would prefer to appeal to their licensing boards. >It all depends on what happens. Yes, since she said it to both of us, we are each free to handle it as we see fit. KJ Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||