Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion "...blow your brains out." A statement by Leslie Packer, "psychotherapist"
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
kar5  
View profile  
 More options Jun 19 1999, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy
From: k...@hotmail.com
Date: 1999/06/19
Subject: Re: "...blow your brains out." A statement by Leslie Packer, "psychotherapist"
In article <19990618195737.25795.00001...@ng-cl1.aol.com>,
  erebus1...@aol.comTFF-FAN (EREBUS1845) wrote:

>From: k...@hotmail.com

T>One can be trained by Freud and Jung themselves, it doesn't

>mean that the person is any better at wisdom because of the
>training.

K>That's for sure. As I've always said, Leslie Packer's

>judgment is extremely poor.

T>I still can't believe she'd waste everything to spout off

>like that, Curio. I've had times when I wanted to state some
>vile things, but common sense prevails.

I know. I think one can write flames, even insults, and some
of it is even humorous or entertaining. It ceases to be funny
when people use violent imagery. I don't like what Fiona
stated to UG Panther -- using suicide imagery under guise of
myth. I don't like what Nancy Alvarado stated to you, (FOAD)
I don't like that Leslie Packer tells both of us to blow our
brains out or John Price's reference to my death over the
years.

For the regulars on this sci group, I know I'm going to
have to spell this out for you. It's unacceptable because
it indicates very poor judgment, a serious lack of self-control,
indicates severe character defects, and it's incredibly
abusive -- even from a lay person. For a self-proclaimed
psychotherapist and "child advocate," it raises so many red
flags for me personally (and I thought my hackles were
raised enough) that I really can't ignore it. Some people
who have past SI can be triggered by words such as this.

T>Harassment and death threats, professionally ethical to you,

>Silke?

K>She probably thinks she's still in a Jackie Collins novel.

>LOL! It's all a black comedy here isn't it? Where friends of
>friends protect others because they have religious and other
>ties. A clique that one has to protect another to get in.

Yes, Silke has played her own games over the years and lied
to me via e-mail to try to get me to cancel one of my own
posts under false pretenses, but I tend to reward good behavior,
no matter how slight. I'll leave it at that unless there's
reason to expand on these comments.

>And why some folks (like Sara) wonder why they just
> don't fit in with anyone here.

I'm just skimming some of these posts. I read her commentary
and I consider it to be a bizarre take on events.

K>Of course it's not acceptable, but some of these people

>are so sociopathic that it does no good to appeal
>to their "higher" nature.

T>Yes, and I can see that's very evident. How can *anyone*

>justify "blow your brains out?" Only one with a pathological
>need to destroy another.

If you are shocked at this it's probably because you are
a genuinely good person and want to think the best of people.
I do that on occasion but not with people who indicate early
on that they have sociopathic tendencies. I got her number
years ago. It has nothing to do with exchanging dialogue
with a person who holds a legitimate difference of opinion,
it has to do with my awareness of conscious deception. She
has made it more than obvious over the years, as have many
here. It could also be due to my work background and personal
life experience, most of which I do  not disclose.

I don't care too much to write posts for this newsgroup
alone because I consider it to be a cesspool and a closed
system. There's nothing to be gained by just writing here
-- for me.

K>I would prefer to appeal to their licensing boards.

>It all depends on what happens.

Yes, since she said it to both of us, we are each free
to handle it as we see fit.

KJ

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google