Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The Psychology of the Modern Female

0 views
Skip to first unread message

John the Man

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 6:43:25 AM6/12/03
to
As a member of the older generation, I have noticed that younger females are
dressing quite inappropriately these days. Females seem to be dressing like a
slut.

What I am referring to is the new proclivity to show skin around the midriff.
They don't wear undershorts. It is just a pair of pants and a very short
blouse. So, when they bend over out pops their panties!!! I have seen more
panties in the last few years than I have seen in a life time. I am at the
grocery store buying groceries when out of the blue some female will bend over
and expose everything as if it were absolutely nothing!

So, tiffany when may I expect the modern female to start showing off their butt
cracks? Is this part of the womens lib movement, tiffany? Are these modern
women jealous of male plumbers? Or, are they just trying to be more like the
hollywood slut Demi More?

Personally, tiffany, I prefer the term sluts to describe them. They seem to
want make rape easier to accomplish. Hey with these new ultra short pants all
it takes one good yank, eh tiffany? What is it about the psychology of the
modern female that makes them think that they have a god given right to walk
around half-naked?

Tiffany 899

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 8:09:50 AM6/12/03
to

Justcount your blessings; this is probably the closest you will EVER get to
sex with a young woman, again (ignorant old fart!).

Tiffany

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service New Rate! $9.95/Month 50GB

John the Man

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 8:29:49 AM6/12/03
to
>Subject: Re: The Psychology of the Modern Female
>From: tiffa...@hotmail.com (Tiffany 899)
>Date: 6/12/03 12:09 PM !!!First Boot!!!
>Message-id: <20030612080950.472$C...@newsreader.com>

I am to die for, Tiffany.

john

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 3:58:19 PM6/12/03
to
Hi John,

> As a member of the older generation, I have noticed that younger females
are
> dressing quite inappropriately these days. <snip>

> What I am referring to is the new proclivity to show skin around the
midriff.
My daughters (21, 23 years) are doing the same, like their friends, for
several years now.
They think it's beatifuk/nice/easy going/..whatever...
How old/flexible are you John???

<snip> > Personally, tiffany, I prefer the term sluts to describe them.


They seem to
> want make rape easier to accomplish.

This is like the old times raping debate: man are excused for raping as soon
as they are 'challenged' by the outfit of women. As if man don't have
(learned through the 25 centuries) to respect the (free) will of any other
(hu)(wo)man on one hand?? don't have their own responxibility on the other
hand.
Shame on you,
ciao
John

--
****************************************
The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance,
it is the illusion of knowledge.
(Daniel Boorstin)
****************************************

"John the Man" <jhg...@wmconnect.comVitalism> schreef in bericht
news:20030612064325...@mb-m03.wmconnect.com...

John the Man

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 5:36:03 PM6/12/03
to
>Subject: Re: The Psychology of the Modern Female
>From: "john" jo...@wanadoo.nl
>Date: 6/12/03 7:58 PM !!!First Boot!!!

>How old/flexible are you John???

A very recent 53 years young. And, still making the ladies jump. :)

>>They seem to want make rape easier to accomplish.

>This is like the old times raping debate: man are excused for raping as soon
>as they are 'challenged' by the outfit of women. As if man don't have
>(learned through the 25 centuries) to respect the (free) will of any other
>(hu)(wo)man on one hand?? don't have their own responxibility on the >other
hand.
>Shame on you,

I recall a recent Amtrak train ride. The young lady was carrying a baby, was
wearing those low V-cut jeans and had a hell of time keeping her pants on the
entire ride from NYC to Richmond, VA. She was wearing a thong and at least one
half of her butt was sticking all the way out of her pants. :)

Thong bathing suites, by the way, in Virginia are prosecuted as public nudity.
--
John Gohde
Email: N...@NaturalHealthPerspective.com
((((((((((( Left-Brain Mode ON ))))))))))))
Richmond, Virginia, USA, Planet Earth, The Sun, Milky Way galaxy

john

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 6:09:27 PM6/12/03
to
Hi John,

> A very recent 53 years young. And, still making the ladies jump. :)
ok, that's about my age.

> I recall a recent Amtrak train ride. The young lady was carrying a baby,
was
> wearing those low V-cut jeans and had a hell of time keeping her pants on
the
> entire ride from NYC to Richmond, VA. She was wearing a thong and at
least one
> half of her butt was sticking all the way out of her pants. :)

so??? what does it say about this woman? what does it say about you?

> Thong bathing suites, by the way, in Virginia are prosecuted as public
nudity.

What does that say about Virginia??
Wish you jumping dreams,
ciao
John

--
****************************************
The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance,
it is the illusion of knowledge.
(Daniel Boorstin)
****************************************

"John the Man" <jhg...@wmconnect.comVitalism> schreef in bericht

news:20030612173603...@mb-m10.wmconnect.com...

Tiffany 899

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 9:49:02 PM6/12/03
to
jhg...@wmconnect.comVitalism (John the Man) wrote:
> >Subject: Re: The Psychology of the Modern Female
> >From: "john" jo...@wanadoo.nl
> >Date: 6/12/03 7:58 PM !!!First Boot!!!
>
> >How old/flexible are you John???
>
> A very recent 53 years young. And, still making the ladies jump. :)

Eeewww! Yuck! 53! GROSS!!!

John the Man

unread,
Jun 12, 2003, 10:24:35 PM6/12/03
to
>Subject: Re: The Psychology of the Modern Female
>From: tiffa...@hotmail.com (Tiffany 899)
>Date: 6/13/03 1:49 AM !!!First Boot!!!
>Message-id: <20030612214902.653$h...@newsreader.com>

>
>jhg...@wmconnect.comVitalism (John the Man) wrote:
>> >Subject: Re: The Psychology of the Modern Female
>> >From: "john" jo...@wanadoo.nl
>> >Date: 6/12/03 7:58 PM !!!First Boot!!!
>>
>> >How old/flexible are you John???
>>
>> A very recent 53 years young. And, still making the ladies jump. :)
>
>Eeewww! Yuck! 53! GROSS!!!
>
>Tiffany

Yeah, I know.

What is really gross is when I knock them off their feet, when I pass them in
the hall!!!

adam shrode

unread,
Jun 14, 2003, 3:03:41 PM6/14/03
to

You've got your hands on a bigger issue then you think John.

You're disgust with the issue stems with a difference in opinion. Why
should they wear more clothes? More importantly then clothes introspect
onto yourself John. Why is it you find disgust in this?

The way in which you objectify women in your posts makes you out to be
more of a slut then the women you predispose, however I fear I might
question your desire to make intelligent speak out of this altogether.
I'm quite certain you merely wish a refuttal from Tiffany in much the way
the whole bully system works.

Humans have spent the better part of hundreds of thousands of years
perfecting instinct, to mimic that is hardly impressive. It is sorrowful
to hear your words, knowing you have had 53 years to construct them.

John the Man

unread,
Jun 14, 2003, 6:11:13 PM6/14/03
to
>Subject: Re: The Psychology of the Modern Female
>From: "adam shrode" n...@sp.am
>Date: 6/14/03 7:03 PM !!!First Boot!!!

>Why is it you find disgust in this?

It is more like I am going around with my tongue hanging 6 inches out of my
mouth drooling. :)

Like I told one Slut at Work, for all I care lady you can come to work naked.

There is a difference between being erotic and simply showing skin. The
younger generation has not a clue as to what sexy is.

Just my opinion. But, I am *right* as usual!


Tiffany 899

unread,
Jun 14, 2003, 6:45:08 PM6/14/03
to
jhg...@wmconnect.comVitalism (John the Man) wrote:

And YOU know what sexy is? I guess you think that referring to women as
Sluts is "sexy". I bet that really turns people on, huh?

Tiffany

adam shrode

unread,
Jun 14, 2003, 8:03:37 PM6/14/03
to

I reiterate ... "...I fear I might question your desire to make intelligent

John the Man

unread,
Jun 14, 2003, 8:40:11 PM6/14/03
to
>Subject: Re: The Psychology of the Modern Female
>From: tiffa...@hotmail.com (Tiffany 899)
>Date: 6/14/03 10:45 PM !!!First Boot!!!
>Message-id: <20030614184508.792$y...@newsreader.com>

Grumpism: A Slut is what a Slut does. :)

John the Man

unread,
Jun 14, 2003, 8:42:16 PM6/14/03
to
>Subject: Re: The Psychology of the Modern Female
>From: "adam shrode" n...@sp.am
>Date: 6/15/03 12:03 AM !!!First Boot!!!
>Message-id: <pan.2003.06.14....@sp.am>

Well, personally I am waiting for an intellegent comment from you.

Nick Varney

unread,
Jun 19, 2003, 12:45:27 PM6/19/03
to
>Well, personally I am waiting for an intellegent comment from you.

Its called feeding the trolls.

--
Nick Varney

Mr Michael Bibby

unread,
Jun 22, 2003, 11:57:52 PM6/22/03
to
the world is changing around you, and you are having difficulty keeping up. you
made sense of the world once, but it has changed faster than you can keep up
with it. your the kind of person who propably complains about 'the downfall of
civilization as we know it' and 'moral degeneration'. we live in a different
world, the terms you once used to make sense of the world no longer apply-the
world has changed, this is perhaps the power over us: change!

smickeyd

John the Man

unread,
Jun 23, 2003, 9:12:32 PM6/23/03
to
>Subject: Re: The Psychology of the Modern Female
>From: "Mr Michael Bibby" s403...@student.uq.edu.au
>Date: 6/23/03 3:57 AM !!!First Boot!!!
>Message-id: <bd5ts0$543$1...@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au>

I am still waiting for an intelligent comment to reply to.

John the Man

unread,
Jun 25, 2003, 9:59:17 AM6/25/03
to
>Subject: The Psychology of the Modern Female
>Date: 6/12/03 10:43 AM !!!First Boot!!!

>What I am referring to is the new proclivity to show skin around the midriff.

>They don't wear undershorts. It is just a pair of pants and a very short
>blouse. So, when they bend over out pops their panties!!!

Finally, some intelligent comments have been made on the subject.

"To a large degree the answer lies in the symbolic nature of the region beneath
a woman's ribcage, which represents her potential for procreation," it
explained. "'A flat belly is a modern-day virginity symbol,' said Stephen
Beckerman, associate professor of anthropology at Pennsylvania State
University, who has studied marriage and mating rituals. 'What it suggests is a
woman who has never borne children and thus has all of her years of fertility
in front of her.'"

So, the modern slut in an attempt to change the erotic zone from the breats to
the midriff is advertising that they are born again virgins!!!

"Although the abdomen has only recently supplanted the breast and the leg as
the most drooled-over bit of the female anatomy, it has for centuries been the
locus of sexual interest."

Yeah, I have been noticlng lately. But, why the need for exposing their
panties? What is the psychological significance?

Can we stomach any more?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,3605,980585,00.html
"Alexander Chancellor
Saturday June 21, 2003
The Guardian

In the film of The Leopard, the great novel by Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa
about the decline of the Sicilian aristocracy, the hero, the Prince of Salina
(played by Burt Lancaster), refuses to confess to his priest about a visit he
has made to a prostitute. It is, he says, his prudish wife who is the sinner.
She has borne him seven children and he has never seen her navel. Who could
blame him for sometimes seeking solace with a prostitute?
Well, if he were alive today, the prince would have no excuse for not going to
confession, because he would be seeing navels everywhere. With the arrival, at
last, of some seriously warm summer weather, there is hardly a girl in sight
without a bare midriff. The practice of exposing a few inches of stomach above
the hips has grown to such an extent over the past few years that last week the
New York Times, which is almost as prudish as the Princess of Salina, finally
decided to wake up and pay attention."

Randomruminations

unread,
Jun 26, 2003, 9:40:44 PM6/26/03
to
Maybe they're just nymphomaniacs trying to redefine the word "libido".

Could it really be that simple?!?!?!?!?!? Let's do some good ol' "get your
hands dirty" research and start asking them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"John the Man" <jhg...@wmconnect.comVitalism> wrote in message
news:20030625095917...@mb-m11.wmconnect.com...

Randomruminations

unread,
Jun 26, 2003, 9:43:20 PM6/26/03
to
Maybe they are just nymphomaniacs trying to redifine the word "libido"?

Could it really be that simple?!?!?!?!?!? Let's do some good ol' research
and start asking them!!!!!!!!!!


"John the Man" <jhg...@wmconnect.comVitalism> wrote in message
news:20030625095917...@mb-m11.wmconnect.com...

0 new messages