Scientists in Revolt against Global Warming

and/or www.mantra.com/jai

unread,

Nov 28, 2011, 3:41:14 AM11/28/11

to

Scientists in Revolt against Global Warming

http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2011/11/scientists_in_revolt_against_global_warming.html

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

and/or www.mantra.com/jai

unread,

Nov 28, 2011, 3:44:33 AM11/28/11

to

Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:

>
> Scientists in Revolt against Global Warming
>
> http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2011/11/scientists_in_revolt_against_global_warming.html

An ongoing discussion here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2812982/posts

be...@iwaynet.net

unread,

Nov 28, 2011, 8:38:15 AM11/28/11

to

Hey, Jai,
Obviously you need a little "education" and haven't been going to
warmist blog sites, reading Scientific American, or Physics Today, or
listening to the BBC enough. Happily "Sam Wormley" can provide you with
the links to learn that AGW is "incontrovertible".

Giga2

unread,

Nov 28, 2011, 11:51:45 AM11/28/11

to

<use...@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)> wrote in
message news:20111127waACI2766iPCWO@HbaUs...

Here you go warmist tell us this paragraph is not true or tell us why this
means the so called consensus is manufactured?:

"
It takes a lot of courage. Scientists who report findings that contradict
man-made global warming find their sources of funding cut, their jobs
terminated, their careers stunted, and their reports blocked from important
journals, and they are victimized by personal attacks. This is a consensus
one associates with a Stalinist system, not science in the free world."

Giga2

unread,

Nov 28, 2011, 11:51:22 AM11/28/11

to

<use...@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)> wrote in
message news:20111127waACI2766iPCWO@HbaUs...

Great article

Marvin the Martian

unread,

Nov 28, 2011, 12:10:57 PM11/28/11

to

"In the APS it is ok to discuss whether the mass of the proton changes
over time and how a multi-universe behaves, but the evidence of global
warming is incontrovertible?" Ivar Giaever, Nobel Laureate in physics.

G. L. Bradford

unread,

Nov 28, 2011, 1:15:57 PM11/28/11

to

"BJA...@teranews.com" <be...@iwaynet.net> wrote in message
news:79MAq.8773$g35....@newsfe09.iad...

==================

It's a long way from being "incontrovertible", your trying to slap down
the last two million years of history telling that the Earth is vast
majority 'Ice Age' now (averaging a hundred thousand years and more) with
much shorter interludes, shorter summer interludes one might say, of global
warming (a few short tens of thousands of years of warmth -- varying from
around fifteen to about thirty-five thousand years; and even those
interludes now being liberally laced with mini-ice ages).

Yes climate has changed for the Earth over billions and millions of years.
The trend over the last few million years is toward fewer interludes
lessening in warmth with longer periods (into hundreds of thousands of
years) of global deep freeze. Not only is Earth's immediate environment in
constant change, but so is the environment external to Earth in constant
change (particularly the Sun's immediate environment. And probably even the
local interstellar environment, which our Sun and our Solar System, and thus
our Earth, may be more sensitive to than we would like to think).

GLB

==================

and/or www.mantra.com/jai

unread,

Nov 28, 2011, 1:40:50 PM11/28/11

to

Scientists in Revolt against Global Warming

http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2011/11/scientists_in_revolt_against_global_warming.html

-----

Forwarded post:

Let's not forget how the Democrats' enviro-friendly "green" foam
caused the disintegration of the space shuttle Columbia on re-entry,
killing seven astronauts.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/959251/posts

Congratulations, Democrats.

Posted by Lancey Howard

End of forwarded post from:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2812982/posts

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

=====================================================================
The Keral KalluMallu (V. Bhattathiri) tries his best to be a bully --
telling others what and where to post, where to post and where not to
post, deliberately publishing lies about others and stalking them --
but fails miserably. He is really stressed out, and like his lap dog
Prem Thomas (who currently posts as "P. Rajah"), he is priming
himself for conditions such as stroke and heart disease.
=====================================================================

AGWFacts

unread,

Nov 28, 2011, 2:18:08 PM11/28/11

to

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:41:14 GMT, use...@mantra.com and/or
www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote:

> Scientists in Revolt against Global Warming

Name just one scientist who isn't.

--
"I'd like the globe to warm another degree or two or three... and CO2 levels
to increase perhaps another 100ppm - 300ppm." -- cato...@sympatico.ca

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,

Nov 28, 2011, 2:22:18 PM11/28/11

to

On 11/28/2011 2:18 PM, AGWFacts wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:41:14 GMT, use...@mantra.com and/or
> www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote:
>
>> Scientists in Revolt against Global Warming
>
> Name just one scientist who isn't.

Scientists for global warming are "Revolting"?

I say they are disgusting and revolting.

AGWFacts

unread,

Nov 28, 2011, 2:34:23 PM11/28/11

to

Name just one scientist who does not object to global warming,
Shit-for-brains.