On Nov 23, 12:22 am,
N0S...@daqarta.com (Bob Masta) wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 03:46:25 -0800 (PST), Arindam Banerjee
>
> <
adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
> >What has not been demonstrated to all is an Internal Force Engine that
> >works on a new physics that throws out relativity, entropy and the law
> >of conservation of energy from the implementation of the maths
> >underlying the equation for surplus energy, that is,
> >e=3D0.5mVVN(N-k)
> >I don't think it is easily possible for anyone to deny me the credit
> >of finding this most basic formula, and what to do with it. I don't
> >underestimate the unscrupulousness of the western intellectuals, but
> >in usenet, print media, etc. they may have found their match. No
> >amount of evasiveness, brainwashing, handwaving can deny me the credit
> >for the above.
> >Cheers,
> >Arindam Banerjee
>
> Science is a lot like sports:
I wish the existing scientists were sporting. But they are not. I
have been categorically told that no reputable instituition today will
entertain any thoughts against the validity of the sacred laws of
conservation of mass and energy etc. and that Einstein is much more
than divine to all that matter. In other words, the existing
physicists are totally corrupt, and physics now is but a phony
religion. Served by fiction such as warp drives, and why not, warp
drives on start trek make money and in some twisted way enhance the
image of the so-called physicists.
You get no credit at all for
> claiming what a great prizefighter/sprinter/cyclist you are,
> you have to actually demonstrate it to the satisfaction of
> others.
So where is the demonstration of the warp drive, apart from Star
Trek? Is that a satisfactory demonstration to scientists?
If you are afraid to compete, the only thing that
> the world can conclude is that you apparently can't back up
> your claims.
I am not afraid to compete. I do not find any but shadowy phonies who
have shut their doors to me, and don't want to acknowledge my
presence. Since I also hold them in even more disgust and contempt, I
am not likely to seek their help or even want to see their faces.
> And please, no whining about how it would take millions of
> dollars.
Who is doing the whining? Who is talking about millions of dollars?
Is it you or me?
Build a small-scale model that demonstrates the
> concept on a table top.
A small-scale model for the Internal Force Engine, a totally new idea,
will be very difficult to make. It is beyond my means at the moment.
However I am taking what steps I can to obtain the funding for doing
same. In the meantime, yes, I can do some experiments to make my
point but these experiments will not be as convincing as a
demonstration of an acual engine, model or real. But even these
experiments are not easy to make - this is not an easy subject.
So I once again say that the best demonstration is to put a
electromagnetic rail machine-gun on a boat, and blow up the bows thus
retaining the momentum of the machine-gun type fired bullets. If the
boat acclerates as a result, then e=0.5mVVN(N-k) is proved. And there
is 100% justification for major funding in this new direction.
Please understand that the IFE is for space applications, and creating
space-type conditions on earth is impossible to make on a tabletop,
especially for a forcibly retired person living off his savings.
So far, we haven't heard any
> indication that you are even considering that... hard to
> imagine for an invention worth "quintillions".
I am not responsible for the low wits of others. If they do not have
the vision, I should not be blamed. If they are too lazy or cowardly
to do such simple things as I suggest, what fault is it of mine?
I have done what I can - put my original research and ideas for
everyone to note, indicated what experiments to be performed... that
is enough for one person to do. If for political and other reasons I
am not heeded, the fault is not mine.
Maybe deep
> inside you are not quite as convinced as you would have us
> believe.
Science is about proving some idea using objectivity. If a
demonstration as I suggest (blow up the bows of a boat using rail
machine gun) works, all will see. Like Torricelli proved air pressure
with his water barometer. Archimedes worked out density using a
bath. No one can be convinced, including myself, unless such a
demonstration works.
Yes, I think that this should work, for e=0.5mVVN(N-k) explains so
many natural phenomena relating to matter and energy most beautifully
and intuitively, as I have written in my unpublished book "The
Principles of Motion". Wrote that last year, but have to revise it
following more work done, and to be done now that I have finished an
even more important work.
But yes, a lot needs to be done before anyone including myself gets
really convinced, before conjecture become fact, and that fact
translates into practice.
> To put it plainly: "Put up or shut up!"
I have put up a lot, by way of the most irrefutable logical words;
pity that moral cowards don't heed same. As for shutting up, sorry.
Bullying does not work with me, as I lack the moral cowardice of the
evil einsteinian bullies and frauds.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee