Super Moon?

[The Starmaker]

All of a sudden
I'm hearing about a
Super Moon?
What galaxy
is it in?

[Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)]

On 3/14/12 1:34 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> All of a sudden
> I'm hearing about a
> Super Moon?

No, that's Super SAILOR Moon:

http://www.freewebs.com/0anime0manga0/Sailor%20Moon%20Main.jpg



--
Sea Wasp
/^\
;;;
Website: http://www.grandcentralarena.com Blog:
http://seawasp.livejournal.com

[tphile2]

Long ago in a galaxy far far away
That's no SuperMoon, That's a Space Station

either that or Supergirl is flying commando again

[thinbluemime thinbluemime]

On Mar 14, 4:41 pm, "Sea Wasp (Ryk E. Spoor)"

<seaw...@sgeinc.invalid.com> wrote:
> On 3/14/12 1:34 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
>
> > All of a sudden
> > I'm hearing about a
> > Super Moon?
>
>         No, that's Super SAILOR Moon:

I Could Have Been a Sailor's Moon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBSHt_nXMVk

[Michael Stemper]

In article <18420310-b6d9-412e...@s7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, tphile2 <tph...@cableone.net> writes:

Subscribe.

--
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>
If this is our corporate opinion, you will be billed for it.

[Dorothy J Heydt]

In article <d6d6008f-842d-485c...@k24g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,

"I wish I was a sailor moon aboard a man o' war,
(Sam's gone away aboard a man o' war.)
I'd make a lot of prize money aboard a man o' war,
(Sam's gone away aboard a man o' war."

(Shamelessly cribbed from a chantey from [I think] the War of
1812, reflecting that specialists -- bosun's mates and what not
-- got a bigger cut of prize money than an ordinary able-bodied
seaman.)

--
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
Should you wish to email me, you'd better use the gmail edress.
Kithrup's all spammy and hotmail's been hacked.

[The Starmaker]

I heard that the moon
might be hollow..
that they say
"the Moon rang like a bell."
http://er.jsc.nasa.gov/seh/pg15.htm

cause, with 'these people', who knows.

They are 'always' coming up...with
explainations, ...have you noticed?

When they start with their...explainations,
you want to shoot yourself.

The Starmaker

[micro...@hotmail.com]

I don't think it is elastic...

[Wayne Throop]

: The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com>
: All of a sudden I'm hearing about a Super Moon?

Sure you are.

: What galaxy is it in?

Probably one of the galaxies in which sub-stellar objects
have actually been discovered.

[Wayne Throop]

: The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com>
: They are 'always' coming up...with explainations, ...have you noticed?

: When they start with their...explainations, you want to shoot
: yourself.

I don't. Feel free yourself, though.

[The Starmaker]

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/03/120306-titanic-supermoon-moon-science-iceberg-sky-sink/
http://online.wsj.com/video/nasa-discusses-upcoming-uper-moon/386C227A-CA84-4E28-950C-EAA798B2E9BA.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_mpvidcar_2

[Paul Cardinale]

The galaxy it's in is called variously: "Via Lactea", "Akash Ganga",
and "Kshira"

[JT]

The only supermoon i know is our own, it seem to attract positive
charges from the sun that pass us when we are between moon and the
sun. Maybe it is because the moon surface is negatively charged and
lacks a magnetosphere to block them out. That is probably also why
there is so many craters on the moon, due to broken domes of gas not
asteroids. Because they would not simply all come in straigh angeles.

In chinese myths moon is called the Jade rabbit, it probably a good
clue to what kind of gas trapped in moons surface.

[tphile2]

How about Larry Nivens Inconstant Moon, where the narrator sees the
moon going super bright and thinks the sun went nova or a large solar
flare. and haven't we been seeing some serious solar activity lately

[tphile2]

are you suggesting they all go commando too? Wouldn't that make them
Sailor Moons?

[JT]

On 15 mar, 00:33, tphile2 <tphi...@cableone.net> wrote:
> are you suggesting they all go commando too?  Wouldn't that make them
> Sailor Moons?

I am not sure what you mean when you say go commando, you mean like
undress into another state then solid?

[micro...@hotmail.com]

Was the Moon Mooning you?

[xxein]

On Mar 14, 8:20 pm, "microm2...@hotmail.com" <microm2...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Was the Moon Mooning you?

xxein: Are you trying for the Guinness worlds's record for stupidness
or do just drink too much of it?

[Dorothy J Heydt]

In article <e1fa2073-9d6e-4ab0...@eb6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,

Last time I noticed, "going commando" meant "wearing no
underwear." Heaven only knows why.

[Greg Goss]

djh...@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote:

>In article <e1fa2073-9d6e-4ab0...@eb6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
>JT <jonas.t...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>On 15 mar, 00:33, tphile2 <tphi...@cableone.net> wrote:
>>> are you suggesting they all go commando too?  Wouldn't that make them
>>> Sailor Moons?
>>
>>I am not sure what you mean when you say go commando, you mean like
>>undress into another state then solid?
>
>Last time I noticed, "going commando" meant "wearing no
>underwear." Heaven only knows why.

Going "with no support".
--
I used to own a mind like a steel trap.
Perhaps if I'd specified a brass one, it
wouldn't have rusted like this.

[Michael Stemper]

In article <6e951267-491f-4c4e...@9g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Paul Cardinale <pcard...@volcanomail.com> writes:

>On Mar 14, 1:16=A0pm, The Starmaker <starma...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> The Starmaker wrote:

>> > All of a sudden
>> > I'm hearing about a
>> > Super Moon?
>> > What galaxy
>> > is it in?

>> cause, with 'these people', who knows.
>>
>> They are 'always' coming up...with
>> explainations, ...have you noticed?

>The galaxy it's in is called variously: "Via Lactea",

I would have been surprised to hear that somebody could detect even a
Jovian planet in another galaxy.

--
Michael F. Stemper
#include <Standard_Disclaimer>

Always use apostrophe's and "quotation marks" properly.

[Androcles]

"Michael Stemper" <mste...@walkabout.empros.com> wrote in message
news:jjsn4j$uhd$2...@dont-email.me...

> In article
> <6e951267-491f-4c4e...@9g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Paul
> Cardinale <pcard...@volcanomail.com> writes:
>>On Mar 14, 1:16=A0pm, The Starmaker <starma...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>
>>> > All of a sudden
>>> > I'm hearing about a
>>> > Super Moon?
>>> > What galaxy
>>> > is it in?
>
>>> cause, with 'these people', who knows.
>>>
>>> They are 'always' coming up...with
>>> explainations, ...have you noticed?
>
>>The galaxy it's in is called variously: "Via Lactea",
>
> I would have been surprised to hear that somebody could detect even a
> Jovian planet in another galaxy.
>

Prepare to be surprised:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
If you find a variable, you've found a planet.

[Howard Brazee]

On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:42:26 -0600, Greg Goss <go...@gossg.org> wrote:

>>>I am not sure what you mean when you say go commando, you mean like
>>>undress into another state then solid?
>>
>>Last time I noticed, "going commando" meant "wearing no
>>underwear." Heaven only knows why.
>
>Going "with no support".

OK. But do we wear underpants for support?

--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."

- James Madison

[JT]

The only underwear support i know of is this thin silica smear our
body is coated with. Of course you could always get a rabbit hat, like
Mr Burns.

[Dorothy J Heydt]

In article <jg24m75rcr288e1nn...@4ax.com>,

Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:42:26 -0600, Greg Goss <go...@gossg.org> wrote:
>
>>>>I am not sure what you mean when you say go commando, you mean like
>>>>undress into another state then solid?
>>>
>>>Last time I noticed, "going commando" meant "wearing no
>>>underwear." Heaven only knows why.
>>
>>Going "with no support".
>
>OK. But do we wear underpants for support?

I don't know. Do you? I understand the principle of the
athletic supporter, but that's a different garment. I think.

[tphile2]

For guys there is a need to prevent chafing and in some cases,
tripping.
as for women, they do seem to think they need some, it was certainly
a concern for Elastigirl of The Incredibles. but most underpants
design seem to be for esthetics and not to defy gravity
not sure about kilt wearers

[JT]

On 15 mar, 16:42, djhe...@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote:
> In article <jg24m75rcr288e1nn3rh6t1kpcl1c6i...@4ax.com>,

I do not know i for a while i thought the chemtrails was silica
coating us.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3E65x7q-e4

Don't worry it is just the electric six
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HD5tnb2RBYg

[Howard Brazee]

On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:42:19 GMT, djh...@kithrup.com (Dorothy J
Heydt) wrote:

>>>>Last time I noticed, "going commando" meant "wearing no
>>>>underwear." Heaven only knows why.
>>>
>>>Going "with no support".
>>
>>OK. But do we wear underpants for support?
>
>I don't know. Do you? I understand the principle of the
>athletic supporter, but that's a different garment. I think.

I only wear an athletic supporter at the gym. There are also sports
bras that support more than standard bras. Cotton underwear are
useful for adults who sweat (I remember as a teen discovering this
advantage of undershirts when sitting on a wooden pew). And
underpants can assist someone menstruating. But support? I don't
think so, I think underpants are about modesty and compliance with
standards.

[JT]

On 15 mar, 16:46, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:42:19 GMT, djhe...@kithrup.com (Dorothy J

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=288020824601081&set=a.288020821267748.63002.100001794973974&type=1&ref=nf
A negative ion flow start from the positive plexi acrylat upwards the
negative silicone/teflon disc. On it's way they exicte positive
electrons in the air creating a drag of upstreaming electrons. Maybe
it should be called the upstreamer.

A weird thing is that if tornados really is ion flow and they somehow
hit a gaspocket and ignite you will have a plasma stream travelling
upwards a vortex from the cavity.In a battery there is no electron
flow between anod and cathod until
you form a circuit that let it happen, could this not be true also
for
statically charged materials and their electron flow?

I read that air itself it positively charged what does it take to
make
it start free an ion electron flow?

So the only supermoon i know is our own, it seem to attract positive

charges from the sun that pass us when we are between moon and the
sun. Maybe it is because the moon surface is negatively charged and
lacks a magnetosphere to block them out. That is probably also why
there is so many craters on the moon, due to broken domes of gas not
asteroids. Because they would not simply all come in straigh angeles.
In chinese myths moon is called the Jade rabbit, it probably a good
clue to what kind of gas trapped in moons surface.

So we must have a good product for our magno hair and a nifty
underwear in rubber and do not forget a rabbit hat if not for
protection at least for good luck ;D

[JT]

On 15 mar, 16:46, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:42:19 GMT, djhe...@kithrup.com (Dorothy J

It is not a supermoon just an upward electron flow exciting the air
around it, making a lift.
http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/427509_288020824601081_100001794973974_677753_859461856_n.jpg

But mostly it just plain old goodfashioned fantasies.

[JT]

On 15 mar, 17:09, JT <jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 15 mar, 16:46, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:42:19 GMT, djhe...@kithrup.com (Dorothy J
>
> > Heydt) wrote:
> > >>>>Last time I noticed, "going commando" meant "wearing no
> > >>>>underwear."  Heaven only knows why.
>
> > >>>Going "with no support".
>
> > >>OK.   But do we wear underpants for support?
>
> > >I don't know.  Do you?  I understand the principle of the
> > >athletic supporter, but that's a different garment.  I think.
>
> > I only wear an athletic supporter at the gym.   There are also sports
> > bras that support more than standard bras.    Cotton underwear are
> > useful for adults who sweat (I remember as a teen discovering this
> > advantage of undershirts when sitting on a wooden pew).    And
> > underpants can assist someone menstruating.    But support?   I don't
> > think so, I think underpants are about modesty and compliance with
> > standards.
>
> > --
> > "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
> > than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
> > to the legislature, and not to the executive department."
>
> > - James Madison
>

> http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=288020824601081&set=a.28802082...

Well positive charged air, not positive charged electrons ;D

[Dorothy J Heydt]

In article <163ec7f7-6987-4db2...@v7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,

Kilt wearers do NOT wear underpants. Not if they're Scottish and
born to the tradition, anyway.

Traditional joke: Lady: "What is worn under the kilt?" Scotsman:
"Madame, NOTHING is worn under the kilt; everything is in perfect
working order."

In the comic "Lady Tudor Glitz," a lady explains tactfully to a
kilt-wearing gentleman, "Frothgar, if you are going to wear a
kilt, you will have to learn to sit like a lady."

And ego ipsa oculis meis vidi a kilt-wearing gentleman at a
party; he was Scottish all right, but he'd had a few drinks and
was sitting carelessly....

[JT]

On 15 mar, 17:40, djhe...@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote:
> In article <163ec7f7-6987-4db2-a71b-9e6ca750b...@v7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,

Dorothy did you know that the most lengthjump records is set on
fullmoon highaltitude ground with alkalic properties, the fullmoon,
mexican alkalic ground and iondrag in air helped Bob Beamon.

[JT]

> around it, making a lift.http://a1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/427509_288020824601081...

>
> But mostly it just plain old goodfashioned fantasies.

It just doesn't look like a traditional compass does it.

[David DeLaney]

Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net> wrote:
>Greg Goss <go...@gossg.org> wrote:
>>>>I am not sure what you mean when you say go commando, you mean like
>>>>undress into another state then solid?
>>>
>>>Last time I noticed, "going commando" meant "wearing no
>>>underwear." Heaven only knows why.
>>
>>Going "with no support".
>
>OK. But do we wear underpants for support?

Moral support, perhaps.

Dave
--
\/David DeLaney posting from d...@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.

[Paul Cardinale]

On Mar 15, 5:25 am, mstem...@walkabout.empros.com (Michael Stemper)
wrote:

> In article <6e951267-491f-4c4e-9e0f-acb836ad8...@9g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>, Paul Cardinale <pcardin...@volcanomail.com> writes:
>
> >On Mar 14, 1:16=A0pm, The Starmaker <starma...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> The Starmaker wrote:
> >> > All of a sudden
> >> > I'm hearing about a
> >> > Super Moon?
> >> > What galaxy
> >> > is it in?
> >> cause, with 'these people', who knows.
>
> >> They are 'always' coming up...with
> >> explainations, ...have you noticed?
> >The galaxy it's in is called variously: "Via Lactea",
>
> I would have been surprised to hear that somebody could detect even a
> Jovian planet in another galaxy.
>
> --
> Michael F. Stemper
> #include <Standard_Disclaimer>
> Always use apostrophe's and "quotation marks" properly.

Watch out for the fast ones. They'll go right over your head.

[Wayne Throop]

:: I would have been surprised to hear that somebody could detect even a

:: Jovian planet in another galaxy.

: "Androcles" <H...@Hgwrts.phscs.Mar.2012>
: Prepare to be surprised:
: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm

Algol is not in another galaxy. It's only about 29 parsecs distant.

: If you find a variable, you've found a planet.

Not all variables are due to the mechanism hypothesized for Algol.
Cephid variables, for example, aren't due to any compansion bodies.
Not even all variables which are due to two stars occluding each other
have planets; it's the details of the brightness curve that's the
key point in the reference.

So, oh for two.

[The Starmaker]

The sum of the square roots of any two
sides of an isosceles triangle is equal to
the square root of the remaining side.

[Howard Brazee]

On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:46:41 -0700 (PDT), tphile2
<tph...@cableone.net> wrote:

>For guys there is a need to prevent chafing and in some cases,
>tripping.
>as for women, they do seem to think they need some, it was certainly
>a concern for Elastigirl of The Incredibles. but most underpants
>design seem to be for esthetics and not to defy gravity
>not sure about kilt wearers

Superheros wear their underwear on the outside, emulating muscle men
who wanted to add definition to their bodies from a time when
everything was covered.

[Androcles]

"Wayne Throop" <thr...@sheol.org> wrote in message
news:13318...@sheol.org...

> :: I would have been surprised to hear that somebody could detect even a
> :: Jovian planet in another galaxy.
>
> : "Androcles" <H...@Hgwrts.phscs.Mar.2012>
> : Prepare to be surprised:
> : http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
>
> Algol is not in another galaxy. It's only about 29 parsecs distant.

True enough, but it's a variable so it has a planet. Variables are found
in other galaxies.

> : If you find a variable, you've found a planet.
>
> Not all variables are due to the mechanism hypothesized for Algol.

Prepare to be surprised: Yes they are.

> Cephid variables, for example, aren't due to any compansion bodies.

Prepare to be surprised: Yes they are.

> Not even all variables which are due to two stars occluding each other
> have planets; it's the details of the brightness curve that's the
> key point in the reference.
>
> So, oh for two.

If you were capable of thinking (which of course you are not) you
wouldn't be indoctrinated by gormless Einstein's crank beliefs.
The speed of light is source dependent. Of course you knee-jerked
and didn't actually read the link I gave you, bigots never do.

[RLW]

On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:21:20 -0700, JT wrote:

> That is probably also why there is so many craters on the moon, due to
> broken domes of gas not asteroids. Because they would not simply all
> come in straigh angeles.

If you run a Web search on meteor impact experiments. You'll find that
they show pretty much the same sort of craters over a wide range of angles
of impact.

--
RLW

[Sjouke Burry]

RLW <rlwa...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:cPqdnQ-UVtZf5f_S...@giganews.com:

To add to this: try throwing wet blobs of sand
from different angles onto a smooth,loose sand surface.
You will see the same appearance as with the moon craters,
including small central heaps in the craters.

[Wayne Throop]

:: Cephid variables, for example, aren't due to any compansion bodies.

: "Androcles" <H...@Hgwrts.phscs.Mar.2012>
: Prepare to be surprised: Yes they are.

If they were, their cycle time wouldn't be proportional
only on their brightness. So basically, I'm not surprised.
By Cephids, nor the fact you didn't realize that.

: If you were capable of thinking (which of course you are not) you

: wouldn't be indoctrinated by gormless Einstein's crank beliefs.

Which has nothing to do with the facts that

1) Algol is not in another galaxy, so it's not an actual counterexample
2) Not all variable stars are due to dark companions.

(The second being especially obvious.)

[Wayne Throop]

:: That is probably also why there is so many craters on the moon, due
:: to broken domes of gas not asteroids. Because they would not simply
:: all come in straigh angeles.

What crater shapes would you expect from off-vertical impacts?
By how much? And why? And do you really think nobody has tried it?

[anim8rFSK]

In article <13318...@sheol.org>, thr...@sheol.org (Wayne Throop)
wrote:

Round. Always round. See Larry Niven's 'Lucifer's Hammer'

[JT]

Wayne, you can beleive what ever you want even that a comet actually
did go down in the Gulf of Mexico, it never did but it passed close
enough to leave a trail of matter and charged particles. And about the
craters on moon, either the general physic explanation simply wrong
there were no asteroids or they really do not like the scenario with
gaspockets inside moon.

But rest assure there is the whole moon surface is negatively charged,
you can start to ponder why when it is steadily pounded by positive
charges from the solar wind. And then you go back ponder abit of what
really create a tornado not that joke of a theory that meteorlogists
use.

It is a flow of negatively charged ions /electrons\ from earths inner
raising upwards a magnetosphere that is battered with positive ions,
on their way they excite the positive charged air creating an upward
drag. For this to happen you need a magnetosphere weakened so the
positive charges can leak inside it and a weaken alkalic surface that
will let thru the ion electron stream.

The sodium carbonate, when dissolved in water, dissociates into 2Na+
(two sodium cations, i.e. ions with a positive electric charge) and
CO3= (a carbonate anion, i.e. an ion with a double negative electric
charge).
The sodium carbonate can react with water to produce carbon dioxide
(CO2), escaping as a gas, and sodium hydroxide (Na+OH–), which is
alkaline (or rather basic) and gives high pH values (pH>9).[2]

And that is the real truth about tornados, craters of moon, Gulf of
Mexico and Bob Beamons world record in length jump. I can guess that
record was during a fullmoon phase it is no hard physic.

[Androcles]

"Wayne Throop" <thr...@sheol.org> wrote in message
news:13318...@sheol.org...

> :: Cephid variables, for example, aren't due to any compansion bodies.
>
> : "Androcles" <H...@Hgwrts.phscs.Mar.2012>
> : Prepare to be surprised: Yes they are.
>
> If they were, their cycle time wouldn't be proportional
> only on their brightness.

You'll pull any shit out of your head just to challenge me, but you
have no mathematical argument.

> So basically, I'm not surprised.
> By Cephids, nor the fact you didn't realize that.

Cepheids are something I've studied and you have not.

> : If you were capable of thinking (which of course you are not) you
> : wouldn't be indoctrinated by gormless Einstein's crank beliefs.
>
> Which has nothing to do with the facts that
>
> 1) Algol is not in another galaxy, so it's not an actual counterexample
> 2) Not all variable stars are due to dark companions.
>

Algol doesn't have a "dark companion" other than a planet.
You are repeating Einstein's bullshit.

> (The second being especially obvious.)
>

Yes, it is especially obvious.
Ask yourself what you can expect to see if the speed of light
is source dependent and the source is in Keplerian orbit. The
answer is simple: regular variation in magnitude, whether by a
so-called "eclipsing" variable or a so-called "intrinsic" variable,
where both are constant emitters.
Explain this curve:

http://www.britastro.org/vss/gifc/00918-ck.gif

Here is the simple explanation:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Doolin'sStar.GIF

You want stars that blow themselves to smithereens twice, settle to
normal and then blow themselves to smithereens again 200 years
later. You want stars that puff up and down like blowfish. You
want stars that play peek-a-boo behind a giant companion that
doesn't glow itself.
You are in violation of Ockham's Razor by dreaming up aether,
time dilation and different star types when the simple explanation
is OBVIOUS.

[Nigel]

On Mar 15, 5:40 pm, djhe...@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote:
> In article <163ec7f7-6987-4db2-a71b-9e6ca750b...@v7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>
>

> tphile2  <tphi...@cableone.net> wrote:
> >On Mar 15, 10:26 am, Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:42:26 -0600, Greg Goss <go...@gossg.org> wrote:
> >> >>>I am not sure what you mean when you say go commando, you mean like
> >> >>>undress into another state then solid?
>
> >> >>Last time I noticed, "going commando" meant "wearing no
> >> >>underwear."  Heaven only knows why.
>
> >> >Going "with no support".
>
> >> OK.   But do we wear underpants for support?
>
> >> --
> >> "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
> >> than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
> >> to the legislature, and not to the executive department."
>
> >> - James Madison
>
> >For guys there is a need to prevent chafing and in some cases,
> >tripping.
> >as for women, they do seem to think they need some,  it was certainly
> >a concern for Elastigirl of The Incredibles.  but most underpants
> >design seem to be for esthetics and not to defy gravity
> >not sure about kilt wearers
>
> Kilt wearers do NOT wear underpants.  Not if they're Scottish and
> born to the tradition, anyway.
>

Which is a major plot point in the old British Movie "Carry On... Up
the Khyber".

: Sir Sidney Ruff-Diamond looks after the British outpost near the
Khybar pass.
: Protected by the kilted Third Foot and Mouth regiment, you would
think they
: were safe. But the Khazi of Kalabar has other ideas. He wants all
the British
: dead! But his troops fear the "skirted-devils"; they are rumoured
not to wear
: anything underneath. Then one is caught with his pants on

In the final battle, the British soldier are ordered to raise their
kilts to prove that they have no underwear. The locals flee in panic:

The Khasi of Kalabar: What are you running from? There's nothing to be
afraid of [turns to look at the exposed regiment] Ooh, I dunno though!


Cheers,
Nigel.

[Professor Bubba]

In article <4F60D6...@ix.netcom.com>, The Starmaker

<star...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> All of a sudden
> I'm hearing about a
> Super Moon?
> What galaxy
> is it in?

Everything you'd want to know about the Super Moon, from NASA:

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=dvHQ1vV21i0>

There's one every year. The next one is on May 5.

[JT]

Gossan of Khyber, Gozer was originally worshiped as a god by the
Hittites, Mesopotamians, and the Sumerians around 6000 BC. Gozer is
without gender (though It first appears as a female in the movie). It
was worshipped by the powerful Cult of Gozer. Gozer has two trusted
minions – themselves worshiped as demi-gods – that are harbingers of
destruction and primary agents for Its coming: Vinz Clortho, The
Keymaster and Zuul, The Gatekeeper. Gozer has visited our world twice,
in 1984 and 1991, both times assuming the form of the Stay Puft
Marshmallow Man.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6HWpqonRcY

Large steel constructions, maybe was the tower of Babel, but mostly i
think it was a matter of the ability to release electrons out of
ground.

[JT]

On 16 mar, 12:09, Nigel <ncwa...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Is it a kilt wearer with rubberboots up for a pleasant or unpleasant
surprise?

[JT]

On 16 mar, 12:09, Nigel <ncwa...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Sigourney certainly had her share of charges in this exciting sexy
scene :D, what to expect she is waiting for gozer realy hovering for
him ;D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sc4g1glBT8U

[JT]

I think the idea behind naming a god gozer must be from the word
gossan it is ground heavily eroded by oxidation proper for mining.
Tower of bable story probably have something todo with the Khyber
gossan ground, it is pure speculation as always.

[Wayne Throop]

:: 2) Not all variable stars are due to dark companions.

: "Androcles" <H...@Hgwrts.phscs.Mar.2012>
: Algol doesn't have a "dark companion" other than a planet.

I didn't say it did. The term "dark companion" includes planets,
rather obviously. The point is, an object that has mass, but does
not emit light on its own.

: You are repeating Einstein's bullshit.

Einstein said planets have mass and sisn't emit light on their own?
I hadn't heard he mentioned it specifically. And you disagree with that?
How clever of you.

Nevertheless,

1) Algolis not in another galaxy
2) Orbital dynamics involving a planet is not the only way
to get a variable star

: You want stars that blow themselves to smithereens twice

Oh, now you're just halucinating.
I've said no such thing, and wish no such thing.
Get back on your meds.

[Wayne Throop]

: JT <jonas.t...@hotmail.com>
: Wayne, you can beleive what ever you want even that a comet actually

: did go down in the Gulf of Mexico, it never did but it passed close
: enough to leave a trail of matter and charged particles.

Ah. Pseudovelikovskianism. Well, good luck with that.

But it's irrelevant to your implied claim that circular craters from
impacts can only occur with perpendicular trajectories. That's been
experimentally shown to be incorrect, so insisting it's true can't
be sustained on the usual BS of "establishment science is being mean
and unfair and overlooking the obvious" at the root of velikovskianism
and pseudovelikovslianism.

So again, sincerely, good luck with that.



Wayne Throop thr...@sheol.org http://sheol.org/throopw

[Androcles]

"Wayne Throop" <thr...@sheol.org> wrote in message

news:13319...@sheol.org...

> :: 2) Not all variable stars are due to dark companions.
>
> : "Androcles" <H...@Hgwrts.phscs.Mar.2012>
> : Algol doesn't have a "dark companion" other than a planet.
>
> I didn't say it did. The term "dark companion" includes planets,
> rather obviously. The point is, an object that has mass, but does
> not emit light on its own.

What does that have to do with the light companion that does
emit light on its own?

>
> : You are repeating Einstein's bullshit.
>
> Einstein said planets have mass and sisn't emit light on their own?
> I hadn't heard he mentioned it specifically. And you disagree with that?
>

Einstein said
"At all events we know with great exactness that this velocity is the same
for all colours, because if this were not the case, the minimum of emission
would not be observed simultaneously for different colours during the
eclipse of a fixed star by its dark neighbour."

So yes, I do disagree with that. Of course, planets don't usually eclipse
stars, do they?

> How clever of you.

Thank you, although being able to read isn't especially clever.

> Nevertheless,
>
> 1) Algolis not in another galaxy

I never said it was, I said variables are found in other galaxies.

> 2) Orbital dynamics involving a planet is not the only way
> to get a variable star

Yes it is.

>
> : You want stars that blow themselves to smithereens twice
>
> Oh, now you're just halucinating.
> I've said no such thing, and wish no such thing.
> Get back on your meds.

Carry on putting your head up your arse and snipping, never doing
any research, dumbfuck.

[Wayne Throop]

: "Androcles" <H...@Hgwrts.phscs.Mar.2012>
: I never said it was, I said variables are found in other galaxies.

And pointed to Algol as an illustration. Which it isn't.

:: Orbital dynamics involving a planet is not the only way to get a

:: variable star

: Yes it is.

Proof by emphatic assertion. How clever of you.

[Androcles]

"Wayne Throop" <thr...@sheol.org> wrote in message
news:13319...@sheol.org...

>: "Androcles" <H...@Hgwrts.phscs.Mar.2012>
> : I never said it was, I said variables are found in other galaxies.
>
> And pointed to Algol as an illustration. Which it isn't.
>

Proof by emphatic assertion. How clever of you.


> :: Orbital dynamics involving a planet is not the only way to get a
> :: variable star
>
> : Yes it is.
>
> Proof by emphatic assertion. How clever of you.

Not at all, I merely followed your lead. How clever of YOU.

When gave you the evidence you snipped it. How fucking clever of you,
shithead.

[Wayne Throop]

::: I never said it was, I said variables are found in other galaxies.

:: And pointed to Algol as an illustration. Which it isn't.

: "Androcles" <H...@Hgwrts.phscs.Mar.2012>
: Proof by emphatic assertion.

No, the proof is by the fact that it's only 29 parsecs distant.
Do you have any proof that no mechanism besides orbital mechanics exists?
Or that orbital mechanics can produce a proportionality between brightness
and period? If so, you haven't mentioned it. Whereas I did mention
Algol's distance.

I objected to Algol as an example, and to the rather obviously bogus
(for reasons just above) assertion that any variable implies a planet.
And that's because Algol isn't an example, and orbital mechanics can't
explain all variables, cepheids in particular. Are cepheids eclipsing
binaries? No. Are there doppler shifts involved? No. There's no
evidence that their variability is due to orbital mechanics, and
strong evidence (the proportionality to luminosity) that it isn't.

In any event, current methods for detecting planets all have to do with
brightness curves, or doppler shifts, or both. Which can be applied at
unlimited distances, providing only that you can resolve the star so
you're getting data from just the one source. So it seems clear that
it's at least possible to detect planets at intergalactic distances.
Difficult, but possible.

[micro...@hotmail.com]

Dumb order. Galaxies don't collide.

Mitchell Raemsch

[The Starmaker]

I would not be just a nuffin'
My head all full of stuffin'
My heart all full of pain
I would dance and be merry
Life would be a ding-a-derry
If I only had a brain

[The Starmaker]

The Starmaker wrote:

>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > All of a sudden
> > I'm hearing about a
> > Super Moon?
> > What galaxy
> > is it in?
>

> I heard that the moon
> might be hollow..
> that they say
> "the Moon rang like a bell."
> http://er.jsc.nasa.gov/seh/pg15.htm

The only logical conclusion one can have is...
the Moon is a Television satellite.


The Starmaker

No other explanation makes any sense.

[Androcles]

"Wayne Throop" <thr...@sheol.org> wrote in message
news:13319...@sheol.org...

> ::: I never said it was, I said variables are found in other galaxies.
>
> :: And pointed to Algol as an illustration. Which it isn't.
>
> : "Androcles" <H...@Hgwrts.phscs.Mar.2012>
> : Proof by emphatic assertion.
>
> No, the proof is by the fact that it's only 29 parsecs distant.

No, the proof is by the fact that it's all of 94 light-years distant.

> Do you have any proof that no mechanism besides orbital mechanics exists?

Do you have any proof that no mechanism besides eclipsing exists, such as
this?
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Copernicus/A2C.gif

> Or that orbital mechanics can produce a proportionality between brightness
> and period?

Yes, I do have that proof, not that you would understand it.

> If so, you haven't mentioned it. Whereas I did mention
> Algol's distance.

Mentioning it would be casting pearls before swine. Carry on
taking your meds.

[Nix]

On 16 Mar 2012, Wayne Throop said:

>: JT <jonas.t...@hotmail.com>
>: Wayne, you can beleive what ever you want even that a comet actually
>: did go down in the Gulf of Mexico, it never did but it passed close
>: enough to leave a trail of matter and charged particles.
>
> Ah. Pseudovelikovskianism. Well, good luck with that.

Not even Velikovsky ever claimed that long jump records were broken by
his planetary billiards. This is madder even than that.

(I note his ignorance of electromagnetics as well: charged particles
will not hang around for long periods of time in the Earth's atmosphere,
sorry. Perhaps he got his physics from Star Trek, where charged trails
of thisandthat seem to hang around for weeks on end?)

--
NULL && (void)

[Wayne Throop]

:: Or that orbital mechanics can produce a proportionality between
:: brightness and period?

: "Androcles" <H...@Hgwrts.phscs.Mar.2012>
: Yes, I do have that proof, not that you would understand it.

Suuuuuuure you do.

[Androcles]

"Wayne Throop" <thr...@sheol.org> wrote in message
news:13319...@sheol.org...

Yes, I do, sneering snipping fuckwit.
You have no rational explanation for the Swan-Leavitt observation,
you think it is just something that happens.

[RLW]

On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:34:16 +0000, Wayne Throop wrote:

> Ah. Pseudovelikovskianism....

[chortle]

I gotta save this one up for one of those days when it's raining anvils.

--
RLW

[The Starmaker]

The truth is...

I mean, the real real truth is..

if a woman were to talk like Wayne Throop,
they would say she is suffering from
some sort of rare brain disease.

But if a man talks that way...?



With the thoughts I'd be thinkin' I could be another Lincoln If I only had a brainnnnn.
The Starmaker

[JT]

On 16 mar, 22:22, Nix <nix-razor-...@esperi.org.uk> wrote:
> On 16 Mar 2012, Wayne Throop said:
>

> >: JT <jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com>

Oh they are filling the air during full moon, basicly the negative
moon act like a katod attracting the positive charges from suns anod
that stream proton all over us when we are between problem is when
electrons from earths inner leak up due to alkalic ground and we get
tornados. I do not care that much about lenghtjumpers allthough the
raising electron is the reason for the air getting a drag upwards.

And you my ignorant friend is basicly and idiot.

[Wayne Throop]

: The Starmaker <star...@ix.netcom.com>
: if a woman were to talk like Wayne Throop,

: they would say she is suffering from
: some sort of rare brain disease.

A pituitary tumor, perhaps.
Something to embiggen the vocal chords
and lower the voice register.

What? Embiggen is a perfectly cromulent word!

[The Starmaker]

I know this is going to be ...difficult
for some of yous to hear..
(because the truth usually is)
so, I'll give it to you slowly...


If a guy is 8 feet tall
they don't say he's..
"Highly tall", they say things
like, he's got some
"rare hormonal disorder".

He's needs to be cured of it..



World's tallest man finally stops growing at 8' 3' in height

Sultan Kosen of Turkey has finally stopped growing after nearly
two years following a neurosurgery at the University of Virginia for his
rare hormonal disorder that caused him to keep growing well into adulthood.
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/321318



You get what I mean? You understand where I'm coming from?


The Starmaker

[tphile2]

Yes, you'll never be hired as a basketball scout

[Bill Snyder]

You could have left off the last 4 words there.

--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank]

[JT]

To be more exact positive charges bombard our magnetosphere looking
for a weak spot, and when they find it they do attract electrons in
the ground, that is why it so important to have underwear. You
clueless imbecile missed all the important thing in the thread.
Because you are simply not intelligent enough to understand the
metaphors dealing with this HUGE PROBLEM.

So there is a problem with acid rain and alkalic ground but it is not
global heating.........
But you and your theoretical physicist friends is just to fucking
stupid to understand it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7fh2RP_uEs

I built this do you understand how it work, because mechanical work is
what it does?
Do you understand the principles behind it working?
No you don't because you are an idiot, only learning to master
idiocies without understanding forces like gravity and centrifugal
force at a university, the guys at military intelligence and the space
agencies all jknow you have the head up your asses for the at least
the last 8 decades. And they let you stay there, because they really
do not want this to be common knowledge.
They laugh at Stephen Hawking and Einstein because they have so
fucking ridiculous ideas of how things work.

[Wayne Throop]

: JT <jonas.t...@hotmail.com>
: To be more exact positive charges bombard our magnetosphere looking

: for a weak spot, and when they find it they do attract electrons in
: the ground, that is why it so important to have underwear.

Ah. *Faux* paeudovelikovskianism. As a joke and all.
Ha ha. Very funny. But it does makes a bit more sense.

[JT]

On 18 mar, 01:39, thro...@sheol.org (Wayne Throop) wrote:
> : JT <jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com>

No really silicon is important in ground so we should be careful with
acidification of soild and water, alkaline soil could mean trouble,
when magnetosphere not working. Even now there is gigant thunderstorms
over alkalaine dessert land. If you think there is just coincidence
that same area always plagued by tornados and lightning you are wrong.
There is nothing wrong with the weather, it is the bombardment of weak
spots of magnetosphere together with alkalic ground that present the
problem.

So look for problem in late september early october or late mars early
april, this time a slight acceleration deacceleration of body occur
due to the elliptic path. Furthermore the fullmoon present a problem
dragging more charged particles our way. Look around equator where
magnetosphere weakest look alkalic ground. You really should read some
history and ponder what went on North Africa in Egypt, Mauretania and
lwhy not outside the pillars of Gibraltar.<
<
And then you go back ponder what really happened to Gulf of Mexico and
the moon, they have been fooling you.

[tphile2]

I thought of that but that would make it an absolute and I don't think
it would be true.
He can always be hired as a test subject for some scientific
experiment.
or hired as the "Before" to be compared to the after.
or be featured in those "This is your brain on. . . " public service
commercials.
or give him to the Taliban, as our secret weapon.
put him in charge of the away team greating aliens that carry books
titled "To Serve Man"

[The Starmaker]

"...some scientific experiment."? The Holocaust was "some scientific experiment". You don't
always hire test subjects, do you?

Is Frankenstein a scientific experiment?

When Einstein died, they removed his brain to find out "What the Hell was wrong with this guy!"



The simple truth is..
"highly intelligent" people have
a rare brain disorder.

They all need to spend at least two years
getting neurosurgery at the University of Virginia,
untill they are cured.


Oh, IIIIIIIIIIIIIII would tell you whyyyyyyyyyyyyy
The ocean's near the shoreeeee

I could think of things I never thunk before

And then I'd sit..
and think some more


The Starmaker

[alie...@gmail.com]

On Mar 17, 9:46 pm, The Starmaker <starma...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

(snip)

> > > >> > The truth is...
>
> > > >> > I mean, the real real truth is..
>
> > > >> > if a woman were to talk like Wayne Throop,
> > > >> > they would say she is suffering from
> > > >> > some sort of rare brain disease.

Uh, no.

> > > >> > But if a man talks that way...?
>
> > > >> > With the thoughts I'd be thinkin' I could be another Lincoln If I only had a brainnnnn.
>

> > > >> I know this is going to be ...difficult
> > > >> for some of yous to hear..
> > > >> (because the truth usually is)
> > > >> so, I'll give it to you slowly...
>
> > > >> If a guy is 8 feet tall
> > > >> they don't say he's..
> > > >> "Highly tall", they say things
> > > >> like, he's got some
> > > >> "rare hormonal disorder".

That's because he does.

> > > >> He's needs to be cured of it..

Unless he wants to die.

> > > >> World's tallest man finally stops growing at 8' 3' in height
>
> > > >> Sultan Kosen of Turkey has finally stopped growing after nearly
> > > >>  two years following a neurosurgery at the University of Virginia for his
> > > >>  rare hormonal disorder that caused him to keep growing well into adulthood.
> > > >>  http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/321318
>
> > > >> You get what I mean? You understand where I'm coming from?

You think he should be left to die "naturally".

> "...some scientific experiment."? The Holocaust was "some scientific experiment". You don't
> always hire test subjects, do you?
>
> Is Frankenstein a scientific experiment?
>
> When Einstein died, they removed his brain to find out "What the Hell was wrong with this guy!"

You misspelled "different".

> The simple truth is..
> "highly intelligent" people have
> a rare brain disorder.

Obvious case of brain envy.

> They all need to spend at least two years
> getting neurosurgery at the University of Virginia,
> untill they are cured.

You mean, made as stupid as you are?

> Oh, IIIIIIIIIIIIIII would tell you whyyyyyyyyyyyyy
> The ocean's near the shoreeeee
>
> I could think of things I never thunk before
>
> And then I'd sit..
> and think some more

My error. Starfaker is a *drunken* creationist.


Mark L. Fergerson

[JT]

On 16 mar, 22:22, Nix <nix-razor-...@esperi.org.uk> wrote:

> On 16 Mar 2012, Wayne Throop said:
>

> >: JT <jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com>

I think i have to help you visualise the whole thing with a little
song i once wrote.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMrIy9zm7QY&feature=fvwrel

[William December Starr]

In article <3a4c3058-8dda-4542...@q11g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>,
JT <jonas.t...@hotmail.com> said:

> To be more exact

No, please don't.

-- wds

[William December Starr]

In article <VCu8r.117561$1V5....@newsfe22.ams2>,
"Androcles" <H...@Hgwrts.phscs.Mar.2012> said:

> If you were capable of thinking (which of course you are not) you
> wouldn't be indoctrinated by gormless Einstein's crank beliefs.

I have nothing to add; I just wanted to watch that sentence go by
again.

-- wds

[pete]

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> All of a sudden
> I'm hearing about a
> Super Moon?

http://www.maximoom.com/

--
pete

[ala]

"Wayne Throop" <thr...@sheol.org> wrote in message
news:13319...@sheol.org...

There was a store here on the main drag called "Suuuuuuure you do".
.

[ala]

"Dorothy J Heydt" <djh...@kithrup.com> wrote in message
news:M0wJq...@kithrup.com...
> In article
> <e1fa2073-9d6e-4ab0...@eb6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
> JT <jonas.t...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>On 15 mar, 00:33, tphile2 <tphi...@cableone.net> wrote:
>>> are you suggesting they all go commando too? Wouldn't that make them
>>> Sailor Moons?
>>
>>I am not sure what you mean when you say go commando, you mean like
>>undress into another state then solid?
>
> Last time I noticed, "going commando" meant "wearing no
> underwear." Heaven only knows why.
>
>

underwear are a prison
https://play.google.com/store/movies/details/OSHO_You_Are_In_Prison_and_You_Think_You_Are_Free?id=FzY70mDtDhM&feature=search_result#?t=W251bGwsMSwyLDEsIm1vdmllLUZ6WTcwbUR0RGhNIl0.
In this talk Osho responds to the question:
George Gurdjieff has said: "You are in prison. If you wish to get out of
prison, the first thing you must do is realize that you are in prison. If
you think you are free, you can't escape." What are the prisons that I call
"Home"? --