Parity calorimetery Experiment, III
Uncle Al
1) 72 space group P3(1)21 single crystal benzil test masses,
2) 72 space group P3(2)21 single crystal benzil test masses,
3) 1 gram of finely powdered racemic benzil from equal masses of
P3(1)21 and P3(2)21 single crystals crushed and mixed,
are verified received at a pair of differential scanning calorimeters
located at 45.04 degrees north. Instrument time and personnel are
allocated 27-30 December inclusive. Instrument runs for calibration
and precision with racemic benzil are SOP.
Response maxima are 44.95 degees latitude (WGS 84) and 03 January
(Earth perihelion).
Simultaneous measurements will be performed with enantiomeric test
masses aligned North(R)-South(S) at 0600, 1200, and 1800 hrs the first
day and East(R)-West(S) the second day. If non-zero net output
obtains, both days will be repeated at 30-minute intervals 0530-1630
hrs.
1) Zero net output within experimental error validates achiral
isotropic vacuum in the mass sector. That is physics as we know it.
2) Non-zero net output with proper amplitude modulation and phasing
Day 3 vs. Day 4 validates chiral anisotropic vacuum in the mass
sector.
2a) General Relativity is falsified vs. teleparallel
gravitation,
2b) perturbative string theory is falsified vs. BRST invariance,
2c) conservation of angular momentum is falsified via Noether's
theorem,
2d) biological homochirality may be sourced,
2e) post-Big Bang inflation may be sourced by a chiral vacuum
pseudoscalar background,
2f) Weak interaction chirality may be sourced,
2g) matter-antimatter imbalance may be sourced,
and it all happens at the founding postulate level without
contradicting any observation in any venue at any scale.
Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can
be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common
commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no
worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a
kilobuck?
Shades of Yang, Lee, and New Years 1957. We'll see how an added
half-century of science fares. Festivus - for the rest of us.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
Eric Gisse
[...]
I want to believe the universe has more depth than it currently
appears to have. Good luck, Al.
Please keep us updated. I want a stardrive, and the best route to that
is finding an empirical falsification of GR.
Douglas Eagleson
> (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
You are all over the place in physics.
The standard model was the basis for the inferred parity. A basic.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111
In first order, after a clear third order predicate warning. All
transition as a spin temperature was the trial.
I can read the system clearly, and the transition was to be
understood. But the class as each crystal was the basic discovery.
You can equate a type to class. SO you used a spin crystal test.
Why does Standard Theory temperature cause typed crystal? And the
answer ( class 1/2 spin or class 2 spin) effect in your experiment.
And so the third derivative constant would be inferred.
8!!!!! A cause to the eight 2*4=8
So simply remath. Get the net guru to remath it.
Here is the task:
psi= 2
Just write the gravity effect on this Standard Theory function???
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It is a failure to have gravity effect transition in math. You would
have TWO spin constants to deal with then:(
Drop all gravity function. And state time difference. All right so
the spin constant of gravity caused transition as the discovery! See.
Write the discovery, nOT the failed constant of parity for General
Relativity.
Douglas Eagleson
wrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
A.
If you want the NOBLE prize just do this:
All spin was the fact, you discovered gravity in effect the hard way.
Place a magnetic field just like the old NBS spin temperature
experiment and see solid then placable in a NMR machine. A magnetic
field will solidify the crystal to the time.
Nice litte chunks that can b eimaged in a MRI/NMR machine. A dose
type of measure would suffice. Although an image would make a crystal
emitt teleparralel. A re-emission also time dependent would occur. A
stabble reusable sample should be what you try to make now.
Richard Schultz
: Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can
: be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common
: commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no
: worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a
: kilobuck?
What happened the last time that you tried the experiment? Now I remember --
your "collaborator" cancelled the experiment when he found out that you
had lied to him.
-----
Richard Schultz sch...@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"A mensch takes personal responsiblity for his actions. When demonstrated to
be empirically wrong a mensch admits error and becomes a better mensch."
-- "Uncle Al" Schwartz, in article <41D0A0BA.BCF76...@hate.spam.net>
harry
"Richard Schultz" <sch...@mail.biu.ack.il> wrote in message
news:fjqlt0$7dr$1...@news.iucc.ac.il...
What was the lie?
harry
"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:47608C08...@hate.spam.net...
>
> http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
[...]
> 1) Zero net output within experimental error validates achiral
> isotropic vacuum in the mass sector. That is physics as we know it.
>
> 2) Non-zero net output with proper amplitude modulation and phasing
> Day 3 vs. Day 4 validates chiral anisotropic vacuum in the mass
> sector.
> and it all happens at the founding postulate level without
> contradicting any observation in any venue at any scale.
>
> Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can
> be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common
> commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no
> worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a
> kilobuck?
>
> Shades of Yang, Lee, and New Years 1957. We'll see how an added
> half-century of science fares. Festivus - for the rest of us.
"A chiral vacuum background can be detected and measured."
Very interesting! :-)
- Are you going to perform the experiment yourself?
- Half of the time you repeat the mantra "There Is No Ether" but here you
propose that the "vacuum background" may even have chiral property. How
come?
Harald
Uncle Al
>
> In sci.chem Uncle Al <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote:
>
> : Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can
> : be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common
> : commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no
> : worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a
> : kilobuck?
>
> What happened the last time that you tried the experiment? Now I remember --
> your "collaborator" cancelled the experiment when he found out that you
> had lied to him.
Gee, Schultzy, without the longitude you cannot pester and harass the
scientist, eh? Too bad. Here's what you will do for the holidays
(you guys have holidays end of year, right? End of Christian year?
Yahweh was singularly incompetent with calendars. Did Hebrews ever
discover zero and place-holding math?): Go to Google Earth and skim
along 45 north,
Bordeux, France
Valence, France
Grenoble, France
Torinao, Italy
Piacenza, Italy
Ferara, Italy,
Istarska, Croatia
Belgrade, Serbia
Ploiesti, Romania
Simferopol, Ukraine
Krasnodar Yuzhnyy
Qiqihar, China
Salem, Oregon
Minneapolis, Minnesota
St. Paul, Minnesota
Green Bay, Wisconsin
Midland, Ontario
Montpelier, Vermont
others
Find the pair (oooh! Could there be more than two?) of differential
scanning calorimeters with an English-speaking technician and again
validate what a consummate asshole you are. In the meanwhile we will
have the empirical answer by New Years. A null result is entirely
acceptable... but Uncle Al at a Swedish podium would especially enjoy
shoving a big fat reproducible net output up your sloppy ass and out
your mouth.
The only vote that matters was cast 13.7 billion years ago. Uncle Al
and his Army of Light are opening the ballot box to look. If you
don't like it, grab George Hammond and complain to the Election
Commission.
Mediocrity is a vice of the doomed.
Androcles
: Richard Schultz wrote:
: >
: > In sci.chem Uncle Al <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote:
: >
: > : Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can
: > : be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common
: > : commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no
: > : worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a
: > : kilobuck?
: >
: > What happened the last time that you tried the experiment? Now I
remember --
: > your "collaborator" cancelled the experiment when he found out that you
: > had lied to him.
:
: Gee, Schultzy,
[snip crap]
Idiot.
hanson
Uncle Al wrote below: "... we will have the empirical answer
by New Year 2008. It can do no worse than fail. A null result
is entirely acceptable... but Uncle Al at a Swedish podium would
especially enjoy... [yada, yada, yada]... Did Hebrews ever discover
zero and place-holding math?"....
>
[hanson]
This is too much!... ahahahaha... Again, Al, just like last time you
are not smart enough to keep your mouth shut and wait until you
have "the bird in you hand" to sing about it"... Now, you are setting
yourself up again, "empirically", to be the laughing stock, this time
by
(a) arguing with your brother-in-faith Richie over Xian holidays
(b) showing your yearnings for Nobel dreams.. and
(c) hedging, pre-weaseling and talking yourself into that even
a useless fuckup will be grand achievement... ahahaha...
but inevitably your one-man-Army of Light, (you being its General,
the Corporal, the trooper and the Recruit, all in one) will complain
later that it's all a "River of Shit"... as has been **empirically**seen
before. Happy Hanukah, you Schmuck and thanks for the laughs!
ahahahaha... ahahahaha.... ahahahanson
>
>
----- experps from the diary of Al Schwartz's epic
travail into that undiscovered land from whose
borne no traveler has yet returned ... --------
>
"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:47618D19...@hate.spam.net...
>>
== Uncle Al Schwartz <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote [edited]:
1 gram of powdered racemic Benzil single crystals [will be] crushed
mixed [& molten in] a pair of calorimeters, loc. @ 45.04° north by/on.
27-30 December. Simultaneous measurements will be performed
with enantiomeric Benzil aligned North(R)-South(S) at 0600, 1200,
and 1800 hrs the first day and East(R)-West(S) the second day.
If non-zero net output obtains, both days will be repeated at 30-min.
intervals 0530-1630 hrs... & Schwartz has the following anticipations:
1) Zero net output validates physics as we know it. [BFD!.. ahaha... ]
2) Non-zero net output IN-validates/falsifies General Relativity,
string theory, conservation of angular momentum, biological
homochirality , post-Big Bang inflation, Weak interaction,
matter-antimatter imbalance...
... & it all happens at the founding postulate level without contradicting
any observation in any venue at any scale.
Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can
be accurately, easily, rapidly, & inexpensively reproduced in common
commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no
worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a
kilobuck?
>>
== the US-expatriate Israeli, Richard Schultz wrote to Al:
What happened the last time that you tried the experiment?
Now I remember -- your "collaborator" cancelled the experiment
when he found out that you had lied to him.
>
== the US Jew, Uncle Al Schwartz wrote to "Schultzy":
Gee, Schultzy, without the longitude you cannot pester and harass the
scientist, eh? Too bad. Here's what you will do for the holidays
(you guys have holidays end of year, right? End of Christian year?
Yahweh was singularly incompetent with calendars. Did Hebrews ever
discover zero and place-holding math?): Go to Google Earth and skim
along 45 north,
>
Bordeux, France / Valence, France / Grenoble, France/ Torinao, Italy /
Piacenza, Italy / Ferara, Italy, / Istarska, Croatia / Belgrade, Serbia /
Ploiesti, Romania / Simferopol, Ukraine / Krasnodar Yuzhnyy / Qiqihar,
China / Salem, Oregon / Minneapolis, Minnesota / St. Paul, Minnesota /
Green Bay, Wisconsin / Midland, Ontario / Montpelier, Vermont / others
>
Find the pair (oooh! Could there be more than two?) of differential
scanning calorimeters with an English-speaking technician and again
validate what a consummate asshole you are. In the meanwhile we will
have the empirical answer by New Years. A null result is entirely
acceptable... but Uncle Al at a Swedish podium would especially enjoy
shoving a big fat reproducible net output up your sloppy ass and out
your mouth.
>
The only vote that matters was cast 13.7 billion years ago. Uncle Al
and his Army of Light are opening the ballot box to look. If you
don't like it, grab George Hammond and complain to the Election
Commission.
Mediocrity is a vice of the doomed.
Bob
[Snip dreams of wet dreams]
It looks like Uncle Al's Annual December Disappoinment is on tract to
.... uh .... disappoint. It happens often enough that we can give it a
name Uncle Al's ADD.
With Uncle Al's record of disappointing performances, it's no wonder
that Mrs Uncle Al divorced him.
This is probably Uncle Al's last chance to perform. If he fails again
the Rabbi will take away his beanie and call in the Mohel to undo his
circumcision.
Eventually, Uncle Al will have to admit to himself that his mama was
wrong and he is just an ordinary turd in the River of Poop.
Richard Schultz
: Find the pair (oooh! Could there be more than two?) of differential
: scanning calorimeters with an English-speaking technician and again
: validate what a consummate asshole you are. In the meanwhile we will
: have the empirical answer by New Years. A null result is entirely
: acceptable... but Uncle Al at a Swedish podium would especially enjoy
: shoving a big fat reproducible net output up your sloppy ass and out
: your mouth.
Will a null result falsify your hypothesis?
Jerry
...except that teleparallel gravitation predicts no such thing.
In response to my repeated challenges, you have NEVER produced
a single citation supporting your belief that teleparallel
gravitation couples with GEOMETRIC parity.
Your experiment is totally without theoretical underpinning.
It -is- known that teleparallel gravitation couples with SPIN
parity and angular momentum; unfortunately the coupling magnitude
is such that it is not likely that any experiment in the near
or intermediate future would be capable of detecting the effects
of such coupling.
> 2b) perturbative string theory is falsified vs. BRST
> invariance,
> 2c) conservation of angular momentum is falsified via
> Noether's theorem,
Not bloody likely...
> 2d) biological homochirality may be sourced,
> 2e) post-Big Bang inflation may be sourced by a chiral
> vacuum pseudoscalar background,
> 2f) Weak interaction chirality may be sourced,
> 2g) matter-antimatter imbalance may be sourced,
You're fantasizing. Chemical properties of left-right enantiomers
have been studied since 1849, since Pasteur. You're going to
revolutionize physics with a kitchen experiment covering known
territory?
> and it all happens at the founding postulate level without
> contradicting any observation in any venue at any scale.
>
> Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the
> experiment can be accurately, easily, rapidly, and
> inexpensively reproduced in common commercial equipment, by
> undergraduates if convenient. It can do no
> worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for
> under a kilobuck?
It does have the merit of being cheap.
> Shades of Yang, Lee, and New Years 1957. We'll see how an added
> half-century of science fares. Festivus - for the rest of us.
Symptoms of megalomania.
Jerry
Androcles
"Jerry" <Cephalobu...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:07b75a0d-2387-422f...@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
: You're fantasizing.
You should be in symbiosis with him then. Both you idiots are
Einstein Dingleberries.
Catch 22:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img22.gif
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img76.gif
Use c+v to "prove" you can't use c+v.
Richard Schultz
:> What happened the last time that you tried the experiment? Now I
:> remember -- your "collaborator" cancelled the experiment when he found
:> out that you had lied to him.
: What was the lie?
Ask Uncle Al to post the email he got from Jun Luo in which Professor Luo
tells him that as far as he (Luo) was concerned, there never had been any
collaboration between them.
Thomas Johnson
> In sci.chem harry <harald.vanlintelButNotT...@epfl.ch> wrote:
>
> :> What happened the last time that you tried the experiment? Now I
> :> remember -- your "collaborator" cancelled the experiment when he found
> :> out that you had lied to him.
>
> : What was the lie?
>
> Ask Uncle Al to post the email he got from Jun Luo in which Professor Luo
> tells him that as far as he (Luo) was concerned, there never had been any
> collaboration between them.
>
> -----
> Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
> Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
> -----
> "A mensch takes personal responsiblity for his actions. When demonstrated to
> be empirically wrong a mensch admits error and becomes a better mensch."
> -- "Uncle Al" Schwartz, in article <41D0A0BA.BCF76...@hate.spam.net>
The proper question is "what were the lies". Plural, not singular.
Prof. Luo had four issues of contention with Mr. Schwartz. If one
wishes to talk about "The" lie, it would probably be Schwartz'
assertion that he could predict an outcome of 3x10^-12 in an
experiment.
Prof. Luo did not seem pleased with the way he was being portrayed by
Mr. Schwartz in newsgroups. One can only imagine that the way Mr.
Schwartz has portrayed the situation since would be even less
appealing to Prof. Luo.
Of course, this is all an aside from the fact that Mr. Schwartz has no
understanding of what he is talking about. The fact that he keeps
asserting that the effect will be highest at a given lattitude
indicates that he doesn't know the difference between his own proposed
experiment and an Eotvos balance measurement.
Perseverations are by definition difficult to control. However, this
one has involved the use of time and equipment of many others. In the
example of Prof. Luo, this involved time, money and manpower based on
false information. Accomodations should be made for perseverations,
but that should not extend into allowing him to waste other peoples
resources.
One must keep in mind that there is a significant chance that this
test-run is a lie, much like his long succession of "third and final"
attempts to make diamonds.
It is just sad that this great perseveration of his centers on an
subject matter that is beyond his comprehension. If he could focus
this effort on something within his reach he might actually accomplish
something.
Mr. Schwartz really should move on from this. Perhaps some nice
person at OCRC could offer you some assistance with that?
Thomas