Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

I aint no use arguing with religious fanatics, OneStonians

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Jan Panteltje

unread,
May 5, 2006, 11:41:17 AM5/5/06
to
One Stone religion it is.
Nothing will prove their god wrong.

Eric Gisse

unread,
May 5, 2006, 11:47:52 AM5/5/06
to

Jan Panteltje wrote:
> One Stone religion it is.
> Nothing will prove their god wrong.

What the fuck are you talking about?

Julian Becker

unread,
May 5, 2006, 12:07:53 PM5/5/06
to
On Fri, 05 May 2006 17:41:17 +0200, Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> One Stone religion it is.
> Nothing will prove their god wrong.

"He who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces, but he on whom it falls will be crushed."

You're right! No way disproving him :(

Jan Panteltje

unread,
May 5, 2006, 1:12:36 PM5/5/06
to
On a sunny day (5 May 2006 08:47:52 -0700) it happened "Eric Gisse"
<jow...@gmail.com> wrote in
<1146844072....@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>:

One = Ein
Stone=Stein

Dirk Van de moortel

unread,
May 5, 2006, 2:13:15 PM5/5/06
to

"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:e3g12b$rgf$1...@news.datemas.de...

Hobbies and interests:
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/jan/interests.html
| My hobbies are science, computers, electronics, etc..
|
| I do meditation.


Jan Panteltje

unread,
May 5, 2006, 2:27:47 PM5/5/06
to
On a sunny day (Fri, 05 May 2006 18:13:15 GMT) it happened "Dirk Van de
moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote in
<%AM6g.408629$1p2.11...@phobos.telenet-ops.be>:

So, what is yours? Slander?
Go away asshole.


Dirk Van de moortel

unread,
May 5, 2006, 2:38:27 PM5/5/06
to

"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:e3g5fb$39u$1...@news.datemas.de...

:-)
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Slander.html

Dirk Vdm


Jan Panteltje

unread,
May 5, 2006, 2:57:38 PM5/5/06
to
On a sunny day (Fri, 05 May 2006 18:27:47 GMT) it happened Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote in <e3g5fb$39u$1...@news.datemas.de>:

>On a sunny day (Fri, 05 May 2006 18:13:15 GMT) it happened "Dirk Van de
>moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote in
><%AM6g.408629$1p2.11...@phobos.telenet-ops.be>:

FYI you have been killfiled from the site.
You are, for all, in IP CHAINS.

Eric Gisse

unread,
May 5, 2006, 3:02:33 PM5/5/06
to

Take a step back and realize you are acting childish about a Nobel
prize winning scientist who created general and special relativity,
while making major contributions to quantum theory.

Jan Panteltje

unread,
May 5, 2006, 3:16:14 PM5/5/06
to
On a sunny day (5 May 2006 12:02:33 -0700) it happened "Eric Gisse"
<jow...@gmail.com> wrote in
<1146855753.0...@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:

Yes he created a mess he did.

>while making major contributions to quantum theory.

Look, the dude is dead, leave him there.
quantum crap does not hack it either.

Now about the subject:
Gravity.
Oh it was One Stone.
Oh it was religious fanatics.

Do you really think you will go to heven parroting OneStone's stuff?
For Gods sake start thinking for yourself.

Dirk Van de moortel

unread,
May 5, 2006, 3:18:01 PM5/5/06
to

"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:e3g8a5$7qp$1...@news.datemas.de...

Does he do mediation as well?

Dirk Vdm


Dirk Van de moortel

unread,
May 5, 2006, 3:18:39 PM5/5/06
to

"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JxN6g.408712$Y65.11...@phobos.telenet-ops.be...

Or does he do meditation?

Dirk Vdm


Eric Gisse

unread,
May 5, 2006, 3:56:11 PM5/5/06
to

Welcome to sci.physics, crank. You will find yourself welcome among the
other delusional fuckwits who think relativity is a religion.

Jan Panteltje

unread,
May 5, 2006, 4:00:08 PM5/5/06
to
On a sunny day (5 May 2006 12:56:11 -0700) it happened "Eric Gisse"
<jow...@gmail.com> wrote in
<1146858971.9...@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>:

Sorry did not know you were a OneStonian too.
OK then do not think for yourself.

T Wake

unread,
May 5, 2006, 4:11:17 PM5/5/06
to

"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e3g8a5$7qp$1...@news.datemas.de...
> Do you really think you will go to heven parroting OneStone's stuff?
> For Gods sake start thinking for yourself.

What has heaven got to do with anything?

If there was any doubt, the warning signs of the crank are dangerously
apparent here.


T Wake

unread,
May 5, 2006, 4:13:23 PM5/5/06
to

"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e3gasg$buv$1...@news.datemas.de...

>
> Sorry did not know you were a OneStonian too.
> OK then do not think for yourself.
>

What makes you think you are either being original or thinking for your
self.

Your posts are an almost copy of Pooh-rats.

Its funny how every crackpot thinks they are the first and only to doubt the
findings of others.


Eric Gisse

unread,
May 5, 2006, 4:15:17 PM5/5/06
to

Like the rest of the cranks in sci.physics, since you are incapable of
understanding relativity you come to the conclusion that anyone who
does is a member of the "religion".

Furthermore, you are incapable of accepting the fact that just mabey I
did think for myself and came to the conclusion that you are not
capable of understanding.

Go ahead. Make all the childish cracks about relativity being a
religion and spew more garbage about "onestonian", nobody cares about
your idiotic views beyond mocking them.

You will find plenty of people here who are just like yourself: Fully
convinced relativiy is a cult/religion/fraud even though they
understand nothing about it.

Jan Panteltje

unread,
May 5, 2006, 4:41:01 PM5/5/06
to
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 May 2006 21:13:23 +0100) it happened "T Wake"
<Usenet...@gishpuppy.com> wrote in <M_ydnWkRu_B...@pipex.net>:

>What makes you think you are either being original or thinking for your
>self.
>
>Your posts are an almost copy of Pooh-rats.
>
>Its funny how every crackpot thinks they are the first and only to doubt the
>findings of others.

I tried to address the physics, they cannot reply.
Join their club, call everyone else a crackpot.
Little insulting clue and brainless walkalong moronic group twiddler.

Jan Panteltje

unread,
May 5, 2006, 4:42:11 PM5/5/06
to
On a sunny day (5 May 2006 13:15:17 -0700) it happened "Eric Gisse"
<jow...@gmail.com> wrote in
<1146860116.9...@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:

T Wake

unread,
May 5, 2006, 5:24:41 PM5/5/06
to

"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e3gd96$fii$1...@news.datemas.de...

> On a sunny day (Fri, 5 May 2006 21:13:23 +0100) it happened "T Wake"
> <Usenet...@gishpuppy.com> wrote in <M_ydnWkRu_B...@pipex.net>:
>
>>What makes you think you are either being original or thinking for your
>>self.
>>
>>Your posts are an almost copy of Pooh-rats.
>>
>>Its funny how every crackpot thinks they are the first and only to doubt
>>the
>>findings of others.
>
> I tried to address the physics, they cannot reply.

Ha.

There is a difference between replying to serious, well thought out posts
and replying to ... welll... cranks.

> Join their club, call everyone else a crackpot.

Why do you think I call every one else a crackpot?

> Little insulting clue and brainless walkalong moronic group twiddler.

Well done.


T Wake

unread,
May 5, 2006, 5:25:22 PM5/5/06
to

"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e3gdbc$fk3$1...@news.datemas.de...

> I tried to address the physics, they cannot reply.
> Join their club, call everyone else a crackpot.
> Little insulting clue and brainless walkalong moronic group twiddler.

I am hurt.

I thought you had come up with that specially for me, but it appears you use
it on every one.

Did you grow up with Porat?


Eric Gisse

unread,
May 5, 2006, 6:17:32 PM5/5/06
to

If you didn't scream "scientific fraud" every chance you got, while
making up idiotic words like "onestone" to describe Einstein, people
just might take you a little more seriously.

It appears though, that you would rather do exactly what you are
complaining about. You are spamming sci.physics with your idiocy which
does not even attempt to address physics.

You see a result that appears to contradict Einstein, and without even
bothering to check if it is accurate, you repeat it over and over as if
it were true. You have no interest in actually learning, you don't like
Einstein and his theories so you will do everything you can to cut them
down, no matter how pathetic you have to act to do it.

0 new messages