On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 16:59:17 +0000 (UTC),
glhan...@steel.ucs.indiana.edu (Gregory L. Hansen) wrote:
>In article <kjb7t11v4ef23vl3116gq34p0uivf5d...@4ax.com>,Repeat after me: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING MOVES IN SPACETIME!
>Traveler <trave...@nospam.net> wrote:
>>On 22 Jan 2006 07:55:33 -0800, glhan...@indiana.edu wrote:
>>Repeat after me: NOTHING MOVES IN SPACETIME.
>World lines don't move in spacetime. When people talk about the motion of
What this means is that there is NO CHANGE in spacetime (that's why it
Now hold on a southern cotton picking second! Aren't Kurt Godel and
>>> Or that your alien-induced lattice that exists nowhere isMaybe in your imagination but I know one thing: I am not an ass
>>>also an abstract model of your invention?
>>Nope. My lattice is not made of abstract crap but of real particles.
>You have a model that describes a lattice that is not made of abstract
kisser. I do my own thinking, than you very much. ahahaha... And
that's the way I like it. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
Physics is so much phucking phun! ahahaha...
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.