Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
From: oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 12:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, May 3 2012 3:14 pm
Subject: Re: there´s no question or discussion about it.
On May 3, 7:08 pm, thro...@sheol.org (Wayne Throop) wrote:
> : oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@gmail.com>It is funny watching you rednecks run around with absolute this and
> : Are you scared of Newton and his attempt to explain the difference
> : between the natural noon AM/PM cycle and the 24 hour AM/PM cycle -
> : "Absolute time, in astronomy, is distinguished from relative, by the
> It's not as if Newton is the first to relate the EoT to the actual motions
> You can pretend it's all Newton's fault for being a nasty empericist,
> If you really want to give up "deducing the celestial motions",
> : I read Isaac like a newspaper
> Well there's your problem. You should be reading it with some
relative that ,don't know what they actually do and what Isaac tried
to make them into,all these schoolboys with lifestyles pretending to
get into intense discussions on clocks,dimensions and what have you
but not one of them know what made the 'theory of gravity' what it was
and why it was always useless and disruptive.
Great to see relativity ultimately merge with a sci-fi forum and fair
Ultimately somebody is going to have to deal with all this as there is
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.