binding energy is equal to mass deficit
if mass deficit emits gravity inertial mass is not equal to
gravitational mass
Kurt Stocklmeir
you have guessed poorly. Try again.
Yes, since man creates his gods after his own image,
yours must be mad as hell:
http://hometown.aol.com/kstocklmeir/myhomepage/personal.html
Dirk Vdm
Seems OK to me,
nuts, somebody put a pink colored shirt on me,
http://students.cs.byu.edu/~daveyg83/Photoshop/ugly-men%20copy.jpg
[anip]
Figured out the difference between x' and xi yet, imbecile?
Androcles
Aaarg!
Dirk Vdm
[anip]
What's the difference between x' and xi, imbecile?
Androcles
PS: Thanks for the source, Zod, General.
His adoring passionate pal is that well-known imbecile, Your Basic
Moron, aka YBM.
If you are observant (or simply check the records) Dork has been
silent recently, on his annual vacation. YBM reappeared at the same
time. The conclusion is rather obvious, given that YBM loves to
kiss his arse.
| The only picture I have of you, Dirk, is this one, with you escaping,
| which must be from ca. 20 years ago in your "halb-starken" days.
| http://www.terranova.net/content/images/mj-chase.jpg
Egads, you should see this one:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DorksBrain.jpg
Ask him if he knows the difference between x' and xi:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Rocket/LTstretch.gif
, he likes to pretend he understands relativity.
Androcles.
Like all Einstein Dingleberries, Dirk too has a 1905 fixation and
is compelled to stick with geriatric physics beliefs... ahahahaha..
What else do you expect from such Einstein Dingleberry Dingleberries?
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DorksBrain.jpg
Without pun one can say that you hit the nail on the head.
ahahaha... ahahahanson
>
[hanson to Dirk]
http://students.cs.byu.edu/~daveyg83/Photoshop/ugly-men%20copy.jpg
finally found a pix of HaHaHanson
http://www.hometowntales.com/MainBlog/9A18A1D4-EAF4-4F13-9D25-9EBA3985FDBA_files/schlitze1.png
>
>
I understand there is some medical concern as to why his brain floats
centrally in a polyhydramnios state. The answer really quite simple,
it is actually air filled and behaves like a tethered buoy.
Hence the (incorrect) term "air-head" .
Androcles
You are a failure. Your life is merely the realization of it. That's a
good thing, you know.
> Dirk Vdm
around a black hole or a star a lot like a black hole
virtual quark anti quark - virtual gluon anti gluon - vacuum fluc -
tidal forces separate particles -
1 particle goes to black hole or star - 1 particle flies away
this method could create - quarks, gluons and glueballs that are
different because they could be particles that are not connected to any
particles - people could see - 1 quark - 1 gluon 1 glueball
it is probably true I was the first person to talk about quarks with a
magnetic charge - there could be some particles flying around the
universe that have part of a charge of a magnetic monopole - the same
is true for particles with a part of a charge of an electron
if there are quarks or some thing like quarks they are made up of
particles - these particles could be flying around the universe - any
spin 1/2 particle is made up of particles
Kurt Stocklmeir
there is a proton and a neutron
binding energy is equal to mass deficit
if the proton and neutron get together they have less mass
strong force - hold together proton and neutron - binding energy of
strong force is equal to decrease of mass of proton and neutron
the mass deficit changes to energy and the energy flies away - this is
associated with an atomic bomb
if I weigh the proton and neutron I will get less weight and I can find
the mass from this - the weight and mass includes the binding energy
if mass deficit emits gravity - when the proton and neutron gets
together the universe has an
increase of energy - energy, mass and momentum of the universe changes
- there is not conservation of energy, mass and momentum - when the
proton and the neutron got attraction
binding energy was created to keep inertia mass and gravitational mass
the same - inertia mass is not the same because I can weigh the proton
and neutron - if mass deficit emits gravity gravitational mass does not
change - inertial mass is not equal to gravitational mass -
universe has - constant gravitational mass energy - not constant
inertial mass energy
I wrote this fast. I may have made some mistakes. I plan to think
about this and write more articles if I have made any mistakes.
Kurt Stocklmeir
perhaps, "bubble-head" ?
or "dingle-berry head" ?
glueballs are similar to spitballs but have a harder coating of glue on them
and are illegal in school.
>. I may have made some mistakes. I plan to think
> about this and write more articles if I have made any mistakes.
>
> Kurt Stocklmeir
>
so you gonna write more articles with more mistakes since you made mistakes
in this one?
if mass deficit emits gravity - universe has - constant inertial mass
energy - gravitational mass energy can change - there is not
conservation of gravitational mass energy
if there is not conservation of gravitational mass energy - there is
not conservation of energy, momentum and angular momentum
Kurt Stocklmeir
graviton is spin one tachyon
when graviton causes attraction - graviton gets more momentum opposite
direction - equal and opposite forces between graviton and particle -
gravity gets more strong
because gravity gets more strong - gravity can change orbits a lot -
make orbits change a lot -make orbits haywire - also creates chaos for
orbits
big clusters of galaxies - orbits haywire and a lot of chaos for orbits
planets - oribts can change a little and a small amount of chaos for
orbits
Kurt Stocklmeir
If Zod General disagrees with me - let him explain it.
Kurt Stocklmeir
Around 1990 I put on sci physics - space particles and time particles
are tachyons
I have a particle like an electron
if there are not any dimensions the particle has an infinite energy
density - infinite energy
time and space are negative energy
time and space spread a particle
time and space decrease energy of positive energy particles
time particles and space particles are negative energy spin one
tachyons
God sent to me theories. God created curses against all my theories.
Kurt Stocklmeir
Around 1990 I put on the internet using sci physics
why does a black hole not absorb the vacuum and get more big - the
vacuum is made up of tachyons - a black hole can not absorb the vacuum
Kurt Stocklmeir
all the energy of the vacuum is negative
Kurt Stocklmeir
time, space and the vacuum are negative energy
negative energy may emit anti gravity
time, space and the vacuum create anti gravity for the universe
Kurt Stocklmeir
most of the universe is negative energy
Kurt Stocklmeir
space, time and the vacuum are negative energy
negative energy may emit anti gravity
if space is expanding and if anti gravity is making space expand - it
is probably true the anti gravity is from space, time and the vacuum
Kurt Stocklmeir
I do not think there is a lot of dark matter. I think gravity gets
more strong - explain speed of stars far from center of galaxy and
speed of galaxies that are part of clusters.
if there is dark matter - if dark matter is made up of particles that
can orbit a center of a galaxy - particles can have a slow speed and
the speed is associated with orbit around center of galaxy - some stars
with fusion - creating light - would be going through the dark matter -
stars would be absorbing dark matter using gravity
if dark matter can have fusion - stars would absorb the dark matter and
there would be fusion of dark matter - the stars would not look like
normal stars - people probably could see this - I do not think this is
happening
if dark matter can not have fusion - stars with fusion would absorb
dark matter and the dark matter would interfer with fusion of star -
people could probably see this - I not not think this is happening
Kurt Stocklmeir
if dark matter is made up of particles that are spread around a galaxy
- particles can have a slow speed associated with an orbit around a
center of a galaxy
if these particles - dark matter - can have fusion - dark stars absorb
the dark matter - dark stars get fusion and this increases - star
absorbs more dark matter - I do not think this is happening - people
could probably see this
if these particles -dark matter - can not have fusion - dark stars and
stars that are not dark - absorb dark matter and get more mass - dark
stars keep getting mass and change to black holes - the black holes
would keep getting more big - stars that are not dark will become dark
stars - keep absorbing dark matter - become a black hole - black hole
would keep getting more big - it is probably true there would be
extreme big black holes - I do not think this is happening - people
could probably see them - like - as particles moved toward black holes
they would emit photons
Kurt Stocklmeir