Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
sci.physics
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion SCI.LOGIC is a STAGNANT CESS PITT of LOSERS!
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Graham Cooper  
View profile  
 More options Nov 17 2012, 3:50 am
Newsgroups: sci.logic, sci.math, sci.physics, sci.chem, comp.ai.philosophy
From: Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 00:50:40 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 17 2012 3:50 am
Subject: SCI.LOGIC is a STAGNANT CESS PITT of LOSERS!
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
FROM AXIOMS you DERIVE THEOREMS!

Nobody CARES if  SomeModel |=  'this is not derivable from your
axioms"

looks TRUE!

IT's not DERIVABLE FROM THE AXIOMS!   END OF STORY!

Nothing Mathematically INCOMPLETE ABOUT IT!

LOGIC is an ARTS DEGREE on SLAGGING OFF COMPUTER PROGRAMMERS because
you PROVED YOURSELVES STUPID!

1 Godel proved LOGIC DOESNT WORK!
2 Everyone FELL FOR IT for 100 years
3 Literacy Students took up volumes of texts on logic

and Swamped any discussion with THAT WONT WORK because  "TEACHER IS
RIGHT" arguments!

Any and All mathematical logicians posting to SCI.LOGIC have all been
verbally abused 100, 1000 times or more until they all left.

Me included.

******************

www.microPROLOG.com

A FORMAL SYSTEM WRITTEN PURELY IN PREDICATES!

f(0).
t(1).
t(X) :- f(f(X)).
wff(X) :- t(X).
wff(X) :- f(X).

what(X,true) :- t(X).
what(X,false) :- f(X).
t(if(X,Y)) :- t(X), t(Y).
t(if(X,Y)) :- f(X), f(Y).
t(if(X,Y)) :- f(X), t(Y).
t(or(X,Y)) :- t(X).
t(or(X,Y)) :- t(Y).
t(and(X,Y)) :- t(X),t(Y).
t(iff(X,Y)) :- t(X),t(Y).
t(iff(X,Y)) :- f(X),f(Y).
t(xor(X,Y)) :- t(X),f(Y).
t(xor(X,Y)) :- f(X),t(Y).
f(if(X,Y)) :- t(X),f(Y).
f(or(X,Y)) :- f(X),f(Y).
f(and(X,Y)) :- f(X).
f(and(X,Y)) :- f(Y).
f(iff(X,Y)) :- t(X),f(Y).
f(iff(X,Y)) :- f(X),t(Y).
f(xor(X,Y)) :- t(X),t(Y).
f(xor(X,Y)) :- f(X),f(Y).

RESOLUTION
or(R,Q) :- if(L,R), or(L,Q).
or(R,Q) :- if(L,R), or(Q,L).
or(Q,R) :- if(L,R), or(L,Q).
or(Q,R) :- if(L,R), or(Q,L).

MODUS PONENS
t(R) :- if(L,R), t(L).
t(R) :- or(f(L),R), t(L).
t(R) :- or(R,f(L)), t(L).

INFERENCE RULES
if( if(t(S),f(R)) , if(t(R),f(S)) ).

-----------------------

On Oct 31, 12:13 am, Gary Forbis  wrote:

> -? wff(if(1,0))
> having found wff(X) :- t(X).
> wants to evaluate t(if(1,0)).
> having found t(if(X,Y)) :- if(X,Y).
> wants to evaluate if(1,0).
> having found if(X,Y) := t(X), t(Y).
> wants to evalueate t(1).
> Find t(1)
> RETURNS success.
> wants to evaluate t(0).
> RETURNS failure.
> wants to evaluate t(if(if(1,0),Y) :- if(if(1,0),Y)
> wants to evaluate if(1,0)
> ...

Only 1 other capable mathematical logician here!

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google