Received: by 10.224.183.13 with SMTP id ce13mr17744137qab.4.1349902560384;
        Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.72.197 with SMTP id f5mr3993646vdv.17.1349902560359; Wed,
 10 Oct 2012 13:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Path: r17ni12790870qap.0!nntp.google.com!l8no34819360qao.0!postnews.google.com!u9g2000vbm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: u9g2000vbm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=79.31.237.211; posting-account=_MXb5woAAABr2WPmcWuSO6-GriVSjZjf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 79.31.237.211
References: <114e7139-fc0c-4798-9cae-73b3e9a77649@r10g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
 <k4rcbv$86o$1@news.albasani.net> <99870d51-a729-4e4e-8fe8-6c9ef3cad6ca@bv9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <k4rl0k$sqb$1@news.albasani.net> <b08a09a1-75ca-4387-adc9-b6bddeaf6837@u9g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
 <k4rp5q$6g3$1@news.albasani.net> <89b795c3-e3a8-4382-a3f4-e764e36e7bf3@q4g2000vbg.googlegroups.com>
 <k4s9ai$fqg$1@news.albasani.net> <605b7e49-b897-4e54-8880-3a2192d7e8d0@c20g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
 <k4uim7$f29$1@news.albasani.net> <c509ded3-7d99-4680-b7f1-2b2a8148fbf6@j12g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
 <k4v4jn$o71$1@news.albasani.net> <5031fc39-0517-490e-aa85-8fb221ebcf63@k6g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
 <k50o3k$eu2$1@news.albasani.net> <34bce975-c49b-4586-9a07-80b642cfc192@10g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>
 <k53e8s$is6$1@news.albasani.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <992a7b2e-484f-42ee-aff3-c8bb2ec6e3fc@u9g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: repetition of MMX with radiowaves
From: Casimiro <fa.mo...@yahoo.it>
Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:56:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 10 Ott, 11:14, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On a sunny day (Tue, 9 Oct 2012 21:57:07 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Casimir=
o
> <fa.mo...@yahoo.it> wrote in
> <34bce975-c49b-4586-9a07-80b642cfc...@10g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >> WINNER!
> >> You are measuring reflections from ground water level.
> >> You have re-invented ground penetrating radar.
> >> The ground water level will change with the tides a bit,
> >> the ground water acts like a large metal reflector just below your lab=
oratory.
>
> >> This is all based on my theory that you are experiencing reflections :=
-)
> >> No magic, no Nobel,
> >> have an expresso.
> >> Next experiment
> >> end
>
> >> pizza:
> >> relax, think of better explanation.
> >> end
>
> >Thank you for your theory, really "magic".
> >How a coaxial cable, closed in =A0COMPLETLY SCREENED BOX, could be
> >a...radar of water? Are you a gambler?
>
> No coax is perfect.
> Coax couples to box, box to environment.
> I am not claiming may analysis is right,
> but I do claim you give zero data and a lot of hot air.

Yes, of coarse, I know. For this I screened completly the junctions.
And again putted in the box a microwave absorber.
Now I'm writing . I have too much and is laborious to choise them.

>
> You have failed to produce even once decent drawing plus data for even on=
e experimen,
> you olny talk hot air.
>

Yes , I think I'm talking to air.