The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
From: "Mike" <elea...@yahoo.gr>
Date: 16 Sep 2006 07:29:50 -0700
Local: Sat, Sep 16 2006 10:29 am
Subject: SRian conflict over velocity addition formula
Mike wrote: You cannot devise an experiment to validate the velocity addition formula [ of SR] since that would require measuring the OWSL. The velocity addition formula is a deduction from the postulate of c invariance in inertial FoR. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/tree/browse_frm... PD wrote: That's simply not true. Relativistic kinematics is confirmed all the time in particle experiments, where those high speeds and also observations from two different reference frames are common. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/tree/browse_frm... Dirt Van Dar Mortal wrote: There is no experimental basis for preferring the classic over the http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/tree/browse_frm... Philosophical? Yes, indeed because SR is the philosophy of a block I enjoy to see SRians contradict each other in such a ridiculus manner. Mike You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||