> On Feb 18, 8:52 am, "gu...@hotmail.com" <gu...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > On Feb 16, 6:27 am, oriel36 <kelleher.ger...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > On Feb 16, 10:52 am, "gu...@hotmail.com" <gu...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > > > E=hc/ smallest_wavelength
> > > > where E = energy of one photon
> > > > and A = amplitude of one photon

> > > > 1. Can a thousand photons in amplitude exist in a wavelength that
> > > > cannot be wider than that of one photon and still retain the shape of
> > > > a sine wave??

> > > > 2. If not, then can the smallest wavelength be considered a binary
> > > > number (since it can only contain one photon or none at all)??

> > > > 3. Anything in the Quantum Field Theory on this?

> > > This was dealt with a decade ago although the arguments would have
> > > been re-directed towards more productive issues if I could rewrite it
> > > today  -

> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/48d48f4234f85118

> > > The preponderance in the early 20th century to set limits to
> > > geometry,time and space is counter-productive as the quasi-periodicity
> > > of certain proportions such as Pi and Phi exclude any possibility of a
> > > limit or a definite digit that closes out a proportion of line to
> > > circumference or the Phi proportion.

> > The above math is wrong because it uses fractions of Planck units
> > (Example: circumference = pi x Planck unit = fraction).

> It is fine and it works.A diameter multiplied by Pi creates a
> circumference which in turn creates a radius half the diameter of the
> original length hence there are no bottom or vanishing limits to
> geometry

> otherwise the choice is to conclude that the Pi value is
> periodic.

>Start off with a Planck length as a diameter and you should
> draw the only possible conclusion that such an entity has as much
> relevance as determining a meter is the smallest length possible.

> > Since:

> > All succeeding Wavelengths, Phi, circumference, Fibonacci numbers,
> > Science has claimed to be Integers (No fractions) of Planck units.

> Both Pi and Phi reflect quasi-periodic decimals in that the sequence

> of numbers are neither ordered nor disordered but finely balanced
> between the two.There is an incredible amount of information contained
> in quasi-periodicity and not least when there is a hideous perspective
> floating out there in terms of the 'no center/no circumference'
> ideologies of 'black hole and big bang'.In short,this really does
> matter.

> > Therefore:

> > It still seems the smallest Planck Wavelength can also have only one
> > Planck Amplitude??