>Fuck Your God, Obama.
>
>And fuck your God damned CIA too.
>
>Torture, Domestic Surveillance, High Crimes?
>
>Guess what, Mr. Obama, you just lost my vote in 2012.
Waaaaah. I have yet to hear your complaint about Mr. Bush.
Try drinking less political kool-aid and more Prozac.
--
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply.
Tell us about climate science you science illiterate religious fuck.
Like I said, try more Prozac.
For starters, I'm hardly religious.
You're a delusional fruitcake.
I can! "Climate science" requires that you (in order):
1. draw up your conclusions.
2. Assemble the data to support (1) above.
3. Create a computer model to support (1) above, using the data filtered
in (2) above.
4. Get a shill to create a giant infomercial to proclaim your
conclusions to the world. It might even get a Nobel Prize for the effort.
--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.
Thomas wrote:
>> Tell us about climate science you science illiterate religious fuck.
>
Jim wrote:
> Like I said, try more Prozac. For starters, I'm hardly religious
> You're a delusional fruitcake.
>
hanson wrote:
... ahahahaha... That's a very promising thread!. Don't stop now,
guys. Thomas, are you gonna be back, for a retort, after dinner,
and having followed Jim's advice to increase your Fluoxetine
uptake?... ahahaha... ahahahaha...
You don't understand how science works, do you?
Tater
I understand how AGW global warming "science" works. In REAL science,
you look at all of the data first, without preconceived notions, THEN
you draw up theories to explain the data.
What I described above sums up the state of "climate science" today.
No, it doesn't, unless by using climate science in quotes you mean
something other than scientific study of the climate.
Tater
> And then when you get new data that doesn't support your 'theory'?
I haven't seen any yet! Please provide!
>
> You're a fucking retard. Forever. Get used to it.
kT, please tell us in the cyber world just HOW you became such an
accomplished ignoranus!
1. Were you born that way?
2. Did you work hard to achieve it?
3. Did you attend the finest liberal universities and suck up to the
most left-wing professors?
4. Was it some combination of the above?
It isn't very scientific to ascribe rising temperatures to CO2 levels
when the plots of "global temperature" lead CO2 levels and operate
independently of CO2 levels for the last 450,000 years.
http://www.meto.umd.edu/~owen/CHPI/IMAGES/co2-temp.html
http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm
The latter website attempts to explain it, but ignores the fact that the
Earth follows Milankivitch cycles and that we are presently approaching
a peak in those cycles.
The AGW people are just using this information to advance their own
agenda: more control of the world's economies. It is like sacrificing a
virgin to the Volcano God to prevent another eruption.
> Tater Gumfries wrote:
>
> [snip nonsense]
>
> >> What I describe
>
> d above sums up the state of "climate science" today.
> >
> > No, it doesn't, unless by using climate science in quotes you mean
> > something other than scientific study of the climate.
>
> Dorinda Outram provides a good example of a standard, intellectual
> definition of the Enlightnment:
>
> "Enlightenment was a desire for human affairs to be guided by
> rationality rather than by faith, superstition, or revelation; a belief
> in the power of human reason to change society and liberate the
> individual from the restraints of custom or arbitrary authority; all
> backed up by a world view increasingly validated by science rather than
> by religion or tradition."
>
> I see no reason to coddle these people anymore.
kT fails the course!
How can you fail wiki?
Failure to search and read and follow the links?
> Data is so weird, it seems like it is immune to ordinary conservation
> theorems.
>
> >> You're a fucking retard. Forever. Get used to it.
> >
> > kT, please tell us in the cyber world just HOW you became such an
> > accomplished ignoranus!
>
> Wikipedia!
>
> > 1. Were you born that way?
>
> Yes, my genes haven't mutated much since then.
>
> > 2. Did you work hard to achieve it?
>
> No, aliens manipulate your genes for their own nefarious purposes.
>
> I don't manipulate them at all, I just run with what I've already got.
>
> > 3. Did you attend the finest liberal universities and suck up to the
> > most left-wing professors?
>
> Well, yes I did, but mostly I audited classes and hung out in the
> libraries, since I had a lot of other things on my agenda back then.
> We'd go to the student union to discuss our results once a week at most.
>
> > 4. Was it some combination of the above?
>
> You can read all about it on my website, but it won't do you any good
> because you are unenlightened in the modern new age of unenlightenment.
>
> This might be helpful if you actually want to improve yourself.
>
> http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf
>
> I don't see that ever happening for you though.
Tell us how tough it is to be in the lowest quartile!
You have broken new ground!
Thomas wrote:
"kT" aka science based natural life form, utter dependent upon
sunlight, soil and plants, living on a planet with a molten core,
asteroid and comet threats, and
>
hanson wrote:
... ahahaha... WOW!..so, Tommy, that did finally dawn on you?
But as the "scientists" that you claim to be you might have been
more descriptive if you simply were to adhere to the classical
definition with you saying: "kT is the thermal energy depending
on the size of T, when express in °K". -- Rem Boltzmann?...
>
Thomas wrote:
"kT" aka seven billion other nationalistic religious assholes.
>
hanson wrote:
it is not quite clear whether you are self-deprecating here
calling yourself "asshole"... ahahaha... or whether your Prozac
induced megalomania makes you that horribly misanthropic.
>
Thomas wrote:
You think you're doing me a disservice, hanson, but actually
you're doing me a favor.
>
hanson wrote:
Aye certainly, Tommy. It's always fun to administer to the needy.
>
Thomas wrote:
Thank you so much for playing the usenet game with me.
>
hanson wrote:
Thank you too, Tommy. I hope you had as much fun at it
as I had... ahahahaha... Again, thanks for the laughs...
ahahaha... ahahahahanson
> You have no discernible scientific reasoning abilities.
>
> You are just parroting things you heard on hack denialist websites.
No -- I looked at the data on websites that you referenced. It is YOU,
"kT", who have zero ability to assess data. You are just parroting the
eco-Nazi party line!
> I have a great outlook on life.
>
Other than that I are you feeling okay. are you smiling and your
head is high, or in fact, have you been getting bloody noses so you may have
to bring the head down a notch or two. :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "marika" <marik...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.tv.this-old-house,alt.usenet.legends.lester-mosley
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 10:38 PM
Subject: outliers: the affair
> Suddenly, the Web Is Giving Eggheads Something to Watch
> a.. By LEE GOMES
> e..
> It was bound to happen: just as the Internet was settling into its role as
> haven for videos about car crashes, Britney Spears and teenage
> confessions, people had to come along to ruin it all by trying to be
> serious.
>
> A number of Web efforts are under way to provide for more cerebral
> alternatives to television on the Web. Call them YouTubes for wonks.
>
> One is called Fora.tv. It's an ambitious for-profit effort based in San
> Francisco and funded by angel backers, including Will Hearst, the
> publishing heir and frequent tech investor. Fora's intent is to establish
> relations with all of the lecture series from the nation's scores of think
> tanks, civic groups, bookstores and the like, and then put tapes of their
> speeches and panel discussions online in an easily searchable fashion.
>
> C-SPAN, the cable public-affairs network that focuses mostly on Washington
> politics and policy, is an obvious model. Brian Gruber, Fora.tv's founder
> and chief executive, is a cable-TV executive who worked at C-SPAN during
> its early years. He said, though, that Fora.tv will be casting a much
> wider net than C-SPAN, including business, technology and the arts.
>
> Happily for folks with broadband connections, other outfits have similar
> ideas. One example is the Research Channel, a 10-year-old consortium of
> some of the country's best universities that is based at the University of
> Washington, Seattle. It started life as a public-access TV channel
> dedicated to presentations by college researchers. But it, too, now has a
> thriving Web presence, with more than 3,000 programs in business, the
> sciences and the humanities.
>
> These shows aren't for viewers with short attention spans, or who come
> expecting glossy but dumbed-down packages, like those increasingly found
> on the commercial cable channels that profess interests in history,
> science and the like.
>
> The typical Fora.tv offering is someone giving a speech and then taking
> questions at the end, with one or two cameras to record the scene. The
> topics are the sort that ought to interest anyone with a passing
> familiarity with the front page of a newspaper. One program last week
> featured speeches and panels on developments in the Middle East and on the
> conservative Christian movement in America.
>
> Among Fora.tv's channels are those for business, environment and religion.
> Mr. Gruber said Fora.tv aims to span the spectrum in its politics; it
> already has relationships with the rightist Hoover Institution and the
> center-left Brookings Institution.
>
> Of course, the unbounded horizons of the Web offer opportunities for niche
> players. Anyone who wants to create a TV channel just needs a computer and
> a Web address. As a business model, Mr. Gruber cites the profitable
> Weather Channel, saying it never would have been possible in the
> limited-channel world of broadcast television.
>
> On TV, in fact, new niches continue to crop up. Link TV, for example, is
> an international-oriented channel available on most cable and satellite
> systems. It's best known for its nightly "Mosaic" show, which features
> newscasts from the Middle East. There is also the recently launched
> Documentary Channel, which hopes to the tap the country's growing interest
> in the genre. The Documentary Channel is currently available on Dish, but
> would love subscribers to other services to write in to their provider and
> request it.
>
> Sites like Fora.tv are still in their early stages, and haven't yet
> attracted enough attention to be considered even niche players. Timothy
> Lorang, director of programming at the Research Channel, said an average
> show might attract 5,000 viewers.
>
> Their goals are ambitious. Fora.tv's is to be for ideas what ESPN is to
> sports. In some areas, like the upcoming presidential election, it will
> have a lot of competition, including from big players such as Google and
> Yahoo, which are themselves trying to connect with an interested public.
>
> Mr. Gruber says Fora.tv is mindful that it can't just dump a bunch of
> videos on a server and expect the public to be entranced. Instead, for
> each presentation, viewers can see a list of chapters, like those on a DVD
> movie, showing what the speaker is discussing at any particular point. You
> can skip to the section that interests you.
>
> You can also download sections, and whole presentations, for later
> listening as a podcast. In fact, sitting in the car or panting on the
> Stairmaster may be the best way to experience many of these visually plain
> offerings.
>
> In an ideal world, so-called serious programming on the Web wouldn't be
> limited to this species of plain-vanilla videos of academics and authors
> giving speeches. Many of them are, to be frank, rather dull.
>
> I haven't referenced any global warming websites yet.
>
> It would be a waste of time.
>
> You're ineducable.
No -- I'm not indocrinable. I HATE party lines!
Thomas wrote:
I have a great outlook on life.
>
hanson wrote:
... ahahahaha... Is that so, Tommy?... But you have demonstrated
precious little of such an outlook and much less of your great life.
ahahahaha... How about some proof or at least an example
about it, hopefully a scientific one... If you don't or can't, Tommy,
then it is clear that your 1-liner is only an illusion brought on by
your abuse of a controlled substance, Prozac... ahahahahaha...
>
Thomas wrote:
I don't buy any of your imaginary shit, your real shit is bad enough,
and it's totally free. All I have to do is scrap it off of my shoes.
>
hanson wrote:
... ahahahaha... Leaving your procto-cropophilic yearning and
fetish aside, Tommy, the question arises why you are not doing
what you preach here. You reaction is not only unscientific but it
is also quite gross and un-hygienic for you to walk around in your
soiled shoes... hahahahaha.. It's funny though... AHAHAHA...
>
Thomas wrote:
Your god is shit, hanson.
>
hanson wrote:
Tommy, you are straining too much under the pharma-kinetic
overload from your Prozac habit which is why you have your
hemmies and your eyeitis-rectitis... all of them precipitated
by & deeply rooted in your compulsive manufacturing of god
in your twisted and drug ridden mind...ahahaha...
>
Tommy, let me administer to you, to ameliorate those deep
seated, primordial God-fears within you which you involuntarily
exhibit about the Mysterious Unknown and about Forces that
are much greater than you can imagine and much less you
ever could handle. So,Tommy, listen closely, listen good now:
>
#=# Nobody is born religious. #=#
#=# Religion is an acquired disease #=#
#=# Religion is a tool used by the few to fuck the many #=#
>
Clearly, Tommy, besides all your other maladies, YOU are
badly infected and affected by that disease. And obviously,
also there are those folks around that used it successfully to
fuck you over....
Can't you see that .. or are you already too deep in the tank?
>
BTW, Tommy, I just read that
poster "marika" <marik...@gmail.com> wrote in
>
http://tinyurl.com/cy8am4
>
that you, Tommy, have "been getting bloody noses"... ahahaha.
Did she do that to you, Tommy?.. Girls are beating you up now?
Is that what gives you a "great outlook on life"?... ahahahaha...
You must be a masochist on top of all your other aberrations.
It's sad, really, but ever so hilariously funny... ahahahaha....
Thanks for the laughs... AHAHAHahahahanson
> Orval Fairbairn wrote:
>
> > I HATE
>
> That says it all.
You, sir, are a world-class ignoranus!
You delete stuff to make up your own message. The quote that you clipped
was "I HATE party lines!"
You have zero credibility.
> Orval Fairbairn wrote:
>
> > kT <cos...@lifeform.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Orval Fairbairn wrote:
> >>
> >>> I HATE
>
> >> That says it all.
>
> > I HATE
>
> We heard ya already.
>
> Seek help. There are public services available to help you.
You should be familiar with all of them! Can you furnish us in this NG
with a rating of them?
well that explains EVERYTHING.
mk5000
"I am the nothing man
You can call me Joe
Buy me a drink and shake my hand
You want courage"--bruce springsteen
when did they start making prozac in syrup form
mk5000
"Playing music is supposed to be fun. It's about heart, it's about
feelings, moving people, and something beautiful, and it's not about notes
on a page. I can teach you notes on a page, I can't teach you that other
stuff."-- Glenn Holland: Mr Holland's opus
have you been complaining? one thing they will be trying to do to improve
on the idea
getting telephone complaints instead of forms -- webpage and automated
over the phone
getting buy in from those who will send in by fax or email
documents, fax and email would be hooked straight to the computer that
built the file.
mk5000
----- Original Message -----
From: "marika" <marik...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: soc.senior.health+fitness,alt.usenet.legends.lester-mosley
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: In the Garden;
>
> "Billy" <wildbilly@without_a.net> wrote in message
> news:wildbilly-E3B4A...@c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au...
>
>>
>> This is a heath and fitness forum. Please, don't post off topic.
>
>
> Wow, I had no idea and I apologize.
>
> I had no idea that Ledger's fitness is debated here even though he has
> been dead for a while now
>
> Is there a corresponding Olsen Twins group as well
>
> mk5000
>
> "I used to dream, and I used to vow
> I wouldn't dream of it now
> We look to Los Angeles
> For the language we use "--glamorous glue, morrissey
>
>
LIFE IS A PARTY, JESUS IS DEAD, JESUS FUCKER