No gravity is just a Matter Wave created by Mass. Just like if you
throw a stone in water Waves are created. These waves are just like
Electromagnetic waves which produce gravity.
You are still in 19th century.
Bye
Sanny
General Relativity.
I had the impression that relativity wasn't absolutely accurate in
each predictions and it is more or less abandon.
I was asking about an modern theory.
As far as "pseudoforce" is concerned, i was referring to a force that
doesn't exist but we feel it as existing because we mixed it up with
something else, maybe still unkown.
So mass waves is the most modern theory? Not gravitrons or strings?
And what kind of change keeps producing those waves??
BTW, i have read about electrogravity which comes in 2 flavours :)
- Gravity is to electrogravity what magnetism is to electromagnetism,
but instead of coils using capasitors.
-Gravity is a pulling force produced by positive charge
What about these?
> No gravity is just a Matter Wave created by Mass. Just like if you
> throw a stone in water Waves are created. These waves are just like
> Electromagnetic waves which produce gravity.
But isn't it then a wave that propagates faster than light? I seem to
recall that light takes a couple of hundred hours to reach Pluto, but
the riddle is that Pluto gravitates to where the sun is *now* - not a
couple of hundred hours ago.
Everyone's going to take the piss out of me for this (I'm a layman),
but something occurred to me a while ago, and screw it - I'm going to
ask. Is there *any way* that gravity could simply be a form of
radiation that happens backwards in time?
I remember reading a book that mentioned "the arrow of time", and it
said that, while a body radiating light in all directions makes
perfect sense, the time-reversed version would require protons to come
from all these different directions and converge, as if by magic, on a
single point - which is surely counterintuitive. And I'd always
thought the same thing about gravity, which is essentially small
objects "homing in" on a larger one's centre of gravity. But
backwards in time, that would make more sense - just stuff flying off
in all directions.
I am annoyed by the fact that I don't understand gravity :o)
--
rt Lavin - - - Stuart Lavin - - - Stuart Lavin - - - Stuart Lavin - -
- Stua
Relativity is actually a very good theory and has been quite accurate.
It has gravity as space waves (distortions of space-time geometry.).
For "electrogravity", well, you seem to describe two different things.
The first sounds sort of like the theory of "gravitoelectromagnetism"
or "GEM", which is an _analogy_ between gravity and electromagnetism,
derived from general relativity. When you have moving objects, there
is a
relativistic component to the gravitational field that behaves like
the
magnetic field.
The second thing you seem to describe is like the "Unified Field"
theory,
which attempts to describe the four forces of nature as different
forms
of one force (so gravity and electromagnetism could be considered two
forms of the same force.). Nobody has yet come up with a successful
one.
Your impression is wrong. General relativity has yet to be
experimentally falsified.
[...]