Message from discussion Searching for "deformed harmonic oscillators" in theoretical chemical physics -- Re: The best search engine for serious research.
Received: by 10.68.233.69 with SMTP id tu5mr12206711pbc.6.1334644385696;
Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Tom Potter" <tdp1...@yahoo.com>
References: <vhRhr.673$JR1.firstname.lastname@example.org><email@example.com><firstname.lastname@example.org><email@example.com><firstname.lastname@example.org><Dvrir.858$M37.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <wCPir.email@example.com> <jMSdnaGPDty_vBHSnZ2dnUVZ_oudnZ2d@mchsi.com>
Subject: Re: Searching for "deformed harmonic oscillators" in theoretical chemical physics -- Re: The best search engine for serious research.
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 06:33:05 UTC
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:29:15 +0800
"Sam Wormley" <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> On 4/16/12 1:56 AM, Tom Potter wrote:
>> I am not defensive about "the Scirus web page".
>> I outlined the reasons that Scirus is superior to Google
>> for SERIOUS searching,
>> but if anyone wants quantity,
>> rather than quality,
>> and wants to be bombarded with ads
>> and "cooked" search hits,
>> Google is the way to gooooooooo.
> No only are you defensive about Scirus, but you obviously have
> a bias against Google. After all they did ban your postings to
> "google groups" due to your bigotry. Just an observation.
It is interesting to see that my follower Sam Wormley
does not know the definition of "bigotry".
The definition of "bigot" is:
"A prejudiced person
who is intolerant of any opinions differing from his own."
As can be seen from my posts,
I am a bigot's worst nightmare,
as I am intolerant of bigotry web sites
that try to silence and discredit folks,
such as Sammy's primary references,
the Dork Moortel and Eric Max Francis smear web sites.
( Sammy also used to operate a smear web site
until I called it to the attention of folks.)
As Sammy observed,
I, like thousands of people,
have a bias against Google
as the greedy, race/religion biased Gang at Google
is an enemy of honesty and free speech,
and bans, censor, and smears folks
who express FACTS and opinions
the Gang does not want the public exposed to.
As I have pointed out,
Google not only bans, censors, and "cooks the books"
on the search results they deliver,
they allow people to "Google Bomb" the
phrases that Google wants to see at the
top of their search hits,
but the most dangerous example of the bigotry of
the Gang at Google, is the fact that after they bought
DejaNews, the quality of Usenet searches immediate
began to deteriorate, and as the Google Gang
was not satisfied with censoring, banning, and
"cooking the books" on Web and Usenet searches,
they are making an effort to kill Usenet,
the last refuge of free speech on the Internet,
by setting up the unnecessary "Google Groups"
that is just a Google controlled clone of Usenet.
It does not take a system engineer to comprehend
that the Gang at Google are more like perverts
that give children candy,
than they are a company that "Does no evil."
Fortunately, the peoples of the world are wising up
to the Gang at Google.
China, the world's biggest
Internet market would not allow them to profit
from illegal drugs and pornography,
so the Gang sulked away, and as can be seen,
Google is being investigated and fined in
America and Europe for many violations of the law,
including a $500,000,000.00 fine in America
for pushing illegal drugs.
After ripping off Unix, and conning thousands of
computer programmers into DONATING their time and skills
to morph UNIX into an OPEN SOURCE <sic> operating system,
Google double crossed them and CONTROL Android
and make it out to be a Google thing.
It appears that Google's deceit and greed has caught
up with them in this case, as they had to spend out billions
of dollars to buy Motorola so they could cherry pick
some patents to intimidate the people who are suing them
for ripping off Unix.
As can be seen from the news, Google recently
did a two for one stock split. I suggest that
this is an effort by the Gang to begin to
unload Google stock, while maintaining control,
and anyone who has Google stock
should keep a close eye on what is happening.
Thanks to my follower Sam Wormley
for demonstrating the use of bigotry,
and for calling attention to Google's use of bigotry.
Regarding the subject of this thread,
here's what Wikipedia had to say about Google Scholar and "Google Bombing".
"Google Scholar is vulnerable to spam. Researchers from the University of
California, Berkeley and Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg demonstrated
that citation counts on Google Scholar can be manipulated and complete
non-sense articles created with SCIgen were indexed from Google Scholar.
They concluded that citation counts from Google Scholar should only be used
with care especially when used to calculate performance metrics such as the
h-index or impact factor. Although Google Scholar does not compute the
h-index itself, several downstream web sites use its data. The practicality
of manipulating h-index calculators by spoofing Google Scholar was
demonstrated in 2010 by Cyril Labbe from Joseph Fourier University, who
managed to rank "Ike Antkare" ahead of Albert Einstein by means of a large
set of SCIgen-produced documents citing each other (effectively an academic