Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Apr 26 2012 4:57 pm
Subject: Re: There is no absolute time dilation or physical length contraction.
On Apr 26, 12:30 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/26/12 8:12 AM, ken...@att.net wrote:No this is not an important step. The important step is to measure the
> >>> Too bad for you....I am light years ahead of you in smart.
> >> You don't even understand concepts of motion, Seto!
> > ROTFLOL....pot kettle black. Relative motion between two objects is
> Seto consider two points, T and B representing the top and bottom
> Chose one or the other as the origin of an inertial frame coordinate
frequency of the distant source. If there is a difference between the
incoming light than the frequency of the observer's identical source
then there is relative motion between them.
> The displacement vector, s, between T and B has magnitude and
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.