On 22 Jan 2006 07:55:33 -0800, glhan...@indiana.edu wrote:
Repeat after me: NOTHING MOVES IN SPACETIME.
>> >Another problem that you are having is that you're one of the
>> >A side effect of becoming an expert is one no longer encounters
>> ahahaha... Hem, I got a few pertinent questions that need answers,
>Are you still confused by stupid semantic issues? A world line, whichahahaha... Hansen the crackpot is all cranked up now. Have you stopped
>represents the entire history of a particle, is frozen motionless. But
>when we talk about particles we usually talk about them at a particular
>moment in time, not their entire history as a whole.
>> How come he does not realize that both space and
>Have you figured out yet that the device you use to reply is a
beating your mother yet? ahahaha...
> Or that your alien-induced lattice that exists nowhere isNope. My lattice is not made of abstract crap but of real particles.
>also an abstract model of your invention?
You crackpots call them virtual photons. ahahaha...
>What is it about crackpots that makes them think that everyone's theoryWhat is it about physicists (the most dangerous crackpots of them all)
>is "just a theory" except for their own?
that they think everybody should kiss their stinking ass? ahahaha...
Oh, by the way. Have you figured out why bodies in motion stay in
One more thing. ahahaha... Have you noticed that a universe where
Phew! Physics is so much phucking phun! ahahaha...
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.