Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Traveler  
View profile  
 More options Jan 22 2006, 11:20 am
Newsgroups: sci.physics
From: Traveler <trave...@nospam.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:20:04 -0500
Local: Sun, Jan 22 2006 11:20 am
Subject: Re: Nutcases have destroyed this newsgroup
On 22 Jan 2006 07:55:33 -0800, glhan...@indiana.edu wrote:

>Traveler wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Jan 06 13:31:20 GMT, jmfbah...@aol.com wrote:

>> >Another problem that you are having is that you're one of the
>> >physics gods.  This means that you have risen from sitting
>> >at the feet of gods and taken a chair.  When you look back
>> >into the past you think how nice it was.  I recall posts
>> >of extreme frustration from you as you wrestled with your
>> >homework and groused about not enough time to learn anything.

>> >A side effect of becoming an expert is one no longer encounters
>> >new information at the same rate as before.  And the new
>> >knowledge one does encounter is more difficult to learn (you've
>> >already done all the easier stuff).

>> ahahaha... Hem, I got a few pertinent questions that need answers,
>> enquiring minds and all that. ahahaha... If Hansen is a physics god,
>> how come he can never understand that spacetime and everything in it
>> is frozen motionless?

Repeat after me: NOTHING MOVES IN SPACETIME.

>Are you still confused by stupid semantic issues?  A world line, which
>represents the entire history of a particle, is frozen motionless.  But
>when we talk about particles we usually talk about them at a particular
>moment in time, not their entire history as a whole.

>> How come he does not realize that both space and
>> time are abstract constructs derived from other phenomena?

>Have you figured out yet that the device you use to reply is a
>keyboard?

ahahaha... Hansen the crackpot is all cranked up now. Have you stopped
beating your mother yet? ahahaha...

>  Or that your alien-induced lattice that exists nowhere is
>also an abstract model of your invention?

Nope. My lattice is not made of abstract crap but of real particles.
You crackpots call them virtual photons. ahahaha...

>What is it about crackpots that makes them think that everyone's theory
>is "just a theory" except for their own?

What is it about physicists (the most dangerous crackpots of them all)
that they think everybody should kiss their stinking ass? ahahaha...

Oh, by the way. Have you figured out why bodies in motion stay in
motion? Oh wait. Nver mind. Physicists are not allow to as why-type
questions. ahahaha... Luckily for me, I'' a layman. I can ask why-type
questions until they start oozing out of your ass. ahahaha...

One more thing. ahahaha... Have you noticed that a universe where
every motion/position is relative is a self-referential universe? I
didn't hink so. This sort of simple things goes right over your pointy
little PhD head. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...

Phew! Physics is so much phucking phun! ahahaha...

Louis Savain

Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.