Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news1
From: David Bernier <david...@videotron.ca>
Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.physics,sci.logic
Subject: Re: first counterexamples in Riemann Hypothesis because Euler encoding
 is not viable #1349 Correcting Math
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 21:44:53 -0500
Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95
Lines: 165
Message-ID: <ifjg3a028fq@news1.newsguy.com>
References: <d114a146-1aaa-426a-8ed9-0093755803a0@w2g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <ecae0007-0bcc-4356-b8f1-e5f4c6a0e843@c2g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <f7fb4c02-14f3-4318-b56e-861bb63fd396@r29g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <540370d6-c588-4212-97cc-c80dcaa58be4@e20g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <df9fdd8a-dad2-44f0-98ca-de80c7316ac8@v17g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> <64aee116-644b-42c9-8673-36843da6669f@j3g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <fc47465f-1056-427e-9439-19cac7e67771@y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <9d258758-e609-4c19-9282-e6184d4fbdc1@j29g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <3436e0ab-d3ff-4343-be63-45a70f6dc333@p1g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <1cac6fd2-5ca2-49f9-bf75-c7057d8792dd@l17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <6aff6ae4-adb2-418b-afb2-990483ed1ebf@k13g2000vbq.googlegroups.com> <db28853a-0a1e-4bd8-a742-f2125d8b2880@v12g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> <8b6176a7-045e-4f1e-9672-764b1254d7b7@j25g2000vbs.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pefa01f6723156e48ae21d4a9417b3850e84ff2e79afb27ea.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101213 Fedora/2.0.11-1.fc13 SeaMonkey/2.0.11
In-Reply-To: <8b6176a7-045e-4f1e-9672-764b1254d7b7@j25g2000vbs.googlegroups.com>

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> On Dec 30, 11:38 am, Archimedes Plutonium
> <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On Dec 30, 5:09 am, Archimedes Plutonium
>>
>>
>>
>> <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> On Dec 30, 1:03 am, Archimedes Plutonium
>>
>>> <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>> On Dec 29, 2:22 am, Archimedes Plutonium
>>>> <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>> (snipped to save space)
>>
>>>>> In Circumferencing the Perimeter we start with a square-side and find
>>>>> its perimeter and then
>>>>> we pi-twiddle and see if we can match it with a circumference. We have
>>>>> truncations also.
>>
>>>>> 215.50
>>>>> 2152.050
>>
>>>>> Here is an example of on square side in the Circumferencing the
>>>>> Perimeter:
>>
>>>>> Let me try 2152.550 as more suitable
>>>>> side of square =  2152.550
>>>>> 
perimeter = 4xside = 8610.200
>>>>> 
8610.200/3.141 = 2741.228 = diameter
>>>>>   
start pi twiddling 1/(B^2)twiddle 8610.200/2741.228 = 3.1410010
>>>>> pi twiddle = 3.141002
>>>>> 
3.141002 x 2741.228 = 8610.202 mismatch
>>>>> 3.141001 x 2741.228 = 8610.199 mismatch
>>
>>>>> Can someone set up a computer program that incorporates the above
>>>>> example and find that
>>>>> accurate table of first breakdowns in B matrices from 100 to 10^8?
>>
>>>>> Is 215.50 the first square-side to have a breakdown in the 100 B
>>>>> matrix? Please fill in the
>>>>> first breakdowns all the way out to 10^8.
>>
>>>>> P.S. Can someone set up a computer program to tell me all of the even
>>>>> cube roots of integerized pi lie? 314 is integerized pi to three
>>>>> places and 3141 is integerized pi to
>>>>> four places and neither are evenly cube rootable. I want to know along
>>>>> the integerized pi
>>>>> string of digits, where it is evenly cube rootable. I suspect that pi
>>>>> is cube rootable only
>>>>> at the 603rd digits where pi has those three zeroes in a row. The
>>>>> reason I want this information is because pi could tell us where the
>>>>> first counterexamples to FLT exist when
>>>>> we have infinity as imprecisely defined. In other words, pi could lead
>>>>> us to how large of a
>>>>> large number we have to go to in order to engineer the counterexample.
>>
>>>>> Or, pi may tell us that 10^603 is the counterexample of FLT for
>>>>> exponent 3.
>>
>>>> So are those accurate?
>>
>>>> 215.50 first breakdown in 100 B matrix
>>>> 2152.050 first breakdown in 1000 B matrix of Circumferencing the
>>>> Perimeter
>>
>>>> And can someone fill in the table out to 10^8 B matrix?
>>
>>> 215.50
>>> 
2152.050
>>> 21521.5000
>>
>>> Circumferencing the 
Perimeter:
>>> for B matrix 10^4
>>> side of square =  21521.5000
>>> 

perimeter = 4xside = 86086.0000
>>> 86086.0000/3.1415 = 27402.8330 = diameter 

>>> start pi twiddling 1/(B^2)twiddle 86086.0000/27402.8330 = 3.141500004
>>> pi twiddle = 3.14150001
>>> 3.14150001 x 27402.8330 = 86086.0001 mismatch
>>> 3.14150000 x 27402.8330 = 86085.9998 mismatch
>>
>>> Apparently the digit pattern arrangement of 215---- leads to
>>> breakdowns in Circumferencing, but whether they are the
>>> first breakdowns for those B matrices is not yet established.
>>
>> I think I may have spotted where the Riemann Hypothesis has its first
>> breakdown in
>> counterexamples of nontrivial zeroes on the 1/2 Real strip. The
>> question being, as in
>> FLT, whether the breakdown is before 10^603 or long after the 10^603
>> as the border between
>> Finite and Infinity.
>>
>
> Reading from the book Prime Obsession by John Derbyshire on page 104.
>
> What I am trying to resolve is whether the Euler encoding of the
> multiplication of primes is really and truly equal to that of the zeta
> function of the addition series.

The Riemann-von Mangoldt formula for psi(x) is a truly marvelous thing.

First, the definition of the von Mangoldt function Lambda(n),
for an integer n >=1:

If n has no prime factors, Lambda(n) = 0.
If n has two or more distinct prime factors, Lambda(n) = 0.
The remaining case is where n has just one prime factor, p.
Then n could be p, p^2, p^3, ...

Then Lambda(p) = Lambda(p^2) = Lambda(p^3) = ... = log(p) [base 'e' ].

< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Mangoldt_function > .

psi(x) :=  sum_{1 <= n <= x} Lambda(n) .
[ This is the summatory von Mangoldt function, or Chebyshev function,
   according to Wikipedia].

There is an expression for psi(x) in terms of the non-trivial zeta zeros
that is referred to as the "Riemann-von Mangoldt explicit formula"
or "von Mangoldt explicit formula".  You can find it here,
following the text "Von Mangoldt's formula for psi(x):"
< http://web.viu.ca/pughg/Psi/ > .

There is also an applet there.  As more zeta zeros are included,
the graph changes less and less.  I think there are jump
discontinuities in psi(x) at primes and prime powers,
and I'm not sure how the "explicit formula" behaves point-wise
at the jump discontinuities.

David Bernier


> Here is what we do know for sure, is that pi is a series involving
> primes and this series allows us to
> fetch three zeroes in a row in the 10^-603 place value.
>
> But that a multiplication of primes as the Euler Encoding would not
> possibly be able to fetch 3 zero digits in a row
> in multiplication. So that the Euler multiplication encoding is not
> equal to the Riemann Zeta Function and that all this huff puff
> hallyballoo about the primes being as perfectly spaced as possible was
> just a fanciful wish.
>
> What I have to do here, is see if I can analyze where RH has its first
> counterexample, whether it is below the 10^603 mark or smack dab on
> the mark of 10^603 where Circumferencing the Perimeter breaks down
> also, or whether RH breaksdown some distance beyond the 10^603 mark.
>
>
> Archimedes Plutonium
> http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
>


-- 
$ gpg --fingerprint david...@videotron.ca
pub   2048D/653721FF 2010-09-16
       Key fingerprint = D85C 4B36 AF9D 6838 CC64  20DF CF37 7BEF 6537 21FF
uid                  David Bernier (Biggy) <david...@videotron.ca>